Adaptation of Surface Rejuvenation Model to Turbulent Mass Transfer with Coupling Between Thermophoretic and Coulombic Force Interactions
Engineering Mathematics
Volume 2, Issue 1, June 2018, Pages: 28-49
Received: Jun. 7, 2018; Accepted: Jun. 27, 2018; Published: Jul. 24, 2018
Views 1092      Downloads 101
Authors
Mingchi Chiou, Department of Vehicle Engineering, National Formosa University, Yunlin, Taiwan
Chinghuang Chiu, Department of Vehicle Engineering, National Formosa University, Yunlin, Taiwan
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
Development and applications of the surface rejuvenation model for particle transport towards the surface through turbulent boundary layer involve (1) the introduction of the constitutive equations to establish relations between the fluxes involved in mass transfer processes and the respective driving potentials, (2) the use of definition of the convective velocity to separate the mass transfer flux into diffusive and convective components based on Eulerian models of turbulent deposition proposed by Guha [1] and Young and Leeming [2], (3) the introduction of exponentially distributed functions given by Danckwerts [3] to transform the instantaneous transport properties into the mean domain prior to the solution of the conservation equations, and finally (4) the use of developed relationships for the mean concentration profile and mass transfer flux to obtained an analytical solution for the mean deposition velocity of neutral and charged particles. The deposition velocity of neutral particles with and without including thermophoretic effect is first calculated and then used to clarify the effects caused by the presence of external imposed electric field. A comparison with the experimental data and other theoretical predictions shows that the surface rejuvenation model is logical in finding the combined effect of thermophoresis and turbophoresis on the deposition of neutral particles and confirming the relative independence of deposition velocity upon these drift mechanisms at high values of particle inertia. When both thermophoretic and Coulombic forces operate together, two important conclusions are obtained from this model: (1) the contribution to particle deposition velocities does not represent the sum of these drift mechanisms considered in isolation; (2) the turbophoresis induces an additional drift velocity toward the wall in the vicinity of the wall, alleviating these external forces and enhancing particle deposition onto the wall through reduced build-up of particle concentration adjacent to the wall.
Keywords
Brownian Diffusion, Turbulent Diffusivity of Particles, Turbophoresis, Thermophoresis, Coulombic Force, External Imposed Electric Field
To cite this article
Mingchi Chiou, Chinghuang Chiu, Adaptation of Surface Rejuvenation Model to Turbulent Mass Transfer with Coupling Between Thermophoretic and Coulombic Force Interactions, Engineering Mathematics. Vol. 2, No. 1, 2018, pp. 28-49. doi: 10.11648/j.engmath.20180201.14
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
[1]
Guha, A.: A unified Eulerian theory of turbulent deposition to smooth and rough surfaces, J. Aerosol Sci. 28(8), 1517-1537 (1997).
[2]
Young, J. B., Leeming, A. D.: A theory of particle deposition in turbulent pipe flow, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 340, 129-159 (1997).
[3]
Danckwerts, P. V.: Significance of liquid-film coefficients in gas absorption, Ind. Eng. Chem. 43, 1460-1467 (1951).
[4]
Montgomery, T. L., Corn, M.: Aerosol deposition in a pipe with turbulent airflow, J. Aerosol Sci. 1, 185–213 (1970).
[5]
Friedlander, S. K., Johnstone, H. F.: Deposition of suspended particles from turbulent gas streams, Ind. Eng. Chem. 49(7), 1151–1156 (1957).
[6]
Davies, C. N.: Deposition of aerosol from turbulent flow through pipes, Proc. Roy. Soc. A. 289, 235-246 (1966).
[7]
Beal, S. K.: Deposition of particles in turbulent flow on channel or pipe walls, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 40, 1–11 (1970).
[8]
Liu, B. Y. H., Ilori, T. Y.: Aerosol deposition in turbulent pipe Flow, Environ Sci. Technol. 8, 351–356 (1974).
[9]
Hinds, W. C.: Aerosol technology – properties, behavior, and measurement of airborne particles, vol. 2, John Wiley & Sons. Inc. (1999).
[10]
Liu, B. Y. H., Agarwal, J. K.: Experimental observation of aerosol deposition in turbulent flow, J Aerosol Sci. 5, 145–155 (1974).
[11]
Kallio, G. A., Reeks, M. W.: A numerical simulation of particle deposition in turbulent boundary layers, Int. J. Multiphase Flow 15, 433-446 (1989).
[12]
Popovich, A. T., Hummel, R. L.: Experimental study of the viscous sublayer in turbulent pipe flow, AIChE J. 13, 854–860 (1967).
[13]
Corino, E. R., Brodkey, R. S.: A visual investigation of the wall region on turbulent flow, J. Fluid Mech. 37, 1-30 (1969).
[14]
Harriott, P.: A random eddy modification of the penetration theory, Chem. Eng. Sci. 17, 149-154 (1962).
[15]
Bullin, J. A., Dukler, A. E.: Random eddy models for surface renewal: formulation as a stochastic process, Chem. Eng. Sci. 27, 439-442 (1972).
