The Vulcanoid Asteroids: Past, Present and Future

Martin Beech; Lowell Peltier

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ajaa.20170503.12

| Peer-Reviewed

The Vulcanoid Asteroids: Past, Present and Future

Martin Beech, Lowell Peltier

Published in American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics (Volume 5, Issue 3)

Received: 10 July 2017 Accepted: 25 July 2017 Published: 25 August 2017

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

A review and discussion of both the historical and contemporaneous ideas pertaining to the putative population of Vulcanoid asteroids is presented. Current observations indicate that no objects larger than between 5 to 10 km in diameter reside in the orbital stability zone between 0.06 and 0.2 AU from the Sun, and that, at best, only a small population of Vulcanoid asteroids might exist at the present epoch. We review the physical processes (sublimation mass loss, evolution of the Sun’s luminosity, Poynting-Robertson drag, the Yarkovsky effect, the YORP effect, unipolar heating and collisions) that will control the lifetime against destruction of objects, either primordial or present-day, that chance to reside in the Vulcanoid region. It is argued that there are no overriding and/or absolute physical mechanisms that fully rule-out the present-day existence of a small Vulcanoid population, but we note that the gap between what the observations allow and what the theoretical models deem possible is closing rapidly.

Published in	American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics (Volume 5, Issue 3)
DOI	10.11648/j.ajaa.20170503.12
Page(s)	28-41
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Vulcanoid Asteroids, Orbital Evolution, Thermal Processing, Detection Methods

