Evaluation of the Impact of Partnership Program on the Technical and Economic Efficiency of Irrigation Water Use for Moroccan Citrus Farms
International Journal of Agricultural Economics
Volume 4, Issue 2, March 2019, Pages: 70-79
Received: Feb. 13, 2019;
Accepted: Mar. 19, 2019;
Published: Apr. 29, 2019
Views 96 Downloads 54
Nassreddine Maatala, Department of Human Sciences, Hassan II Institute of Agronomy and Veterinary Medicine, Rabat, Morocco
Aziz Fadlaoui, Department of Management of Natural Resources, Economics and Sociology and Quality, Regional Agricultural Research Center, Meknes, Morocco
Philippe Lebailly, Department of Rural Economy, Faculty of Gembloux Agro Bio-Tech, Gembloux, Belgium
A public-private partnership (PPP) in irrigated area is a mode of collaboration and governance that allows the Moroccan Government to entrust the design, financing, construction, operation and maintenance of irrigation equipment to a private enterprise. In this research, we want to estimate technical efficiency of farms, the technical and economic efficiency of irrigation water use, analyzing the determinants of each of these aspects. The sampling was undertaken using the propensity score matching. The estimation of the farms’ technical efficiency was carried out using FRONTIER 4.1 software and a stochastic parametric method with the functional form Translog. The transition from an output orientation to an input orientation in order to estimate the technical and economic efficiency scores of the irrigation water was carried out through the use of the Reinhard derivative. The determinants of these aspects were analyzed with the Gnu Regression, Econometrics and Time series Library (Gretl) software using the Tobit model. A survey was carried out among 130 citrus growers (65 pairs). The average of the technical efficiency increased from 62% in 2009 to 72% in 2016. This improvement is explained by the presence of highly qualified employed who assure the management and the technical supervision of the workers on the farms. Conversely, the analysis shows that the PPP irrigation program has had no impact on the farms’ technical efficiency scores. On the basis of the results, it is appropriate to focus on several aspects in order to improve the different types of efficiencies. Indeed, the Moroccan Government must ensure the aspect of the technical supervision of farmers in the two perimeters, which will better help to control the technical conduct of citrus farms.
Evaluation of the Impact of Partnership Program on the Technical and Economic Efficiency of Irrigation Water Use for Moroccan Citrus Farms, International Journal of Agricultural Economics.
Vol. 4, No. 2,
2019, pp. 70-79.
Yigezu A., Mohamed A., Kamil S., Aden A., Tamer E. and Samman A., (2013). Implications of a shift in irrigation technology on resource use efficiency: A Syrian case.
Allan, T., 1999. Productive efficiency and allocative efficiency: why better water management may not solve the problem. Agric. Water Manage. 40, 71–75.
World Bank, (2016). How to develop sustainable irrigation projects with private sector participation.
Austin P., (2011). An Introduction to propensity score Methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational Studies, Multivariate Behavioral Research, Vol. 46 (3), pp 399-424.
Agresti A., (2013). Categorical Data Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey.
Cochran W. et Rubin D., (1973). The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series A (1961-2002), Vol. 35 (4), pp 417-446.
Farrell M., (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency, Journal of the royal statistical society, Vol. 120 (3), pp 253-290.
Amara N., Romain R., (2000). Mesure de l’efficacité technique: Revue de la littérature. La série Recherche des cahiers du CREA, U. Laval Canada, Septembre 2000, pp 32.
Shomo F., Ahmed M., Shideed K., Aw-Hassan A., and Erkan O., (2010). Sources of technical efficiency of sheep production systems in dry areas in Syria, Small Ruminant Research, Vol. 91 (3), pp 160-169.
Zhang T., and Xue B. D., (2005). Environmental efficiency analysis of China’s vegetable production, Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, Vol. 18, pp 21-30.
Kebede T. A., (2001). Sources of technical efficiency of sheep production systems in dry areas in Syria, Sources of technical efficiency of sheep production systems in dry areas in Syria, A master’s thesis. Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Agricultural University of Norway, Norway.
Battese G. E. and Coelli T., (1995). A model of technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Economics, Vol. 20, pp 325-332.
Karagiannis G., Tzouvelekas V. and Xepapadeas A., (2003). Measuring irrigation water efficiency with a stochastic production frontier: an application to Greek out-ofseason vegetable cultivation. Environ. Resource Econ. Vol. 26, pp 57–72.
Kopp R. J., (1981). The measurement of productive efficiency: a reconsideration. Quart. J. Econ, Vol. 96, pp 477–503.
Akridge, J. T., (1989). Measuring productive efficiency in multiple product agribusiness firms: a dual approach. Am. J. Agric. Econ, Vol. 71, pp 116–125.
Leveque J. and Roy W., (2004). Quelles avancées permettent les techniques de frontière dans la mesure de l’efficience des exploitants de transport urbain, XIVème journées du SESAME, 23, 24 et 25 septembre 2004, pp 19.
Christensen L. R., Jorgenson D. W. et Lou L. J., (1973). Transcendental logarithmic production frontiers. Rev. Econ. Stat, Vol. 55, pp 28–45.
Kneller R. and Stevens A., (2003). The specification of the aggregate production function in the presence of inefficiency. Econ. Lett, Vol. 81, pp 223–226.
Duffy, J., Papageorgiou, C., (2000). A cross-country empirical investigation of the aggregate production function specification. J. Econ. Growth, Vol. 5, pp 87–120.
Varian, H. R., (1978), Microeconomic Analysis. W. W. Norton and Co. Inc., New York.
Reinhard S., Lovell K. and Thijssen J., (1999). Econometric estimation of technical and environmental efficiency: an application to Dutch dairy farms. A. J. Agric. Econ, Vol. 81, pp 44–60.