Science Journal of Public Health

| Peer-Reviewed |

Retrospective Analysis of Dentin Hypersensitivity Among Patients at the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Rivers State Nigeria

Received: 15 October 2014    Accepted: 27 October 2014    Published: 30 October 2014
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

Background: Dentin hypersensitivity impact significantly on individual’s quality of life and can cause considerable concern for patients. The aim of the study was retrospectively to determine the prevalence of dentin hypersensitivity among patients attending the dental clinic at the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital. Subjects and methods: This was a retrospective study involving hospital patients. Data of patients diagnosed with dentin hypersensitivity were retrieved from the records of the Oral Diagnosis Unit at the Dental Centre of the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital over a 3.5 years period, between January 1, 2010 and June 30, 2013. Demographic and clinical information were retrieved and analyzed using the SPSS version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Results: A total of 7020 patients attended the Oral Diagnosis Clinic within the period under review. The prevalence of dentin hypersensitivity was 1.37% (96). The age ranged from 12 to 68 years with a mean age of 39.7+SD 14.3 years. Most of the patients with dentin hypersensitivity (51%) were within 17-40 year's age bracket. Dentin hypersensitivity was significantly (p=0.02) higher in females (58%) than males (42%). The shocking sensation was experienced by the patients on the left side 57 (59.4%), right side 26 (27.1%), and both sides 13 (13.5%). The prevalence of dentinal sensitivity was significantly higher in maxilla than the mandible (P=0.03). In this study, gingival recession was seen in all the sensitive teeth. Conclusion: The prevalence of dentin hypersensitivity in this study was low; it was significantly higher in females than in males and showed a decline with age.

DOI 10.11648/j.sjph.20140206.13
Published in Science Journal of Public Health (Volume 2, Issue 6, November 2014)
Page(s) 516-519
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Dentin Hypersensitivity, Hospital Patients, Oral Diagnosis, Prevalence

References
[1] Bartold PM. Dentin hypersensitivity: a review. Aus Dent J 2006;51:212–8.
[2] Kim JL, Karastathis D. Dentin hypersensitivity management. In: Darby ML, Walsh MM. Dental Hygiene Theory and Practice. 3rd ed. St. Louis, MO: Saunders-Elsevier. 2010:726-35.
[3] Stojsin I, Petrović L, Stojanac I, Drobac M. Multi-factoriality of dentine hypersensitivity. Med Pregl 2008;61:359–63.
[4] Chu CH. Management of dentine hypersensitivity. Dent Bull 2010;15:21-3.
[5] Que K, Ruan J, Fan X, Liang X, Hu D. A multi-centre and cross sectional study of dentin hypersensitivity in China. J Clin Periodontol 2010;37:631-7.
[6] Chu CH, Lo EC. Dentine hypersensitivity: a review. Hong Kong Dent J 2010;7:15-22.
[7] Pashley DH, Tay FR, Haywood VB, Collins MC, Drisko CL. Dentin hypersensitivity; Consensus-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of dentin hypersensitivity. Inside Dentistry 2008;4:I-35.
[8] Walters PA. Dentinal hypersensitivity: a review. J Contemp Dent Pract 2005;2:107-17.
[9] Amarasena N, Spencer J, Ou Y, Brennan D. Dentine hypersensitivity-Australian dentists’ perspective. Aust Dent J 2010;55:181-7.
[10] Gillam DG. Current diagnosis of dentine hypersensitivity in the dental office: an overview. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17 Suppl 1:S21-29.
[11] Bamise CT, Olusile AO, Oginni AO, Dosumu OO. The prevalence of dentin hypersensitivity among adult patients attending a Nigerian teaching hospital. Oral Health Prev Dent 2007;5:49-53.
[12] Taani SD, Awartani F. Clinical evaluation of cervical dentin sensitivity (CDS) in patients attending general dental clinics (GDC) and periodontal specialty clinics (PSC). J Clin Periodontol 2002;29:118-22.
[13] Tan CS, Hu DY, Fan X, Li X, Que KH. Epidemiological survey of dentin hypersensitivity of young people in Chengdu City. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2009;27:394–6.
[14] Ye W, Wang GY, Lv J, Feng XP. The epidemiology of dentin hypersensitivity among adults in Shanghai municipality. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue 2009;18:247–50.
[15] Rees JS, Jin LJ, Lam S, Kudanowska I, Vowles R. The prevalence of dentin hypersensitivity in a hospital clinic population in Hong Kong. J Dent 2003;31:453–61.
[16] Chrysanthakopoulos NA. Prevalence of Dentin Hypersensitivity in a General Dental Practice in Greece. J Clin Exp Dent 2011;3:e445-51.
[17] Kehua Q, Yingying F, Hong S, Menghong W, Deyu H, Xu F. A cross-sectional study of dentine hypersensitivity in China. Int Dent J 2009;59:376-80
[18] Amarasena N, Spencer J, Ou Y, Brennan D. Dentine hypersensitivity in a private practice population in Australia. J Oral Rehabil 2011;38:52-60.
[19] Udoye CI. Pattern and distribution of cervical dentin hypersensitivity in a Nigerian tertiary hospital. Odontostomatol Trop 2006;29:19-22.
[20] Azodo CC, Amayo AC. Dentin sensitivity among a selected group of young adults in Nigeria. Niger Med J 2011;52:189–92.
[21] Afolabi AO, Olojede AC, Aregbesola BS, Ogundipe KO. Prevalence and perception of self reported dentin hypersensitivity among dentate population in South-western Nigeria. Tanz Dent J 2010;16:29-34.
[22] Ojehanon PI, Akhionbare O. Prevalence of Dentin Hypersensitivity and its response to non-surgical treatment in Benin City, Nigeria. Ebonyi Med J 2011;10:70-4.
[23] Bamise CT, Kolawole KA, Oloyede EO, Esan TA. Tooth sensitivity experience among residential university students. Int J Dent Hyg 2010; 8:95–100.
[24] Que K, Ruan J, Fan X, Liang X, Hu D. A multi-centre and cross-sectional study of dentine hypersensitivity in China. J Clin Periodontol. 2010;37:631–7.
[25] Gillam DG, Aris A, Bulman JS, Newman HN, Ley F. Dentine hypersensitivity in subjects recruited for clinical trials: clinical evaluation, prevalence and intra-oral distribution. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:226-31.
[26] Rees JS, Addy M. A cross-sectional study of buccal cervical sensitivity in UK general dental practice and a summary review of prevalence studies. Int J Dent Hyg 2004;2:64-9.
Author Information
  • Department of Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, College of Health Sciences, University of Port Harcourt, Choba Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria

  • Department of Child Dental Health, University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Alakahia, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria

  • Department of Preventive Dentistry, University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Alakahia, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria

Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Braimoh Omoigberai Bashiru, Ukegheson Gabriel, Osagbemiro Babatope. (2014). Retrospective Analysis of Dentin Hypersensitivity Among Patients at the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Rivers State Nigeria. Science Journal of Public Health, 2(6), 516-519. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjph.20140206.13

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Braimoh Omoigberai Bashiru; Ukegheson Gabriel; Osagbemiro Babatope. Retrospective Analysis of Dentin Hypersensitivity Among Patients at the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Rivers State Nigeria. Sci. J. Public Health 2014, 2(6), 516-519. doi: 10.11648/j.sjph.20140206.13

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Braimoh Omoigberai Bashiru, Ukegheson Gabriel, Osagbemiro Babatope. Retrospective Analysis of Dentin Hypersensitivity Among Patients at the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Rivers State Nigeria. Sci J Public Health. 2014;2(6):516-519. doi: 10.11648/j.sjph.20140206.13

