Journal of Surgery

| Peer-Reviewed |

Post-Splenectomy Portal Venous Thrombosis in Cirrhotic Patients: An Observational Clinical Trial

Received: 22 September 2017    Accepted: 04 October 2017    Published: 12 November 2017
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

Background: Post-splenectomy portal venous thrombosis (PS-PVT) carries multiple threats to patients’ lives. Different variables were identified as risk factors for PS-PVT in cirrhotic patients. The aim of this study was to prospectively assess the incidence, risk factors, clinical presentation and treatment outcomes of PS-PVT in cirrhotic patients. Patients and methods: Sixty cirrhotic patients of Child class A submitted to open splenectomy were observed, both clinically and by Duplex ultrasound (US) examination, for the development of PS-PVT. Results: Overall, 17 patients (28.3%) developed PS-PVT at a median interval of 4.5 days (21 hours-7 days) post-splenectomy. Univariate analysis showed that lower preoperative platelet count (P<0.0460) and white blood cell (WBC) count (P<0.0001) and wider splenic vein diameter (SVD) (P<0.0001) correlated with PS-PVT. Multivariate analysis identified lower preoperative WBC count [odds ratio (OR): 0.651, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.245-0.893, P<0.005] and wider SVD (OR: 2.383, 95% CI: 1.558-3.646., P<0.001) as independent risk factors of PS-PVT. While 16 out of the 17 patients (94%) who had these 2 risk factors developed PS-PVT, only 1 out of the 43 patients (2.3%) who didn’t have the same risk factors developed thrombosis. All 17 patients had complete resolution of their thrombosis on anticoagulation therapy within 3-6 months without complications or mortality. Conclusion: PVT is a common complication of splenectomy in cirrhotic patients. Patients with low WBC count and wide SVD are highly susceptible to develop this complication mandating close observation from the 1st PO day and immediate anticoagulation after diagnosis.

DOI 10.11648/j.js.20170506.14
Published in Journal of Surgery (Volume 5, Issue 6, December 2017)
Page(s) 105-110
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Splenectomy, Portal Vein Thrombosis, Cirrhosis, Risk Factors

