The term strategy and structure is said to be a result of decision making by managers through analysing the firm’s performance, market, segmenting the market, selecting the market, positioning themselves and using resources to implement the process. The paper seeks to examine the effects of strategy and structure on organizational performance using exploratory analysis of data of Remou Oil Nig. Ltd with an interview with management staff. The population is 50 and sample size is based on purposive sampling which are 10. It is discovered that strategy and structure are interdependent variables that firms must always consider when introducing new action or plan. It was also found that there is a positive relationship between structure and strategy that determine firm’s performance in terms of net profit. Therefore, if a firm’s structure change, strategies will also changes with changing demand and that structure affects strategy and the two variables determine the performance of a firm if properly matched and monitored. The recommendation is that: Remou Oil Nigeria Limited should use both structure and strategy as a source of increasing organizational performance in terms of profit since positive relationship exists between line structure and product differentiation strategy in Remou Oil Nig. Ltd. They should try to combine these variables together to enhance returns in terms of investment, equity, asset and net profit.
| Published in | American Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics (Volume 4, Issue 4) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ajere.20190404.14 |
| Page(s) | 139-143 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Structure, Strategy, Organization and Performance
| [1] | Abbab, J. E. (2013), corporate strategy: an introduction. Ocho house, keffi, Nigeria. |
| [2] | Aderounmu W. O & Ehiametakor E. T (1981), introduction to administration of schools in Nigeria, Ibadan, Evans Brothers (Nigeria Publishers) Limited. |
| [3] | Andrews, K. (1971), the concept of corporate strategy. Richard D. Irwin, Inc. 3rd Edition. |
| [4] | Andrews, K. R. (1998), the concept of corporate strategy. In H. Mintzberg, J. B. Quinn and S. Ghoshal; The strategy process. Prentice hall: London. |
| [5] | Andrews, K. R. (1980), the concept of Corporate Strategy. Richard D. Irwing, Homewood, Ill, USA. |
| [6] | Ansoff, I. H. (1988), the new corporate strategy. New York, John Wiley. |
| [7] | Business Dictionary website. 2010. http://www.Business Dictionary.com/definition/performance. Html (accessed 17 January 2015). |
| [8] | Chandler, D. A. (1962). Strategy and structure, chapters in the history of the American industrial enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MT Press, USA. |
| [9] | Campbell, J. P., McCloy, R. A., Oppler, S. H., & Sager, C. E. (1993), a theory of performance, in E. Schmitt, W. C. Borman, & Associates (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. |
| [10] | David, I. (2014). Strategy and structure of an organization. Demand media press. |
| [11] | Daft, R. L. (1997), organizational theory and design. Cinicinnati, South Western. |
| [12] | Hall, D. J. & Saias, M. A. (1980), strategy follows structure: strategic management journal vol. 1, no 2. |
| [13] | Kpatel (2006), management and strategy essay notes. Study mode publisher. |
| [14] | Katz, D. & Kahn, R. (1978), The Social Psychology of organizations, New York, Wiley. |
| [15] | Lawrence, A. & Lorschj, A (1967). Organization and environment: Managing differentiation and integration. Boston: Division of Research. Graduate School of Business. |
| [16] | Ilgen, D. R., & Schneider, J. (1991). Performance measurement: A multi-discipline view, in C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology, Chichester: Wiley, Vol. 1Administration, Harvard University. |
| [17] | Lenz, R. T. (1980).”Environmental Strategy, Organization Structure and Performance: Pattern in One Industry”. Strategic Management Journal, 1 (3). |
| [18] | Mathis, R. L. & Jackson, J. H. (2009). Human resource management, Mason, OH, USA: South-Western Cengage Learning. |
| [19] | Morgan J. G., (1966), image of organization. Thousand Ouks, Sage. |
| [20] | Motowidlo, S. J., Borman, W. C., & Schmit, M. J. (1997), a theory of individual differences in task and contextual performance. Human Performance 10. |
| [21] | Mintzberg, H. (1978). Structuring of organization. Prentice Hall, USA. |
| [22] | Mintzberg, H. (1973). “Strategy Making in Three Modes”. California Management Review, (Winter), 16 (2). |
| [23] | MacMillan Dictionary Website. Turnover definition. http://www.Macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/turnover (accessed 3 October 2010). |
| [24] | Nicolay, W. (2013). Why is to so difficult to align the structure with the strategy. Unpublished. |
| [25] | Teresa, N. (2013). Managing human resources in the 21st century and beyond: context and concept. Africa Christian Textbooks (ACTS). |
| [26] | Noe, R. A., Hollenback, J. R. & Wright P. M., (2000), human resources management. Boston: McGraw hill-Irvin. |
| [27] | Porter, M. E., (1980), competitive strategy. Free press. |
| [28] | Porter, M. E. (1996). What is strategy?. Harvard Business Review. |
| [29] | Pugh, D. S., (1990). Organization theory. Harmond Sworth, Penguin. |
| [30] | Sablybski, I. (2005), applying quantitative methods in organizations. Nova, Southeastern. |
| [31] | Sree, R. R. (2010). How does strategy affect structure. Management articles repository of cite, power sponsor publisher. |
| [32] | Schein, E. (1996), organization, culture and leadership, Wiley. |
| [33] | Thompson, P. (2009), Organization: a critical Approach. Palgraue, Macmillan. |
| [34] | Zhang et al (1994), mineralogical society of America, USA. |
APA Style
Opusunju Michael Isaac, Akyuz Murat, Abdullahi Ibrahim Ahmed. (2019). Effect of Structure and Strategy on Organizational Performance: Case Study of Remou Oil Nig. Ltd. American Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics, 4(4), 139-143. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajere.20190404.14
ACS Style
Opusunju Michael Isaac; Akyuz Murat; Abdullahi Ibrahim Ahmed. Effect of Structure and Strategy on Organizational Performance: Case Study of Remou Oil Nig. Ltd. Am. J. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2019, 4(4), 139-143. doi: 10.11648/j.ajere.20190404.14
AMA Style
Opusunju Michael Isaac, Akyuz Murat, Abdullahi Ibrahim Ahmed. Effect of Structure and Strategy on Organizational Performance: Case Study of Remou Oil Nig. Ltd. Am J Environ Resour Econ. 2019;4(4):139-143. doi: 10.11648/j.ajere.20190404.14
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ajere.20190404.14,
author = {Opusunju Michael Isaac and Akyuz Murat and Abdullahi Ibrahim Ahmed},
title = {Effect of Structure and Strategy on Organizational Performance: Case Study of Remou Oil Nig. Ltd},
journal = {American Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics},
volume = {4},
number = {4},
pages = {139-143},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajere.20190404.14},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajere.20190404.14},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajere.20190404.14},
abstract = {The term strategy and structure is said to be a result of decision making by managers through analysing the firm’s performance, market, segmenting the market, selecting the market, positioning themselves and using resources to implement the process. The paper seeks to examine the effects of strategy and structure on organizational performance using exploratory analysis of data of Remou Oil Nig. Ltd with an interview with management staff. The population is 50 and sample size is based on purposive sampling which are 10. It is discovered that strategy and structure are interdependent variables that firms must always consider when introducing new action or plan. It was also found that there is a positive relationship between structure and strategy that determine firm’s performance in terms of net profit. Therefore, if a firm’s structure change, strategies will also changes with changing demand and that structure affects strategy and the two variables determine the performance of a firm if properly matched and monitored. The recommendation is that: Remou Oil Nigeria Limited should use both structure and strategy as a source of increasing organizational performance in terms of profit since positive relationship exists between line structure and product differentiation strategy in Remou Oil Nig. Ltd. They should try to combine these variables together to enhance returns in terms of investment, equity, asset and net profit.},
year = {2019}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Effect of Structure and Strategy on Organizational Performance: Case Study of Remou Oil Nig. Ltd AU - Opusunju Michael Isaac AU - Akyuz Murat AU - Abdullahi Ibrahim Ahmed Y1 - 2019/10/31 PY - 2019 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajere.20190404.14 DO - 10.11648/j.ajere.20190404.14 T2 - American Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics JF - American Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics JO - American Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics SP - 139 EP - 143 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2578-787X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajere.20190404.14 AB - The term strategy and structure is said to be a result of decision making by managers through analysing the firm’s performance, market, segmenting the market, selecting the market, positioning themselves and using resources to implement the process. The paper seeks to examine the effects of strategy and structure on organizational performance using exploratory analysis of data of Remou Oil Nig. Ltd with an interview with management staff. The population is 50 and sample size is based on purposive sampling which are 10. It is discovered that strategy and structure are interdependent variables that firms must always consider when introducing new action or plan. It was also found that there is a positive relationship between structure and strategy that determine firm’s performance in terms of net profit. Therefore, if a firm’s structure change, strategies will also changes with changing demand and that structure affects strategy and the two variables determine the performance of a firm if properly matched and monitored. The recommendation is that: Remou Oil Nigeria Limited should use both structure and strategy as a source of increasing organizational performance in terms of profit since positive relationship exists between line structure and product differentiation strategy in Remou Oil Nig. Ltd. They should try to combine these variables together to enhance returns in terms of investment, equity, asset and net profit. VL - 4 IS - 4 ER -
Information
Email: