Urban Resilience in Addis Ketama and Lideta Sub Cities of Addis Ababa: The Case Tekilehaimanot Area Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Urban and Regional Planning
Volume 3, Issue 2, June 2018, Pages: 44-54
Received: May 24, 2018;
Accepted: Jul. 9, 2018;
Published: Aug. 15, 2018
Views 881 Downloads 71
Mesfin Assefa, Ethiopian Institute of Architecture, Building Construction and City Development, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Follow on us
The city of Addis Ababa is experiencing wide range of changes in terms of physical, socio-economic, and environmental aspects. Its administration has implementing various programs to re-structure and to create resilient city. However, empirical researchers argue that despite remarkable achievements in restructuring of the city to make it more livable, there are several and complex urban downsides and bottlenecks. With this regards, this study is conducted to identify the resilience of sampled residents in Teklehayimanot areas of Addis Ababa city using cognitive mapping strategy. The study is carried out taking a case study of specific area of Teklhayimant District in which three specific sites are randomly selected from the district. From these three different sites, three informants are randomly selected from each specific site. The research has pursued a qualitative research approach substantiated by descriptive research design to analyze and interprets data. To gather pertinent data from respondents, the research has employed in-depth interview, observation and document analysis tools. Besides, secondary data are generated from literature through review of documents. The findings of the study indicate that respondents had almost similar understandings of their surroundings in terms of the socio-economic values. It is discovered that respondents observe the social, economic, and physical changes in their respective area closely and that the restructuring processes are perceived as it bears impacts on their physical, socio-economic lives. Two of the respondents argued that the re-construction and re-establishment efforts that the city administration conducts in the area are significantly harming the social, economic, and physical conditions of the residents while the other respondent stated that the change are important as far as they are planned and reserve the social and economic bonds of the society. In general, the cognitive mapping portrayed by respondents from three different localities of the study area indicates that respondents are highly affiliated to the living condition they are leading. It indicates that the city administration efforts of re-structuring of the area must integrate all scope of resilience, as the residents are exceedingly worried about their firmed economic and social existence. In addition, it is suggested that the range of instruments including effective communication, participatory approach, and integrative urban development framework will help the city administration to its concerns to make the city more resilience. This will also bring opportunities to manage the change in well-organized manner.
Neighborhood, Urban, Resilience, Mapping, Cognitive, Re-construction, Construction
To cite this article
Urban Resilience in Addis Ketama and Lideta Sub Cities of Addis Ababa: The Case Tekilehaimanot Area Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, Urban and Regional Planning.
Vol. 3, No. 2,
2018, pp. 44-54.
Copyright © 2018 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Wikström, Anna. 2013. “The Challenge of Change: Planning for social urban resilience: An analysis of contemporary planning aims and practices”. Master's Thesis in Urban and Regional Planning, Department of Human Geography, Stockholm University, 2013. Available on: www.humangeo.su.se
World Bank. 2012. “Building Urban Resilience: Principles, Tools and Practice”. World Bank Group 1818 H Street, NW Washington, DC, USA, 2012.
Ove Arup and Partners International Limited. 2014. City Resilience Framework: City Resilience Index. Rockefeller Foundation.
Godschalk, David R. 2003. “Urban Hazard Mitigation: Creating Resilient Cities”. Natural Hazards Review, ASCE.
Ministry of Urban Development, Housing and Construction. 2014. “National Report on Housing & Sustainable Urban Development”. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Office for the Revision of Addis Ababa Master Plan. The Revision of Addis Ababa Master Plan. 2001. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Alebe Bayrau and Genanew Bekele. 2007. “Investors' Willingness to Pay for Urban Land: The Case of Addis Ababa City”. Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, USA.
Meheret Ayenew. 1999. “The City of Addis Ababa: Policy Options for the Governance and Management of a City with Multiple Identity”. FSS Discussion Paper No. 2, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia.
Williams, Yolanda. 2015. “Cognitive Map: Definition and Examples”. Available on: Cognitive mapping 2/cognitive-map-definition-and-examples. html. Assessed on 26/12/2015.
Davis, Diane E. and John Tirman. 2012. “Urban Resilience in Situations of Chronic Violence”. Woodrow Wilson Center, Comparative Urban Studies Program, Harvard University, Center for International Studies.
World Bank Group. 2017. Safe and Resilient Cities in Ethiopia city strength Diagnostics in nine Regional Capitals and Dire Dawa City Administration. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
World Bank Group. 2015. Enhancing Urban Resilience. USA, Washington, DC.
United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN- Habitat). 2017. The State of Addis Ababa. Nairobi, Kenya.
Kothari, C. R. 2004. “Research Methodology- Methods and Techniques”. New Delhi, Wiley Eastern Limited. Liao,
Davis, Diane E. 2012. “Urban Resilience in Situations of Chronic Violence”. Final Report, Massachusetts Institutes of Technology, USA.