Hydrology

| Peer-Reviewed |

Predicting the Impact of Climate Change on Kulfo River Flow

Received: 10 October 2018    Accepted: 10 November 2018    Published: 19 December 2018
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

Assessment of the potential impact of climate change on hydrology and water resources of rivers is important for future planning and management of water resources. The objective of this paper is to predict the impact of climate change on stream flow of Kulfo River. This study used Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model and hypothetical climate change scenarios based on the fifth assessment report of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and by review different research papers on climate change to investigate the current and two future scenarios 2050s and 2080s stream flow magnitude in the River. The SWAT mode was calibrated and Validated against stream flow and attained coefficient of determination 0.81 and 0.92, and Nash Sutcliffe Efficient of 0.68 and 0.78 during calibration and validation respectively. The hypothetical climate scenarios were compared to the observed baseline period (1987-2014) and the potential impact of climate change on stream flow quantified as, the average annual stream flow of Kulfo River is projected to increase by 5.42%, in 2050s. In contrast it was found to give the maximum decrease in discharge by -8.2% in 2080s. Increasing temperature by 0.5°C decreased stream flow rates by 2.99% in 2050s while 10% drops in rainfall resulted in a stream flow reduction by 5.28% in 2080s. Overall, the results show that stream flow in the Kulfo River will be more sensitive to change in precipitation than change in temperature.

DOI 10.11648/j.hyd.20180603.11
Published in Hydrology (Volume 6, Issue 3, September 2018)
Page(s) 78-87
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Climate Change Impact, Hydrologic Model, Stream Flow, SWAT Model

