International Journal of Law and Society
Volume 3, Issue 4, December 2020, Pages: 204-208
Received: Aug. 13, 2020;
Accepted: Nov. 24, 2020;
Published: Dec. 11, 2020
Views 87 Downloads 35
Donald Lee Buresh, Cybersecurity Assurance and Policy Department, Morgan State University, Baltimore, Maryland
The purpose of this paper is to examine the penalties proposed in the Model Penal Code when a police officer engages in sexual conduct while on duty. At issue is whether the Model Penal Code should explicitly make it an enhanced penalty or offense when a law enforcement officer engages in sexual conduct while on duty with any individual, including a child, or is involved in sexual violence of any kind, whether on or off duty. The paper discusses the procedural due process issue, substantive due process issues, and equal protection issues of including an enhanced penalty when a police officer engages in sexual conduct with an individual involved in sexual violence. The work also considers the moral authority of the Model Penal Code as well as public welfare matters when a police officer participates in such behavior. The article concludes by recommending that the Model Penal Code should specifically make it an enhanced penalty or offense when a law enforcement officer engages in sexual conduct while on duty with any individual, including a child, or is involved in sexual violence of any kind, whether on or off duty. The conclusion seems appropriate given that police officers hold the public trust when performing their duties.
Donald Lee Buresh,
The Model Penal Code and the Sexual Conduct of Police Officers While on Duty, International Journal of Law and Society.
Vol. 3, No. 4,
2020, pp. 204-208.
Paulsen, M. G., & Kadish, S. H. (1964, February). Criminal Law and Its Processes. Harvard Law Review, 77 (4), 5. doi: 10.2307/1339153.
Upcounsel Staff. (n.d.). The Model Penal Code (MPC). Upcounsel. https://www.upcounsel.com/lectl-model-penal-code-mpc-criminal-law-basics.
Model Penal Code § 213 (Official Draft and Explanatory Notes 1985).
National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. (2016, March 02). NACDL Comments on Model Penal Code: Sexual assault and related offenses Preliminary Draft No. 6 http://www.prosecutorintegrity.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/NACDL-Comments-Draft-6-MPC-Sexual-Assault.pdf.
American Law Institute. (n.d.). Model Penal Code: Sexual assault and related offenses. American Law Institute. https://www.ali.org/projects/show/sexual-assault-and-related-offenses/.
Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 332 (1976).
United States v. Sokolow, 490 U.S. 1, 7 (1989).
Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132, 162 (1925).
Frazier v. Cupp, 394 U.S. 731 (1969).
Garner, B. A. [ed.]. (2004). Black’s Law Dictionary (8th ed.). St. Paul, MN: West & Thompson Publishers.
American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois v. Alvarez, 679 F. 3d 583 (7th Cir. 2012).
United States v. Mendenhall, 446 U.S. 544 (1980).
Rogers v. City of Little Rock, Arkansas, 152 F. 3d 790 (8th Cir. 1988).
United States v. Caudill, 709 F. 3d 444 (5th Cir. 2013).
Sylvester v. Fogley, 465 F. 3d 851 (8th Cir. 2006).
Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968).
U.S. Const. amend. V and U.S. Const. amend. XIV § 1.
Shneebaum, S. M. (1998). Human rights in the United States: The role of lawyers. Washington and Lee Law Review. 55 (3). https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr/vol55/iss3/6.
Leckie, S., & Gallanger, A. (2006). Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: A Legal Resource Guide. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Massachusetts Bd. of Retirement v. Murgia, 427 U.S. 207 (1976).
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).
Kogan, S. M. (2004). Disclosing Unwanted Sexual Experiences: Results from a National Sample of Adolescent Women. Child Abuse & Neglect, 18 (2), 19. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2003.09.014.
Bolling v. Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497 (1954).
Snyder, B. R. (1990, July). Private motivation state action and the allocation of responsibility for Fourteenth Amendment violations. Cornell Law Review, 75 (5), 42. http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr/vol75/iss5/3.
J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B., 511 U.S. 127 (1994).
Bazemore v. Friday, 478 U.S. 385, 400 (1986).
U.S. Const. Art. VI, Cl. 2.
United States v. Virginia, 518 U.S. 515 (1996).
Robinson, P. H. (2008). Distributive principles of criminal law: Who should be punished how much? Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Andenas, M., & Fairgrieve, D. [eds.] (2000). Liber Amicorum in honor of Lord Slynn of Hadley: Judicial Review in International Perspective. The Hague, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.
White, T. H. (1938). The Sword in the Stone (book 1 of The Once and Future King). Cork, Ireland: Collins Press.
Eskridge Jr., W. N. (2008). Dishonorable passions: Sodomy laws in America. New York: Penguin Group.
Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003).
Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986).
Norwich University Online. (2020, October 26). Characteristics of successful public policy. Norwich University. https://online.norwich.edu/academic-programs/resources/characteristics-successful-public-policy.
Kilpatrick, D. (2000). Definitions of public policy and law. National Violence Against Women Prevention Research Center: Medical University of South Carolina. https://mainweb-v.musc.edu/vawprevention/policy/definition.shtml.
Ramphele, M. (n.d.). Social disintegration in the black community – Implications for transformation. Nelson Mandela Centre of Memory. https://www.nelsonmandela.org/omalley/index.php/site/q/03lv01538/04lv01584/05lv01585.htm.