Information Loss Paradox Resolved by Nonsingular Hyperbolic Spacetime
International Journal of Astrophysics and Space Science
Volume 2, Issue 5, October 2014, Pages: 71-80
Received: Oct. 23, 2014; Accepted: Nov. 6, 2014; Published: Nov. 20, 2014
Views 5519      Downloads 173
Salah A. Mabkhout, Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Education, Dhamar University, Dhamar, Republic of Yemen
Article Tools
Follow on us
Black holes owe their existence to the presence of singularity. Singularity appears theoretically as a result to the Schwarzschild solution in asymptotically flat spacetime. Such an approximated Schwarzschild solution creates singularity (when r = 0). This false paradigm constitutes our observation. The observer is operating within a "paradigm". Observations being made are not complete in themselves, they interpreted within a theory (a paradigm). Schwarzschild solution singularity paradigm works as a lunette, through which we imagine that we could observe Black holes. Black holes have never been seen directly, their existence is just a matter of illusion. We did prove that the spacetime of the actual Universe is hyperbolic [S. A. Mabkhout, Phys. Essays 25, 112. 2012)]. Neither Schwarzschild metric nor Kerr metric possess singularity in the hyperbolic spacetime [S. A. Mabkhout, Phys. Essays 26, 422. 2013)] . Singularity is the main character of the Black hole. If, in principle, singularity theoretically doesn't exist, Black holes also don`t exist. There is no singularity to crush and destruct the infalling information. In the actually hyperbolic spacetime infalling particles (information) have just come to rest at the origin (r = 0). Hence Information Loss Paradox does no longer exist.
Information Loss Paradox, Black Hole, Nonsingularity, Hyperbolic Spacetime
To cite this article
Salah A. Mabkhout, Information Loss Paradox Resolved by Nonsingular Hyperbolic Spacetime, International Journal of Astrophysics and Space Science. Vol. 2, No. 5, 2014, pp. 71-80. doi: 10.11648/j.ijass.20140205.11
Matt Strassler, Of Particular Significance Conversations About Science
S. W. Hawking, Particle Creation by Black Holes,commun. math. phys.43, 199-220 Springer- Verlag (1975) .
S. W. Hawking, Breakdown of predictability in gravitational collapsePhys. Rev. D 14, 2460 – Published 15 November 1976.
Peter Bokulich-Boston University.
Warren G. Anderson 1996.
Leonard Susskind, L´arus Thorlacius, and John Uglum, The Stretched Horizon and Black Hole Complementarity arXiv:hep-th/9306069v2 28 Jun 1993
C. R. Stephens , G. ’t Hooft and B. F. Whiting, BLACK HOLE EVAPORATION WITHOUT INFORMATION LOSS. arXiv:gr-qc/9310006v1 4 Oct 1993
Ahmed Almheiri, Donald Marolf, Joseph Polchinski, and James Sully, Black Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls? arXiv:1207.3123v4 [hep-th] 13 Apr 2013.
Nature 496, 20–23 (04 April 2013) doi:10.1038/496020a, Notion of an 'event horizon', from which nothing can escape, is incompatible with quantum theory, physicist claims.
Stephen Hawking, 'There are no black holes' : arXiv:1401.5761v1 [hep-th] 22 Jan 2014
Nature doi:10.1038/nature.2014.14583
REBECCA JACOBSON , What Hawking meant when he said ‘there are no black holes’
S. Hossenfelder and L. Smolin, ,Restoring unitary evolution relies on elimination of singularities. (arXiv:0901.3156)
Laura Mersini-Houghton, Black holes do not exist! Backreaction of Hawking Radiation on a Gravitationally Collapsing Star I Black Holes? arXiv:1406.1525v1 [hep-th] 5 Jun 2014.
Salah. A. Mabkhout (2012), The hyperbolic geometry of the universe and the wedding of general relativity theory to quantum theory. Physics Essays: March 2012, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 112-118.
Salah. A. Mabkhout (2013) The Big Bang hyperbolic universe neither needs inflation nor dark matter and dark energy. Physics Essays: September 2013, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 422-429.
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
Tel: (001)347-983-5186