References

[1]	Le Verrier, U. J. J. 1859. Lettre de M. Le Verrier á M. Faye sur la tháorie de Mercure et sur le movement du párihália de cette planáte. Comptes rendus hebdomadaires de séances de l’Académie des sciences. Vol. 49, 379-383.
[2]	Hall, Asaph. 1894. A suggestion in the theory of Mercury. Astron. J. 14, 49-51.
[3]	Beech, M. 2014. The Pendulum Paradigm – Variations on a Theme and the Measure of Heaven and Earth. Brown Walker Press, Boca Raton, Florida. pp. 44-50.
[4]	Baum, R., and Sheehan, W. 1997. In Search of Planet Vulcan – the ghost in Newton’s clockwork universe. Plenum Press, New York.
[5]	Pannekoek, A. 1961. A History of Astronomy. Interscience Publishers, inc. New York. pp. 359-363.
[6]	Nieto, M. 1972. The Titius-Bode law of planetary distances: its history and theory. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
[7]	Jaki, S. L. 1972. The Original Formulation of the Titius-Bode Law. J. Hist. Astron. 3, 136-138.
[8]	Jenkine, B. G. 1878. Vulcan and Bode’s Law. Nature, 19, 74-75.
[9]	P. E. Chase, 1873. Note on Planeto-Taxis. Publications of the American Philosophical Society, 13, 143 – 145.
[10]	Hayes, W., and Tremaine, S. 1998. Fitting selected random planetary systems to Titius-Bode laws. Icarus, 135, 549-557.
[11]	Schumacher, G., and Gay, J. 2001. An attempt to detect Vulcanoids with SOHO/LASCO images I: Scale relativity and quantization of the solar system. A&A. 368, 1108-1114.
[12]	Levenson, T. 2015. The Hunt for Vulcan. Random House, New York.
[13]	Challis, J. 1860. On the planet within the Orbit of Mercury, discovered by M. Lescarbault. Cambridge Phil. Soc. Proc. 1, 219-222.
[14]	Russell, H. N., Dugan, R. S., and Stewart, J. Q. 1926. Astronomy 1: Solar System. Ginn & Co., Boston. p. 358.
[15]	Young, C. 1899. A Text-Book of General Astronomy for Colleges and Scientific Schools. Ginn & Co. Boston. pp. 373-375.
[16]	Courten, H. C., Brown, D. W., and Albert, D. B. 1976. Ten Years of Solar eclipse comet Searches. BAAS. 8, 504.
[17]	Leake, M. A., Chapman, C. R., Weidenschilling, S. J., Davis, D. R., and Greenberg, R. 1987. The chronology of Mercury’s geological and geophysical evolution – the Vulcanoid hypothesis. Icarus, 71, 350-375.
[18]	Durda, D. D., et al., 2000. A New Observational Search for Vulcanoids in SOHO/LASCO Coronagraph Images. Icarus, 148, 312-315.
[19]	Zhao, H., Lu, H., Zhaori, G., Yao, J., and Ma, Y. 2009. The search for vulcanoids in the 2008 total solar eclipse. Sci. China Ser G. 52, 1790-1793.
[20]	Steffl, A. J., et al. 2013. A search for Vulcanoids with the STEREO Heliospheric Imager. Icarus, 223, 48-56.
[21]	Strom, R. G. 2015. The inner solar system cratering record and the evolution of impactor populations. Res. Astron. Astrophys. 15, article id 407.
[22]	Volk, K., and Gladman, B. 2015. Consolidating and crushing exoplanets: did it happen here? Astrophs. J. Lett. 806, article id L26.
[23]	Warell, J., Karlsson, O., and Skoglov, E. 2003. Evolution of Mercury-like orbits: a numerical study. A & A. 411, 291-307.
[24]	Beech, M., and Peltier, L. 2015. Vulcanoid asteroids and sun-grazing comets – past encounters and possible outcomes. Am. J. Astron. Astrophys. 3 (2), 26-36.
[25]	Evans, N. W., and Tabachnik, S. A. 1999. Possible long-lived asteroid belts in the inner Solar System. Nature, 399, 41-43.
[26]	Evans, N. W., and Tabachnik, S. A. 2002. Structure of Possible Long-lived Asteroid Belts. MNRAS. 333, L1-L5.
[27]	Wieczorek, M. A., et al. 2011. Mercury’s spin-orbit resonance explained by initial retrograde and subsequent synchronous rotation. Nature Geoscience, 5, 18-21.
[28]	Buie, M. W., Reitsema., and Linfield, R. P. 2016. Surveying the Inner Solar System with an Infrared Space Telescope. Arxiv: 1607.05255.
[29]	Stern, S. A., and Durda, D. D. 2000. Collisional evolution in the Vulcanoid region: implications for present-day population constraints. Icarus, 143, 360-370.
[30]	Vokrouhlicky, D., Farinella, P., and Bottke, W. F. 2000. The depletion of the putative Vulcanoid population via the Yarkovsky effect. Icarus, 148, 147-152.
[31]	Beech, M., and Peltier, L. 2015. Lifetime against sublimation and an initial mass estimate for the exoplanet  Cen Bb. Am. J. Astron. Astrophys. 3 (4), 70-76.
[32]	Townsend, R. 2015. http://www.astro.wisc.edu/~townsend/static.php?ref=ez-web.
[33]	Wyatt, S. P., and Whipple, F. L. 1950. The Poynting-Robertson effect on meteor streams. Astron. J. 111, 134-141.
[34]	Burns, J. A., Lamy, P. I., and Soter, S. 1979. Radiation forces on small particles in the solar system. Icarus, 40, 1-48.
[35]	Bottke, W., Vokrouhlicky, D., Rubicam, D. P., and Nesvorny, D. 2006. The Yarkovsky and YORP effects: implications for asteroid Dynamics. Ann. Rev. Earth Planet Sci., 34, 157-191.
[36]	Vokrouhlicky, D. 1998. Diurnal Yarkovsky effect as a source of mobility of meter-sized asteroidal fragments. MNRAS. 335, 1093-1100.
[37]	Farinella, P., Vokrouhlicky, D., and Hartmann. 1998. Meteorite delivery via Yarkovsky orbital drift. Icarus, 132, 378-387.
[38]	Beech, M., and Brown, P. 2000. Fireball flickering – the case for indirect measurement of meteoroid rotation rates. Plan. Space Sci. 48, 925-932.
[39]	Samarasinha, N. H. 2008. Rotational excitation and damping as probes of interior structures of asteroids and comets. Meteoritics and Plan. Sci. 43, 1063-1073.
[40]	Jewitt. D. C. 2004. From cradle to grave: the rise and demise of comets. In Comets II (Eds. M. C. Festou; H Uwe Keller; H. A. Weaver). University of Arizona Press, Tucson. pp. 659-676.
[41]	Granvik, M., et al., 2016. Super-catastrophic disruption of asteroids at small perihelion distances. Nature, 530, 303-306.
[42]	Rubincam, D. P. 2000. Radiative spin-up and spin-down of small asteroids. Icarus, 148, 2-11.
