| Peer-Reviewed

Soil Fertility Status and Productivity Trends Along a Toposequence: A Case of Gilgel Gibe Catchment in Nadda Assendabo Watershed, Southwest Ethiopia

Received: 6 August 2015    Accepted: 19 August 2015    Published: 7 September 2015
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The Impact of landscape positions and land use type on properties as well as land productivity are commonly observed in Ethiopia. The study was therefore conducted to quantify soil fertility and productivity trends under three land uses along the gradient (lower, middle and upper slope positions) of Nadda Assendabo watershed, Southwest Ethiopia. Thus field survey was covered a total of 54 composite soil samples using split plots (for soil physical properties) and split-split factorial arrangements with randomized complete block design from woodlot, grazing and crop land following topographic positions then different parameters were analyzed. The highest mean soil moisture content (56.68%) and porosity (71.09%) were observed for woodlot at the lower slope while the highest soil bulk density (1.74 g/cm3) was observed for soil crop land at the upper slope where as the lowest (0.94 g/cm3) was for woodlot at the lower slope. Sand, silt and clay fractions were significantly affected by interaction effects of slope and land uses (P≤0.01). Soil pH, electrical conductivity, organic carbon, cation exchange capacity, total nitrogen, available phosphorus, base saturation percentage and exchangeable basic cations for all land uses were increased down slope while they were affected significantly by slope steepness, land use and soil depth (P≤0.01). Therefore, electrical conductivity at middle and upper slope in grazing land and woodlot; total nitrogen, available phosphorus in crop land at lower slope was significantly different (P≤0.05) due to interaction effect. Furthermore, above ground biomass and grain yields of sorghum, maize and teff were also calculated on farm fields using split plots arrangements. Thus both yields were significantly affected by interaction effect of slope and crop type. Finally, based on the results woodlot, grazing and crop land were recommended for upper, middle and lower slopes respectively.

Published in International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy (Volume 3, Issue 5)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijepp.20150305.14
Page(s) 137-144
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Toposequence, Biomass and Grain Yield, Productivity Indicators

