Our understanding of the process of contracture of the fingers is based on extrinsic and intrinsic theories. Yet there has always been an inherent contradiction in these concepts. Additionally, nearly all of these theories proceed from the assumption of a contractio digitorum and this assumption is reflected in basic research as well. The author presents a concept, which describes the finger contracture more accurately as retention in the flexed position. This contraction-free concept, deduced from the function and structure of the palmar subcutaneous tissue, combines the different pathogenic aspects. Palmar fibromatosis primarily manifests itself in the palmar subcutaneous tissue. The function of this tissue was studied in the living hand; the anatomic structure of the subcutaneous fibrofatty tissue was studied for the first time in slice plastinates of adult hands. The palmar tissue exhibits varying tissue consistencies. It is compressed and expanded as the fingers move. In fibromatosis, fibrous nodules infiltrate the finger tissue in its shortened flexion configuration, which predominates both by day and by night. In the normal hand, the anchoring fibers allow nearly tension-free deformation of the skin tissue. In fibromatosis, this tissue loses its extensibility. Motion in the finger subjects the new formed tissue to tensile stress. This in turn provides the decisive stimulus for adaptive tissue transformation. This process does not require any active contraction. It plausibly explains the finger contracture as an extension block. In the contraction-free concept, the myofibroblast is understood to be a form of fibroblast that resists the tension arising in the tissue by isometric contraction. The contraction-free concept can explain all clinical pictures of fibromatosis as reactive remodeling of the specific local host tissue. It can also provide basic research with a conclusive anatomic pattern. Moreover, it implies a specific therapeutic paradigm: Treatment options that influence the formation of pathologic tissue and address the characteristic tensile stress will be able to control the root causes of the deformity.
| Published in | Advances in Surgical Sciences (Volume 1, Issue 3) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ass.20130103.11 |
| Page(s) | 11-16 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Dupuytren Disease, Palmar Fibro-Fatty Tissue, Flexion Configuration, Reactive Tissue Remodeling, Extension Block
| [1] | McFarlane RM (1990) The finger. McFarlane RM et al (eds.) Dupuytren’s disease, Churchill Livingstone Edinburgh London Melbourne New York:155-167 |
| [2] | Hueston JT (1985) Overview of aetiology and pathology. Hueston JT, Tubiana R (eds.) Dupuytren’s disease, second edition G.E.M.Monograph, Churchill Livingstone Edinburgh London Melbourne New York:75-81 |
| [3] | Plater F (1614) Observationum, in hominis affectibus plerisque, corpori & animo, functionum laesione, dolore, aliave molestia & vitio incommodantibus. C. Waldkirch, Basileae:140 |
| [4] | Shum DT (1990) Histopathology. McFarlane R M et al (eds.) Dupuytren’s disease, Churchill Livingstone Edinburgh London Melbourne New York:25-30 |
| [5] | Luck JV (1959) Dupuytren’s contracture: a new concept of the pathogenesis correlated with surgical management. J Bone Joint Surgery Am 41:635-664 |
| [6] | MacCallum P, Hueston JT (1962) The pathology of Dupuytren’s contracture. Aust N Z J Surg 31:241-253 |
| [7] | Thomine JM (1985) The development and anatomy of the digital fascia. Hueston JT, Tubiana R (eds.) Dupuytren’s disease, second edition G.E.M.Monograph Churchill Livingstone Edinburgh London Melbourne New York:3-12 |
| [8] | Flint MH (1990) Connective tissue biology. McFarlane RM et al (eds.) Dupuytren’s disease, Churchill Livingstone Edinburgh London Melbourne New York:13-24 |
| [9] | von Hagens G (1979) Impregnation of soft biological specimens with thermosetting resins and elastomers. Anat Rec 194:247-255 |
| [10] | Stack HG (ed.) (1973) The palmar fascia. Churchill Livingstone Edinburgh London |
| [11] | Landsmeer JMF (ed.) (1976) Atlas of anatomy of the hand. Churchill Livingstone Edinburgh London New York |
| [12] | Grayson J (1940) The cutaneous ligaments of the digits. J Anatomy 75:164 |
| [13] | Meinel A (2012) Palmar fibromatosis or the loss of flexi- bility of the palmar finger tissue: A new insight into the disease process of Dupuytren contracture. C. Eaton et al. (eds.), Dupuytren’s disease and related hyperproliferative disorders, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg:11-20 |
| [14] | Gabbiani G, Majno G (1972) Dupuytren’s contracture: fibroblast contraction? An ultrastructural study. Am J Pathol 66:131-146 |
| [15] | Hinz B, Gabbiani G (2012) The role of the myofibroblast in Dupuytren’s disease: Fundamental aspects. C. Eaton et al. (eds.), Dupuytren’s disease and related hyperproliferative disorders, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg:53-60 |
| [16] | Schultz RJ, Tomasek JJ (1990) Cellular structure and interconnections. McFarlane RM et al (eds.) Dupuytren’s disease, Churchill Livingstone Edinburgh London Melbourne New York:86-98 |
| [17] | Davis P, Eaton Ch (2012) Hand therapy for Dupuytren’s contracture. C. Eaton et al. (eds.), Dupuytren’s disease and related hyperproliferatve disorders, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg:305-316. |
APA Style
Albrecht Gerhard Meinel. (2013). Dupuytren Contracture - How Fibromatosis Remodels the Palmar Subcutaneous Tissue and Its Fibrous Environment. Advances in Surgical Sciences, 1(3), 11-16. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ass.20130103.11
ACS Style
Albrecht Gerhard Meinel. Dupuytren Contracture - How Fibromatosis Remodels the Palmar Subcutaneous Tissue and Its Fibrous Environment. Adv. Surg. Sci. 2013, 1(3), 11-16. doi: 10.11648/j.ass.20130103.11
