Comparative Analysis of Leasing's Evaluation as a Method of Financing Investments in Greek Agribusiness Sector Before and During Greek Economic Crisis
Journal of Business and Economic Development
Volume 2, Issue 2, May 2017, Pages: 79-86
Received: Oct. 27, 2016; Accepted: Dec. 30, 2016; Published: Jan. 20, 2017
Views 2575      Downloads 108
Apostolos D. Zaridis, Business Administration, Hellenic Open University, Patras, Greece
Article Tools
Follow on us
Financing for acquiring assets in Greek agribusiness sector is very common and supports Greek agribusiness sme’s production. Purpose of this study is the comparative analysis of leasing's evaluation as a method of financing in order to acquire assets used directly in the production process of a business of secondary Greek agribusiness sector or even vertically integrated business. Thus, research was held in April of 2006 and December of 2012, collecting proper data from Greek banking sector and considering Tax Legislation. Decision for the selection of the financial practices in the event of such an investment should be made after taking into consideration several factors. Proper financial evaluation of future investment is necessary, while it’s too necessary to be compared the financing choices that are given in Greece. Considering Tax Legislation, Banking Practices, and Law on Leasing, financing methods were compared in two different reference periods, before and during Greek economic crisis. Avoiding generalizations, typical examples are given, showing that leasing preceded against borrowing, considering conditions prevailing in Greece at these two reference periods. But decision making for selection of financing method is affected by factors, which may lead to either correct or incorrect conclusions for firm’s interests, if evaluation is not correct or there are personal interests of decision-makers in the administration. Consequently, incentives to use leasing for financing a business can be a lot, but quite important are ownership structure, nature of investment opportunities, business risk and tax status.
Financing, Leasing, Borrowing, Agribusiness, Investments, Smes, Economy, Crisis
To cite this article
Apostolos D. Zaridis, Comparative Analysis of Leasing's Evaluation as a Method of Financing Investments in Greek Agribusiness Sector Before and During Greek Economic Crisis, Journal of Business and Economic Development. Vol. 2, No. 2, 2017, pp. 79-86. doi: 10.11648/j.jbed.20170202.12
Copyright © 2017 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License ( which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Jensen, M. C.; Meckling, W. H. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. J. Financial Economics 1976, 10, 305–360.
Smith, C. W.; Wakeman, L. M. Determinants of Corporate Leasing Policy. J. Finance 1985, 7, 896–908.
Flath, D. The Economics of Short-Term Leasing. Economic Inquiry 1980, 4, 247–259.
Barclay, M. J.; Smith, C. W. Jr. The Priority Structure of Corporate Liabilities. J. Finance1995, 7, 899–917.
Williamson, O. E. Corporate Finance and Corporate Governance. J. Finance1988, 7, 567–591.
Bower, R. S. Issues in Lease Financing, Financial Management1973, 1, 25-34.
Brealey, R.; Young, C. Debt, Taxes and Leasing: A Note. J. Finance 1980, 12, 1245–1250.
Brick, I. E.; Fung, W.; Subrahmanyam, M. Leasing and Financial Intermediation: Comparative Tax Advantages. Financial Management1987, 2, 55–59.
Lewellen, W. G.; Long, M. S.; McConnell, J. J. Asset Leasing and Competitive Capital Markets. J. Finance1976, 6, 787–798.
Miller, M. H.; Upton, C. W. Leasing, Buying and Cost of Capital Services. J. Finance1976, 6, 761–786.
Myers, S. C.; Dill, D. A.; Bautista, A. J. Valuation of Financial Lease Contracts. J. Finance1976, 6, 799–820.
Finucane, T. J. Some Empirical Evidence on the Use of Financial Leases. J. Financial Research1988, 4, 321–333.
Graham, J. R.; Leary, M. T. A Review of Empirical Capital Structure Research and Directions for the Future. Annual Review of Financial Economics2011, 3, 309-345.
Vora, P. P.; Ezzell, J. R. Leasing vs. Purchasing: Direct Evidence on a Corporation’s Motivations for Leasing and Consequences of Leasing. Pennsylvania State University, Working Paper, Vol. 3., 1991.
Marston, F.; Harris, R. S. Substitutability of Leases and Debt in Corporate Capital Structures. J. Accounting, Auditing & Finance1988, 2, 147–169.
Deloof, M.; Verschueren, I. Are Leases and Debt Substitutes? Evidence from Belgian Firms. Financial Management1999, 3, 91–95.
Gavazza, A. Asset liquidity and financial contracts: Evidence from aircraft leases. J. Fin. Econ. 2010, 95, 62-84.
Rampini, A.; Viswanathan, S. Collateral, risk management, and the distribution of debt capacity. J. Finance 2010, 65, 2293-2322.
Eisfeldt, A.; Rampini, A. Leasing, Ability to Repossess, and Debt Capacity. Rev. Financ. Stud. 2009, 22, 1621-1657.
Rampini, A.; Viswanathan, V. Collateral and Capital Structure, Work. Pap., Duke Univ., 2010.
Mehran, H.; Taggart, R. A.; Yermack, D. CEO Ownership, Leasing and Debt Financing. Financial Management1999, 3, 5–14.
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
Tel: (001)347-983-5186