[16]
Brocker, S.: A new viscous sublayer influx (VSI) concept for near-wall turbulent momentum, heat and mass transfer, Rev. Gen. Therm. 37, 353–370 (1998).
[17]
Meek, R. L., Baer, A. D.: The periodic viscous sublayer in turbulent flow, AIChE J. 16, 841-848 (1970).
[18]
Fortuin, J. M. H., Musschenga, E. E., Hamersma, P. J.: Transfer processes in turbulent pipe flow described by the ERSR model, AIChE J. 38, 343–362 (1992).
[19]
Musschenga, E. E., Hamersma, P. J., Fortuin, J. M. H.: Momentum, heat and mass transfer in turbulent pipe flow: the extended random surface renewal model, Chem. Eng. Sci. 47, 4373–4392 (1992).
[20]
Mito, Y., Hanratty, T. J.: A stochastic description of wall sources in a turbulent field, Part 3: Effect of gravitational settling on the concentration profiles, Int. J. Multiphase Flow 31, 155–178 (2005).
[21]
Shin, M., Kim, D. S., Lee, J. W.: Deposition of inertia-dominated particles inside a turbulent boundary layer, Int. J. Multiphase Flow 26, 892–926 (2003).
[22]
Sookne, D. J.: Bessel functions of real argument and integer order, Natl. Bureau Stand. J. Res. B 77A, 125–132 (1973).
[23]
He, C., Ahmadi, G.: Particle deposition in a nearly developed turbulent duct flow with electrophoresis, J. Aerosol Sci. 30, 739-758 (1999).
[24]
Turner, J. R., Fissan, H. J.: Convective diffusion of particles in external force fields: The role of electrostatics on particle removal from turbulently-mixed gases, Chem. Eng. Sci. 44, 1255-1261 (1989).
[25]
Cooper, D. W., Peters, M. H., Miller, R. J.: Predicted deposition of submicron particles due to diffusion and electrostatics in viscous axisymmetric stagnation-point flow, Aerosol Sci. Technol. 11, 133-143 (1989).
[26]
Fan, F. G., Ahmadi, G.: On the sublayer model for turbulent deposition of aerosol particles in the presence of gravity and electric field, J. Aerosol Sci. 21, 49-71 (1994).
[27]
Li, A., Ahmadi, G.: Aerosol particle deposition with electrostatic attraction in turbulent channel flow, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 158, 476-482 (1993).
[28]
Soltani, M, Ahmadi, G., Ounis, H., McLaughlin, J. B.: Charged particle trajectory statistics and deposition in a turbulent channel flow, Int. J. Multiphase Flow 24, 77-92 (1998).
[29]
Hartmann, G. C., Marks, L. M., Yang, C. C.: Physical models for photoactive pigment electrophotography, J. Appl. Phys. 47, 5409-5420 (1976).
[30]
Hidy, G. M.: Aerosls, An Industrial and Environmental Science, Academic Press, New York (1984).
[31]
Turner, J. R., Liguras, D. K., Fissan, H. J.: Clean room applications of particle deposition form stagnation flow: Electrostatic effects, J. Aerosol Science 20, 403–417 (1989).
[32]
Soltani, M., Ahmadi, G.: Charged particle trajectory statistics and deposition in a turbulent channel flow, Aerosol Science and Technology 31, 170-186 (1999).
[33]
Whitby, K. T., Liu, B. Y. H.: Aerosol science (edited by Davies C. N.), Academic Press, London and New York (1966).
[34]
Eck, B.: Technische Stromungslehre, Springer, New York (1973).
[35]
Sehmel, G. A.: Particle diffusivities and deposition velocities over a horizontal smooth surface, J. Coll. Interf. Sci. 37(4), 891–906 (1971).
[36]
Flagan, R. C., Seinfeld, J. H.: Fundamentals of Air Pollution Engineering, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, (1988).
[37]
Wang, A., Song, Q., Ji, B. Q., Yao, Q., 2015. Thermophoretic motion behavior of submicron particles in boundary-layer-separation flow around a droplet. Phys. Rev. E 92, 063031.
[38]
Eslamian, M., Ahmed, M., El-Dosoky, M. E., Saghir, M. Z.: Effect of thermophoresis on natural convection in a Rayleigh–Benard cell filled with a nanofluid, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 81, 142–156 (2015).
[39]
Yi Zhou, Chun Yang, Yee Cheong Lam, Xiaoyang Huang, Thermophoresis of charged colloidal particles in aqueous media – Effect of particle size, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 101, 1283-1291 (2016).
[40]
Talbot, L., Cheng, R. K., Schefer, R. W., Willis, D. R.: Thermophoresis of Particles in a Heated Boundary Layer, J. Fluid Mech. 101, 737-758 (1980).
[41]
Batcheler, G. K., Shen, C.: Thermophoretic deposition of particles in gas flowing over cold surfaces, J. Colloid and Interface Sci. 107, 21-37 (1985).
[42]
Messerer, A., Niessner, R., Poschl, U.: Thermophoretic deposition of soot aerosol particles under experimental conditions relevant for modern diesel engine exhaust gas systems, J. Aerosol Sci. 34, 1009–1021 (2003).
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-983-5186