Parks’ Governance and Management in Rwanda: Opportunities and Challenges of the Community Participation for a Sustainable Conservation - Case Study of Nyungwe National Park

Gloriose Umuziranenge

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijepp.20190702.13

| Peer-Reviewed

Parks’ Governance and Management in Rwanda: Opportunities and Challenges of the Community Participation for a Sustainable Conservation - Case Study of Nyungwe National Park

Gloriose Umuziranenge

Published in International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy (Volume 7, Issue 2)

Received: 26 February 2019 Accepted: 2 April 2019 Published: 10 May 2019

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

In the field of conservation, the shift from the fortress conservation approach towards participatory management has considerably increased the interest for tourism activities and income. In Rwanda, the protected areas governance system is promoting community-based conservation through tourism revenue sharing to achieve conservation and development goals. The case study was designed to: (1) assess the understanding and implementation of principles of community participation by different stakeholders for the benefit of local communities and the efficiency of the conservation and (2) define interactive dynamics and conditions created for fully and sustainably population involvement in the conservation. The study area was selected because of its rich biodiversity and the high dependence of surrounding populations on natural resources. The study adopted a qualitative approach based on semi-structured individual interviews to key stakeholders from different categories of stakeholders including local communities. The data collected were transcribed, translated and analyzed using content analysis methods, MAXQDA Software and a coding system. The results showed that the involvement and empowerment of local people are done through keen activities based cooperative associations and funded projects, reference made to resources use, awareness raising and skills for interactions, cooperative spirit promotion and entrepreneurship. They indicated that the level of communities’ participation remains only of procedural kind and is still low though community members are benefiting of jobs, loans for their projects and income generating activities such as organized productions for market thanks to tourism revenue sharing and revolving fund programs. The transfer of the management is slow and smooth because of a slow change of mindset from receiving mentality, farming related difficulties, unaffordable lending conditions and a great deal of communication and misunderstanding on the tourism revenue sharing and the projects funding approaches. Contradictory understandings and appreciations of the community participation are recorded according to the categories of stakeholders. Actually, all the administrative and technical processes including mediation between communities and funding agencies are driven through a top-down management model; the study area being a state owned and controlled park and not a co-managed one. Though local communities gradually understand the role of the park thanks to income generating activities and community projects, the new approach does not meet basic criteria for effective community participation to ensure the sustainability of the conservation. However, the socio-economic incentives have a positive impact on the reduction of illegal activities and threats, except poaching for which a compensation fund for damaged crops was created.

Published in	International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy (Volume 7, Issue 2)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijepp.20190702.13
Page(s)	61-71
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Nyungwe National Park, Community Participation, Natural Resources Management, Tourism Revenue Sharing, Rwanda

