Journal of Surgery
Volume 7, Issue 4, August 2019, Pages: 114-118
Received: Jun. 7, 2019;
Accepted: Jul. 15, 2019;
Published: Aug. 5, 2019
Views 129 Downloads 23
Kazuhiro Suzumura, Department of Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
Kenjiro Iida, Department of Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
Hideaki Iwama, Department of Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
Yusuke Kawabata, Department of Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
Background: Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is an aggressive surgery with considerable operative risks. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of PD in patients of≥75 years of age and to show the influence of advanced age on the mortality and morbidity associated with PD. Methods: Between July 2009 and December 2013, 131 patients underwent PD at Hyogo College of Medicine. We analyzed the perioperative data and outcomes after PD in patients of≥75 years of age (elderly group) in comparison to those of patients of<75 years of age (younger group). Results: There were no differences between the elderly group (n=28) and younger group (n=103) in terms of gender, body mass index (BMI), biochemistry test results, operative time or intraoperative blood loss. There were significant differences in the incidence of preoperative complications in the elderly and younger groups. There were no differences in the rates of mortality (0% vs. 1%; p=0.601) or morbidity (64% vs. 49%; p=0.139). Morbidities included pancreatic fistula, delayed gastric emptying, intra-abdominal bleeding, intra-abdominal abscess, ascites and pneumonia. Conclusion: The preoperative complication rate in the elderly group was significantly higher than that in the younger group. However, PD can be performed safely in elderly patients and advanced age alone should not be a contraindication to PD.
Surgical Outcomes After Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Elderly Patients, Journal of Surgery.
Vol. 7, No. 4,
2019, pp. 114-118.
Allen O. Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy for islet carcinoma: a five-year follow-up. Ann Surg 1945; 121: 847-852.
Monge JJ, Judd ES, Gage RP. Radical pancreatoduodenectomy: a 22-year experience with the complications, mortality rate and survival rate. Ann Surg 1964; 160: 711-722.
Crile G Jr. The advantages of bypass operations over radical pancreatoduodenectomy in the treatment of pancreatic carcinoma. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1970; 130: 1049-1053.
Shapiro TM. Adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: a statistical analysis of biliary bypass vs Whipple resection in good risk patients. Ann Surg 1975; 182: 715-721.
Grace PA, Pitt HA, Tompkins RK, DenBesten L, Longmire WP Jr. Decreased morbidity and mortality after pancreatoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 1986; 151: 141-149.
Yeo CJ. Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg 1997; 226: 248-257, discussion 257-260.
Neoptolemos JP, Russell RC, Bramhall S, Theis B. Low mortality following resection for pancreatic and periampullary tumours in 1026 patients: UK survey of specialist pancreatic units. UK Pancreatic Cancer Group. Br J Surg 1997; 84: 1370-1376.
Conlon KC, Labow D, Leung D, Smith A, Jamagin W, Coit DG, et al. Prospective randomized clinical trial of the value of intraperitoneal drainage after pancreatic resection. Ann Surg 2001; 234: 487-93, discussion 493-494.
Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, Sohn TA, Campbell KA, Sauter PK, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without distal gastrectomy and extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma, part 2: randomized controlled trial evaluating survival, morbidity, and mortality. Ann Surg 2002; 236: 355-366, discussion 366-368.
Brozzetti S, Mazzoni G, Miccini M, Puma F, De Angelis M, Cassini D, et al. Surgical treatment of pancreatic head carcinoma in elderly patients. Arch Surg 2006; 141: 137-142.
Lee MK, Dinorcia J, Reavey PL, Holden MM, Genkinger JM, Lee JA, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy can be performed safely in patients aged 80 years and older. J Gastrointest Surg 2010; 14: 1838-1846.
Khan S, Sclabas G, Lombardo KR, Sarr MG, Nagorney D, Kendrick ML, et al. Pancreatoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma in the very elderly; is it safe and justified? J Gastrointest Surg 2010; 14: 1826-1831.
Fong Y, Blumgart LH, Fortner JG, Brennan MF. Pancreatic or liver resection for malignancy is safe and effective for the elderly. Ann Surg 1995; 222: 426-434, discussion 434-437.
DiCarlo V, Balzano G, Zerbi A, Villa E. Pancreatic cancer resection in elderly patients. Br J Surg 1998; 85: 607-610.
Tani M, Kawai M, Hirono S, Ina S, Miyazawa M, Nishioka R, et al. A pancreaticoduodenectomy is acceptable for periampullary tumors in the elderly, even in patients over 80 years of age. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2009; 16: 675-680.
Ito Y, Kenmochi T, Irino T, Egawa T, Hayashi S, Nagashima A, et al. The impact of surgical outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients. World J Surg Oncol 2011; 9: 102.
Yamada S, Shimada M, Utsunomiya T, Morine Y, Imura S, Ikemoto T, et al. Surgical results of pancreatoduodenectomy in elderly patients. Surg Today 2012; 42: 857-862.
Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 2005; 138: 8-13.
Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, et al. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 2007; 142: 761-768.
Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, et al. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 2007; 142: 20-25.
Gordon TA, Burleyson GP, Tielsch JM, Cameron JL. The effects of regionalization on cost and outcome for one general high-risk surgical procedure. Ann Surg 1995; 221: 43-49.
Sosa JA, Bowman HM, Gordon TA, Bass EB, Yeo CJ, Lillemoe KD, et al. Importance of hospital volume in the overall management of pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg 1998; 228: 429-438.
Lieberman MD, Kilburn H, Lindsey M, Brennan MF. Relation of perioperative deaths to hospital volume among patients undergoing pancreatic resection for malignancy. Ann Surg 1995; 222: 638-645.
Finlayson E, Fan Z, Birkmeyer JD. Outcomes in octogenarians undergoing high-risk cancer operation: a national study. J Am Coll Surg 2007; 205: 729-734.
Makary MA, Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA, Chang D, Cunningham SC, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the very elderly. J Gastrointest Surg 2006; 10: 347-356.
Lowy AM, Lee JE, Pisters PW, Davidson BS, Fenoglio CJ, Stanford P, et al. Prospective, randomized trial of octreotide to prevent pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy for malignant disease. Ann Surg 1997; 226: 632-641.
Roder JD, Stein HJ, Bottcher KA, Busch R, Heidecke CD, Siewert JR. Stented versus nonstented pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy: a prospective study. Ann Surg 1999; 229: 41-48.
Cameron JL, Pitt HA, Yeo CJ, Lillemoe KD, Kaufman HS, Coleman J. One hundred and forty-five consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies without mortality. Ann Surg 1993; 217: 430-435, discussion 435-438.
Montorsi M, Zago M, Mosca F, Capussotti L, Zotti E, Ribotta G, et al. Efficacy of octreotide in the prevention of pancreatic fistula after elective pancreatic resections: a prospective, controlled, randomized clinical trial. Surgery 1995; 117: 26-31.
Poon RT, Fan ST, Lo CM, Ng KK, Yuen WK, Yeung C, et al. External drainage of pancreatic duct with a stent to reduce leakage rate of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 2007; 246: 425-433.
Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, Talamini MA, Hruban RH, et al. Should pancreaticoduodenectomy be performed in octogenarians? J Gastrointest Surg 1998; 2: 207-216.