According to past studies, Nigerian Bentonites are found to be deficient in both fluid loss and rheological properties. Due to the deficiency of the Nigerian bentonite (NB), a good majority of bentonites used within Nigeria are imported. This research work seeks to evaluate the economic profitability of beneficiating the fluid loss and rheological properties of NB using periwinkle shell (PWS) and Mucuna Solannie (MS) as additives. The economic evaluation of this research seeks to point out the best possible action, based on available evidence. Two parameters—cost and outcome, are measured by the economic evaluation. From this measurement, an economic evaluation’s results will not exactly point out the better alternative, the way that an experimental trial would. If the most effective option from the evaluation is the cheapest, then it is the most cost effective option. In such a scenario, the most cost effective option is said to be the dominant alternative. From the economic evaluation of the PWS and MS additives performed during the course of this research, it can be said that these additives are economically profitable when added to local bentonite (LB), compared to the cost of using imported bentonite (IB) clay. Estimation of required equipment and facility for processing of additives (PWS and MS), calculation of discounted cash flow rate of return (DCF – ROR) for the investment and sensitivity analysis on the cash flow assumptions were carried out for the achievement of optimum results.
| Published in | International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering (Volume 8, Issue 5) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ogce.20200805.13 |
| Page(s) | 116-123 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Bentonite, Mucuna Solannie, Periwinkle Shell, Economic Evaluation, Sensitivity Analysis
| [1] | Chilingarian G. V. and Vorabutr P. (1983). Drilling and drilling fluids. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 149–151. |
| [2] | Elward-Berry J. and Darby J. B. (1997). Rheologically stable, nontoxic, high temperature, water based drilling fluid. SPE Drill Complet. 12 (3): 158–162. |
| [3] | Odumugbo C. A. (2005). Evaluation of local bentonitic clay as oil drilling fluids in Nigeria. SPE 85304. |
| [4] | Omole O, Adeleye J. O., Falode O., Malomo S. and Oyedeji O. A. (2013). Investigation into the rheological and filtration properties of drilling mud formulated with clays from Northern Nigeria. J Petrol Gas Eng 4 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5897/JPGE0 9.017. |
| [5] | Nweke, O. M., Igwe, E. O., Nnabo, P. N., (2015). Comparative evaluation of clays from Abakaliki formation with commercial bentonite clays for use as drilling mud. Afr. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 9 (6): 508–518. http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/AJEST2015.1904. |
| [6] | Nweke, O. M., (2015). Evaluating the suitability of clays from Abakaliki Area, South-eastern Nigeria for oil industrial application using geotechnical and rheological properties. Sci. Innov. 3 (2): 22–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20150302.11. |
| [7] | Oriji, A. B., Lawal, F. S., Bala, Z., (2014). Evaluating the efficiency of Nigerian local bentonite as an extender in oil well cementation. Chem. Process Engrg. Res. 28, 78–88. |
| [8] | Abdullahi, A. S., Ibrahim, A. A., Muhammad, M. A., Kwaya, M. Y. and Mustapha, S. (2011). Comparative Evaluation of Rheological Properties of Commercial Bentonite and Locally Beneficiated BentoniticClay from a Marine Deposit in Upper Benue Basin, Nigeria. British J. of Applied Sci. and Techn., 1 (4): 211–221. |
| [9] | Salam, K. K., Adeleye, O. J., Arinkoola, A. O., (2010). Evaluation of rheological properties of beneficiated locally sourced mud using factorial design. Int’l J. Oil, Gas Coal Technol. 3 (2), 144–159. |
| [10] | Dewu, B. B. M., Funtua, I. I., Oladipo, M. O. A., Arabi, S. A., Mohammed-Dabo, I. A., Muhammad, A. M. and Hamidu, I. (2011). Evaluation and Beneficiation of Bentonitic Clays from Pindiga Formation in Benue Trough. American J. of Eng. and Applied Sci., 4 (4): 497–503. |
| [11] | Udoh F. D. and Okon A. N. (2012). Formulation of Water-Based Drilling Fluid Using Local Materials. Asian J. Microbiol. Biotech. Envt. Sci., 14 (2): 167-174. |
| [12] | Ibrahim A. O., Momoh O. R. and Isa M. T. (2017). Enhancement of Gambe Clay using Un-Fermentable Polymers for Drilling Mud Formulation. Nigerian J. Techno., 36 (1): 119. |
| [13] | Obiakor-Okeke P. N., Chikwendu J. N., Anozie T. (2014). Effect of Different Processing Methods on the Chemical, Functional and Microbial Properties of Mucuna sloanei Seeds. Int. J. Nutrition and Food Sci. 3 (6): 551-559. |
| [14] | Afolabi O. A, Oshuntogun B. A, Adewusi S. R, Fapojuwo O. O, Ayorinde F. O, Grisson F. E and Oke O. L (1985). Preliminary nutritional and chemical evalution of raw seeds from mucuna solannie. An underutilized food source. J. Agric. food chemistry, (38): 122–124. |
| [15] | Ukachukwu S. N, Ezeagu I. E, Tarawall G. and Ikeorgu J. E. G. (2002). Utilization of Mucuna as a food and feed: Current uses and the way forward. R. J Workshops, CIDICCO, CIEPCA and World Hunger Research Center, Tegucigalpa, Honduras, pp. 189–287. |
| [16] | Uwaezuoke N., Obah B., Onwukwe S I., Igwilo, K C. (2016). An Economic Evaluation of Investment in Mucuna solannie Production. Int’l J. of Envt, Agriculture and Biotechn. (IJEAB). 1 (3): 610-620. |
| [17] | McGee J. (2019). Cost analysis. Vol. 1, p. 1–6. |
| [18] | Hwang K. (2016). Cost-benefit analysis: its usage and critiques. J. Public Affairs. 16 (1): 75–80. |
| [19] | Kerunwa A., Ariche P. O. and Izuwa N. C. (2020). Economic Evaluation of Hydraulic Fracturing in a Gas Condensate Reservoir Operating below Dewpoint. Open J. Yangtze Gas and Oil, 5 (3): 73-86. |
| [20] | Ackerman F. and Heinzerling L. (2002). Pricing the Priceless: Cost-Benefit Analysis of Environmental Protection. Uni. of Pennsylvania Law Review 150, 1553. |
| [21] | Blank L. and Tarquin A. (2002). Engineering Economy 5Ed. 1221 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10020, McGraw-Hill, pp 172-173, 266-299, 621-653. |
| [22] | Andronis L., Barton P. and Bryan S. (2009). Sensitivity analysis in economic evaluation: An audit of NICE current practice and a review of its use and value in decision-making. Health Techno. Assessment; 13 (29): 1-84. |
| [23] | Salahudeen N. and Ahmed A. S. (2016). Effect of Beneficiation on the Characteristics of Gambe and Pindiga Bentonitic Clays. J. Mod. Chemist. Chemical Techno., 7 (2): 20-26. |
| [24] | API, 13A (1993) Specifications for drilling fluids materials. 1220 L Street, NW Washington, DC 20005, USA. |
| [25] | Afolabi R. O. Ogunkunle T. F. Olabode O. A. and Yusuf E.O. (2018). Dataset on the beneficiation of a Nigerian bentonite clay mineral for drilling mud formulation. Data in Brief (20): 234–24. |
APA Style
Kevin Chinwuba Igwilo, Anthony Kerunwa, Bala S. Zakka, Izunna Chinemelum Okeke. (2020). Economic Evaluation of Beneficiating Nigerian Bentonite Using Periwinkle Shell and Mucuna Solannie. International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering, 8(5), 116-123. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ogce.20200805.13
ACS Style
Kevin Chinwuba Igwilo; Anthony Kerunwa; Bala S. Zakka; Izunna Chinemelum Okeke. Economic Evaluation of Beneficiating Nigerian Bentonite Using Periwinkle Shell and Mucuna Solannie. Int. J. Oil Gas Coal Eng. 2020, 8(5), 116-123. doi: 10.11648/j.ogce.20200805.13
AMA Style
Kevin Chinwuba Igwilo, Anthony Kerunwa, Bala S. Zakka, Izunna Chinemelum Okeke. Economic Evaluation of Beneficiating Nigerian Bentonite Using Periwinkle Shell and Mucuna Solannie. Int J Oil Gas Coal Eng. 2020;8(5):116-123. doi: 10.11648/j.ogce.20200805.13
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ogce.20200805.13,
author = {Kevin Chinwuba Igwilo and Anthony Kerunwa and Bala S. Zakka and Izunna Chinemelum Okeke},
title = {Economic Evaluation of Beneficiating Nigerian Bentonite Using Periwinkle Shell and Mucuna Solannie},
journal = {International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering},
volume = {8},