[43]	Wang, H., el al., 2017. Lifetime of the solar nebula constrained by meteorite paleomagnetism. Science, 355, 623-627.
[44]	Sonnett, C. P., Colburn, D. S., and Schwarte, K. 1968. Electrical heating of massive parent bodies and planets by dynamo induction from pre-main sequence T Tauri solar wind. Nature, 219, 924-926.
[45]	Herbert, F. 1989. Primordial electrical induction heating of asteroids. Icarus, 78, 402-410.
[46]	Menzel, R., and Roberge, W. G. 2013. Reexamination of induction heating of primitive bodies in protoplanetary disks. Ap. J. 776, article id. 89.
[47]	Delbo, M., et al. 2014. Thermal fatigue as the origin of regolith on small asteroids. Nature, 508, 233-236.
[48]	Syal, M. B., Rovny, J., Owen, J. M., & Miller, P. L. 2017. Excavating Stickney Crater at Phobos. 2016. Geophysical Research Letters, 43, 10,595-10,601.
[49]	Granvik M., et al. 2016. Super-catastrophic disruption of asteroids at small perihelion distances. Nature, 530, 303 – 306.
[50]	Swift, L. 1878. Discovery of Vulcan. Nature, 18, 539.
[51]	Eggen, O. J. 1953. Vulcan. Astron. Soc. Pacific Leaflets, 6, No. 287.
[52]	Frontenrose, R. 1973. In search of Vulcan. Jour. Hist. Astron. 4, 145-158.
[53]	Merline, W. J. et al. 2016. Search for Vulcanoids and Mercury satellites from MESSENGER. 47^th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, 2765. pdf.
[54]	Stern, S. A., Durda, D. D., Davis, M., and Olkin, C. B. 2010. Planetary Science from a Next-Gen Suborbital Platform: sleuthing the long sought after Vulcanoid asteroids. Next-Generation Suborbital Researchers Conference, Boulder. 4004. pdf.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Martin Beech, Lowell Peltier. (2017). The Vulcanoid Asteroids: Past, Present and Future. American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 5(3), 28-41. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaa.20170503.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Martin Beech; Lowell Peltier. The Vulcanoid Asteroids: Past, Present and Future. Am. J. Astron. Astrophys. 2017, 5(3), 28-41. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaa.20170503.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Martin Beech, Lowell Peltier. The Vulcanoid Asteroids: Past, Present and Future. Am J Astron Astrophys. 2017;5(3):28-41. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaa.20170503.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajaa.20170503.12,
  author = {Martin Beech and Lowell Peltier},
  title = {The Vulcanoid Asteroids: Past, Present and Future},
  journal = {American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics},
  volume = {5},
  number = {3},
  pages = {28-41},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajaa.20170503.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaa.20170503.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajaa.20170503.12},
  abstract = {A review and discussion of both the historical and contemporaneous ideas pertaining to the putative population of Vulcanoid asteroids is presented. Current observations indicate that no objects larger than between 5 to 10 km in diameter reside in the orbital stability zone between 0.06 and 0.2 AU from the Sun, and that, at best, only a small population of Vulcanoid asteroids might exist at the present epoch. We review the physical processes (sublimation mass loss, evolution of the Sun’s luminosity, Poynting-Robertson drag, the Yarkovsky effect, the YORP effect, unipolar heating and collisions) that will control the lifetime against destruction of objects, either primordial or present-day, that chance to reside in the Vulcanoid region. It is argued that there are no overriding and/or absolute physical mechanisms that fully rule-out the present-day existence of a small Vulcanoid population, but we note that the gap between what the observations allow and what the theoretical models deem possible is closing rapidly.},
 year = {2017}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - The Vulcanoid Asteroids: Past, Present and Future
AU  - Martin Beech
AU  - Lowell Peltier
Y1  - 2017/08/25
PY  - 2017
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaa.20170503.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajaa.20170503.12
T2  - American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics
JF  - American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics
JO  - American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics
SP  - 28
EP  - 41
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2376-4686
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaa.20170503.12
AB  - A review and discussion of both the historical and contemporaneous ideas pertaining to the putative population of Vulcanoid asteroids is presented. Current observations indicate that no objects larger than between 5 to 10 km in diameter reside in the orbital stability zone between 0.06 and 0.2 AU from the Sun, and that, at best, only a small population of Vulcanoid asteroids might exist at the present epoch. We review the physical processes (sublimation mass loss, evolution of the Sun’s luminosity, Poynting-Robertson drag, the Yarkovsky effect, the YORP effect, unipolar heating and collisions) that will control the lifetime against destruction of objects, either primordial or present-day, that chance to reside in the Vulcanoid region. It is argued that there are no overriding and/or absolute physical mechanisms that fully rule-out the present-day existence of a small Vulcanoid population, but we note that the gap between what the observations allow and what the theoretical models deem possible is closing rapidly.
VL  - 5
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Martin Beech