References

[1]	Adams, M. W. and Infield, M. (2003). Who is on the Gorilla’s Payroll? Claims on Tourist Revenue from an Ugandan National Park. World Development 31 (1): 177-190.
[2]	Western, D. and Wright, R. (1994). Natural Connections; Perspectives on Community- Based Conservation. Island Press, Washington DC.
[3]	Mugisha, A. (2002). Evaluation of community based conservation approaches: management of protected areas in Uganda, University of Florida, Nantonga, USA.
[4]	Jones, Samantha. (2006). “A Political Ecology of Wildlife Conservation in Africa.”Review of African Political Economy no. 33 (109): 483-495.
[5]	Songorwa, A. N. (1999). Community-based wildlife management (CWM) in Tanzania: Are communities interested? World Development, 27 (12) 2061-2079.
[6]	Holland, T. G., Peterson, G. D. & Gonzalez, A. (2009) A cross-national analysis of how economic inequality predicts biodiversity loss. Conservation Biology, 23, 1304–1313.
[7]	Hulme, D. and Murphree, M. (2001). African Wildlife and Livelihoods: The Promise and performance of Community Conservation James Currey Ltd. Oxford.
[8]	Mehta, J. N., & Heinen, J. T. (2001). Does community-based conservation shape favorable attitudes among locals? An empirical study from Nepal. Environmental management, 28 (2), 165-177.
[9]	Lele, S. et al., (2010). Beyond exclusion: alternative approaches to biodiversity conservation in the developing tropics. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2 (1-2), pp. 94–100.
[10]	Gbadegesin, A. and O. Ayileka. (2000). Avoiding the mistakes of the past. Toward community oriented management strategy for the proposed national Park in Abuja- Nigeria. Land use Policy 17: 89-100.
[11]	Mabunda, M. D. (2004). Historical overview of tourism development in the KNP.
[12]	Kumasi, T. C., Obiri-Danso, K., & Ephraim, J. H. (2010). Community engagement in the sustainable management of rivers: Barekese catchment, Kumasi, Ghana. Environment, development and sustainability, 12 (6), 927-943.
[13]	Fabricius, C., Koch, E., Turner, S., & Magome, H. (Eds.). (2013). Rights resources and rural development: Community-based natural resource management in Southern Africa. Routledge.
[14]	Salafsky, N. &Wollenberg, E. (2000) Linking livelihoods and conservation: a conceptual framework and scale for assessing the integration of human needs and biodiversity. World Development, 28, 1421–1438.
[15]	Reed, M. S., Fraser, E. D. G., Dougill, A. J., 2006. An adaptive learning process for developing and applying sustainability indicators with local communities. Ecological Economics 59, 406–418.
[16]	Estrella, M., Gaventa, J., 2000. Who counts reality? Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation: a literature review. IDS Working Paper 70, Institute of Development Studies, Brighton.
[17]	Reed, M. S., Dougill, A. J., Taylor, M. J., 2007. Integrating local and scientific knowledge for adaptation to land degradation: Kalahari rangeland management options. Land Degradation and Development 18, 249–268.
[18]	Binot A. et Joiris D. V. (2007). Règles d’accès et gestion des ressources pour les acteurs des périphéries d’aires protégées. VertigO - la revue électronique en sciences de l'environnement [En ligne], Hors-série 4 \| novembre 2007, mis en ligne le 11 novembre 2007, consulté le 21 avril 2016. URL: http://vertigo.revues.org/759; DOI: 10.4000/vertigo.759.
[19]	Binot A. (2010). La Conservation de la Nature en Afrique Centrale. Entre Théories et Pratiques. Des Espaces Protégés à Géométrie Variable. Thèse de Doctorat, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, 444p.
[20]	Laslaz L. (2010). Parcs nationaux de montagne et construction territoriale des processus participatifs. Revue de géographie alpine/Journal of Alpine Research Vol. 98, 19p.
[21]	Kapoor, I., (2001). Towards participatory environmental management? J. Environ. Manag. 63, 269 et 279.
[22]	UNDP, ‘Turning Vision 2020 into Reality: From Recovery to Sustainable Human Development. National Human Development Report’, Kigali, 2007.
[23]	FAO, (2005). Negotiation and mediation techniques for natural resource management by Antonia Engel and BenediktKorf.
[24]	Masozera, M. K. (2002) Socio-economic impact analysis of the conservation of the Nyungwe Forest Reserve, Rwanda. MSc thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
[25]	Munene Ndereba, I, 2017, “The movement for community- led development. Lessons from Rwanda. Retrieved from https://communityleddev.org/2017/06/27/lessons-from-decentralization-in-rwanda/
[26]	REMA, (2015) Study to establish a national list of threatened terrestrial ecosystems and species in need of protection in Rwanda. Kigali, Rwanda.
[27]	ORTPN, (2005). Tourism Revenue sharing in Rwanda. Kigali- Rwanda.
[28]	RDB, (2012). Nyungwe National Park Management Plan 2012-2021.
[29]	Kurt, A. K. and R. A. Fimbel (1994). Gold mining Activities within the UGZ 4 Management Zone Nyungwe Forest Reserve, Rwanda. Nyungwe Forest Conservation Projet.