References
[1] Bates B., K. C., WU W., Palutiko FP. (EDS) Climate change and water Technical Paper of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, Switzerland, IPCC Secretariat 2008: p. 210.
[2] Hunt A, W. P., Climate change impacts and adaptation in cities a review of the literature. Clim Chang 2011. 104: p.13-49. doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9975-6.
[3] IPCC, Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Core Writing Team, R. K. Pachauri and L. A. Meyer (eds.). IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 2014: p. 151.
[4] Abdella, The Effect of Climate Change on Water Resources Potential of Omo Gibe Basin, Ethiopia 2013: p. 200.
[5] IPCC, statement on the melting of Himalayan glaciers A statement from the Chair and Vice-Chairs of the IPCC, and the Co-Chairs of the IPCC Working Groups 2010.
[6] Setegn, S. G., D. Rayner, A. M. Melesse, B. Dargahi, and R. Srinivasan, Impact of climate change on the hydroclimatology of Lake Tana Basin, Ethiopia. Water Resour. Res., (2011). 47: p. W04511, doi:10.1029/2010WR009248.
[7] Ethiopian Mapping Authority, N. A., Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Ethiopian Mapping Authority 1988.
[8] Ayenew, Recent changes in the level of Lake Abiyata, central main Ethiopian Rift. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 2002. 47 (3) p. 493-503.
[9] Ayalkibet, Evaluation of impacts of Soil and water Conservation on Watershed hydrology of Kulfo River Using Hydrological SWAT Models, SNNPR International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research 2016. 7 (8): p. 2229-5518.
[10] Stefan, B. a., Kulfo River, South-Ethiopia as the regulator of lake level chananges in the Lake Abaya-Lake Chamo system. 2006: p. 129-143.
[11] Neitch, S. L., Arnold, J. R., Kiniry, J. R., & Williams, J. R., Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) Theoretical Documentation Version2009 Texas Water Resources Institute Technical Report No. 406, Texas A&M University System, College Station, Texas, 2011.
[12] IPCC, Climate Change 2014. Syntetic report Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assesement Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on climate change, 2014: p. 151.
[13] Abraham Mechal, T. W., Steffen Birk, Recharge variability and sensitivity to climate: The exampleof Gidabo River Basin, Main Ethiopian Rift. Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies 2015. 4 (2015): p. 644-660.
[14] Habtom, Evaluation of Climate Change Impact on Upper Blue Nile Basin Reservoirs (Case Study on Gilgel Abay Reservoir, Ethiopia). 2009.
[15] Arnold, J. G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R. S., & Williams, J. R, Large Area Hydrologic Modeling and Assessment Part I: Model Development. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1998. 34 (1),: p. 73-89. Retrieved from http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x doi: 10.1111/j.1752-1688 1998.tb05961.x.
[16] Arnold, J. G., Haney, E. B., Kiniry, J. R., Neitsch, S. L., Srinivasan, R., Neitsch, S. L., & Williams, J. R., Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) theoretical documentation version 2012. Texas Water Resources Institute Technical Report No. 439: pp650. College Station, Texas 2012.
[17] Neitch, S. L., Arnold, J. R., Kiniry, J. R., & Williams, J. R Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) Theoretical Documentation Version2009 Texas Water Resources Institute Technical Report No. 406, Texas A&M University System, College Station, Texas, 2011.
[18] SCS, Section 4 Hydrology. In National engineering handbook, 1972.10 (22): p. 10-1 -10-22.
[19] Green, W. H., & Ampt, G., Studies on soil physics, 1. the ow of air and water through soils. J. Agric. Sci, 1911. 4 (1): p. 1-24.
[20] Abbaspour, K. C., Yang, J., Maximov, I., Siber, R., Bog-ner, K., & Mieleitner, J., Spatially Distributed Modelling of Hydrology and Water Quality in the Prealpine/Alpine Thur Watershed Using SWAT Journal of Hydrology 2007. 333 (2-4): p. 413-430.
[21] Yang J, R. P., Abbaspour K, Xia J, Yang H, Comparing uncertainty analysis techniques for a SWAT application to the Chaohe Basin in China. J. Hydrol 2008. 358: p. 1-23.
[22] Abbaspour, K. C., User Manual for SWAT-CUP, SWAT Calibration and Uncertainty Analysis Programs Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology. Duebendorf, Switzerland 2015: p. 101.
[23] Van de Giesen, N., Liebe, J., & Jung, G., Adapting to climate change in the volta basin, west africa. Current science, 2010. 98 (8): p. 1033-1037.
[24] Kassa, Watershed Hydrological Responses to Changes in Land Use and Land Cover, and Management Practices at Hare Watershe. Ethiopia PHD thesis. University of Siegen, Germany 2009.
[25] Neitsch, S. L., Arnold, J. G., Kiniry, J. R., & Williams, J. R., Soil and Water Assessment Tool. Theoretical Documentation Version 2005. Temple, TX. USDA 2005.
[26] Goswami, M., K. M. O'Connor, Bhattari, K. & Shamseldin, A., Assessing the performance of eight real-time updating models and procedures for the Brosna River. Hydrology and the Earth system Sciences 2005. 9 (4): p. 394 – 411.
[27] Moriasi, D., Arnold, J., Van Liew, M., Bingner, R., Harmel, R., & Veith, T., Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quanti cation of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans, Asabe, 2007. 50 (3): p. 885-900.
[28] Nash JE, S. J., River flow forecasting through conceptual models: part I-a discussion of principles. J Hydrol, 1970. 10: p. 282–290.
[29] Kassa, T., Watershed Hydrological Responses to Changes in Land Use and Land Cover, and Management Practices at Hare Watershed, Ethiopia PHD thesis. University of Siegen, Germany 2009.
[30] Komlavi, Impact of Rainfall Variability, Land Use and Land Cover Change on Stream Flow for Hydropower Generation in the Black Volta Basin. 2015.
[31] Anwar. A, S., Tilahun, Essayas, Ayana, Abeyou, Worqlul, Tewodros, Assefa, Shimelis, Dessu, Assefa, Climate Change Impact on Stream flow in the UpperGilgelAbayCatchment, BlueNilebasin, Ethiopia. Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, 2015.
[32] Tesfay G. Gebremicael, Y. A. M., Pieter, Zaag and Eyasu Y. Hagos, Temporal and spatial changes of rainfall and streamflow in the Upper Tekez Atbara river basin, Ethiopia. Hydrology and Earth System Scence, 2017. 21: p. 2127–2142.
[33] Shi, W., Yu, X., Liao, W., Wang, Y., and Jia, B, Spatial and temporal variability of daily precipitation concentration in the Lancang River basin. China, J. Hydrol, 2013. 495: p. 197–207.
[34] Tesemma, Z. K., Mohamed, Y. A., and Steenhuis, T. S, Trends in rainfall and runoff in the Blue Nile Basin. Hydrol Process, 2010. 24: p. 3747–3758.
[35] Zhao, J., Huang, Q., Chang, J., Liu, D., Huang, S. and Shi, X, Analyses of temporal and spatial trends of hydro-climatic variables in the Wei River Basin, Environ. Environ Res, 2015. 139: p. 55–64.
[36] Piniewski, M. S. a. M., Improvement of Hydrological Simulations by Applying Daily Precipitation Interpolation Schemes inMeso-Scale Catchments. Water, 2015.7 (ISSN 2073-4441): p. 747-779; doi:10.3390/w7020747.
[37] Tekleab, S., Mohamed, Y., and Uhlenbrook, S, Hydro-climatic trends in the Abay/Upper Blue Nile basin, Ethiopia. Phys Chem Earth A/B/C, 2013: p. 61–62, 32–42.
[38] Gebremicael, T. G., Mohamed, Y. A., Betrie, G. D., van der Zaag, P., and Teferi, E, Trend analyses of runoff and sediment fluxesin the Upper Blue Nile basin:A combined analyses of statistical tests, physically based models and landuse maps. J. Hydrol, 2013.482:p. 57–68.
[39] Hannaford, J., Climate-driven changes in UK river flows, A review of the evidence. Prog. Phys. Geogr, 2015. 39: p. 29–48.
[40] Saraiva Okello, A. M. L., Masih, I., Uhlenbrook, S., Jewitt, G. P. W., van der Zaag, P., and Riddell, E, Drivers of spatial and temporal variability of streamflow in the Incomati River basin. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci, 2015. 19: p. 657–673, doi:10.5194/hess-19-657-2015.
Author Information
  • Department of Hydraulic and Water Resources Engineering, Mizan- Tepi University, Tepi, Ethiopia

  • Department of Hydraulic and water Resources Engineering, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia

  • Department of Hydraulic and water Resources Engineering, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia

Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Nega Gudeta Demmissie, Tamene Agugna Demissie, Fayera Gudu Tufa. (2018). Predicting the Impact of Climate Change on Kulfo River Flow. Hydrology, 6(3), 78-87. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hyd.20180603.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Nega Gudeta Demmissie; Tamene Agugna Demissie; Fayera Gudu Tufa. Predicting the Impact of Climate Change on Kulfo River Flow. Hydrology. 2018, 6(3), 78-87. doi: 10.11648/j.hyd.20180603.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Nega Gudeta Demmissie, Tamene Agugna Demissie, Fayera Gudu Tufa. Predicting the Impact of Climate Change on Kulfo River Flow. Hydrology. 2018;6(3):78-87. doi: 10.11648/j.hyd.20180603.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.hyd.20180603.11,
      author = {Nega Gudeta Demmissie and Tamene Agugna Demissie and Fayera Gudu Tufa},
      title = {Predicting the Impact of Climate Change on Kulfo River Flow},
      journal = {Hydrology},
      volume = {6},
      number = {3},
      pages = {78-87},
      doi = {10.11648/j.hyd.20180603.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hyd.20180603.11},
      eprint = {https://download.sciencepg.com/pdf/10.11648.j.hyd.20180603.11},
      abstract = {Assessment of the potential impact of climate change on hydrology and water resources of rivers is important for future planning and management of water resources. The objective of this paper is to predict the impact of climate change on stream flow of Kulfo River. This study used Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model and hypothetical climate change scenarios based on the fifth assessment report of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and by review different research papers on climate change to investigate the current and two future scenarios 2050s and 2080s stream flow magnitude in the River. The SWAT mode was calibrated and Validated against stream flow and attained coefficient of determination 0.81 and 0.92, and Nash Sutcliffe Efficient of 0.68 and 0.78 during calibration and validation respectively. The hypothetical climate scenarios were compared to the observed baseline period (1987-2014) and the potential impact of climate change on stream flow quantified as, the average annual stream flow of Kulfo River is projected to increase by 5.42%, in 2050s. In contrast it was found to give the maximum decrease in discharge by -8.2% in 2080s. Increasing temperature by 0.5°C decreased stream flow rates by 2.99% in 2050s while 10% drops in rainfall resulted in a stream flow reduction by 5.28% in 2080s. Overall, the results show that stream flow in the Kulfo River will be more sensitive to change in precipitation than change in temperature.},
     year = {2018}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Predicting the Impact of Climate Change on Kulfo River Flow
    AU  - Nega Gudeta Demmissie
    AU  - Tamene Agugna Demissie
    AU  - Fayera Gudu Tufa
    Y1  - 2018/12/19
    PY  - 2018
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hyd.20180603.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.hyd.20180603.11
    T2  - Hydrology
    JF  - Hydrology
    JO  - Hydrology
    SP  - 78
    EP  - 87
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-7617
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hyd.20180603.11
    AB  - Assessment of the potential impact of climate change on hydrology and water resources of rivers is important for future planning and management of water resources. The objective of this paper is to predict the impact of climate change on stream flow of Kulfo River. This study used Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model and hypothetical climate change scenarios based on the fifth assessment report of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and by review different research papers on climate change to investigate the current and two future scenarios 2050s and 2080s stream flow magnitude in the River. The SWAT mode was calibrated and Validated against stream flow and attained coefficient of determination 0.81 and 0.92, and Nash Sutcliffe Efficient of 0.68 and 0.78 during calibration and validation respectively. The hypothetical climate scenarios were compared to the observed baseline period (1987-2014) and the potential impact of climate change on stream flow quantified as, the average annual stream flow of Kulfo River is projected to increase by 5.42%, in 2050s. In contrast it was found to give the maximum decrease in discharge by -8.2% in 2080s. Increasing temperature by 0.5°C decreased stream flow rates by 2.99% in 2050s while 10% drops in rainfall resulted in a stream flow reduction by 5.28% in 2080s. Overall, the results show that stream flow in the Kulfo River will be more sensitive to change in precipitation than change in temperature.
    VL  - 6
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

  • Sections