References
[1] Abebayehu, A. 2010. Soil Fertility Management and Nutrient Balance in Farm Components and Socioeconomic Groups: A Case Study in Selected Sites of Gilgel Gibe Catchment. MSc Thesis, Hawassa University, Ethiopia.
[2] Alemayehu Kiflu and Sheleme Beyene, 2013. Effects of different land use systems on selected soil properties in South Ethiopia. Journal of soil science and Environmental Management. Vol.4(5), pp. 100-107.
[3] Amanuel Abate, 2011. Land Use Dynamics and Its Impact on Productivity. MSc. Thesis, Jimma University, Ethiopia. analysis. Agron. Part I, No. 9, Am. Soc. Agron. Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
[4] Ashanafi Ali, Abaynesh Esayas and Sheleme Beyene, 2010. Characterizing Soils of Delbo Wegene Watershed, Wolaita Zone, and Southwestern Ethiopia for Planning Appropriate Land Management. Journal of Soil Science and Environmental Management Vol.1 (8), pp.184-199.
[5] Azene, B., 1997. A Participatory agro-forestry approach for soil and water conservation in Ethiopia. PhD Dissertation, Wageningen Agricultural University, The Netherland.
[6] Blake, G. R., 1965. Bulk density. pp. 374-399. In: C. A. Black (ed.). Methods of soil
[7] Brady, N. C. and Weil, R. R., 2002. The nature and properties of soils. 13th ed. Prentice Hall Inc., New Jersey. 960p.
[8] Brady, N. C. and Weil, R. R., 2002. The nature and properties of soils. 13th ed. Prentice Hall Inc., New Jersey. 960p.
[9] Bremner, J. M. and Mulvaney, C. S. 1982. “Total nitrogen”, In: A. L. Page, R. H. Miller and D. R. Keeny, (Eds.), Methods of Soil Analysis, American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp. 1119-1123.
[10] Brubaker, S. C., Jones, A. J., Lewis, D. T. and Frank, K., 1993. Soil Properties associated with landscape positions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 57: 235-239.
[11] Butros, I. H., Awni, Y. Taimeh and Feras, M. Ziadat., 2010. Variation in soil chemical properties along toposequences in an Arid Region of the Levant.Catena 83 (2010) 34-45.
[12] Buytaert, W., J. Deckers, G. Dercon, B. D. Bierve, J. Poesen and G. Govers, 2002. impactof land use changes on the hydrological properties of Volcanic Ash Soils in South Ecuador. Soil Use and Management 18: 94-100.
[13] Buzuayehu, T., Gezahegn, A., Yigezu, A., Jabbar, M. A. and Paulos, D., 2002. Nature and causes of land degradation in the Oromiya Region: A review. Socio-economics and Policy Research Working Paper 36. ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute), Nairobi, Kenya. 82 pp. catchment of the Loess Plateau, China
[14] Central Statistical Agency (CSA), 2010. Agricultural sample survey. Statistical Bulletin 468, Octeber, 23-27, CSA, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[15] Central Statistical Agency (CSA), 2010. Agricultural sample survey. Statistical Bulletin 468, Octeber, 23-27, CSA, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[16] Chapman, H. D., 1965. Cation exchange capacity. In: Black et al., C. A. (eds.). Methods of
[17] Chris, J. Grose, Darren, B. Kidd, Robert M. Moreton and Susan, E. Tate., 2004. Quantifying trends in soil condition: gathering baseline data for developing targets and supporting informed land management decision making. Water and Environment, Tasamani.
[18] Day, P. R., 1965. Hydrometer method of particle size analysis. pp. 562-563. In: C. A. Black (eds.). Methods of soil analysis. Agron. Part II, No. 9. Am. Soc. Agron. degradation and restoration in the Highlands of Ethiopia: Implications for sustainable land management. Doctoral thesis. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden. 70p.
[19] Demel, T., 2001. Vegetation type and forest fire management in Ethiopia, pp 1-35. Proceedings of Round-Table Conference on Integrated Forest Fire Management in Ethiopia. September 19-21, 2001, Ministry of Agriculture, Addis Ababa.
[20] Desta, K., 2003. Farmers’ perception of crop trend and soil fertility management constraints in the Kabale District, Msc Thesis, Bahir dar University, Ethiopia.
[21] Doerge, T., N. R. Kitchen and E. D. Lund, 1999. Site specific management guidelines. South Dakota State University, USA.
[22] Esteban, G., Jobba Gy and Robert, B. Jackson, 2000. The vertical distribution of soil organic carbon and its relation to climate and vegetation. Ecological Applications, 10(2), 2000, Pp. 423– 436.
[23] Fabien, A. and Oliver, D. 2012. Persipective in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics.
[24] Fitsum Hagos, John Pender and Nega Gebreselasie. (1999). Land Degradation in the Highlands of Tigray and Strategies for Sustainable Land Management. Addis Abeba, Ethiopia.
[25] Gebeyaw, T., 2007. Soil fertility status as influenced by different land uses in
[26] Hikmatullah, H. Subagyo and B. H. Prasetyo, 2003. Soil Properties of the Eastern Toposequence of Mount Kelimutu. Flores Island. East Nusa Tenggara and their Potential for Agricultural Use. Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Science 4(1) 2003: 1-11.
[27] Jimma Zone Agriculture and Rural Development Sector (JZARDS), 2011. Annual Report on sustainable land management strategies, Jimma, Ethiopia.
[28] Maja Sundqvist, 2011. Nitrogen and Phosphorus Dynamics Across an Elevational Gradient in aSwedish Subarctic Tundra. Doctoral Thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umea.
[29] Maybar areas of south Wello Zone, north Ethiopia. M. Sc. Thesis, Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia.
[30] Muchena, F. N., 2008. “Indicators for sustainable land management in Kenya’s Context”. GEF Land Degradation Focal Area Indicators, ETC-East Africa. Nairobi, Kenya.
[31] Ogeh J. S. and Ukodo E., 2012. Profile Distribution of Physical and Chemical Properties in Soils of a Toposequence in Benin, Rainforest of Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Basic and Applied Science (March, 2012), 20(1): 68-72.
[32] Pal S., Panwar P., Bhardwaj D. R., 2013. Soil quality under forest compared to other land uses in acid soil of North Western Himalaya, India Ann. For. Res. 56(1):187-198, 2013.
[33] Sheleme, B., 2011. Characterization of Soils along a Toposequence in Gununo Area, Southern Ethiopia. Journal of Science and Development 1(1) 2011, 31-41 soil analysis. Agronomy 9: 891-901. Am. Soc. Agro., Inc., Madison, Wisconsin.
[34] Sustainable land Management Programme (SLMP), 2010. Causes, consequences and solution of land degradation in Omo Nadda District: Annual report by SLMP woreda level. Nadda, Ethiopia.
[35] Taffesse, Alemayehu, S. Dorosh, Paul, A. and Sinafikeh, 2011. Crop production in Ethiopia Regional Patterns and Trends. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
[36] Van Ranst E, Tolossa A R, Dumon M, Cornelis J-T and Deckers J (2010). On the origin of planosols – the process of ferrolysis revisited. 19th World Congress of Soil Science, Soil solutions for a Changing World, Brisbane, Australia.
[37] Van wambeke, A. R., 1962. criteria for classifying tropical soils by age. J. Soil Sci. 13.
[38] Wischmeier, W. H. and Smith, D. D., 1978. Predicting rainfall erosion losses—a guide to conservation planning. U. S. Agricultural Handbook 537. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, USA. 58 pp.
[39] Wolayita zone, southern Ethiopia. M. Sc. Thesis, Hawassa University, Ethiopia.
[40] Yang Qiu, Bojie Fu, Jun Wang A., Liding Chen, 2001. Spatial variability of soil moisture content and its relation to environmental indices in a semi-arid gully.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Siraj Beshir, Mulugeta Lemeneh, Endalkachew Kissi. (2015). Soil Fertility Status and Productivity Trends Along a Toposequence: A Case of Gilgel Gibe Catchment in Nadda Assendabo Watershed, Southwest Ethiopia. International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy, 3(5), 137-144. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20150305.14