[30]	REMA, (2015) Study to establish a national list of threatened terrestrial ecosystems and species in need of protection in Rwanda. Kigali, Rwanda.
[31]	Mulindahabi, F. & Ndikubwimana, I. (2010) Monitoring Threats to Biodiversity in Nyungwe National Park, Rwanda. Ranger-based Monitoring Report Year 2010. Wildlife Conservation Society Rwanda and Rwandan Development Board Tourism & Conservation, Kigali, Rwanda.
[32]	Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
[33]	Savin-Baden, M. & Major, C. H. (2013). Qualitative research: The essential guide to theory and practice. London & New York: Routledge.
[34]	Silverman, D. (2014). Interpreting qualitative data (4th Ed.). Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore & Washington DC.: SAGE.
[35]	MacMillan, J. & Schumacher, S. (2014). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (7th Ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
[36]	Reed, M. S., 2008. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biol. Conserv. 141, 2417 and 2431.
[37]	Tosun, C. (2000). Limits to community participation in the tourism development process in developing countries, Tourism Management, vol. 21. 613-633.
[38]	Archabald, K. and Naughton-Treves, L. (2001). Tourism revenue-sharing around national parks in Western Uganda: early efforts to identify and reward local communities, Environmental Conservation, 28 (2) 135-149.
[39]	Havel, V. (1996). The World Bank Participation Sourcebook, the World Bank. Available: http://www.worldbank.org/wbi/sourcebook.
[40]	Borrini-Feyerabend G., Dudley N., Jaeger T. and al. (2013). Governance of Protected Areas: From understanding to action. Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines, Series 20, Gland, Switzerland: IUCN, xvi, 124p.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Gloriose Umuziranenge. (2019). Parks’ Governance and Management in Rwanda: Opportunities and Challenges of the Community Participation for a Sustainable Conservation - Case Study of Nyungwe National Park. International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy, 7(2), 61-71. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20190702.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Gloriose Umuziranenge. Parks’ Governance and Management in Rwanda: Opportunities and Challenges of the Community Participation for a Sustainable Conservation - Case Study of Nyungwe National Park. Int. J. Environ. Prot. Policy 2019, 7(2), 61-71. doi: 10.11648/j.ijepp.20190702.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Gloriose Umuziranenge. Parks’ Governance and Management in Rwanda: Opportunities and Challenges of the Community Participation for a Sustainable Conservation - Case Study of Nyungwe National Park. Int J Environ Prot Policy. 2019;7(2):61-71. doi: 10.11648/j.ijepp.20190702.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijepp.20190702.13,
  author = {Gloriose Umuziranenge},
  title = {Parks’ Governance and Management in Rwanda: Opportunities and Challenges of the Community Participation for a Sustainable Conservation - Case Study of Nyungwe National Park},
  journal = {International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy},
  volume = {7},
  number = {2},
  pages = {61-71},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijepp.20190702.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20190702.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijepp.20190702.13},
  abstract = {In the field of conservation, the shift from the fortress conservation approach towards participatory management has considerably increased the interest for tourism activities and income. In Rwanda, the protected areas governance system is promoting community-based conservation through tourism revenue sharing to achieve conservation and development goals. The case study was designed to: (1) assess the understanding and implementation of principles of community participation by different stakeholders for the benefit of local communities and the efficiency of the conservation and (2) define interactive dynamics and conditions created for fully and sustainably population involvement in the conservation. The study area was selected because of its rich biodiversity and the high dependence of surrounding populations on natural resources. The study adopted a qualitative approach based on semi-structured individual interviews to key stakeholders from different categories of stakeholders including local communities. The data collected were transcribed, translated and analyzed using content analysis methods, MAXQDA Software and a coding system. The results showed that the involvement and empowerment of local people are done through keen activities based cooperative associations and funded projects, reference made to resources use, awareness raising and skills for interactions, cooperative spirit promotion and entrepreneurship. They indicated that the level of communities’ participation remains only of procedural kind and is still low though community members are benefiting of jobs, loans for their projects and income generating