| Peer-Reviewed

MRI Distinguish the Types of Placental Accrete Ability and Finding: 27 Patients Results

Received: 17 August 2019    Accepted: 16 September 2019    Published: 26 September 2019
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The placenta accrete is a kind of emergency and it leads to maternal postpartum hemorrhage, and one of the causes of death. Its aims is to evaluate diagnostic ability and findings of MRI in placental accrete of different types. This study included 27 pregnant women who were all histologically confirmed placental accrete after operation. According to the Maldjia diagnostic MRI criteria. The sensitivity and accuracy of MRI imaging were compared, and the MRI features of placental accrete were also described. The results showed a statistically significant difference among the three radiologists in MRI classification (P<0.05). For the type 0 and the type 3, there is a statistical difference between MRI diagnosis to the type 0 and the type 3 (P<0.05), and Kappa test also showed the difference (P<0.05). And for the type 1 and the type 2, especially for the type 1, there is a good consistency with the pathological results (P>0.05), chi square test (c2) showed no difference between the two types diagnostic capabilities (P>0.05). ADC and high b value DWI both showed slightly high signal of placental accrete. Residual placenta demonstrated "flower braid" or "mushroom" inhomogeneous enhancement. Comparison of MRI and US, 0 and 1 type are no obviously difference between US and MRI (P>0.05), but there are statistical difference (P<0.05) for distinguishing type 2 and type 3. MRI has a high diagnostic accuracy in placental implantation and the location, extent and depth of its invasion, displaying the condition of blood supply, and the drawing the typing diagnosis based on them. Moreover, MRI was more useful than US in distinguishing type 2 and type 3 of placental accrete.

Published in Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics (Volume 7, Issue 5)
DOI 10.11648/j.jgo.20190705.12
Page(s) 130-137
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Placenta, Accrete, MRI, US

