Indigenous Administration and Dispute Resolution System of the “Abo Gereb” and Its Essence of Democracy from the Modern Philosophical Perception
Journal of Political Science and International Relations
Volume 3, Issue 2, June 2020, Pages: 36-43
Received: May 28, 2020;
Accepted: Jun. 15, 2020;
Published: Jul. 4, 2020
Views 359 Downloads 60
Bisrat Tesfay, Department of Civics & Ethical Education, Wolaita Sodo Universit
Follow on us
This paper was targeted to emphasize and promote the traditional political and social perspectives of the abo-gereb. Abo-gereb is an indigenous administrative system and conflict resolution mechanism in Enderta, Wejereat Raya and the low land (Afar). The paper aimed to discuss the central activities and core problems of the abo-gereb, the role of the paper was to scrutinize the role of the traditional democratic system of, “Abo-gereb” to the current politics of Tigray and Ethiopia and attempts to identify the factors that weakens the indigenous traditional democratic system of the Enderta province “Abo-gereb” and put direction about its revival. In the end, the paper emphasizes the entity of the traditional administration of Abo-gereb and its articulation with the modern political thought of Hobbes and Locke. This paper also investigates the political failure of the administrative system of the Abo gereb; the peasants or Abo gerebs didn’t have scientific program that enable them successful in defeating the colonial and imperial government. Finally, it exemplifies the political system of abo-gereb deserve the entity of traditional democracy and the role of this traditional administrative system to the contemporary democracy of the politics of Tigray, and Ethiopia and it explores several mechanisms to salvage the system of Abo gereb.
Enderta Province, Abo-gereb, Indigenous, Democracy, Conflict Resolution, Administration
To cite this article
Indigenous Administration and Dispute Resolution System of the “Abo Gereb” and Its Essence of Democracy from the Modern Philosophical Perception, Journal of Political Science and International Relations.
Vol. 3, No. 2,
2020, pp. 36-43.
Copyright © 2020 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Salt, H. (1814). A Voyage to Abyssinia. London.
Young, J. (1997). Peasant revolution in Ethiopia. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sarah Vaughan (2003) Ethnicity and Power in Ethiopia, PhD Thesis, University of Edinburgh.
Coser, L. A. (1968). “Conflict, Social Aspect” In international Encyclopedia of the Social Science. V. 3. Macmilian: Macmilian Company and Free press.
Kinfe S (2014). Dispute Resolution Mechanisms among the Afar People of Ethiopia and Their Contribution to the Development Process. J. Transdisciplinary Res. Southern Afr. 10 (3): 152-64.
Gowok, S. M. (2008). Alternative dispute resolution in Ethiopia - a legal framework. African Research Review, 2 (2), 265-285. Endalew, L. (2014). Ethiopian customary dispute resolution mechanisms: forms of restorative justice? African Journal of Conflict Resolution, 14 (1), 125-154.
Zeleke, Meron 2010. Ye Shakoch Chilot (the court of the sheiks): A traditional institution of conflict resolution in Oromiya zone of Amhara regional state, Ethiopia. African Journal on Conflict Resolution, 10 (1), pp. 63–84.
Kebede, Yidnekachew (Legal Researcher and Customary Law Research Team Leader in JLSRI [Justice and Legal System Research (Ethiopia)]) 2012. Interview with the author on 13 September 2012. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. (Field notes in possession of the author.).
Harrison, R. (2003). Hobbes, Locke, and Confusion’s Masterpiece: An Examination of Seventeenth-Century. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Marcus, H. G. (1994). A History of Ethiopia. London, England: University of California Press, Ltd.
Hansen, M. H. (2005). The Tradition of Ancient Greek Democracy and its Imporatnce for modern Democracy. Copenhagen: The Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters.
Assefa, Getachew and Alula Pankhurst 2008. Facing the challenges of customary dispute resolution: Conclusions and recommendations. In: Pankhurst and Assefa eds.
Stout, J. (2004). Democracy and Tradition. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 41 William Street.