activities such as organized productions for market thanks to tourism revenue sharing and revolving fund programs. The transfer of the management is slow and smooth because of a slow change of mindset from receiving mentality, farming related difficulties, unaffordable lending conditions and a great deal of communication and misunderstanding on the tourism revenue sharing and the projects funding approaches. Contradictory understandings and appreciations of the community participation are recorded according to the categories of stakeholders. Actually, all the administrative and technical processes including mediation between communities and funding agencies are driven through a top-down management model; the study area being a state owned and controlled park and not a co-managed one. Though local communities gradually understand the role of the park thanks to income generating activities and community projects, the new approach does not meet basic criteria for effective community participation to ensure the sustainability of the conservation. However, the socio-economic incentives have a positive impact on the reduction of illegal activities and threats, except poaching for which a compensation fund for damaged crops was created.},
 year = {2019}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Parks’ Governance and Management in Rwanda: Opportunities and Challenges of the Community Participation for a Sustainable Conservation - Case Study of Nyungwe National Park
AU  - Gloriose Umuziranenge
Y1  - 2019/05/10
PY  - 2019
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20190702.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijepp.20190702.13
T2  - International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy
JF  - International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy
JO  - International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy
SP  - 61
EP  - 71
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-7536
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20190702.13
AB  - In the field of conservation, the shift from the fortress conservation approach towards participatory management has considerably increased the interest for tourism activities and income. In Rwanda, the protected areas governance system is promoting community-based conservation through tourism revenue sharing to achieve conservation and development goals. The case study was designed to: (1) assess the understanding and implementation of principles of community participation by different stakeholders for the benefit of local communities and the efficiency of the conservation and (2) define interactive dynamics and conditions created for fully and sustainably population involvement in the conservation. The study area was selected because of its rich biodiversity and the high dependence of surrounding populations on natural resources. The study adopted a qualitative approach based on semi-structured individual interviews to key stakeholders from different categories of stakeholders including local communities. The data collected were transcribed, translated and analyzed using content analysis methods, MAXQDA Software and a coding system. The results showed that the involvement and empowerment of local people are done through keen activities based cooperative associations and funded projects, reference made to resources use, awareness raising and skills for interactions, cooperative spirit promotion and entrepreneurship. They indicated that the level of communities’ participation remains only of procedural kind and is still low though community members are benefiting of jobs, loans for their projects and income generating activities such as organized productions for market thanks to tourism revenue sharing and revolving fund programs. The transfer of the management is slow and smooth because of a slow change of mindset from receiving mentality, farming related difficulties, unaffordable lending conditions and a great deal of communication and misunderstanding on the tourism revenue sharing and the projects funding approaches. Contradictory understandings and appreciations of the community participation are recorded according to the categories of stakeholders. Actually, all the administrative and technical processes including mediation between communities and funding agencies are driven through a top-down management model; the study area being a state owned and controlled park and not a co-managed one. Though local communities gradually understand the role of the park thanks to income generating activities and community projects, the new approach does not meet basic criteria for effective community participation to ensure the sustainability of the conservation. However, the socio-economic incentives have a positive impact on the reduction of illegal activities and threats, except poaching for which a compensation fund for damaged crops was created.
VL  - 7
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Gloriose Umuziranenge

Department of Natural Resources and Environment Management, Protestant Institute of Arts and Social Science, Huye, Rwanda

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Gloriose Umuziranenge. (2019). Parks’ Governance and Management in Rwanda: Opportunities and Challenges of the Community Participation for a Sustainable Conservation - Case Study of Nyungwe National Park. International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy, 7(2), 61-71. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20190702.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Gloriose Umuziranenge. Parks’ Governance and Management in Rwanda: Opportunities and Challenges of the Community Participation for a Sustainable Conservation - Case Study of Nyungwe National Park. Int. J. Environ. Prot. Policy 2019, 7(2), 61-71. doi: 10.11648/j.ijepp.20190702.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Gloriose Umuziranenge. Parks’ Governance and Management in Rwanda: Opportunities and Challenges of the Community Participation for a Sustainable Conservation - Case Study of Nyungwe National Park. Int J Environ Prot Policy. 2019;7(2):61-71. doi: 10.11648/j.ijepp.20190702.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijepp.20190702.13,
  author = {Gloriose Umuziranenge},
  title = {Parks’ Governance and Management in Rwanda: Opportunities and Challenges of the Community Participation for a Sustainable Conservation - Case Study of Nyungwe National Park},
  journal = {International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy},
  volume = {7},
  number = {2},
  pages = {61-71},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijepp.20190702.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20190702.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijepp.20190702.13},
  abstract = {In the field of conservation, the shift from the fortress conservation approach towards participatory management has considerably increased the interest for tourism activities and income. In Rwanda, the protected areas governance system is promoting community-based conservation through tourism revenue sharing to achieve conservation and development goals. The case study was designed to: (1) assess the understanding and implementation of principles of community participation by different stakeholders for the benefit of local communities and the efficiency of the conservation and (2) define interactive dynamics and conditions created for fully and sustainably population involvement in the conservation. The study area was selected because of its rich biodiversity and the high dependence of surrounding populations on natural resources. The study adopted a qualitative approach based on semi-structured individual interviews to key stakeholders from different categories of stakeholders including local communities. The data collected were transcribed, translated and analyzed using content analysis methods, MAXQDA Software and a coding system. The results showed that the involvement and empowerment of local people are done through keen activities based cooperative associations and funded projects, reference made to resources use, awareness raising and skills for interactions, cooperative spirit promotion and entrepreneurship. They indicated that the level of communities’ participation remains only of procedural kind and is still low though community members are benefiting of jobs, loans for their projects and income generating activities such as organized productions for market thanks to tourism revenue sharing and revolving fund programs. The transfer of the management is slow and smooth because of a slow change of mindset from receiving mentality, farming related difficulties, unaffordable lending conditions and a great deal of communication and misunderstanding on the tourism revenue sharing and the projects funding approaches. Contradictory understandings and appreciations of the community participation are recorded according to the categories of stakeholders. Actually, all the administrative and technical processes including mediation between communities and funding agencies are driven through a top-down management model; the study area being a state owned and controlled park and not a co-managed one. Though local communities gradually understand the role of the park thanks to income generating activities and community projects, the new approach does not meet basic criteria for effective community participation to ensure the sustainability of the conservation. However, the socio-economic incentives have a positive impact on the reduction of illegal activities and threats, except poaching for which a compensation fund for damaged crops was created.},
 year = {2019}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Parks’ Governance and Management in Rwanda: Opportunities and Challenges of the Community Participation for a Sustainable Conservation - Case Study of Nyungwe National Park
AU  - Gloriose Umuziranenge
Y1  - 2019/05/10
PY  - 2019
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20190702.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijepp.20190702.13
T2  - International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy
JF  - International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy
JO  - International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy
SP  - 61
EP  - 71
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-7536
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20190702.13
AB  - In the field of conservation, the shift from the fortress conservation approach towards participatory management has considerably increased the interest for tourism activities and income. In Rwanda, the protected areas governance system is promoting community-based conservation through tourism revenue sharing to achieve conservation and development goals. The case study was designed to: (1) assess the understanding and implementation of principles of community participation by different stakeholders for the benefit of local communities and the efficiency of the conservation and (2) define interactive dynamics and conditions created for fully and sustainably population involvement in the conservation. The study area was selected because of its rich biodiversity and the high dependence of surrounding populations on natural resources. The study adopted a qualitative approach based on semi-structured individual interviews to key stakeholders from different categories of stakeholders including local communities. The data collected were transcribed, translated and analyzed using content analysis methods, MAXQDA Software and a coding system. The results showed that the involvement and empowerment of local people are done through keen activities based cooperative associations and funded projects, reference made to resources use, awareness raising and skills for interactions, cooperative spirit promotion and entrepreneurship. They indicated that the level of communities’ participation remains only of procedural kind and is still low though community members are benefiting of jobs, loans for their projects and income generating activities such as organized productions for market thanks to tourism revenue sharing and revolving fund programs. The transfer of the management is slow and smooth because of a slow change of mindset from receiving mentality, farming related difficulties, unaffordable lending conditions and a great deal of communication and misunderstanding on the tourism revenue sharing and the projects funding approaches. Contradictory understandings and appreciations of the community participation are recorded according to the categories of stakeholders. Actually, all the administrative and technical processes including mediation between communities and funding agencies are driven through a top-down management model; the study area being a state owned and controlled park and not a co-managed one. Though local communities gradually understand the role of the park thanks to income generating activities and community projects, the new approach does not meet basic criteria for effective community participation to ensure the sustainability of the conservation. However, the socio-economic incentives have a positive impact on the reduction of illegal activities and threats, except poaching for which a compensation fund for damaged crops was created.
VL  - 7
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download