Patients Satisfaction Post Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair with External Fixation Versus Post Internal Fixation
Journal of Surgery
Volume 4, Issue 2, April 2016, Pages: 20-23
Received: Feb. 25, 2016; Accepted: Mar. 5, 2016; Published: Mar. 23, 2016
Views 3406      Downloads 84
Authors
Mohamed Salah Abdelhamid, Surgery Department, Bani-Suef Faculty of Medicine, Bani-Suef University, Bani-Suef, Egypt
Ayman Hamdi Abouleid, Surgery Department, Bani-Suef Faculty of Medicine, Bani-Suef University, Bani-Suef, Egypt
Mohamed Hasan Abdelmola, Surgery Department, Bani-Suef Faculty of Medicine, Bani-Suef University, Bani-Suef, Egypt
Ahmed Mohamed Rashad, Surgery Department, Bani-Suef Faculty of Medicine, Bani-Suef University, Bani-Suef, Egypt
Mahmoud Ahmed Negida, Surgery Department, Kasr Elaini Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
Ahmed Zaky Gharib, Surgery Department, October 6th Faculty of Medicine, October 6th University, Giza, Egypt
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair wth external fixation is a new technique in which there is a marked reduction in the cost without affecting the outcome The issue of mesh fixation in laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia repairs remains unsolved. The need for fixing the mesh arises from the fear of increasing recurrence rates. However, specific complications have emerged as a result of mesh fixation. The aim was to find out which is more satisfactory to the patients external fixation or internal fixation. In 80 patients the mesh were fixed from the interior using staples while in the other 80 patients it is fixed to the exterior using prolene threads (Abdelhamid Technique). We conducted A prospective study for laparoscopic TAPP inguinal hernia repair on 160 patients between September 2008 until May 2014 and we follow the patients till May 2015. In 80 we fixed the mesh to the exterior and in another 80 from the interior. There were 90 patients with direct inguinal hernia 45 done through external fixation (gp1) another 45 through internal fixation of the mesh (gp2), 70 patients with indirect inguinal hernia 35 external fixation (gp3) 35 internal fixation (gp4). We follow the patients for recurrence, impulse on cough, inguinal pain and sense of discomfort. The operative time ranged from 35 – 70minutes for external fixation, 30 -60 minutes for internal fixation. During this period we did not encounter any recurrence, but in group 1 there is one patient complained of impulse on cough and in group 2 there were three had the same complain. Regarding pain non of the external fixation patients complained of groin pain while in group 2 there were two and in group 4 there were two patients complained of groin pain. We concluded that in addition to much reduction in the cost as we did not use stapler nor tucker, external fixation is safe easy to learn, external fixation is associated with no groin pain compared to internal fixation and much less incidence of impulse of cough making this technique more acceptable to the patients.