AMA Style
Albrecht Gerhard Meinel. Dupuytren Contracture - How Fibromatosis Remodels the Palmar Subcutaneous Tissue and Its Fibrous Environment. Adv Surg Sci. 2013;1(3):11-16. doi: 10.11648/j.ass.20130103.11
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ass.20130103.11,
author = {Albrecht Gerhard Meinel},
title = {Dupuytren Contracture - How Fibromatosis Remodels the Palmar Subcutaneous Tissue and Its Fibrous Environment},
journal = {Advances in Surgical Sciences},
volume = {1},
number = {3},
pages = {11-16},
doi = {10.11648/j.ass.20130103.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ass.20130103.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ass.20130103.11},
abstract = {Our understanding of the process of contracture of the fingers is based on extrinsic and intrinsic theories. Yet there has always been an inherent contradiction in these concepts. Additionally, nearly all of these theories proceed from the assumption of a contractio digitorum and this assumption is reflected in basic research as well. The author presents a concept, which describes the finger contracture more accurately as retention in the flexed position. This contraction-free concept, deduced from the function and structure of the palmar subcutaneous tissue, combines the different pathogenic aspects. Palmar fibromatosis primarily manifests itself in the palmar subcutaneous tissue. The function of this tissue was studied in the living hand; the anatomic structure of the subcutaneous fibrofatty tissue was studied for the first time in slice plastinates of adult hands. The palmar tissue exhibits varying tissue consistencies. It is compressed and expanded as the fingers move. In fibromatosis, fibrous nodules infiltrate the finger tissue in its shortened flexion configuration, which predominates both by day and by night. In the normal hand, the anchoring fibers allow nearly tension-free deformation of the skin tissue. In fibromatosis, this tissue loses its extensibility. Motion in the finger subjects the new formed tissue to tensile stress. This in turn provides the decisive stimulus for adaptive tissue transformation. This process does not require any active contraction. It plausibly explains the finger contracture as an extension block. In the contraction-free concept, the myofibroblast is understood to be a form of fibroblast that resists the tension arising in the tissue by isometric contraction. The contraction-free concept can explain all clinical pictures of fibromatosis as reactive remodeling of the specific local host tissue. It can also provide basic research with a conclusive anatomic pattern. Moreover, it implies a specific therapeutic paradigm: Treatment options that influence the formation of pathologic tissue and address the characteristic tensile stress will be able to control the root causes of the deformity.},
year = {2013}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Dupuytren Contracture - How Fibromatosis Remodels the Palmar Subcutaneous Tissue and Its Fibrous Environment AU - Albrecht Gerhard Meinel Y1 - 2013/11/10 PY - 2013 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ass.20130103.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ass.20130103.11 T2 - Advances in Surgical Sciences JF - Advances in Surgical Sciences JO - Advances in Surgical Sciences SP - 11 EP - 16 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2376-6182 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ass.20130103.11 AB - Our understanding of the process of contracture of the fingers is based on extrinsic and intrinsic theories. Yet there has always been an inherent contradiction in these concepts. Additionally, nearly all of these theories proceed from the assumption of a contractio digitorum and this assumption is reflected in basic research as well. The author presents a concept, which describes the finger contracture more accurately as retention in the flexed position. This contraction-free concept, deduced from the function and structure of the palmar subcutaneous tissue, combines the different pathogenic aspects. Palmar fibromatosis primarily manifests itself in the palmar subcutaneous tissue. The function of this tissue was studied in the living hand; the anatomic structure of the subcutaneous fibrofatty tissue was studied for the first time in slice plastinates of adult hands. The palmar tissue exhibits varying tissue consistencies. It is compressed and expanded as the fingers move. In fibromatosis, fibrous nodules infiltrate the finger tissue in its shortened flexion configuration, which predominates both by day and by night. In the normal hand, the anchoring fibers allow nearly tension-free deformation of the skin tissue. In fibromatosis, this tissue loses its extensibility. Motion in the finger subjects the new formed tissue to tensile stress. This in turn provides the decisive stimulus for adaptive tissue transformation. This process does not require any active contraction. It plausibly explains the finger contracture as an extension block. In the contraction-free concept, the myofibroblast is understood to be a form of fibroblast that resists the tension arising in the tissue by isometric contraction. The contraction-free concept can explain all clinical pictures of fibromatosis as reactive remodeling of the specific local host tissue. It can also provide basic research with a conclusive anatomic pattern. Moreover, it implies a specific therapeutic paradigm: Treatment options that influence the formation of pathologic tissue and address the characteristic tensile stress will be able to control the root causes of the deformity. VL - 1 IS - 3 ER -
Information
Email: