Optimization of Heat Recovery for Shell & Tube Exchangers in Sulphur Granulation Unit of South Pars Fifth Refinery by Software, ASPEN B-JAC
American Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering
Volume 2, Issue 4, July 2017, Pages: 162-173
Received: Apr. 28, 2017;
Accepted: May 6, 2017;
Published: Jul. 5, 2017
Views 1701 Downloads 97
Kazem Moaveni, Department of Mechanic, Dashtestan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Borazjan, Iran
Mehran Zarkesh, Department of Mechanic, Dashtestan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Borazjan, Iran
Shell and tube heat exchangers are the most important tools in heat transfer process. Optimization efficiency of these tools is always the goal of designers. Now a day there are a lot of efficient methods for selecting the best heat exchanger, such as analytic and numerical methods that everyone has advantages and defects. For example, confront of jamming in calculations by receiving to the local minimums and errors during interruption quantities. Today by entering of simulation and design softwares in industries, the simulation of process tools is so simple. the procedure of studies in this thesis is in these steps: first simulation of sulfur solidification heat exchangers in ASPEN B-JAC software same as operation conditions and then evaluation the effects of changing the design parameters in tube bundle section such as number of passes, arrangement of tubes, number of baffles,…. the sulfur solidification package’ heat exchanger that it’s active fluid is demine water for cooling of package will be optimized till the rate of exchanged heat increases to 15 percent and pressure drop will not affect the operation conditions. The most important note in the correction of tube bundle is that the heat exchanger should be out of service and stopping of production, on the other hand changing in shell of heat exchanger needs to change the piping system and redesign of supports that will spend a lot of time for shut down of plant, so it is out of order for this thesis and optimization of tube bundle will be done.
Optimization of Heat Recovery for Shell & Tube Exchangers in Sulphur Granulation Unit of South Pars Fifth Refinery by Software, ASPEN B-JAC, American Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering.
Vol. 2, No. 4,
2017, pp. 162-173.
American Society of Mechanical Engineers, (2013), “ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code-An International Code”, Section VIII, Division 3, Alternative Rules for Construction of High Pressure Vessels, New York.
Bell,K. J. (1981), Preliminary design of shell and tube heat exchangers. In Heat Exchangers: Thermal-Hydraulic Fundamentals and Design, S. Kaksc, A. E. Bergles, and F. Mayinger (Eds.), Taylor & Francis, Washington D.C., pp. 559-579.
Bell, K. J., (1981), Delaware method for shell-side design. In heat exchangers: Thermal-hydraulic fundamentals and design, S. Kakac, A. E. Bergles, and E. Mayinger (Eds.), pp. 581-618. Taylor & Francis, Washington D.C.
Fraas, A. P., (1989), Heat Exchanger Design, Wiley, New York.
Gaddis, Daniel, (2007), “Standards of the Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association”, Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association [TEMA], Inc., 9th Edition, New York.
Hewitt, G. F., Shires, G. L., and Bott, T. R., (1994), Process Heat Transfer, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Sadik Kakac and Hongtan Liu., (2002), Heat Exchanger selection: rating and thermal design book, (2nd ed.). CRC Press.
Saunders, E. A., (1988), Heat Exchanges: Selection, Design and Construction, New York: Longman Scientific and Technical.
Taborek, J., (1983), Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger. In Heat Exchanger Design Handbook, E. U. Schlunder (Ed), Section, 3.3. Hemisphere, New York.
Tinker, T., (1951), Shell-side Characteristics of Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger. General Discussion on Heat Transfer, pp. 97-116. Institute Mechanical Engineering and ASME, New York, London.
Holman J. P., 2002. Heat Transfer, 9th Edition, McGraw-Hill.
Hossain, S. N., and Bari, S., (2011), “Effect of different working fluids on shell and tube heat exchanger to recover heat from exhaust of an automotive diesel engine”. World Renewable Energy Congress.
Dizaji H. S., Jafarmadar S., Hashemian M., 2015. The effect of flow, thermodynamic and geometrical characteristics on exergy loss in shell and coiled tube heat exchangers, Energy conversion and management, Vol. 91, PP. 678-684.
Gao B., Bi Q., Nie Z. and Wu J., 2015. Experimental study of effects of baffle helix angle on shell-side performance of shell-and-tube heat exchangers with discontinuous helical baffles. Experimental thermal and fluid Science, Vol. 68, PP. 48-57.
Yang J. F., Zeng M., Wang Q. W., 2015. Numerical investigation on combined single shell and tube heat exchanger with two-layer continuous helical baffles, International Journal of Heat and Mass transfer, Vol. 84, PP 103-113.