Keywords
Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair, Mesh Fixation, Cost, Stapling
To cite this article
Mohamed Salah Abdelhamid, Ayman Hamdi Abouleid, Mohamed Hasan Abdelmola, Ahmed Mohamed Rashad, Mahmoud Ahmed Negida, Ahmed Zaky Gharib, Patients Satisfaction Post Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair with External Fixation Versus Post Internal Fixation, Journal of Surgery. Vol. 4, No. 2, 2016, pp. 20-23. doi: 10.11648/j.js.20160402.13
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
[1]
Wall ML, Cherian TH, Lotz JC (2008) Laparoscopic Hernia Repair-The Best Option?. Acta Chir Belg 108: 186-191
[2]
Fingerhut A, Millat B, Veyrie N, Chouillard E, Dziri C (2006) Inguinal Hernia Repair – Update 2006. In: Neugebauer E AM, Sauerland S, Fingerhut A, Millat B, Buess G. EAES Guidelines For Endoscopic Surgery. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 297-309
[3]
Wellwood J, Sculpher MJ, Stoker D (1998) Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open hernia repair for inguinal hernia: outcome and cost. Br Med J 317: 103-10
[4]
Wright Dm, Kennedy A, Baxter JN (1996) Early outcome after open versus extraperitoneal endoscopic tension-free hernioplasty. Surgery 119: 552-7
[5]
Millikan KW, Kosik ML, Doolas A (1994) A prospective comparison of transabdominal peritoneal laparoscopic hernia repair versus traditional open hernia repair in a university setting. Surg Laparosc Endosc 4: 247-53
[6]
Kiruparan P, Pettit SH (1998) Prospective audit of 200 patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with followup from 1 to 4 years. JR Coll Surg Edin 43: 13-6
[7]
Brooks DC (1994) A prospective comparison of laparoscopic and tension-free open herniorraphy. Arch Surg 129: 361-6
[8]
Seid AS, Amos E (1994) Entrapment neuropathy in laparoscopic herniorraphy. Surg Endosc 8: 1050-3
[9]
Schmedt CG, Sauerland S, Bittner R (2005) Comparison of endoscopic procedures vs Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 19: 188-99
[10]
McCormack K, Wake B, Perez J, Fraser C, Cook J, Mcintosh E (2005) Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systemic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 9: 1-203
[11]
Ridings P, Evans DS (2000) The transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair: a trip along the learning curve. J R Coll Surg Edinb 45(1): 29-32
[12]
Neugebauer EAM, Troidi H, Kum CK (2006) The EAES Clinical Practice Guidelines on Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, Appendectomy and Hernia Repair. In: Neugebauer EAM, Sauerland S, Fingerhut A, Millat B, Buess G (eds) EAES Guidelines For Endoscopic Surgery. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 265-289
[13]
Koniger J, Redecke J, Butters M (2004) Chronic pain after hernia repair: a randomized trial comparing Shouldice, Lichtenstein and TAPP. Langens Arch Surg 389: 361-365
[14]
Tatulli F, Chetta G, Caputi A, Mastrototaro P, Ruggieri T (2009) Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: audit of our experience with laparoscopic trans-abdominal pro-peritoneal repair (TAPP). Chir Ital 61(1): 47-53
[15]
A Watson, P Ziprin, S Chadwick (2006) TAPP Repair for Inguinal Hernias – A New Composite Mesh Technique. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 88(7): 678
[16]
Voyles CR, Hamilton BJ, Johnson WD, Kano N (2002) Meta-analysis of laparoscopic inguinal hernia trials favors open hernia repair with preperitoneal prosthesis. Am J Surg 184: 6-10
[17]
Schwab R, Schumacher O, Junge K, Binnebosel M, Klinge U, Becker HF (2008) Biomechanical analyses of mesh fixation in TAPP and TEP hernia repair. Surgical endoscopy 22(3): 731-8
[18]
Abdelhamid MS,(2011) Transabdominal pre peritoneal inguinal hernia repair with external fixation. Hernia 15(2): 185-188
[19]
Olmi S, Erba L, Bertolini A, Scaini A, (2006) Fibrin glue for mesh fixation in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair indications, technique and outcomes. Surgical Endoscopy volume 20 (12): 1846-1850
[20]
Kapiris S, Mavromatis T, Andrikopoulus S, Georgiades C, Floros D, Diamantoupolus G, (2009) Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Hernia Repair (TAPP): Stapling the Mesh Is Not Mandatory Journal of Laparoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques volume 19 (3): 419-422
[21]
Abdelhamid MS*, Sadat AM, Abdelhaseeb AR, Nabil TM, Abdelbasset MS, Bechet AM, Nafady HA, Shawky KA (2013)Transabdominal Pre-Peritoneal Mesh for Inguinal Hernia Repair with External Fixation versus Mesh Stapling Journal of Surgical Science, volume 4, 516-519 Published Online November 2013 (http://www.scirp.org/journal/ss) http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ss.2013.411100 Open Access SS
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-983-5186