number = {5},
pages = {116-123},
doi = {10.11648/j.ogce.20200805.13},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ogce.20200805.13},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ogce.20200805.13},
abstract = {According to past studies, Nigerian Bentonites are found to be deficient in both fluid loss and rheological properties. Due to the deficiency of the Nigerian bentonite (NB), a good majority of bentonites used within Nigeria are imported. This research work seeks to evaluate the economic profitability of beneficiating the fluid loss and rheological properties of NB using periwinkle shell (PWS) and Mucuna Solannie (MS) as additives. The economic evaluation of this research seeks to point out the best possible action, based on available evidence. Two parameters—cost and outcome, are measured by the economic evaluation. From this measurement, an economic evaluation’s results will not exactly point out the better alternative, the way that an experimental trial would. If the most effective option from the evaluation is the cheapest, then it is the most cost effective option. In such a scenario, the most cost effective option is said to be the dominant alternative. From the economic evaluation of the PWS and MS additives performed during the course of this research, it can be said that these additives are economically profitable when added to local bentonite (LB), compared to the cost of using imported bentonite (IB) clay. Estimation of required equipment and facility for processing of additives (PWS and MS), calculation of discounted cash flow rate of return (DCF – ROR) for the investment and sensitivity analysis on the cash flow assumptions were carried out for the achievement of optimum results.},
year = {2020}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Economic Evaluation of Beneficiating Nigerian Bentonite Using Periwinkle Shell and Mucuna Solannie AU - Kevin Chinwuba Igwilo AU - Anthony Kerunwa AU - Bala S. Zakka AU - Izunna Chinemelum Okeke Y1 - 2020/10/17 PY - 2020 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ogce.20200805.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ogce.20200805.13 T2 - International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering JF - International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering JO - International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering SP - 116 EP - 123 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2376-7677 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ogce.20200805.13 AB - According to past studies, Nigerian Bentonites are found to be deficient in both fluid loss and rheological properties. Due to the deficiency of the Nigerian bentonite (NB), a good majority of bentonites used within Nigeria are imported. This research work seeks to evaluate the economic profitability of beneficiating the fluid loss and rheological properties of NB using periwinkle shell (PWS) and Mucuna Solannie (MS) as additives. The economic evaluation of this research seeks to point out the best possible action, based on available evidence. Two parameters—cost and outcome, are measured by the economic evaluation. From this measurement, an economic evaluation’s results will not exactly point out the better alternative, the way that an experimental trial would. If the most effective option from the evaluation is the cheapest, then it is the most cost effective option. In such a scenario, the most cost effective option is said to be the dominant alternative. From the economic evaluation of the PWS and MS additives performed during the course of this research, it can be said that these additives are economically profitable when added to local bentonite (LB), compared to the cost of using imported bentonite (IB) clay. Estimation of required equipment and facility for processing of additives (PWS and MS), calculation of discounted cash flow rate of return (DCF – ROR) for the investment and sensitivity analysis on the cash flow assumptions were carried out for the achievement of optimum results. VL - 8 IS - 5 ER -
Information
Email: