International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy

| Peer-Reviewed |

Zero Tolerance: Evolving Wildlife Management in Kenya

Received: 28 May 2013    Accepted:     Published: 20 July 2013
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of contrasting wildlife management regimes on the probability of elephant presence in the Tsavo ecosystem base on the New York “zero tolerance policing”. Point data for the location of elephant, elephant carcasses, cattle, buffalo, giraffe, occupied bomas, charcoal kilns, settlements and farms, and water points were collected through aerial survey from 7-12 February 2011. Secondary data layers included main rivers, 30m resolution digital elevation model, and moderate resolution imaging spectro-radiometer (MODIS) 250m spatial resolution normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) data for January 2011. Information on the three management regimes (none, passive, and active) adopted by protected areas and ranches in Tsavo ecosystem was identified through interviews. The Maxent algorithm was used for modeling the probability of elephant presence in the ecosystem. Multicollinearity of the fourteen explanatory variables was tested using Eigen values and Condition Index (CI). We used Maxent with elephant location points as the presence only data and the twelve explanatory variables as environmental variables. Bootstrapping of ten replications was included in the model. The accuracy of the model was determined using the area under the curve (AUC) of the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) function. The results indicated that elephants were significantly more likely to be found in the protected areas than the non-protected areas. The northern sector of Tsavo West and the Voi sector of Tsavo East were the most likely areas to record elephants. Sectors with protected areas and ranches that practiced active management were more likely to show elephant than those with passive or no management. The areas with high probability of elephant occurrence coincided with actual high elephant density. Elephant carcasses, buffalo, giraffe, and settlements were the main variables that predicted the probability of elephant presence. Elephants are more likely to be in protected areas and ranches that were managed actively than those passively or not managed. In order to capitalize on the notion of protection and active management, we propose a wildlife management model based on the New York ‘zero tolerance’ policing. Any misdemeanor is not tolerated, especially illegal charcoal burning and livestock grazing in the ranches.

DOI 10.11648/j.ijepp.20130102.12
Published in International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy (Volume 1, Issue 2, July 2013)
Page(s) 24-31
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Tsavo, Ecosystem, Protected Area, Elephant, Livestock, Charcoal

References
[1] Bailey, D.W. & Provenza, F.D. (2008) Mechanisms determining large-herbivores distribution. In: Resource Ecology: Spatial and Temporal Dynamics of Foraging (Eds. H.H.T. Prins & F. Van Langevelde). Springer, New York, United States of America.
[2] Belsky,A.J.,Amundson,R.G.,Duxbury,J.M.,Riha,S.J.,Ali,A.R. and Mwonga,S.M.(1989) The effects of trees on their physical, chemical and biological environments in a semi-arid savannah in kenya. Journal of Applied Ecology, 26, 1005-1024.
[3] Blake, S. (2002) The Ecology of Forest Elephant Distribution and its Implications for Conservation. Phd thesis, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
[4] Blom, A., Zalinge, R., Heitkonig, M.A., & Prins, H.H.T. (2005) Factors influencing the distribution of large mammals within protected central African forest. Oryx 39(4), 381-388.
[5] Boer, W.F. Ntumi, C., Correia, A.U. & Mafuca, M.J. (2000) Diet and distribution of elephant in the Maputo elephant reserve, Mozambique. Afr. J. Ecol. 38,188-201.
[6] Cobbs, S. (1976) The Distribution and Abundance of the Large Herbivore Community of Tsavo National Park. D.Phil. Thesis Univ. of Oxford.
[7] Douglas-Hamilton, I. (1996) Counting elephants from the air: total counts. In: Kangawana, K.F. (ed.), Studying Elephants. AWF Technical Handbook Series Vol. 7.pp.28-37. Nairobi: African Wildlife Foundation.
[8] Dormann, C.F., Schymanski, S.J., Cabral, J., Chuine, I., Graham, C., Hartig, F., Kearney, M., Morin, X., Ro¨mermann, C., Schro¨der, B. & Singer, A. (2012) Correlation and process in species distribution models: bridging a dichotomy. Journal of Biogeography, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02659.x.
[9] Douglas-Hamilton, I., Krink, T. & Vollrath, F. (2005) Movement and corridors of African elephants in relation to protected areas. Naturwissenschaften 92, 158-163.
[10] Estes, R.D. (1991) The behavioural guide to African mammals: including hoofed mammals, carnivores, primates. University of California press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, California, USA.
[11] ESRI. (2010) ArcGIS Desktop: Tools for authoring, editing, and analyzing geographic information. Redlands, CA: ESRI Press.
[12] Harris, G.M., Russell, G.J., van Aarde, R.I., Pimm, S.L., 2008. Rules of habitat use by elephants Loxodonta africana in southern Africa: insights for regional management. Oryx 42, 66–75.
[13] Hoare, R.E., Toit, J.T.D., 1999. Coexistence between people and elephants in African Savannas. Conserv. Biol. 13, 633–639.
[14] Jachmann, H., and Billiouw, M. (1997). Elephant poaching and law enforcement in the central Luangwa Valley, Zambia. Journal of Applied Ecology 34 (1), 233–244. doi:10.2307/2404861
[15] Kyale, D.M., Ngene, S., and Maingi, J. (2011) Biophysical and human factors determine the distribution of poached elephants in Tsavo East National Park, Kenya. Pachyderm 49, 48-60.
[16] Leader-Williams N. Albon S. D. and Berry P.S.M. (1990) Illegal Exploitation of Black Rhinoceros and Elephant Populations: Patterns of Decline, Law Enforcement and Patrol Efforts in Luangwa Valley, Zambia. Journal of Applied Ecology 27(3), 1055-1087.
[17] Leuthold, B.M. (1978) Ecology of the giraffe in Tsavo East National Park, Kenya. East African Wildlife Journal, 16 (1):1-20. (Behavior and Ecology)
[18] Maingi, J.K., Mukeka, J.M., Kyale, D.M., and Muasya, R.M. (2012) Spatio-temporal patterns of elephant poaching in South-eastern Kenya. Wildlife Research; http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/WR11017.
[19] Mitchell, A. (2005) The ESRI guide to GIS analysis: Volume 2, spatial measurements and statistics. ESRI Press, Ridland, California, USA.
[20] Napier Bax, P. and Sheldrick, D.L.W. (1963) Some preliminary observation on the food of elephants in Tsavo East National Park of Kenya. East African Wildlife Journal 1: 40-53.
[21] Nasa [National Aeronautics and Space Administration] (2000) Shuttle radar topographic mission. NASA, Washington D.C., USA.
[22] Nasa [National Aeronautics and Space Administration] (2009) Shuttle radar topographic mission. NASA, Washington D.C., USA.
[23] Ngene, S.M., Njumbi, S., Munyao, N.M., Mukeka, J., Ihwagi, F., Omondi, P. (2011) total aerial census of elephants and other large mammals in the Tsavo-Mkomazi ecosystem. A Kenya Wildlife Service Report, Nairobi, Kenya.
[24] Ngene, S.M., Skidmore, A.K., Gils, H. van, Douglas-Hamilton, I. and Omondi, P.O.M. (2009) Elephant distribution around a volcanic shield dominated by a mosaic of forest-savannah (Marsabit, Kenya). African Journal of Ecology 47, 234–245.
[25] Olindo P, Douglas-Hamilton I, Hamilton P. (1988) Tsavo elephant count 1988. Nairobi: Wildlife Conservation and Management Department and Ministry of Tourism, Kenya.
[26] Omondi, P., Bitok E.K., Mukeka, J., Mayienda, R.M. & Litoroh, M. (2008) Total aerial count of elephants and other large mammal species of Tsavo/Mkomazi ecosystem. Kenya Wildlife Service.
[27] Pittiglio, C., Skidmore, A.K., Gils, H. A.M.J. van, and Prins, H.H.T (2012) Identifying transit corridors for elephant using a long time-series. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 14, 61-72.
[28] Pilgram T. and Western D. (1986) Inferring Hunting Patterns on African Elephant from Tusks in the International Ivory Trade. Journal of Applied Ecology 23(2), 503-514.
[29] Prins, H.H.T. & F. Van Langevelde (2008) Resource Ecology: Spatial and Temporal Dynamics of Foraging. Springer, New York, United States of America.
[30] Ruggiero, R. (1990). The effects of poaching disturbance on elephant behaviour. Pachyderm 13, 44–46.
[31] SPSS (Statistical package for social sciences] (2006) Statistical Package for Social Scinces (SPSS) release 16. New york, USA.
[32] Statsoft, Inc (2002) Statistica release 6.0. New York, USA.
[33] Tyrrell, H.G. and Coe, M.J. (1974) The rainfall regime of Tsavo National Park Kenya and its potential phonological significance. Journal of Biogeography. 1,187-192.
[34] van Gils, H.A.M.J., Conti, F., Ciaschetti, G. and Westinga, E. (2012) Fine resolution distribution modelling of endemics in Majella National Park, Central Italy. In: Plant biosystems, 146(2012) Sup.1. pp 276-287.
[35] van Gils, H.A.M.J. and Kayijamahe, E. (2010) Sharing natural resources: mountain gorillas and people in the Parc National des Volcans, Rwanda. In: African journal of ecology, 48 (2010)3 pp. 621-627.
[36] Viljoen, P.J. (1989) Spatial distribution and movements of elephants in the northern Namib desert region of Kaokoveld, Namibia. South African Journal of Zoology 219, 1-19.
[37] Weisberg, S. (1985) Applied Linear Regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
[38] Wijgaarden W. (1985) Elephants – trees- grazers: Relationship between climate, soil, vegetation and large herbivores in a semi-arid ecosystem (Tsavo, Kenya). ITC Publication #4.
[39] Zar, J.H. (1996) Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA.
Author Information
  • Kenya Wildlife Service, Biodiversity Research and Monitoring, Biodiversity Research and Monitoring, Nairobi, Kenya

  • University of Twente, Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), Enschede, The Netherlands

  • University of Twente, Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), Enschede, The Netherlands

  • University of Twente, Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), Enschede, The Netherlands

  • Kenya Wildlife Service, Biodiversity Research and Monitoring, Biodiversity Research and Monitoring, Nairobi, Kenya

  • Kenya Wildlife Service, Biodiversity Research and Monitoring, Biodiversity Research and Monitoring, Nairobi, Kenya

Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Shadrack Mumo Ngene, Andrew Skidmore, Hein van Gils, Francis Kamau Muthoni, Wycliffe Mutero, et al. (2013). Zero Tolerance: Evolving Wildlife Management in Kenya. International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy, 1(2), 24-31. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20130102.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Shadrack Mumo Ngene; Andrew Skidmore; Hein van Gils; Francis Kamau Muthoni; Wycliffe Mutero, et al. Zero Tolerance: Evolving Wildlife Management in Kenya. Int. J. Environ. Prot. Policy 2013, 1(2), 24-31. doi: 10.11648/j.ijepp.20130102.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Shadrack Mumo Ngene, Andrew Skidmore, Hein van Gils, Francis Kamau Muthoni, Wycliffe Mutero, et al. Zero Tolerance: Evolving Wildlife Management in Kenya. Int J Environ Prot Policy. 2013;1(2):24-31. doi: 10.11648/j.ijepp.20130102.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijepp.20130102.12,
      author = {Shadrack Mumo Ngene and Andrew Skidmore and Hein van Gils and Francis Kamau Muthoni and Wycliffe Mutero and Patrick Omondi},
      title = {Zero Tolerance: Evolving Wildlife Management in Kenya},
      journal = {International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy},
      volume = {1},
      number = {2},
      pages = {24-31},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijepp.20130102.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20130102.12},
      eprint = {https://download.sciencepg.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijepp.20130102.12},
      abstract = {This study investigates the impact of contrasting wildlife management regimes on the probability of elephant presence in the Tsavo ecosystem base on the New York “zero tolerance policing”. Point data for the location of elephant, elephant carcasses, cattle, buffalo, giraffe, occupied bomas, charcoal kilns, settlements and farms, and water points were collected through aerial survey from 7-12 February 2011. Secondary data layers included main rivers, 30m resolution digital elevation model, and moderate resolution imaging spectro-radiometer (MODIS) 250m spatial resolution normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) data for January 2011. Information on the three management regimes (none, passive, and active) adopted by protected areas and ranches in Tsavo ecosystem was identified through interviews. The Maxent algorithm was used for modeling the probability of elephant presence in the ecosystem. Multicollinearity of the fourteen explanatory variables was tested using Eigen values and Condition Index (CI). We used Maxent with elephant location points as the presence only data and the twelve explanatory variables as environmental variables. Bootstrapping of ten replications was included in the model. The accuracy of the model was determined using the area under the curve (AUC) of the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) function. The results indicated that elephants were significantly more likely to be found in the protected areas than the non-protected areas. The northern sector of Tsavo West and the Voi sector of Tsavo East were the most likely areas to record elephants. Sectors with protected areas and ranches that practiced active management were more likely to show elephant than those with passive or no management. The areas with high probability of elephant occurrence coincided with actual high elephant density. Elephant carcasses, buffalo, giraffe, and settlements were the main variables that predicted the probability of elephant presence. Elephants are more likely to be in protected areas and ranches that were managed actively than those passively or not managed. In order to capitalize on the notion of protection and active management, we propose a wildlife management model based on the New York ‘zero tolerance’ policing. Any misdemeanor is not tolerated, especially illegal charcoal burning and livestock grazing in the ranches.},
     year = {2013}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Zero Tolerance: Evolving Wildlife Management in Kenya
    AU  - Shadrack Mumo Ngene
    AU  - Andrew Skidmore
    AU  - Hein van Gils
    AU  - Francis Kamau Muthoni
    AU  - Wycliffe Mutero
    AU  - Patrick Omondi
    Y1  - 2013/07/20
    PY  - 2013
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20130102.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijepp.20130102.12
    T2  - International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy
    JF  - International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy
    JO  - International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy
    SP  - 24
    EP  - 31
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-7536
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20130102.12
    AB  - This study investigates the impact of contrasting wildlife management regimes on the probability of elephant presence in the Tsavo ecosystem base on the New York “zero tolerance policing”. Point data for the location of elephant, elephant carcasses, cattle, buffalo, giraffe, occupied bomas, charcoal kilns, settlements and farms, and water points were collected through aerial survey from 7-12 February 2011. Secondary data layers included main rivers, 30m resolution digital elevation model, and moderate resolution imaging spectro-radiometer (MODIS) 250m spatial resolution normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) data for January 2011. Information on the three management regimes (none, passive, and active) adopted by protected areas and ranches in Tsavo ecosystem was identified through interviews. The Maxent algorithm was used for modeling the probability of elephant presence in the ecosystem. Multicollinearity of the fourteen explanatory variables was tested using Eigen values and Condition Index (CI). We used Maxent with elephant location points as the presence only data and the twelve explanatory variables as environmental variables. Bootstrapping of ten replications was included in the model. The accuracy of the model was determined using the area under the curve (AUC) of the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) function. The results indicated that elephants were significantly more likely to be found in the protected areas than the non-protected areas. The northern sector of Tsavo West and the Voi sector of Tsavo East were the most likely areas to record elephants. Sectors with protected areas and ranches that practiced active management were more likely to show elephant than those with passive or no management. The areas with high probability of elephant occurrence coincided with actual high elephant density. Elephant carcasses, buffalo, giraffe, and settlements were the main variables that predicted the probability of elephant presence. Elephants are more likely to be in protected areas and ranches that were managed actively than those passively or not managed. In order to capitalize on the notion of protection and active management, we propose a wildlife management model based on the New York ‘zero tolerance’ policing. Any misdemeanor is not tolerated, especially illegal charcoal burning and livestock grazing in the ranches.
    VL  - 1
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

  • Sections