Accessibility to Oral Health Care in Peri-Urban Areas of Burkina Faso: Qualitative Survey on the Perceptions of the Populations of Kaya Health District
World Journal of Public Health
Volume 4, Issue 1, March 2019, Pages: 20-23
Received: Mar. 15, 2019;
Accepted: Apr. 16, 2019;
Published: May 15, 2019
Views 662 Downloads 156
Drabo Rose, Directorate for Prevention and Control of Non-Communicable Diseases, Ministry of Health, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
Sangaré Abou Dramane, Department of Public Health, UFR of Odonto-Stomatology, Felix Houphouet-Boigny, Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire
Samba Mamadou, Department of Public Health, UFR of Odonto-Stomatology, Felix Houphouet-Boigny, Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire
Guinan Jean Claude, Department of Public Health, UFR of Odonto-Stomatology, Felix Houphouet-Boigny, Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire
Follow on us
Accessibility to oral health care in the sub-urban areas is a case for worry due to scarcity of basic socio-sanitary facilities in these zones. The purpose of this study was to understand the perceptions of peri-urban dwellers about the use of oral health services. The nature of this quality study centres on people of eighteen years and above who came to the Regional Medical Centre of Kaya for oral health care purposes. The trial case comprised of thirty individuals divided into three focal groups of ten people each. The data were assembled as a support paper following the guide line elaborated for the purposes of the study, and analyzed according to the methods of content analysis. The study has revealed that oral health care services are not very much available in the peri-urban areas of the District of Kaya. The inhabitants are confronted with financial, geographic and cultural handicaps which impacts negatively on their oral health care. The inhabitants, most of whom are, farmers without a stable source of revenue, tend to resort to traditional remedies as solutions to their oral/dental diseases. This work has brought to focus the factors that impede attendance to oral health care by the inhabitants of peri-urban communities of the District of Kaya. Improving the use of the oral health care services entails improving the basic social facilities of the rural people as well as improving the condition of living in their territories.
Accessibility, Oral Health Care, Perception, Recourse, Burkina Faso
To cite this article
Sangaré Abou Dramane,
Guinan Jean Claude,
Accessibility to Oral Health Care in Peri-Urban Areas of Burkina Faso: Qualitative Survey on the Perceptions of the Populations of Kaya Health District, World Journal of Public Health.
Vol. 4, No. 1,
2019, pp. 20-23.
Copyright © 2019 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Rebouha F. “Concentration of health facilities, challenges of mobility and difficulties on access to treatment in the metropolitan city of Oran”. Territory in movement geographic developmental review 2007. http//journals. Openedition.org/tem/852; DOI: 10.4000/tem.852
Petersen PE. The World Oral Health Report 2003: continuous improvement of oral health in the 21st century - the approach of the WHO Global Oral Health Programme. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2003; 31 (Suppl. 1): 3-23.
Colussi CF, Calvo MCM. An evaluation model for oral health in primary care. Cad Saúde Pública 2011; 27 (9): 1731-45.
Roncalli AG, Tsakos G, Sheiham A, de Souza GC, Watt RG. Social determinants of dental treatment needs in Brazilian adults. BMC Public Health. 2014; 14: 1097.
Varenne B, Msellati P, Zoungrana C, Fournet F, Salem G. Reasons for attending dental-care services in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. Bull World Health Organ. 2005; 83 (9): 650-5.
Sangaré AD, Samba M, Bourgeois D. Illness-related behaviour and socio-demographic determinants of oral health care use in Dabou, Côte d’Ivoire. Community Dent Health. 2012; 29 (1): 78-84.
Lo CM, Diop M, Faye D, Kanouté A, Diouf M, Cissé D. The determinants of the use of oral health care services by consumers in West Africa - the case of Senegal. Science J Public Health. 2016; 4 (6): 445-450.
Dumez H. Méthodologie de la recherche qualitative 2è édition. Les questions clés de la démarche compréhensive. Eds Vuibert 2016.
Sangaré AD, Samba M, Meless GD, Guinan JC, Bakayoko-Ly R, Bourgeois D. Regards croisés sur le recours aux soins bucco-dentaires modernes et traditionnels enCôte d’Ivoire. Rev. Col Odonto-Stomatol. Afr. Chir. Maxillo-fac. 2013, 20 (3): 5-11.
Kiyak HA. Age and culture: influences on oral health behaviour. Int Dent J. 1993; 43 (1): 9-16.
Mbwambo ZH, Mahunnah RLA, Kayombo EJ. Traditional health practitioner and the scientist: bridging the gap in contemporary health research in Tanzania. Tanzan J Health Res. 2007; 9 (2): 115-120.
Sangaré AD, Samba M, Guinan JC, Diouf M, Bakayoko-Ly R, Bourgeois D. Socio demographic factors associated with renunciation to oral care in Côte d’Ivoire. MOJ Public Health 2017, 6 (1): 00156.
Mizrahi A, Mizrahi A. Evolution de la consommation bucco-dentaire et renoncement aux soins CREDES; http://www.irdes.fr/Publications/Rapports1993/rap1005.pdf.
Gobert M, Artoisenet C, Roch I. Offre et besoins en soins dentaires Perspectives d’avenir. Rapp Synthèse Univ Cathol Louvain-Socio-Econ Santé. 2007; 1-30.
Barimah KB, Van Teijlingen ER. The use of traditional medicine by Ghanaians in Canada. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2008; 8 (1): 30.
Rao KD, Ryan M, Shroff Z, Vujicic M, Ramani S, Berman P. Rural clinician scarcity and job preferences of doctors and nurses in India: a discrete choice experiment. PloS One. 2013; 8 (12): e82984.
Lawal FB, Taiwo JO, Oke GA. Factors influencing awareness and attendance of traditional oral health care practices by residents of a peri-urban community in Ibadan, Nigeria. Afr Health Sci. 2015; 15 (1): 233-239.
Enwonwu CO. Societal expectations for oral health: response of the dental care system in Africa. J Public Health Dent. 1988; 48 (2): 84-93.