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Siraj Beshir; Mulugeta Lemeneh; Endalkachew Kissi. Soil Fertility Status and Productivity Trends Along a Toposequence: A Case of Gilgel Gibe Catchment in Nadda Assendabo Watershed, Southwest Ethiopia. Int. J. Environ. Prot. Policy 2015, 3(5), 137-144. doi: 10.11648/j.ijepp.20150305.14

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Siraj Beshir, Mulugeta Lemeneh, Endalkachew Kissi. Soil Fertility Status and Productivity Trends Along a Toposequence: A Case of Gilgel Gibe Catchment in Nadda Assendabo Watershed, Southwest Ethiopia. Int J Environ Prot Policy. 2015;3(5):137-144. doi: 10.11648/j.ijepp.20150305.14

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijepp.20150305.14,
      author = {Siraj Beshir and Mulugeta Lemeneh and Endalkachew Kissi},
      title = {Soil Fertility Status and Productivity Trends Along a Toposequence: A Case of Gilgel Gibe Catchment in Nadda Assendabo Watershed, Southwest Ethiopia},
      journal = {International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy},
      volume = {3},
      number = {5},
      pages = {137-144},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijepp.20150305.14},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20150305.14},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijepp.20150305.14},
      abstract = {The Impact of landscape positions and land use type on properties as well as land productivity are commonly observed in Ethiopia. The study was therefore conducted to quantify soil fertility and productivity trends under three land uses along the gradient (lower, middle and upper slope positions) of Nadda Assendabo watershed, Southwest Ethiopia. Thus field survey was covered a total of 54 composite soil samples using split plots (for soil physical properties) and split-split factorial arrangements with randomized complete block design from woodlot, grazing and crop land following topographic positions then different parameters were analyzed. The highest mean soil moisture content (56.68%) and porosity (71.09%) were observed for woodlot at the lower slope while the highest soil bulk density (1.74 g/cm3) was observed for soil crop land at the upper slope where as the lowest (0.94 g/cm3) was for woodlot at the lower slope. Sand, silt and clay fractions were significantly affected by interaction effects of slope and land uses (P≤0.01). Soil pH, electrical conductivity, organic carbon, cation exchange capacity, total nitrogen, available phosphorus, base saturation percentage and exchangeable basic cations for all land uses were increased down slope while they were affected significantly by slope steepness, land use and soil depth (P≤0.01). Therefore, electrical conductivity at middle and upper slope in grazing land and woodlot; total nitrogen, available phosphorus in crop land at lower slope was significantly different (P≤0.05) due to interaction effect. Furthermore, above ground biomass and grain yields of sorghum, maize and teff were also calculated on farm fields using split plots arrangements. Thus both yields were significantly affected by interaction effect of slope and crop type. Finally, based on the results woodlot, grazing and crop land were recommended for upper, middle and lower slopes respectively.},
     year = {2015}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Soil Fertility Status and Productivity Trends Along a Toposequence: A Case of Gilgel Gibe Catchment in Nadda Assendabo Watershed, Southwest Ethiopia
    AU  - Siraj Beshir
    AU  - Mulugeta Lemeneh
    AU  - Endalkachew Kissi
    Y1  - 2015/09/07
    PY  - 2015
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20150305.14
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijepp.20150305.14
    T2  - International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy
    JF  - International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy
    JO  - International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy
    SP  - 137
    EP  - 144
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-7536
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20150305.14
    AB  - The Impact of landscape positions and land use type on properties as well as land productivity are commonly observed in Ethiopia. The study was therefore conducted to quantify soil fertility and productivity trends under three land uses along the gradient (lower, middle and upper slope positions) of Nadda Assendabo watershed, Southwest Ethiopia. Thus field survey was covered a total of 54 composite soil samples using split plots (for soil physical properties) and split-split factorial arrangements with randomized complete block design from woodlot, grazing and crop land following topographic positions then different parameters were analyzed. The highest mean soil moisture content (56.68%) and porosity (71.09%) were observed for woodlot at the lower slope while the highest soil bulk density (1.74 g/cm3) was observed for soil crop land at the upper slope where as the lowest (0.94 g/cm3) was for woodlot at the lower slope. Sand, silt and clay fractions were significantly affected by interaction effects of slope and land uses (P≤0.01). Soil pH, electrical conductivity, organic carbon, cation exchange capacity, total nitrogen, available phosphorus, base saturation percentage and exchangeable basic cations for all land uses were increased down slope while they were affected significantly by slope steepness, land use and soil depth (P≤0.01). Therefore, electrical conductivity at middle and upper slope in grazing land and woodlot; total nitrogen, available phosphorus in crop land at lower slope was significantly different (P≤0.05) due to interaction effect. Furthermore, above ground biomass and grain yields of sorghum, maize and teff were also calculated on farm fields using split plots arrangements. Thus both yields were significantly affected by interaction effect of slope and crop type. Finally, based on the results woodlot, grazing and crop land were recommended for upper, middle and lower slopes respectively.
    VL  - 3
    IS  - 5
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Madawalabu University, Department of Plant Science, Bale Robe, Ethiopia

  • International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

  • Jimma University, Department of Natural Resource Management, Jimma, Ethiopia

  • Sections