American Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine

| Peer-Reviewed |

Healthcare Provider and Patient Dispute: From Prevention to Restoration-the Neccessity of Communication and Caring

Received: 01 December 2015    Accepted:     Published: 01 December 2015
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

This article is meant to discourse the idea and skill of communication and care that is fundamental to the prevention as to restoration from dispute between healthcare provider and patient (DHP). DHP can be separated into 3 steps of intervention, thus 1. internal hospital negotiation; 2. external hospital mediation from Bureau of Health, medial association, city government mediation committee or arbitration; 3. Court litigation or mediation. Then, we introduced the current models of these 3 steps in Taiwan and Internal Hospital Mediator (IHM) model known as Japanese style, a form of medical alternative dispute resolution (ADR). Different ability of communication and care can be used in different situations as self-mediation, onsite correspondence, and professional mediation. Finally, how IHM can be of use as intervention principle and methods to 7 scenarios of physician-patient relationship.

DOI 10.11648/j.ajcem.20150305.30
Published in American Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine (Volume 3, Issue 5, September 2015)
Page(s) 310-313
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Medical Dispute, Communicating Caring, Internal Hospital Mediator, Mediation, Healthcare Provider and Patient Dispute, Alternative Dispute Resolution

References
[1] 醫療糾紛處理辦法及補償條例草案[Z],參http://www.tma.tw/bill/bill_files/121%E8%A1%8C%E6%94%BF%E9%99%A2%E7%89%88%E9%86%AB%E7%99%82%E7%B3%BE%E7%B4%9B%E8%99%95%E7%90%86%E5%8F%8A%E9%86%AB%E7%99%82%E4%BA%8B%E6%95%85%E8%A3%9C%E5%84%9F%E6%B3%95%E8%8D%89%E6%A1%88.pdf,最後檢視日2015/11/09。
[2] 李詩應,日本促進醫療和諧訓練課程學習之旅[J],臺灣醫界,2013,Vol.56(No.6):頁55-58。
[3] 和田仁孝,医療メデイエシヨン最前線,Part 4 Q&A[J], 醫療安全,Dec.2008,Vol.5 (No.4):頁32-37。
[4] 和田仁孝、中西淑美著,醫療促進溝通:由敘事著手的衝突管理[M],黃羿文、李訓承等翻譯,臺北市,原水文化出版,2013/11/14。
[5] 抽血瘀青怒告醫檢師不起訴[N]。參http://www.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/article/new/20141201/516289/,最後檢視日2015/11/09。
[6] 臺北市及新北市調處申請案件數[C],請參2013年5/18舉行之臺北醫法論壇(IX)醫療糾紛處理法制與兩岸比較,講義資料,頁135-147。
[7] 劉家正,臺北市衛生局美容醫學醫療糾紛調處經驗分享[C]。2014「醫療安全與醫療糾紛系列講座」—「美容醫學安全與醫療爭議態樣及調處經驗分享」研討會,2014年8月17日,研討會資料,頁33-34。
[8] 醫療糾紛調解機制各地經驗分享研討會[J],臺灣醫界,2014,Vol. 57, No. 5,頁25-36。
[9] 顏福瑞,消費爭議調解制度之研究-強制調解之可行性[D],高雄市:國立中山大學管理學院EMBA碩士論文,2001.7。
[10] 高雄市調解業務統計分析報告[R],高雄市民政局報告,2006.9。https://encrypted.google.com/search?hl=zh-TW&source=hp&q=高雄市調解業務統計分析報告&gbv=2&oq=高雄市調解業務統計分析報告&gs_l=heirloom-hp.12...3502.25960.0.27867.54.17.6.31.26.0.864.1968.12j3j6-1.16.0.msedr...0...1ac.1j4.34.heirloom-hp..33.21.1823.nAoO1dHi6gE ,最後檢視日2105/11/09。
[11] 張嘉真,洪舒萍,臺灣調解制度之簡介與比較[J],萬國法律,2009/2(No.163):頁55-66。
[12] 郭英調,醫療糾紛適合仲裁[R],衛福部醫療爭審報導,2009/1。http://www.mohw.gov.tw/dmc/admin/UpFile/Period38/02醫療糾紛適合仲裁.pdf ,最後檢視日2015/11/09。
[13] 台大教授知財貪財-A兩億只罰一百萬[N],http://bluestapler.pixnet.net/blog/post/25631520-%5B中時%5D,最後檢視日2015/11/09。
[14] 林萍章,醫療調解前置主意之爭議[J],月旦法學,2013/5(No. 216):頁62-86。
[15] 李詩應、陳永綺。臺灣醫療糾紛調解現狀與展望[C],發表於2014/10/25-26南京舉行之第五屆海峽兩岸醫藥法學術研討會論文集,頁115-120。
[16] 李詩應、陳永綺著,當醫療遇上衝突糾紛,訴訟是最好的解決方法?[M]臺北市,原水文化出版社,2013/10/24。
[17] Carol B. Liebman and Chris Stern Hyman. A Mediation Skills Model to Manage Disclosure of Errors and Adverse Events to Patients. [J]Health Aff. July 2004, vol. 23,(no.4): P.22-32.
[18] Richard Boothman, Amy Blackwell, Darrell A. Campbell, Jr., Elaine Commiskey, and Susan Anderson. A Better Approach to Medical Malpractice Claims? [J]The University of Michigan Experience. Journal of Health & Life Law 2009, vol. 2(No. 2): pp.125-159.
[19] 李詩應,陳永綺,促進醫療溝通調解的理想與未來─提升醫療安全與醫療品質之重要且不可或缺之一環[J],臺灣醫界,2015,Vol. 58(No. 11):頁55-58。
[20] Tammy C. Hoffmann, PhD; Victor M. Montori, MD, MSc; Chris Del Mar, MD, FRACGP. The Connection Between Evidence-Based Medicine and Shared Decision Making. [J]Viewpoint | October 1, 2014, JAMA. 2014; 312(13): 1295-1296.
Author Information
  • Chen Chung Chwen Memorial Doctor-Patient Relationship Promotion Educational Public Welfare Trust Fund(CDPET), Taipei, Taiwan

  • Chen Chung Chwen Memorial Doctor-Patient Relationship Promotion Educational Public Welfare Trust Fund(CDPET), Taipei, Taiwan

Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Yong-Chi Chen, Shih-Ying Lee. (2015). Healthcare Provider and Patient Dispute: From Prevention to Restoration-the Neccessity of Communication and Caring. American Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 3(5), 310-313. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajcem.20150305.30

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Yong-Chi Chen; Shih-Ying Lee. Healthcare Provider and Patient Dispute: From Prevention to Restoration-the Neccessity of Communication and Caring. Am. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 2015, 3(5), 310-313. doi: 10.11648/j.ajcem.20150305.30

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Yong-Chi Chen, Shih-Ying Lee. Healthcare Provider and Patient Dispute: From Prevention to Restoration-the Neccessity of Communication and Caring. Am J Clin Exp Med. 2015;3(5):310-313. doi: 10.11648/j.ajcem.20150305.30

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajcem.20150305.30,
      author = {Yong-Chi Chen and Shih-Ying Lee},
      title = {Healthcare Provider and Patient Dispute: From Prevention to Restoration-the Neccessity of Communication and Caring},
      journal = {American Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine},
      volume = {3},
      number = {5},
      pages = {310-313},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajcem.20150305.30},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajcem.20150305.30},
      eprint = {https://download.sciencepg.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajcem.20150305.30},
      abstract = {This article is meant to discourse the idea and skill of communication and care that is fundamental to the prevention as to restoration from dispute between healthcare provider and patient (DHP). DHP can be separated into 3 steps of intervention, thus 1. internal hospital negotiation; 2. external hospital mediation from Bureau of Health, medial association, city government mediation committee or arbitration; 3. Court litigation or mediation. Then, we introduced the current models of these 3 steps in Taiwan and Internal Hospital Mediator (IHM) model known as Japanese style, a form of medical alternative dispute resolution (ADR). Different ability of communication and care can be used in different situations as self-mediation, onsite correspondence, and professional mediation. Finally, how IHM can be of use as intervention principle and methods to 7 scenarios of physician-patient relationship.},
     year = {2015}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Healthcare Provider and Patient Dispute: From Prevention to Restoration-the Neccessity of Communication and Caring
    AU  - Yong-Chi Chen
    AU  - Shih-Ying Lee
    Y1  - 2015/12/01
    PY  - 2015
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajcem.20150305.30
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajcem.20150305.30
    T2  - American Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
    JF  - American Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
    JO  - American Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
    SP  - 310
    EP  - 313
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-8133
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajcem.20150305.30
    AB  - This article is meant to discourse the idea and skill of communication and care that is fundamental to the prevention as to restoration from dispute between healthcare provider and patient (DHP). DHP can be separated into 3 steps of intervention, thus 1. internal hospital negotiation; 2. external hospital mediation from Bureau of Health, medial association, city government mediation committee or arbitration; 3. Court litigation or mediation. Then, we introduced the current models of these 3 steps in Taiwan and Internal Hospital Mediator (IHM) model known as Japanese style, a form of medical alternative dispute resolution (ADR). Different ability of communication and care can be used in different situations as self-mediation, onsite correspondence, and professional mediation. Finally, how IHM can be of use as intervention principle and methods to 7 scenarios of physician-patient relationship.
    VL  - 3
    IS  - 5
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

  • Sections