Effect of Age and Genetic Groups on Growth Performance of Crossed Koekoek and Sasso Chickens
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Volume 5, Issue 4, December 2020, Pages: 44-49
Received: Oct. 7, 2020;
Accepted: Oct. 22, 2020;
Published: Nov. 19, 2020
Views 111 Downloads 58
Bayesa Tolasa, Department of Animal Science, Werabe University, Werabe, Ethiopia
Ahmad Seid, Department of Animal Science, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia
Wasihun Hassen, Department of Animal Science, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia
Mohamed Aliy, Department of Animal Science, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia
This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of age and genetic groups on growth performance of crossed koekoek and sasso chickens. To fulfill this aim, a total of 360 randomly selected day-old-chicks (90 from each genetic group) were obtained from the hatchery of Jimma University College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine poultry farm. And then, the chicks were placed at brooder house in completely randomized design within three replicates. At the end of the brooding period, each group was transferred to grower’s house. Data have been collected for sixteen weeks of age on the variables such as: body weight, daily weight gain, feed intake, feed conversion ratio and mortality. Finally, the collected data were entered in to a statistical analysis system (SAS, 2014, Version 9.3). The result revealed that Sasso (SS) had significantly (P<0.05) heavy body weight followed by crosses of Koekoek cockerels and Sasso pullets (KS crosses). In opposite, Koekoek (KK) parental breed was the least among others while crosses between Sasso cockerels and Koekoek pullets (SK crosses) were not far from KK. The values of mean and standard error for SS, KS, SK and KK were listed as follows: 983.00±12.55, 883.00±11.65, 820.00±11.60 and 702.00 ±10.05 at 8th week, respectively. Among crosses, KS chicks gained significantly (P<0.05) higher daily body weight (15.04±0.25) than the SK chicks (13.96±0.20) at brooder phase. Further, the mean feed conversion ratio recorded for KS cross during brooding period were significantly (p<0.05) higher than the mean feed conversion ratio recorded for SK cross with values (2.55±0.04 and 2.70±0.05), respectively. In summary, the resulting progenies from crosses of KK and SS performed better than both parental breeds, thus suggesting that is possible to be an encouraging factor for the poultry breeders to cross these two breeds (Koekoek male and Sasso female) to get hybrid vigor in growth performance.
Effect of Age and Genetic Groups on Growth Performance of Crossed Koekoek and Sasso Chickens, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Vol. 5, No. 4,
2020, pp. 44-49.
CSA. Agricultural Sample Survey. 2017. Volume II report on livestock and livestock characteristics (private peasant holdings). Central Statistical Agency (CSA): Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; 2017; 2: 584-585.
Alemayehu G and Negasi A. Characterization of scavenging and intensive chicken production system in Lume District, East Showa Zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia. Int. J. of Livest. Prod; 2020; 11 (1): 8-20. DOI: 10.5897/IJLP2018.0569/. http://www.academicjournals.org/IJLP.
Abraham, L. and Yayneshet, T. Performance of exotic and indigenous poultry breeds managed by smallholder farmers in northern Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development; 2010; 4: 13-16. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd22/7/leml22133.htm.
Ahmed. M. Major Constraints and Health Management of Village Poultry Production in Ethiopia: Review School of Veterinary Medicine, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia, International Journal of Research studies in Microbiology and Biotechnology; 2018; 4: 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.20431/2454-9428.0401001.
Bekele, F., Ådnøy, T., Gjøen, H. M., Kathle, J., Girma, A. Production performance of dual purpose crosses of two indigenous with two exotic chicken breeds in sub-tropical environment. Int. J. Poultry Sci; 2010; 9: 702-710.
Wondmeneh E E. H. Van der Waaij, H. M. J. Udo, D. Tadelle and J. A. M Van Arendonk. Village poultry production system: Perception of farmers and simulation of impacts of interventions. African Journal of Agricultural Research; 2016; 11: 2075 2081. DOI: 10.5897/AJAR2015.10493/http://www.academicjournals.org/AJAR/.
