Adverse Effects of Lipocryolysis: Analysis of 28 Cases
Journal of Surgery
Volume 3, Issue 1-1, February 2015, Pages: 6-7
Received: Nov. 5, 2014; Accepted: Nov. 7, 2014; Published: Dec. 31, 2014
Views 3168      Downloads 239
Authors
Rafaela Vidal, IM Clinic, Sant Cugat del Vallès, Spain
Laura Segura, Policlínico Salud 4, La Coruña, Spain
Paulo Vergara, IMEBA, Palma, Spain
Hernán Pinto, Instituto de Investigaciones para las Especialidades Estéticas y del Envejecimiento (i2e3), Barcelona, Spain
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
Introduction: Lipocryolysis is an effective and safe technique for the treatment of localized adiposities. However, there is very little evidence regarding its adverse effects. Materias and Methods: Retrospective analysis of 28 clinical records. Results: The adverse effects of lipocryolysis are mild to moderate, and reversible. Discussion: Specific studies need to be carried out in order to survey adverse effects in a large number of subjects, including medium/long-term follow-up.
Keywords
Lipocryolysis, Adverse Effects
To cite this article
Rafaela Vidal, Laura Segura, Paulo Vergara, Hernán Pinto, Adverse Effects of Lipocryolysis: Analysis of 28 Cases, Journal of Surgery. Special Issue: Breakthroughs in Aesthetic Medicine. Vol. 3, No. 1-1, 2015, pp. 6-7. doi: 10.11648/j.js.s.2015030101.12
References
[1]
Stewart KJ, Stewart DA, Coghlan B, Harrison DH, Jones BM, Waterhouse N. Complications of 278 consecutive abdominoplasties. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2006;59(11):1152-5.
[2]
Anderson RR, Farinelli W, Laubach H, Manstein D, Yaroslavsky AN, Gubeli J III, et al. Selective photothermolysis of lipid-rich tissues: A free electron laser study Lasers Surg Med 2006;38(10):913-9.
[3]
Narins RS, Tope WD, Pope K, Ross EV. Over treatment effects associated with a radio frequency tissue-tightening device: Rare, preventable, and correctable with subcision and autologous fat transfer. Dermatol Surg 2006;32(1):115-24.
[4]
Teitelbaum SA, Burns JL, Kubota J, Matsuda H, Otto MJ, Shirakabe Y, et al. Noninvasive body contouring by focused ultrasound: safety and efficacy of the contour I device in a multicenter, controlled, clinical study Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;120(3):779–89;discussion 790.
[5]
Laubach H, Watannabe K, Farinelli W, ZurakowskiD, Anderson RR. Selective Cryolysis: A Novel Method of Non-Invasive Fat Reduction Las in Surg and Med 2008;40:595-604.
[6]
Avram MM, Harry RS. Cryolipolysis for subcutaneous fat layer reduction. Lasers Surg Med. 2009Dec;41(10):703-8. Erratum in: Lasers Surg Med 2012Jul;44(5):436.
[7]
Pinto H, Arredondo E, Ricart- Jané D. Evaluation of adipocytic changes after a simil-lipocryolysis stimulus CryoLetters 2013;34(1):100-5.
[8]
Zelickson B, Egbert B, Preciado J, Allison A, Springer K, Manstein D. Cryolipolysis™ for Noninvasive Fat Cell Destruction: Initial Results from a Pig Model. Dermatol Surg 2009;35(10):1462–70.
[9]
Coleman SR, Sachdeva K, Egbert BM, Preciado J, Allison J. Clinical efficacy of noninvasive cryolipolysis and its effects on peripheral nerves. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2009Jul;33(4):482-8.
[10]
Riopelle J, Tsai MY, Kovack B. Lipid and Liver Function Effects of the Cryolipolysis Procedure in a Study of Male Love Handle Reduction Laser Surg Med 2009;S21:82.
[11]
Klein KB, Zelickson B, Riopelle JG, Okamoto E, Bachelor EP, Harry RS, et al. Non-invasive cryolipolysis for subcutaneous fat reduction does not affect serum lipid levels or liver function tests SurgMed 2009Dec;41(10):785-90.
[12]
Dierickx CC, Mazer JM, Sand M, Koenig S, Arigon V. Safety, tolerance, and patient satisfaction with noninvasive cryolipolysis DermatolSurg 2013Aug;39(8):1209-16.
[13]
Jalian HR, Avram MM, Garibyan L, Mihm MC, Anderson RR. Paradoxical Adipose Hyperplasia After Cryolipolysis JAMA Dermatol 2014Jan;Doi 10.1001/Jama dermatol.2013.8071 [Epubahead of print].
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-983-5186