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.sjph.20140206.13,
      author = {Braimoh Omoigberai Bashiru and Ukegheson Gabriel and Osagbemiro Babatope},
      title = {Retrospective Analysis of Dentin Hypersensitivity Among Patients at the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Rivers State Nigeria},
      journal = {Science Journal of Public Health},
      volume = {2},
      number = {6},
      pages = {516-519},
      doi = {10.11648/j.sjph.20140206.13},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjph.20140206.13},
      eprint = {https://download.sciencepg.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjph.20140206.13},
      abstract = {Background: Dentin hypersensitivity impact significantly on individual’s quality of life and can cause considerable concern for patients. The aim of the study was retrospectively to determine the prevalence of dentin hypersensitivity among patients attending the dental clinic at the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital. Subjects and methods: This was a retrospective study involving hospital patients. Data of patients diagnosed with dentin hypersensitivity were retrieved from the records of the Oral Diagnosis Unit at the Dental Centre of the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital over a 3.5 years period, between January 1, 2010 and June 30, 2013. Demographic and clinical information were retrieved and analyzed using the SPSS version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Results: A total of 7020 patients attended the Oral Diagnosis Clinic within the period under review. The prevalence of dentin hypersensitivity was 1.37% (96). The age ranged from 12 to 68 years with a mean age of 39.7+SD 14.3 years. Most of the patients with dentin hypersensitivity (51%) were within 17-40 year's age bracket. Dentin hypersensitivity was significantly (p=0.02) higher in females (58%) than males (42%). The shocking sensation was experienced by the patients on the left side 57 (59.4%), right side 26 (27.1%), and both sides 13 (13.5%). The prevalence of dentinal sensitivity was significantly higher in maxilla than the mandible (P=0.03). In this study, gingival recession was seen in all the sensitive teeth. Conclusion: The prevalence of dentin hypersensitivity in this study was low; it was significantly higher in females than in males and showed a decline with age.},
     year = {2014}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Retrospective Analysis of Dentin Hypersensitivity Among Patients at the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Rivers State Nigeria
    AU  - Braimoh Omoigberai Bashiru
    AU  - Ukegheson Gabriel
    AU  - Osagbemiro Babatope
    Y1  - 2014/10/30
    PY  - 2014
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjph.20140206.13
    DO  - 10.11648/j.sjph.20140206.13
    T2  - Science Journal of Public Health
    JF  - Science Journal of Public Health
    JO  - Science Journal of Public Health
    SP  - 516
    EP  - 519
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2328-7950
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjph.20140206.13
    AB  - Background: Dentin hypersensitivity impact significantly on individual’s quality of life and can cause considerable concern for patients. The aim of the study was retrospectively to determine the prevalence of dentin hypersensitivity among patients attending the dental clinic at the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital. Subjects and methods: This was a retrospective study involving hospital patients. Data of patients diagnosed with dentin hypersensitivity were retrieved from the records of the Oral Diagnosis Unit at the Dental Centre of the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital over a 3.5 years period, between January 1, 2010 and June 30, 2013. Demographic and clinical information were retrieved and analyzed using the SPSS version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Results: A total of 7020 patients attended the Oral Diagnosis Clinic within the period under review. The prevalence of dentin hypersensitivity was 1.37% (96). The age ranged from 12 to 68 years with a mean age of 39.7+SD 14.3 years. Most of the patients with dentin hypersensitivity (51%) were within 17-40 year's age bracket. Dentin hypersensitivity was significantly (p=0.02) higher in females (58%) than males (42%). The shocking sensation was experienced by the patients on the left side 57 (59.4%), right side 26 (27.1%), and both sides 13 (13.5%). The prevalence of dentinal sensitivity was significantly higher in maxilla than the mandible (P=0.03). In this study, gingival recession was seen in all the sensitive teeth. Conclusion: The prevalence of dentin hypersensitivity in this study was low; it was significantly higher in females than in males and showed a decline with age.
    VL  - 2
    IS  - 6
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

  • Sections