Anti-Sink Ship Safety Realized by Hull Mechanical Structure Design: Mobile Carry Cargo Buoyancy Tanks
American Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering
Volume 2, Issue 5, September 2017, Pages: 194-197
Received: Feb. 12, 2017;
Accepted: Mar. 14, 2017;
Published: Aug. 29, 2017
Views 1450 Downloads 95
Yan Ji, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang, China
Ship safeties were an important problem since the ship invention. Every shipwreck cause huge hazard, which make lots of casualties, properties loss, huge economic loss, and psychic trauma of dead relatives. Consider these, many ship safety work and design have been done and try to avoid the maritime loss. This letter introduces a design that mainly included carry cargo buoyancy tank with clapboard system. This anti-sink ship design with buoyancy tanks and clap board to protect ship safety quick and efficient. The cargo can be transport in the buoyancy tanks, without wasting space. The clap board have doors can be sealed as the second bottom when ship in danger. The system can be unfold in short time to enlarge draft areas, and then make ship anti-sink. When ship in danger, to unfold buoyancy tanks and sealed clap board, which can enlarge draft area and to anti-sink in short time. This anti-sink ship design thinking that try to make the shipping more safety than before.
Anti-Sink Ship Safety Realized by Hull Mechanical Structure Design: Mobile Carry Cargo Buoyancy Tanks, American Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering.
Vol. 2, No. 5,
2017, pp. 194-197.
Copyright © 2017 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
National Research Council (US). Transportation Research Board. Meeting. Transportation research record. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, 1987.
Resobowo D S, Buda K A, Dinariyana A A B. Using sensitivity analysis for selecting of ship maintenance variables for improving reliability of military ship. Academic Research International, 2014, 5 (2): 127.
Zhi-qiang H U. CUI Wei-cheng. Review of the researches on the ship collision mechanisms and the structural designs against collision. Journal of Ship Mechanics, 2005, 2.
Brooks M R. Sea change in liner shipping: regulation and managerial decision-making in a global industry. 2000.
Pietrzykowski Z, Gucma L. Theoretical basis of the probalilistic-fuzzy method for assessment of dangerous situation of a ship manoeuvring in a restricted area. Annual of Navigation, 2001: 111-125.
Fowler T G, Sørgård E. Modeling ship transportation risk. Risk Analysis, 2000, 20 (2): 225-244.
Statheros T, Howells G, Maier K M D. Autonomous ship collision avoidance navigation concepts, technologies and techniques. Journal of navigation, 2008, 61 (01): 129-142.
Delhommeau G, Guilbaud M, David L, et al. Boundary between unsteady and overturning ship bow wave regimes. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2009, 620: 167-175.
May D A, Monaghan J J. Can a single bubble sink a ship?. American Journal of Physics, 2003, 71 (9): 842-849.
Anyanwu O, Lazarus Okoroji J. The causes and minimization of maritime disasters on passenger vessels. Global Journal of Research in Engineering, 2014, 14 (2).
Stumme G, Taouil R, Bastide Y, et al. Computing iceberg concept lattices with TITANIC. Data & knowledge engineering, 2002, 42 (2): 189-222.
Lincoln M. Shipwreck narratives of the eighteenth and early nineteenth century: indicators of culture and identity. Journal for Eighteenth‐Century Studies, 1997, 20 (2): 155-172.
Leclerc H, Mossel D A A, Edberg S C, et al. Advances in the bacteriology of the coliform group: their suitability as markers of microbial water safety. Annual Reviews in Microbiology, 2001, 55 (1): 201-234.
Kristiansen S. Maritime transportation: safety management and risk analysis. Routledge, 2013.
Yan Ji. A kind of anti-sink ship. CN. Patent: ZL2015 2 0358634.4.
Ran X, Shi C, Chen J, et al. Draft line detection based on image processing for ship draft survey//Proceedings of the 2011 2nd International Congress on Computer Applications and Computational Science. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012: 39-44.
Stocks D T, Daggett L L, Page Y. Maximization of ship draft in the St. Lawrence Seaway, 2002, 1.
Lin I I, Kwoh L K, Lin Y C, et al. Ship and ship wake detection in the ERS SAR imagery using computer-based algorithm//Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1997. IGARSS'97. Remote Sensing-A Scientific Vision for Sustainable Development. 1997 IEEE International. IEEE, 1997, 1: 151-153.
Van’T Veer R, De Kat J O, Cojeen P. Large passenger ship safety: time to sink//Proceedings of the Sixth International Ship Stability Workshop, New York, Oct. 2002: 13-16.
Kim S, Frangopol D M. Optimum inspection planning for minimizing fatigue damage detection delay of ship hull structures. International Journal of Fatigue, 2011, 33 (3): 448-459.