Single-Session Treatment of Cholecysto-Choledocholithiasis: Totally Laparoscopic versus Laparo-Endoscopic
Journal of Surgery
Volume 5, Issue 5, October 2017, Pages: 72-78
Received: Jul. 2, 2017;
Accepted: Jul. 11, 2017;
Published: Sep. 13, 2017
Views 1898 Downloads 130
Mostafa Mohamoud Sayed, General Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Assuit University, Assiut, Egypt
Ayman Kamal, General Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Assuit University, Assiut, Egypt
Abdallah Mohamed Taha, General Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, South Valley University, Qena, Egypt
Mahmoud Abdelhameid, General Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, South Valley University, Qena, Egypt
Ahmed Mohamed Ali Abdallah, General Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Assuit University, Assiut, Egypt
Zein Sayed, Internal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Assuit University, Assiut, Egypt
Background: This study details Assiut and South Valley universities experience in treating combined gall bladder and common bile duct stones in a single session, either with Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-Pancreatography (ERCP) for Common Bile Duct (CBD) stone extraction followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), or totally laparoscopic treatment. Patients and methods: In this prospective randomized study, 46 consecutive patients with confirmed cholecysto-choledocholithiasis were randomized to 2 groups. Group (A) included 24 patients treated with single-session ERCP for CBD stone extraction and laparoscopic cholecystectomy [ERCP-LC]. Group (B) included 22 patients treated with laparoscopic CBD exploration and laparoscopic cholecystectomy [LCBDE-LC]. Demographic data, operative time, CBD clearance success rate, short term complications and duration of hospital stay were recorded. Results: Patients included 28 females and 18 males with mean age of 42.1 ± 12.1 years (range 17 – 71 years). In 22/24 patients (91.7%) ERCP-LC was done successfully. Mean operative time was 105 ± 19.1 minutes (50-150 min.). No intra-operative complications occurred. Early post-operative complications occurred in 3 patients (12.5%). Mean hospital stay was 2.1 ± 0. 91 days (1-6 days). In the other group, LCBDE-LC was performed successfully in 22/22 patients (100%). Mean operative time was 145 ± 23 minutes (100-180 min.). Minor intra-operative complications (bleeding) occurred in 2/22 cases (9%). Minor early post-operative complications (bile leak, ileus, bleeding) occurred in 4/22 patients (18%). Mean hospital stay was 2.8 ± 0.83 days (2-7 days). Conclusion: Single session ERCP-LC and LCBDE-LC procedures for management of cholecysto-choledocholithiasis are feasible, safe, and effective and have comparable outcome regarding success rate, peri-operative complications. ERCP-LC has statistically significant less operative time and less hospital stay.
Mostafa Mohamoud Sayed,
Abdallah Mohamed Taha,
Ahmed Mohamed Ali Abdallah,
Single-Session Treatment of Cholecysto-Choledocholithiasis: Totally Laparoscopic versus Laparo-Endoscopic, Journal of Surgery.
Vol. 5, No. 5,
2017, pp. 72-78.
Sarli L, Pietra N, Franze A, Colla G, Costi R, Gobbi S, et al. Routine intravenous cholangiography, selective endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and endoscopic treatment of common bile duct stones before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 50: 200-8.
Collins C, Maguire D, Ireland A, Fitzgerald E, O'Sullivan GC. A prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: natural history of choledocholithiasis revisited. Ann Surg 2004; 239: 28-33.
Clayton ES, Connor S, Alexakis N, Leandros E. Meta-analysis of endoscopy and surgery versus surgery alone for common bile duct stones with the gallbladder in situ. Br J Surg. 2006 Oct; 93 (10): 1185-91.
Urbach DR, Khajanchee YS, Jobe BA, Standage BA, Hansen PD, Swanstrom LL. Cost-effective management of common bile duct stones: a decision analysis of the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), intraoperative cholangiography, and laparoscopic bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 2001; 15: 4-13.
Enochsson L, Lindberg B, Swahn F, Arnelo U. Intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) to remove common bile duct stones during routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not prolong hospitalization: a 2-year experience. Surg Endosc 2004; 18: 367-71.
Sherman S, Hawes RH, Rathgaber SW, Uzer MF, Smith MT, Khusro QE, et al. Post-ERCP pancreatitis: randomized, prospective study comparing a low- and high-osmolality contrast agent. Gastrointest Endosc 1994; 40: 422-7.
Rogers S J, Cello J P, Horn J K, Siperstein A E, Schecter W P, Campbell AR, et al. Prospective randomized trial of LC+LCBDE vs ERCP/S+LC for common bile duct stone disease. Arch Surg 2010; 145: 28-33.
Cuschieri A, Croce E, Faggioni A, Jakimowicz J, Lacy A, Lezoche E, et al. EAES ductal stone study. Preliminary findings of multi-center prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage versus single-stage management. Surg Endosc 1996; 10: 1130-5.
Lu J, Cheng Y, Xiong X Z, Lin Y X, Wu S J, Cheng NS. Two-stage vssinglestage management for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18: 3156-3166.
Williams GL, Vellacot KD. Selective operative cholangiography and perioperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) during laproscopic cholecystectomy. A viable option for choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 2002; 16: 465-7.
Bago L, Vicente C, Soler F, Delgado M, Moral I, Guerra I, et al. Two-stage treatment with preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) compared with single-stage treatment with intraoperative ERCP for patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis with possible choledocholithiasis. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 779-86.
Hong DF, Xin Y, Chen DW. Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct for cholecystocholedocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 2006; 20: 424-7.
Meyer C, Le Jacques VH, Rohr S, Duclos B, Reimund J, Baumann R. Management of common bile duct stones in a single operation combining laparoscopic cholecystectomy and perioperative endoscopic sphincterotomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2002; 9: 196-200.
Wright B, Freeman M, Cumming J, Quickel R, Mandal A. Current management of common bile duct stones: is there a role for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography as a single stage procedure? Surgery 2002; 132: 729-37.
Alexakis N, Connor S. Meta-analysis of one- vs. two-stage laparoscopic/ endoscopic management of common bile duct stones. HPB (Oxford) 2012; 14: 254-259.
Dasari B V, Tan C J, Gurusamy K S, Martin D J, Kirk G, Mc Kie L, et al. Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 12: CD003327.
National Institutes of Health Consensus. Development panel on gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Med Assoc 1993; 269: 1018-24.
Rhodes M, Nathanson L, O’Rourke N, Fielding G. Laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct: lessons learned from 129 consecutive cases. Br J Surg 1995; 82: 666-8.
Berthou JC, Drouard F, Charbonneau P, Moussalier K. Evaluation of laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones in 220 patients. Surg Endosc 1998; 12: 16-22.
Shojaiefard A, Esmaeilzadeh M, Ghafouri A, Mehrabi A. Various techniques for the surgical treatment of common bile duct stones: a meta review. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2009; 2009: 840208.
De Palma GD, Angrisiani L, Lorenzo M, Di Matteo E, Catanzano C, Persico G, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES), and common bile duct stones (CBDS) extraction for management of patients with cholecystocholedocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 1998; 10: 649-52.
Decker G, Borie F, Millat B, Berthou JC, Deleuze A, Drouard F, et al. One hundred laparoscopic choledochotomies with primary closure of the common bile duct. Surg Endosc 2003; 17: 12-8.