Dynamical Essence of the Basic Relations of the Special Theory of Relativity and the Origin of Fundamental Interactions: Phenomenology
International Journal of Astrophysics and Space Science
Volume 2, Issue 2, April 2014, Pages: 22-32
Received: May 30, 2014; Accepted: Jun. 20, 2014; Published: Jun. 30, 2014
Views 2387      Downloads 56
Author
Timashev Serge, National Research Nuclear University MEPhI, Moscow, Russia; Karpov Institute of Physical Chemistry, Moscow, Russia
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
It is shown that the adoption of the hypothesis that the electromagnetic component of physical vacuum, the vacuum of quantum electrodynamics (QED vacuum), undergoes polarization in the vicinity of elementary particles allows us to comprehend, on the phenomenological level, the physical essence of the basic hypotheses of the special theory of relativity, including the nature of the limitation of the velocity of material objects to the velocity of light in vacuum. The QED vacuum here plays the part of the base medium that governs the development of the fundamental strong and gravitational interactions.
Keywords
Phenomenology, Electromagnetic Component of Physical Vacuum, Special Theory of Relativity, Strong and Gravitational Interactions
To cite this article
Timashev Serge, Dynamical Essence of the Basic Relations of the Special Theory of Relativity and the Origin of Fundamental Interactions: Phenomenology, International Journal of Astrophysics and Space Science. Vol. 2, No. 2, 2014, pp. 22-32. doi: 10.11648/j.ijass.20140202.12
References
[1]
L.D. Landau, and E.M. Lifshitz, The Classic Theory of Fields (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 4th Ed., 1975).
[2]
Einstein A., Podolsky B., Rosen N. Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? // Phys. Rev. 1935. V. 47. P. 777-780.
[3]
Bell J.S. On the Eins-tein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox // Physics. 1964. V. 1. P. 195-200.
[4]
B. B. Kadomtsev, Dynamics and in-formation (Editorial office “Physics – Uspekhi”, Moscow, 1997).
[5]
Gröblacher S., et al An experimental test of non-local realism // Nature. 2007. V. 446. P. 871-875.
[6]
Aspect A. To be or not to be local // Nature. 2007. V. 446. P. 866-867.
[7]
Salart D., et al Testing the speed of “spooky action at a distance”. Na-ture. 2008. V. 454. P. 861-864.
[8]
Weizsäcker C.F. von. Time – Empirical Mathematics – Quantum Theory // Time, Temporality, Now. Experiencing Time and Concept of Time in an Interdisciplinary Perspective / Editors: Harald Atmanspacher, Eva Ruhnau. – Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1997. P.91-104.
[9]
Sil-verman A. Resolution of a cosmological paradox using concepts from general relativity theory// Amer. J. Phys. 1986. V. 54. N 12. P. 1092-1096.
[10]
Davis T.M., Lineweaver C.H., Webb J.K. Solutions to the tethered galaxy problem in an expanding universe and the ob-servation of receding blueshifted object // Amer. J. Phys. 2003. V. 71. N 4. P. 358-364.
[11]
Rubakov V.A. Hie-rarchies of fundamental constants (to items Nos 16, 17, and 27 from Ginzburg’s list) // Physics – Uspekhi. Advances in Physical Sci. 2007. V. 50. N 4. P. 390–396.
[12]
Sahni V. Dark matter and dark energy // Lect. Notes Phys. 2004. V. 653. P. 141-180; ar-xiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0403324v3.
[13]
Chernin A.D. Dark energy and universal antigravitation // Physics – Us-pekhi. Advances in Physical Sci. 2008. V. 51. N 3. P. 253–282.
[14]
Padmanabhan T. Darker side of the Universe. 29 International Cosmic Ray Conf. Pune. 2005. V. 10. P. 47-62.
[15]
Timashev S.F. Physical vaccum as a system manifesting itself on various scales – from nuclear physics to cosmology: http://arxiv.org/abs/1107.1799v7.
[16]
G.W. Erickson. Improved Lamb-shift calculation for all values of Z // Phys. Rev. Lett. 1971. V. 27. P. 780-783.
[17]
Klim-chitskaya G.L., Mohideen U., Mostepanenko V.M. The Casimir force between real materials: experiment and theory // Rev Mod. Phys. 2009. V. 81. P. 1827-1885.
[18]
Mostepanenko V.M., Trunov N.N. The Casimir effect and its applications // Physics – Uspekhi. Advances in Physical Sciences. 1988. V. 31. N 3. P. 965–987.
[19]
C. Beck, M.C. Mackey. Zeropoint fluctuations and dark energy in Josephson junctions // Fluctuation and Noise Letters. 2007. V. 7. No. 2. P. C27-C35.
[20]
Burlankov D.E. Time, space, gravity. Moscow-Izhevsk: NIC “Regular and Chaotic Dynamics”. 2006. 420 p. (in Russian).
[21]
Timashev S.F. On the microscopic origin of the Second Law // Quantum Limits to the Second Law. First International Conference on Quantum Limits to the Second Law. AIP Conference Proceedings: V. 643 / Editor Daniel P. Sheehan. – Melville, New York: Amer. Inst. Phys., 2002. – P. 367-372.
[22]
Okun’ L.B. The Einstein formula: E0 = mc2. Is not the Lord laughing? // Physics – Uspekhi. Ad-vances in Physical Sciences. 2008. V. 51. N 5. P. 513–527.
[23]
Feynman R.P., Leighton R.B., Sands M. The Feynman Lectures on Physics. Vol. 1: Mechanics. Heat. Radiation. Chap. 15, § 9. Addison Wesley Reading Mass. 1966.
[24]
Thomson J.J. On relation between matter and ether in accordance with the novel re-searches in the electricity. The speech given on the 4th of November 1907 at Manchester University. In: Ether and matter. Moscow: URSS. 2004. P. 71-92. (in Rus-sian).
[25]
Ovchinnikov A.A., Timashev S.F., and Belyy A. A. Kinetics of Diffusion Controlled Chemical Processes (Nova Science Publishers, New York, 1989), 239 pp.
[26]
Timashev S.F., Polyakov Yu.S., Misurkin P.I., Lakeev S.G. Anomalous diffusion as a stochastic component in the dynamics of complex processes // Physical Rev. E. 2010. V. 81. No 4. P. 041128-1-17; http://arxiv.org/abs/1004.0235
[27]
Brooks D.W.C., Botter T, Schreppler S. Non-clqssic light generated by quantum-noise-driven cavity optomechanics // Nature. 2012. V.488. P. 476-480.
[28]
Dalvit D.A.R., Neto P.A.M., Mazzitelli F.D. Fluctuations, dissipation and the dynamical Casimir effect. http://arxiv.org/abs/1006.4790v2.
[29]
Wilson C.M., Johansson G., Pourkabirian A., Johansson J.R., Duty T., Nori F., Delsing P. Observation of the Dynamical Casimir Effect in a Superconducting Circuit. http://arxiv.org/pdf/1105.4714v1
[30]
Pauli W. Theory of relativity. Translated by G. Field. New York: Pergamon Press Inc., 1959. 241 pp
[31]
Higgs P.W. Broken symmetries, massless particlees and gauge fields // Phys. Lett. 1964. V. 12. P. 132-133.
[32]
The CMS Collaboration. Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC. http:// 1207.7235v2 [hep-ex].
[33]
The ATLAS Collaboration. Observation of a New Particle in the Search for the Standard Model Higgs Boson with the ATLAS Detector at the LHC. http:// 1207.7214v2 [hep-ex]
[34]
Ginzburg V.L. Radiation by uniformly moving sources (Vavi-lov-Cherenkov effect, transition radiation, and other phe-nomena) // Physics – Uspekhi. Advances in Physical Sciences. 1996. V. 39. N 10. P. 973–982.
[35]
Bolo-tovskii B.M. Vavilov-Cherenkov radiation: its discovery and application // Physics – Uspekhi. Advances in Physical Sciences. 2009. V. 52. N 11. P. 1099–1110.
[36]
Bailey J., Borer K., Combley F., et al. Measurements of relativistic time dilatation for positive and negative muons in circular orbit // Nature. 1977. V. 268. P. 301-305.
[37]
Boyer T.H. Quantum electromagnetic zero-point energy of a conducting spherical shell and the Casimir model for a charged particle // Phys, Rev. 1968. V. 174. P. 1764-1776.
[38]
Feynman R.P., Leighton R.B., Sands M. The Feynman Lectures on Physics. Vol. 2: Electromagnetism and Matter. Chap. 28, § 4. Addison Wesley. Reading Mass. 1966.
[39]
Milton K.A., DeRaad L.L., Jr, Schwinger J. Casimir self-stress on a perfectly conducting spherical shell // Annals of Physics. 1978. V. 115. P. 388-403.
[40]
Ohanian H.C. What is spin? // American Journal of Physics. 1986. V. 54. N 6. P. 500-505.
[41]
Migdal A.B. Quadrupole and dipole γ-radiation of nuclei // JETP. 1945. V. 15. P. 81-88 (in Russian).
[42]
Ferentz M., Gell-Mann M., Pines D. The giant nuclear dipole resonance // Phys. Rev. 1953. V. 92. P. 836-837.
[43]
Ishkhanov B.S., Yudin N.P., Eramzhyan R.A. Giant Resonances in Atomic Nuclei // Physics of Elementary Particles and Atomic Nuclei. 2000. V. 31. N. 2. P. 313-349.
[44]
Landau L.D., Lifshitz E.M. Quantum Mechanics: Non-Relativistic Theory. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1977.
[45]
Bettini A. Introduction to elementary particle Physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2008, 431 p.
[46]
Dubovikov M.S., Simonov Yu.A. Decay of resonant states and determination of their quantum numbers // Physics – Uspekhi. Advances in Phys. Sci. 1971. V. 13. N 4. P. 522-543.
[47]
Lanczos C. The Variational Principles of Mechanics. Toronto: Univ. Toronto Press, 1964.
[48]
Dirac P.A.M. Principles of Quantum Mechanics. Oxford University Press. 1982. 4th Edition. 314 p.
[49]
Timashev S.F. Planckian energy-mass source and the Universe dynamics: phenomenology // Paper 2.
[50]
Weinberg S. Cosmology. Oxford: Univ. Press. 2008, 593 p.
[51]
Ioffe B.L. The origin of mass and experiments on high-energy particle accelerators // Physics – Uspekhi. Advances in Phys. Sci. 2006. V. 49. N 10. P. 1077-1078.
[52]
Okun' L.B. Physics of elementary particles. Moscow: Nauka. 1984, 224 p. (in Russian)
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
548 FASHION AVENUE
NEW YORK, NY 10018
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-688-8931