References
[1] Shepard CW, Finelli L, Alter MJ (2005) Global epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection. Lancet Infect Dis 5:558–67.
[2] Sievert W, Altraif I, Razavi HA, et al (2011) A systematic review of hepatitis C virus epidemiology in Asia, Australia and Egypt. Liver Int 31:61-80.
[3] El-Zanaty and Associates (2015) Egypt health issues survey 2015. Cairo, Egypt and Rockville, Maryland, USA: Ministry of Health and Population and ICF International 25-49.
[4] Struthers A (2007) From schistosomiasis to hepatitis C: the spread of HCV in Egypt. Med J Ther Africa 1(3):213-21.
[5] Darwish MA, Faris R, Darwish N, et al (2001) Hepatitis C and cirrhotic liver disease in the Nile delta of Egypt: A community-based study Am J Trop. Med Hyg 64:147-53.
[6] Kercher KW, Carbonell AM, Heniford BT, Matthews BD, Cunningham DM, Reindollar RW (2004) Laparoscopic splenectomy reverses thrombocytopenia in patients with hepatitis C cirrhosis and portal hypertension. J Gastrointest Surg 8:120-6.
[7] Hirooka M, Ishida K, Kisaka Y, et al (2008) Efficacy of splenectomy for hypersplenic patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Res 38:1172-7.
[8] Morihara D, Kobayashi M, Ikeda K (2009) Effectiveness of combination therapy of splenectomy and long-term interferon in patients with hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis and thrombocytopenia. Hepatol Res 39:439-47.
[9] Hassab MA, Younis MT, El-Kilany MS (1986) Gastroesophageal decongestion and splenectomy in the treatment of esophageal varices secondary to bilharzial cirrhosis: anatomical and experimental studies. Surg 63:731-37.
[10] Li MX, Zhang XF, Liu ZW, Lv Y (2013) Risk factors and clinical characteristics of portal vein thrombosis after splenectomy in patients with liver cirrhosis. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 12:512-519.
[11] Yoshida M, Watanabe Y, Horiuchi A, Yamamoto Y, Sugishita H, Kawachi K (2009) Portal and splenic venous thrombosis after splenectomy in patients with hypersplenism. Hepatogastroenterol 56(90):538-41.
[12] Kawanaka H, Akahoshi T, Tomikawa M et al (2010) Risk factors for portal venous thrombosis after splenectomy in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. British J Surg 97:910-916.
[13] Jiang G, Bai D, Chen P, Qian J, Jin S, Wang X (2016) Risk Factors for portal vein system thrombosis after laparoscopic splenectomy in cirrhotic patients with hypersplenism. J laparoendosc & adv surg techn 26(6):419-423.
[14] Wu S, Wu Z, Zhang X, Wang R, Bai J (2015) The incidence and risk factors of portal vein system thrombosis after splenectomy and pericardial devascularization. Turk J Gastroenterol 26:423-428.
[15] Stamou KM, Toutouzas KG, Kekis PB (2006) Prospective study of the incidence and risk factors of postsplenectomy thrombosis of the portal, mesenteric, and splenic veins. Arch Surg 141:663-669.
[16] Pietrabissa A, Moretto C, Antonelli G, Morelli L, Marciano E, Mosc F (2004) Thrombosis in the portal venous system after elective laparoscopic splenectomy. Surg Endosc 18:1140-1143.
[17] Winslow ER, Klingensmith ME, Brunt LM (2005) Problem of portal venous thrombosis after splenectomy. Ann Surg 242:745.
[18] Miniati DN, Padidar AM, Kee ST, Krummel TM (2005) Mallory B. Portal vein thrombosis after laparoscopic splenectomy: an ongoing clinical challenge. JSLS 9:335-8.
[19] Van’t Riet M, Burger JWA, van Muiswinkel JM, Kazemier G, Schipperus MR, Bonjer HJ (2000) Diagnosis and treatment of portal vein thrombosis following splenectomy. Br J Surg 87:1229-33.
[20] Kawanaka H, Akahoshi T, Itoh S, et al (2014) Decreased antithrombin III (ATIII) activity and large splenic vein diameter (SVD) Optimizing Risk Stratification in Portal Vein Thrombosis after Splenectomy and its Primary Prophylaxis with Antithrombin III Concentrates and Danaparoid Sodium in Liver Cirrhosis with Portal Hypertension. J Am Coll Surg 219:865-74.
[21] Danno K, Ikeda M, Sekimoto M, et al (2009) Diameter of splenic vein is a risk factor for portal or splenic vein thrombosis after laparoscopic splenectomy. Surgery 145:457-64.
[22] Bach AM, Hann LE, Brown KT, et al (1996) Portal vein evaluation with US: comparison to angiography combined with CT arterial portography. Radiology 201:149-54.
[23] Margini C, Berzigotti A (2017) Portal vein thrombosis: The role of imaging in the clinical setting. Digestive and Liver Disease 49:113-20.
[24] Eguchi A, Hashizume M, Kitano S, Tanoue K, Wada H, Sugimachi K (1991) High rate of portal vein thrombosis after splenectomy in patients with esophageal varices and idiopathic portal hypertension. Arch Surg 126:752-55.
[25] Boissel P, Bresler L, Trackeon G, Poussot D, Gosdidier (1991) Mesenteric and portal vein thrombosis following splenectomy in hematologic diseases. A report of 3 cases. Chirurgie 117:591-95.
[26] Borissoff JI, ten Cate H (2011) From neutrophil extracellular traps release to thrombosis: an overshooting host-defense mechanism? J Thromb Haemost 9:1791-94.
[27] Massberg S, Grahl L, von Bruehl ML, et al (2010) Reciprocal coupling of coagulation and innate immunity via neutrophil serine proteases. Nat Med 16:887-96.
[28] Levi M, van der Poll T, Buller HR (2004) Bidirectional relation between inflammation and coagulation. Circulation 109:2698-704.
[29] Ruggeri ZM (2007) The role of von Willebrand factor in thrombus formation. Thromb Res 120 (Suppl 1):S5–S9.
[30] Jimenez-Alcazar M, Napirei M, Panda R, et al (2015) Impaired DNase1-mediated degradation of neutrophil extracellular traps is associated with acute thrombotic microangiopathies. J Thromb Haemost 732-42.
[31] von Bruhl ML, Stark K, Steinhart A, et al (2012) Monocytes, neutrophils, and platelets cooperate to initiate and propagate venous thrombosis in mice in vivo. J Exp Med 209:819-35.
[32] Romano F, Caprotti R, Conti M, et al (2006) Thrombosis of the splenoportal axis after splenectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 391:483-88.
[33] Benoist S (2000) Les complications a moyen et long term de la splenectomie. Ann Chir 125:317-24.
[34] Ikeda M, Sekimoto M, Takiguchi S, et al (2007) Total splenic vein thrombosis after laparoscopic splenectomy: a possible candidate for treatment. Am J Surg 193:21-5.
[35] Condat B, Pessione F, Denninger MH, et al (2000) Recent portal or portal vein thrombosis: increased recognition and frequent recanalization on anticoagulant therapy. Hepatology 32:466-70.
[36] Rhee RY, Gloviczki P, Mendonca CT, et al (1994) Portal vein thrombosis: still a lethal disease in the 1990s. J Vasc Surg 20:688–97.
[37] Winslow ER, Brunt LM, Drebin JA, Soper NJ, Klingensmith ME (2002) Portal vein thrombosis after splenectomy. Am J Surg 184:631–6.
[38] Rossi P, Passariello R, Simonetti. G (1976) Portal Thrombosis: High Incidence Following Splenectomy for Portal Hypertension. Gastrointest Radiol 1:225-7.
Author Information
  • General Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt

  • General Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt

  • General Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt

Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Hamdy Sedky Abd Allah, Mohamad Hamdy Abo-Ryia, Sherif Abd-Al Fattah Saber. (2017). Post-Splenectomy Portal Venous Thrombosis in Cirrhotic Patients: An Observational Clinical Trial. Journal of Surgery, 5(6), 105-110. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.js.20170506.14

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Hamdy Sedky Abd Allah; Mohamad Hamdy Abo-Ryia; Sherif Abd-Al Fattah Saber. Post-Splenectomy Portal Venous Thrombosis in Cirrhotic Patients: An Observational Clinical Trial. J. Surg. 2017, 5(6), 105-110. doi: 10.11648/j.js.20170506.14

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Hamdy Sedky Abd Allah, Mohamad Hamdy Abo-Ryia, Sherif Abd-Al Fattah Saber. Post-Splenectomy Portal Venous Thrombosis in Cirrhotic Patients: An Observational Clinical Trial. J Surg. 2017;5(6):105-110. doi: 10.11648/j.js.20170506.14

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.js.20170506.14,
      author = {Hamdy Sedky Abd Allah and Mohamad Hamdy Abo-Ryia and Sherif Abd-Al Fattah Saber},
      title = {Post-Splenectomy Portal Venous Thrombosis in Cirrhotic Patients: An Observational Clinical Trial},
      journal = {Journal of Surgery},
      volume = {5},
      number = {6},
      pages = {105-110},
      doi = {10.11648/j.js.20170506.14},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.js.20170506.14},
      eprint = {https://download.sciencepg.com/pdf/10.11648.j.js.20170506.14},
      abstract = {Background: Post-splenectomy portal venous thrombosis (PS-PVT) carries multiple threats to patients’ lives. Different variables were identified as risk factors for PS-PVT in cirrhotic patients. The aim of this study was to prospectively assess the incidence, risk factors, clinical presentation and treatment outcomes of PS-PVT in cirrhotic patients. Patients and methods: Sixty cirrhotic patients of Child class A submitted to open splenectomy were observed, both clinically and by Duplex ultrasound (US) examination, for the development of PS-PVT. Results: Overall, 17 patients (28.3%) developed PS-PVT at a median interval of 4.5 days (21 hours-7 days) post-splenectomy. Univariate analysis showed that lower preoperative platelet count (P<0.0460) and white blood cell (WBC) count (P<0.0001) and wider splenic vein diameter (SVD) (P<0.0001) correlated with PS-PVT. Multivariate analysis identified lower preoperative WBC count [odds ratio (OR): 0.651, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.245-0.893, P<0.005] and wider SVD (OR: 2.383, 95% CI: 1.558-3.646., P<0.001) as independent risk factors of PS-PVT. While 16 out of the 17 patients (94%) who had these 2 risk factors developed PS-PVT, only 1 out of the 43 patients (2.3%) who didn’t have the same risk factors developed thrombosis. All 17 patients had complete resolution of their thrombosis on anticoagulation therapy within 3-6 months without complications or mortality. Conclusion: PVT is a common complication of splenectomy in cirrhotic patients. Patients with low WBC count and wide SVD are highly susceptible to develop this complication mandating close observation from the 1st PO day and immediate anticoagulation after diagnosis.},
     year = {2017}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Post-Splenectomy Portal Venous Thrombosis in Cirrhotic Patients: An Observational Clinical Trial
    AU  - Hamdy Sedky Abd Allah
    AU  - Mohamad Hamdy Abo-Ryia
    AU  - Sherif Abd-Al Fattah Saber
    Y1  - 2017/11/12
    PY  - 2017
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.js.20170506.14
    DO  - 10.11648/j.js.20170506.14
    T2  - Journal of Surgery
    JF  - Journal of Surgery
    JO  - Journal of Surgery
    SP  - 105
    EP  - 110
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-0930
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.js.20170506.14
    AB  - Background: Post-splenectomy portal venous thrombosis (PS-PVT) carries multiple threats to patients’ lives. Different variables were identified as risk factors for PS-PVT in cirrhotic patients. The aim of this study was to prospectively assess the incidence, risk factors, clinical presentation and treatment outcomes of PS-PVT in cirrhotic patients. Patients and methods: Sixty cirrhotic patients of Child class A submitted to open splenectomy were observed, both clinically and by Duplex ultrasound (US) examination, for the development of PS-PVT. Results: Overall, 17 patients (28.3%) developed PS-PVT at a median interval of 4.5 days (21 hours-7 days) post-splenectomy. Univariate analysis showed that lower preoperative platelet count (P<0.0460) and white blood cell (WBC) count (P<0.0001) and wider splenic vein diameter (SVD) (P<0.0001) correlated with PS-PVT. Multivariate analysis identified lower preoperative WBC count [odds ratio (OR): 0.651, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.245-0.893, P<0.005] and wider SVD (OR: 2.383, 95% CI: 1.558-3.646., P<0.001) as independent risk factors of PS-PVT. While 16 out of the 17 patients (94%) who had these 2 risk factors developed PS-PVT, only 1 out of the 43 patients (2.3%) who didn’t have the same risk factors developed thrombosis. All 17 patients had complete resolution of their thrombosis on anticoagulation therapy within 3-6 months without complications or mortality. Conclusion: PVT is a common complication of splenectomy in cirrhotic patients. Patients with low WBC count and wide SVD are highly susceptible to develop this complication mandating close observation from the 1st PO day and immediate anticoagulation after diagnosis.
    VL  - 5
    IS  - 6
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

  • Sections