A Comparative Study on Beam Divergence Angle and Wave Length Between Semiconductor Laser and Helium-Neon Laser
American Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering
Volume 4, Issue 5, September 2019, Pages: 69-75
Received: Sep. 21, 2019;
Accepted: Oct. 30, 2019;
Published: Nov. 5, 2019
Views 149 Downloads 62
Senamaw Mequanent Zgeye, Department of Physics, Collage of Natural and Computational Science, Debre Markos University, Debre Markos, Ethiopia
In this experimental study, I have seen that a comparative study on semiconductor laser and Helium-Neon laser is presented using the experimental techniques and tried to compare the experimental value with that of the theoretical one. On this work the wave length and beam divergence angle of the two types of lasers up to ten number of trials in the three orders, starting from 20cm to 200cm, with an interval of 20cm for each order was measured and I found that in the first and second order in the two types of laser, the wave length and the divergence angle is greater for Helium-Neon laser than semiconductor laser, thus, from this it is possible to understand that semiconductor laser is highly directional, means that it has high intensity, whereas, in the third order the Helium-Neon laser is not visible but semiconductor laser is visible, which is one of the indicator of Helium-Neon laser is not highly directional. And again, I examine that the beam divergence angle and wave length can have inverse relationship for the two types of lasers, as we see from figures 3 and 4. Thus, we concluded that the experimental result is almost agreed with that of the theoretical one.
Senamaw Mequanent Zgeye,
A Comparative Study on Beam Divergence Angle and Wave Length Between Semiconductor Laser and Helium-Neon Laser, American Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering.
Vol. 4, No. 5,
2019, pp. 69-75.
Copyright © 2019 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Peter W. Milonni and Joseph H. Ebrli, laser physics, Wiley and son Inc, (2009).
Murrav III Sargent, Maraln O. Scully and Willis E. Lamb, laser physics, west view press, (1978).
O. Svel to and Dc Hanna, principle of lasers, springs, 5th edition, (2010).
F. A. Whites, fundamentals of optics, MCG raw Hill, 4th edition, (2001).
Shich C. L; D. E. E. Ackley, and H. C. Lee, temperature insensitive vertical cavity surface emitting laser, V. S patent NO. 5274,655, (1993).
Andeson, SG, Annual review of laser markets, lasr focus world 32: 50, (1996).
T. Maiman, stimulated optical radiation in ruby, nature vol. 1187, 47736, pp. 493-494, (1960).
R. F. Kazarinov and R. A. Suris, Fiz. Tekh, Poluprovedn, Original concept and theoretical prediction, 5, pp. 797-800, (1971).
J. Gowar, optical communication systems, prentice Hall, London, (1984).
B. Mroziewiez, External cavity wave length tunable semiconductor lasers-a review, opt-Electron, Rov. 16, no. 4, (2008).
Elie Kapon, semiconductor laser I fundamentals/optics and photonics press/, Santiago London Boston, New York Sydney Tokyo Toronto, vol. 2, (1999).
M. I. Nathan, semiconductor lasers, Appl. opt. 5, 1514-1528, (1966).
K. D. Mielenz, K. F. Nefflen, W. R. C. Rowley, D. C. Wilson, and E. England, reproducibility of helium-neon laser wavelengths at 633nm, vol. 7, no. 2, (1968).
Lau, K. Y.; Yariv, A., Ultra high speed semiconductor lasers, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, volume. 21, issue. 2, pp. 121-138, (1985).