Geleta, T., Leta, S. and Bekana, E. Production performance of Fayoumi chickens under intensive management condition of Adami Tulu research center. Int. J. Livest. Prod; 2013; 4:172 176. http:/www.academicjournals.org/IJLP.
Wondmeneh, E., Dawud, I. and Adey, M. Comparative evaluation of fertility and hatchability of Horro, Fayoumi, Lohmann Silver and Potchefstroom Potchefstroom koekoek breeds of chicken. Asian Journal of Poultry Science; 2011; 5: 124-129.
Aman G, Bangu B, Bereket Z, Desta G, Abiti T, 2017. Production performance of Sasso (distributed by ethio chicken private poultry farms) and Bovans brown chickens breed under village production system in three agro- ecologies of Southern Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples' Regional State (SNNPR), Ethiopia. Int. J. Livest. Prod; 8: 145 157. DOI: 10.5897/IJLP2017.0391/http://www.academicjournals.org/IJLP.
Solomon D. Egg production performance of local and White Leghorn hens under intensive and rural household conditions in Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development; 2008; 16: 8 9. ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/011/ai320e/ai320e00.pdf.
Basant, M. N. Shafik; El-Bayomi, Kh. M.; Sosa, G. A. and Osman, A. M. R. Effect of Crossing Fayoumi and Rhode Island Red on Growth Performance, Egg and Reproductive Traits Under Egyptian Conditions. Benha Veterinary Medical Journal; 2013; 24: 11-18.
Amao, S.R. Effect of Crossing Fulani Ecotype with Rhode Island Red chickens on growth performance, egg and reproductive traits under Southern Guinea Savanna region of Nigeria. Journal of Animal and Verinary Science; 2017; 4: 14 18. http://www.openscienceonline.com/journal/javs.
Tamir S, Moges,Y, Tilahun, H. Determinants of adoption of exotic poultry breeds among smallholder poultry producers in North Western Amahara Region, Ethiopia. Global Sci Res J; 2015; 3: 162 168. Link: https://bit.ly/2O0k6fE.
Khawaja, T., Khan, S. H., Mukhtar, N., Parveen, A. and Fareed, G. Production performance, egg quality and biochemical parameters of three way crossbred chickens with reciprocal F1 crossbred chickens in sub-tropical environment. Italian Journal of Animal Science; 2013; 12: 127-132.
Hermiz, H. N., K. A. Abas, A. M. Ahmed, T. R. Al-Khatib, Sh. M. Amin and D. A. Hamad. 2014. Effect of genetic lines and season on body weights of chicks. Recent Advances in Biomedical and Chemical Engineering and Materials Science; 2014; 1: 15 17 http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd16/2/deme1602.htm.
Jeremiah M. I. Nwenya, E. P. Nwakpu, R. N. Nwose, K. P. Ogbuagu. Performance and Heterosis of Indigenous Chicken Crossbreed (Naked Neck x Frizzled Feather) In the Humid Tropics. Journal of Poultry Research; 2017; 14: 07-11.
Sola-Ojo, F. E and Ayorinde, K. L. Evaluation of reproductive performance and egg quality traits in progenies of Dominant Black strain crossed with Fulani Ecotype Chicken. Journal of Agricultural Science; 2011; 3: 259-265.
Razuki, W. M. and S. A. AL-Shaheen. Use of full diallel Cross to estimate crossbreeding effects in laying chickens. International Journal of Poultry Science; 2011; 10: 197-204.
Yonas K, Sandip B, Mestawet T and Mohammed B. Urban poultry production systems and constraints of local and exotic chickens reared in Yirgalem and Hawassa Towns, Ethiopia, Int. J. Livest. Prod; 2019; 10: 62 69. DOI: 10.5897/IJLP2018.0540/http://www.academicjournals.org/IJLP.