Coupling the Permeability and Permittivity of Space to the Electron Orbital Time: Potential Phase Shift Between Entanglement Latency and the Universe’s Final Epoch
International Journal of Astrophysics and Space Science
Volume 5, Issue 1, February 2017, Pages: 1-5
Received: Nov. 30, 2016;
Accepted: Dec. 10, 2016;
Published: Feb. 13, 2017
Views 1882 Downloads 56
Michael Persinger, Biophysics Laboratory, Biomolecular Sciences Program, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Canada
Trevor Carniello, Biophysics Laboratory, Biomolecular Sciences Program, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Canada
The strength of the magnetic field for different ratios of matter densities relative to the permittivity of a vacuum solves for values approaching the velocity of light. When the strength of the field associated with densities similar to liquid water, ice, or stars (such as the Sun) is considered with respect to the magnetic permeability and average mass density of the universe, the emergent velocity is ~1023 m•s-1. This value has been derived from several approaches as the latency for excess correlation or “entanglement” and is consistent with a process that might explain the integrity of large-scale spatial structure over distances that are within fractions of the universe’s present diameter. The estimated latency to traverse this diameter with this velocity relative to the total duration of the universe (the final epoch) when considered as an Aharanov-Bohm type phase shift, results in an energy quantum that is convergent with Planck’s constant. One interpretation is that the duration of a single electron’s orbit is the phase shift between duration (latency) to traverse the universe and its total duration (final epoch). If this approach is valid then non-local effects and related excess correlations (Schrödinger’s “entanglement”) between photon emissions and specific dynamics of densities similar to liquid water may be a property of these conditions immersed within an average universal mass density of about one proton per cubic meter. It may also accommodate the challenges of understanding the apparent homogeneity across large scale space.
Coupling the Permeability and Permittivity of Space to the Electron Orbital Time: Potential Phase Shift Between Entanglement Latency and the Universe’s Final Epoch, International Journal of Astrophysics and Space Science.
Vol. 5, No. 1,
2017, pp. 1-5.
Y. Hoffman, O. Lahav, G. Yepes, Y. Dover, “The future of the local large scale structure: the roles of dark matter and dark energy,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, doi: 10.1088/1475-7416/10/16, 2007.
M. A. Persinger, “Convergent calculations that dark solutions are reflective of mass-energy yet to occur,” International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics. Vol. 2, pp. 12-128, 2012.
D. Hutsemekers, L. Braibant, V. Pelgrims, D. Sluse, “Alignment of quasar polarizations with large-scale structures,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, no.572, A18, 2014.
D. Ryu, H. Kang and P. L. Biermann, “Cosmic magnetic fields in larges cale filaments and sheets,” Astronomy and Astrophysics, Vol. 335, pp. 19-25, 1998.
M. A. Persinger, “Discrepancies between predicted and observed intergalactic magnetic field strengths from the universe’s total energy: it is contained within submatter spatial geometry? International Letters of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy, Vol. 11, pp. 18-23, 2014.
E. Fischbach, H. Kloor, R. A. Langel, A. T. Lui, M. Peredo, “New geomagnetic limits on the photon mass and on long range forces co-existing with electromagnetism”, Physics Review Letters, Vol. 73, pp. 514-517, 1994.
L. Davis, A. S. Goldharber, M. Nieto, “Jovian magnetic fields,” Physics Reviews Letters, Vol. 35, pp. 1402-1405, 1975.
L.-C. Tu, J. Luo, G. T. Gilles, “Limit on the photon mass deduced from Pioneer-10 observations of Jupiter’s magnetic field,” Reports on Progress in Physics, Vol. 68, pp. 77-130, 2005.
W. C. McCLewis, A System of Physical Chemistry, Logmans, Green and Co. Bombay, 1921, pp. 115-117.
T. E. DeCoursey, “Voltage-gated proton channels and other proton transfer pathways,” Physiology Reviews, Vol. 83(2), pp. 475-579, 2003.
M. A. Persinger, “Quantitative convergence between physical-chemical constants of the proton and the properties of water: implications for sequestered magnetic field and a universal quantity,” International Letters of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy, Vol. 2, pp. 1-10, 2014.
M. A. Persinger, S. A. Koren, “The product of the calculated impedance and capacitance of the universe solves for Planck’s time and 8π,” Journal of Advances in Physics, Vol. 11, pp. 2347-3487, 2016.
M. A. Persinger, S. A. Koren, “Dimensional analyses of geometric products and boundary conditions of the universe: implications for a quantitative value for the latency to display entanglement,” The Open Astronomy Journal, Vol. 6, pp. 1-10-13, 2013.
B. M. Vladmirsky, A. V. Bruns, “Influence of the sector structure of the interplanetary magnetic field on the results of measurements of the gravitational constant,” Biophysics, Vol. 43, pp. 720-725, 1998.
T. Quinn, H. Parks, C. Speake, R. Davis, “Improved determination of G using two method,” Physics Letters, 111, 101102, 2013.
M. A. Persinger, L. S. St-Pierre, “Is there a geomagnetic component involved with the determination of G?” International Journal of Geosciences, Vol. 5, pp. 450-452, 2014.
B. T. Dotta, M. A. Persinger, “’Doubling’” of local photon emissions when two simultaneous spatially separated, chemiluminescent reactions share the same magnetic field configurations,” Journal of Biophysical Chemistry, Vol. 3, pp. 72-80, 2012.
B. T. Dotta, N. J. Murugan, L. M. Karbowski, M. A. Persinger, “Excessive correlated shifts in pH with distal solutions sharing phase-uncoupled angular accelerating magnetic fields: macro-entanglement and information transfer,” International Journal of Physical Sciences, Vol. 8, pp. 1783-1787, 2013.
M. A. Persinger, S. A. Koren, “Potential role of the entanglement velocity of 1023 m•s-1 to accommodate recent measurements of large scale structures of the universe. International Letters of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy, Vol. 3, pp. 106-112, 2015.
T. Oka, “Water on the Sun: molecules everywhere. Science, Vol. 277, pp. 328-329, 1997.
N. V. Klocheck, L. E. Palamarchuk, M. V. Nikonova, “Preliminary results of investigations into the effect of cosmophysical radiation of a non-electromagnetic nature on physical and biological systems,” Biophysics, Vol. 40, pp. 883-891, 1995.
G. Piccardi, The Chemical Bases of Medical Climatology, C. C. Thomas, Ill., 1967.
M. Takata. Uber eine neue biologisch wirksame Komponente der Sonnenstrahlug. Archives fur Meteorologie, Geophysik und Bioklimatologie, Vol. 2, 486-508, 1951.
T. A. Moraes, P. W. Barlow, E. Kingele, C M. Gallep, Spontaneous ultra-weak light emissions from wheat seedlings are rhythmic and synchronized with the time profile of the local gravimetric tide. Naturwissenschafen, Vol. 99, 465-472, 2012.
L. Y. Berzhanskaya, B. V. Berzhanskii, O. Y. Beloptovota, T. G. Pil’nnikova, T. N. Metlyayev. Bacterial bioluminescent activity as a pointer to geomagnetic disturbances. Biophysics, Vol. 40, 761-764, 1995.
A. Tonomura, N. Osakabe, T. Matsuda, T, Kawaski, J. Endo, “Evidence of Aharanov-Bohm effect with magnetic field completely shielded from electron wave,” Physics Review Letters, Vol. 56, pp. 792-795, 1986.
M. B. Bell, “Mach’s principle of inertia is supported by recent astronomical evidence,” International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Vol. 5, pp. 166-172, 2015.