Campion College, The University of Regina, Regina, Canada; Department of Physics, The University of Regina, Regina, Canada
Lowell Peltier

Department of Physics, The University of Regina, Regina, Canada

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Martin Beech, Lowell Peltier. (2017). The Vulcanoid Asteroids: Past, Present and Future. American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 5(3), 28-41. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaa.20170503.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Martin Beech; Lowell Peltier. The Vulcanoid Asteroids: Past, Present and Future. Am. J. Astron. Astrophys. 2017, 5(3), 28-41. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaa.20170503.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Martin Beech, Lowell Peltier. The Vulcanoid Asteroids: Past, Present and Future. Am J Astron Astrophys. 2017;5(3):28-41. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaa.20170503.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajaa.20170503.12,
  author = {Martin Beech and Lowell Peltier},
  title = {The Vulcanoid Asteroids: Past, Present and Future},
  journal = {American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics},
  volume = {5},
  number = {3},
  pages = {28-41},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajaa.20170503.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaa.20170503.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajaa.20170503.12},
  abstract = {A review and discussion of both the historical and contemporaneous ideas pertaining to the putative population of Vulcanoid asteroids is presented. Current observations indicate that no objects larger than between 5 to 10 km in diameter reside in the orbital stability zone between 0.06 and 0.2 AU from the Sun, and that, at best, only a small population of Vulcanoid asteroids might exist at the present epoch. We review the physical processes (sublimation mass loss, evolution of the Sun’s luminosity, Poynting-Robertson drag, the Yarkovsky effect, the YORP effect, unipolar heating and collisions) that will control the lifetime against destruction of objects, either primordial or present-day, that chance to reside in the Vulcanoid region. It is argued that there are no overriding and/or absolute physical mechanisms that fully rule-out the present-day existence of a small Vulcanoid population, but we note that the gap between what the observations allow and what the theoretical models deem possible is closing rapidly.},
 year = {2017}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - The Vulcanoid Asteroids: Past, Present and Future
AU  - Martin Beech
AU  - Lowell Peltier
Y1  - 2017/08/25
PY  - 2017
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaa.20170503.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajaa.20170503.12
T2  - American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics
JF  - American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics
JO  - American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics
SP  - 28
EP  - 41
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2376-4686
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaa.20170503.12
AB  - A review and discussion of both the historical and contemporaneous ideas pertaining to the putative population of Vulcanoid asteroids is presented. Current observations indicate that no objects larger than between 5 to 10 km in diameter reside in the orbital stability zone between 0.06 and 0.2 AU from the Sun, and that, at best, only a small population of Vulcanoid asteroids might exist at the present epoch. We review the physical processes (sublimation mass loss, evolution of the Sun’s luminosity, Poynting-Robertson drag, the Yarkovsky effect, the YORP effect, unipolar heating and collisions) that will control the lifetime against destruction of objects, either primordial or present-day, that chance to reside in the Vulcanoid region. It is argued that there are no overriding and/or absolute physical mechanisms that fully rule-out the present-day existence of a small Vulcanoid population, but we note that the gap between what the observations allow and what the theoretical models deem possible is closing rapidly.
VL  - 5
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download