References
[1] Sevan AV, Jessica AL, Cande VA, etal. Placental implantation abnormalities and risk of preterm delivery: a systematic review and metaanalysis. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2015, 10: S78-S90.
[2] Vintzileos AM, Ananth CV, Smulian JC. Using ultrasound in the clinical management of placental implantation abnormalities. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015, 213 (4 Suppl): S70-7.
[3] Michael AB, MBBCH. Placenta accrete. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2010, 5: 430-439.
[4] D’Antonio F, Iacovella C, Bhide A. Prenatal identification of invasive placentation using ultrasound: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42: 509.
[5] Rennan Ling, Jie Ma, Zibin Rao, etal. The diagnostic value of MRI in postpartum placental accrete. Journal of Medical Imaging. 2013, 23: 1996-1999.
[6] Liu W, Chen X, Sun C, etal. Morphological evaluation of cervix using MRI at 32 to 36 weeks of gestation: Findings for predicting invasive placenta previa. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018, 97 (49): e13375.
[7] Maldjian C, Adam R, Pelosi M, et al. MRI appearance of placenta percreta and placenta accrete. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999, 17: 965-971.
[8] Chen YL, Song T, Liu Y, et al. Diagnosis of Prenatal MRI in Placenta Implantation Abnormality. Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging, 2015, 23 (6): 470-473-477.
[9] Rahaim NS, Whitby EH. The MRI features of placental adhesion disorder and their diagnostic significance: systematic review. Clin Radiol. 2015, 70 (9): 917-25.
[10] Jauniaux E, Bhide A. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and outcome of placenta previa accreta after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 217 (1): 27-36.
[11] Dannheim K, Shainker SA, Hecht JL. Hysterectomy for placenta accrete: methods for gross and microscopic pathology examination. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016, 293 (5): 951-8.
[12] Baughman WC, Corteville JE, Shah RR. Placenta accrete: spectrum of US and MRI imaging findings. Radiographics. 2008, 28: 1905-1916.
[13] Dighe M. MR Imaging of Abnormal Placentation. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am, 2017, 25 (3): 601-610.
[14] Kumar I, Verma A, Ojha R, etal. Invasive placental disorders: a prospective US and MRI comparative analysis. Acta Radiol. 2017, 58 (1): 121-128.
[15] Zun Z, Limperopoulos C. Placental perfusion imaging using velocity-selective arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med. 2018, 80 (3): 1036-1047.
[16] Millischer AE, Salomon LJ, Porcher R, etal. Magnetic resonance imaging for abnormally invasive placenta: the added value of intravenous gadolinium injection. BJOG. 2017, 124 (1): 88-95.
[17] Riteau AS, Tassin M, Chambon G, etal. Accuracy of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of placenta accreta. PLoS One. 2014, 9 (4): e94866.
[18] Cuthbert F, Teixidor Vinas M, Whitby E. The MRI features of placental adhesion disorder-a pictorial review. Br J Radiol. 2016, 89 (1065): 20160284.
[19] Cunningham KM, Anwar A, Lindow SW. The recurrence risk of placenta accrete following uterine conserving management. J Neonatal Perinatal Med. 2015, 8 (4): 293-296.
[20] Xuemei Zhang, Hongbo Qi. Diagnosis and treatment of placenta accrete in a cesarean scar. Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2010, 26: 589-591.
[21] Fox KA, Shamshirsaz AA, Carusi D, etal. Conservative management of morbidly adherent placenta: expert review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015, 213 (6): 755-760.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Tianran Li, Xiaobin Huang, Fayu Chen, Beibei Zhang, Zhijie Yang. (2019). MRI Distinguish the Types of Placental Accrete Ability and Finding: 27 Patients Results. Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 7(5), 130-137. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jgo.20190705.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Tianran Li; Xiaobin Huang; Fayu Chen; Beibei Zhang; Zhijie Yang. MRI Distinguish the Types of Placental Accrete Ability and Finding: 27 Patients Results. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2019, 7(5), 130-137. doi: 10.11648/j.jgo.20190705.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Tianran Li, Xiaobin Huang, Fayu Chen, Beibei Zhang, Zhijie Yang. MRI Distinguish the Types of Placental Accrete Ability and Finding: 27 Patients Results. J Gynecol Obstet. 2019;7(5):130-137. doi: 10.11648/j.jgo.20190705.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.jgo.20190705.12,
      author = {Tianran Li and Xiaobin Huang and Fayu Chen and Beibei Zhang and Zhijie Yang},
      title = {MRI Distinguish the Types of Placental Accrete Ability and Finding: 27 Patients Results},
      journal = {Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics},
      volume = {7},
      number = {5},
      pages = {130-137},
      doi = {10.11648/j.jgo.20190705.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jgo.20190705.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jgo.20190705.12},
      abstract = {The placenta accrete is a kind of emergency and it leads to maternal postpartum hemorrhage, and one of the causes of death. Its aims is to evaluate diagnostic ability and findings of MRI in placental accrete of different types. This study included 27 pregnant women who were all histologically confirmed placental accrete after operation. According to the Maldjia diagnostic MRI criteria. The sensitivity and accuracy of MRI imaging were compared, and the MRI features of placental accrete were also described. The results showed a statistically significant difference among the three radiologists in MRI classification (PPPP>0.05), chi square test (c2) showed no difference between the two types diagnostic capabilities (P>0.05). ADC and high b value DWI both showed slightly high signal of placental accrete. Residual placenta demonstrated "flower braid" or "mushroom" inhomogeneous enhancement. Comparison of MRI and US, 0 and 1 type are no obviously difference between US and MRI (P>0.05), but there are statistical difference (P<0.05) for distinguishing type 2 and type 3. MRI has a high diagnostic accuracy in placental implantation and the location, extent and depth of its invasion, displaying the condition of blood supply, and the drawing the typing diagnosis based on them. Moreover, MRI was more useful than US in distinguishing type 2 and type 3 of placental accrete.},
     year = {2019}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - MRI Distinguish the Types of Placental Accrete Ability and Finding: 27 Patients Results
    AU  - Tianran Li
    AU  - Xiaobin Huang
    AU  - Fayu Chen
    AU  - Beibei Zhang
    AU  - Zhijie Yang
    Y1  - 2019/09/26
    PY  - 2019
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jgo.20190705.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.jgo.20190705.12
    T2  - Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
    JF  - Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
    JO  - Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
    SP  - 130
    EP  - 137
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2376-7820
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jgo.20190705.12
    AB  - The placenta accrete is a kind of emergency and it leads to maternal postpartum hemorrhage, and one of the causes of death. Its aims is to evaluate diagnostic ability and findings of MRI in placental accrete of different types. This study included 27 pregnant women who were all histologically confirmed placental accrete after operation. According to the Maldjia diagnostic MRI criteria. The sensitivity and accuracy of MRI imaging were compared, and the MRI features of placental accrete were also described. The results showed a statistically significant difference among the three radiologists in MRI classification (PPPP>0.05), chi square test (c2) showed no difference between the two types diagnostic capabilities (P>0.05). ADC and high b value DWI both showed slightly high signal of placental accrete. Residual placenta demonstrated "flower braid" or "mushroom" inhomogeneous enhancement. Comparison of MRI and US, 0 and 1 type are no obviously difference between US and MRI (P>0.05), but there are statistical difference (P<0.05) for distinguishing type 2 and type 3. MRI has a high diagnostic accuracy in placental implantation and the location, extent and depth of its invasion, displaying the condition of blood supply, and the drawing the typing diagnosis based on them. Moreover, MRI was more useful than US in distinguishing type 2 and type 3 of placental accrete.
    VL  - 7
    IS  - 5
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Radiology, The Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China

  • Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fuzhou General Hospital of Chinese PLA, Putian, China

  • Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fuzhou General Hospital of Chinese PLA, Putian, China

  • Department of Radiology, The Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China

  • Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fuzhou General Hospital of Chinese PLA, Putian, China

  • Sections