International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering

| Peer-Reviewed |

Operational Investigation of Multi Feed Amine Process Performance in Comparison with Conventional Process

Received: 12 November 2014    Accepted: 27 November 2014    Published: 15 December 2014
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

The alkanolamines are the most generally accepted and widely used of the many available solvents for removal of acid gases from natural gas streams. Amongst different amine sweetening processes like conventional scheme, split flow, absorbers in series or parallel and multi feed, selecting the proper scheme has great impact on acid gas removal. Using multi feed scheme in Fajr-e-Jam gas refinery has provided the chance for better analysis of conventional and multi feed schemes. In current work, the most important parameters in gas sweetening refineries like CO2, H2S and mercaptan removal, caustic solution consumption and temperature distribution throughout the absorption column were investigated for sweetening trains utilizing DEA. For all the parameters mentioned above, multi feed scheme shows good acid gas removal capability and lower causted solution consumption compared to the conventional process with single feed.

DOI 10.11648/j.ogce.20140206.11
Published in International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering (Volume 2, Issue 6, November 2014)
Page(s) 78-83
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Alkanolamines, Acid Gas, Multi Feed, Mercaptan, Caustic Solution

References
[1] H. Mackenzie Douglas, A. Daniels Christina, 1987, “Design & Operation of a Selective Sweetening Plant Using MDEA”, Bryan Research & Engineering, Inc.
[2] S. Mokhatab, S. A. Poe, W. G. Speight, J. 2006, Handbook of Natural Gas Transmission and Processing, Elsevier Inc.
[3] A. Kohl, R. Nielsen: Gas Purification, 1997, 5th ed., Gulf Publications, Houston.
[4] A. Aroonwilas, A. Veawab, 2007, “Integration of CO2 capture unit using single- and blended-amines into supercritical coal-fired power plants: Implications for emission and energy management, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages 143–150.
[5] J. C. Polasek, J. A. Bullin, 1982, “Selective absorption with amines”, 61st Annual GPA Convection, pp. 86-90.
[6] K. Onda, E. Sada, T. Kobayashi, S. Kito, and K. Ito, 1970, “Salting-out parameters of gas solubility in aqueous salt solutions”, J. chem. Engng Japan, 3, 18-24.
[7] P. V. Danckwerts and M. M. Sharma, (1966), “The absorption of carbon dioxide into solutions of alkalis and amines”, The Chemical Engineer No. 202 CE 244.
[8] C. Ouwerkerk, “Design for Selective H2S Absorption, Hydrocarbon processing, Vol. 57, NO. 4, April, p. 89.
[9] C. Alvarez–Fuster, N. Midoux, A. Laurent, and J. C. Charpentier, 1980, “ Chemical kinetics of the reaction of carbon dioxide with amines in pseudo m-nth order conditions in aqueous and organic solutions”, Chemical Engineering Science, 35, 1717-1723.
[10] T. L. Donaldson and Y. N. Nguyen, 1980, “Carbon Dioxide Reaction Kinetics and Transport in Aqueous Amine Membranes”, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals, 19, 260–266.
[11] H. Hikita, S. Asai, H. Ishikawa, M. Honda, 1977, “The kinetics of reactions of carbon dioxide with monoethanolamine, diethanolamine and triethanolamine by a rapid mixing method”, The Chemical Engineering Journal, Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 7–12.
[12] D. W. van Krevelen and P. J. Hoftijzer, 1948, “Kinetics of gas-liquid reactions. Part 1: General theory, Recueil des Travaux Chimiques des Pays-Bas Volume 67, Issue 7, pages 563–586.
[13] Richard J. Nunge and William N. Gill, 1963, “Gas-liquid kinetics: The absorption of carbon dioxide in diethanolamine, AIChE Journal, Volume 9, Issue 4, pages 469–474.
[14] P. W. Coldrey and I. J. Harris, 1976, “Kinetics of the liquid phase reaction between carbon dioxide and diethanolamine”, The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, Volume 54, Issue 5, pages 566–571.
[15] Ko Jiun-Jie and Li Meng-Hui, 2000, “Kinetics of absorption of carbon dioxide into solutions of N-methyldiethanolamine + water”, Chem. Eng. Sci., 55, 4139-4147
[16] C. Blanc and G. Demarais, 1984, “The reaction rate of CO2 with diethanolamine, Int. Chem. Eng, 24, 43-51.
[17] P. M. M. Blauwhoff, G. F. Versteeg and W. P. M. van Swaaij, 1984, “A study on the reaction between CO2 and alkanolamines in aqueous solutions, Chem. Engng Sci, 39, 207-225.
[18] C. J. Wendt and L. W. Dailey, 1967, “Gas Treating: The SNPA Process”, Hydrocarbon. Processing, Vol. 46, NO. 10, pp. 155-157.
Author Information
  • Pars Oil & Gas Company, South Pars, Iran

  • Fajr-e-Jam Gas Refinery, Jam, Iran

  • Fajr-e-Jam Gas Refinery, Jam, Iran

Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Vahid Abkhiz, Isa Heydari, Mostafa Taheri. (2014). Operational Investigation of Multi Feed Amine Process Performance in Comparison with Conventional Process. International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering, 2(6), 78-83. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ogce.20140206.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Vahid Abkhiz; Isa Heydari; Mostafa Taheri. Operational Investigation of Multi Feed Amine Process Performance in Comparison with Conventional Process. Int. J. Oil Gas Coal Eng. 2014, 2(6), 78-83. doi: 10.11648/j.ogce.20140206.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Vahid Abkhiz, Isa Heydari, Mostafa Taheri. Operational Investigation of Multi Feed Amine Process Performance in Comparison with Conventional Process. Int J Oil Gas Coal Eng. 2014;2(6):78-83. doi: 10.11648/j.ogce.20140206.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ogce.20140206.11,
      author = {Vahid Abkhiz and Isa Heydari and Mostafa Taheri},
      title = {Operational Investigation of Multi Feed Amine Process Performance in Comparison with Conventional Process},
      journal = {International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering},
      volume = {2},
      number = {6},
      pages = {78-83},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ogce.20140206.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ogce.20140206.11},
      eprint = {https://download.sciencepg.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ogce.20140206.11},
      abstract = {The alkanolamines are the most generally accepted and widely used of the many available solvents for removal of acid gases from natural gas streams. Amongst different amine sweetening processes like conventional scheme, split flow, absorbers in series or parallel and multi feed, selecting the proper scheme has great impact on acid gas removal.  Using multi feed scheme in Fajr-e-Jam gas refinery has provided the chance for better analysis of conventional and multi feed schemes. In current work, the most important parameters in gas sweetening refineries like CO2, H2S and mercaptan removal, caustic solution consumption and temperature distribution throughout the absorption column were investigated for sweetening trains utilizing DEA. For all the parameters mentioned above, multi feed scheme shows good acid gas removal capability and lower causted solution consumption compared to the conventional process with single feed.},
     year = {2014}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Operational Investigation of Multi Feed Amine Process Performance in Comparison with Conventional Process
    AU  - Vahid Abkhiz
    AU  - Isa Heydari
    AU  - Mostafa Taheri
    Y1  - 2014/12/15
    PY  - 2014
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ogce.20140206.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ogce.20140206.11
    T2  - International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering
    JF  - International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering
    JO  - International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering
    SP  - 78
    EP  - 83
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2376-7677
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ogce.20140206.11
    AB  - The alkanolamines are the most generally accepted and widely used of the many available solvents for removal of acid gases from natural gas streams. Amongst different amine sweetening processes like conventional scheme, split flow, absorbers in series or parallel and multi feed, selecting the proper scheme has great impact on acid gas removal.  Using multi feed scheme in Fajr-e-Jam gas refinery has provided the chance for better analysis of conventional and multi feed schemes. In current work, the most important parameters in gas sweetening refineries like CO2, H2S and mercaptan removal, caustic solution consumption and temperature distribution throughout the absorption column were investigated for sweetening trains utilizing DEA. For all the parameters mentioned above, multi feed scheme shows good acid gas removal capability and lower causted solution consumption compared to the conventional process with single feed.
    VL  - 2
    IS  - 6
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

  • Sections