International Journal of Animal Science and Technology
Volume 3, Issue 3, September 2019, Pages: 35-40
Received: Jun. 22, 2019;
Accepted: Aug. 6, 2019;
Published: Aug. 23, 2019
Views 216 Downloads 71
Kibebew Wakjira, Oromia Agricultural Research Institute Holeta Bee Research Center, Holeta, Ethiopia
Taye Negera, Oromia Agricultural Research Institute Holeta Bee Research Center, Holeta, Ethiopia
Shimu Dabela, Oromia Agricultural Research Institute Holeta Bee Research Center, Holeta, Ethiopia
Tadele Alemu, Oromia Agricultural Research Institute Holeta Bee Research Center, Holeta, Ethiopia
A study was conducted in view of analyzing the responses of central highland honeybees (Apis mellifera bandasii) to Karl Jenter and Doolittle grafting queen-rearing methods at Holeta for two consecutive active seasons. The result of the study revealed that there was significant difference (p<0.001) between the techniques in percentage of accepted larvae and sealed queen cells. The acceptance rates for Karl Jenter and Doolittle grafting queen rearing methods were 78.19 and 50.81%, respectively while the rates were 42.75 and 25.56% for sealing, respectively. However, the result of the study showed that the rate of hatching (out of the total given larvae) into virgin queen stage in Karl Jenter and Doolittle grafting systems were about 23 and 23.8%, indicating no significant difference between the two techniques. From this study it is recommended that using Karl Jenter kit is an excellent option to overcome the problem of indentifying appropriate larvae for grafting under field conditions. However, there might be a difference in quality of the queens obtained from these two methods. Therefore, also further study recommended to evaluate the performance of queens reared using the two techniques.
Comparing Responses of Local Honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) to Karl Jenter and Doolittle Grafting Queen Rearing Methods, International Journal of Animal Science and Technology.
Vol. 3, No. 3,
2019, pp. 35-40.
G. Ahmet and A. Hasan, “Reproductive Characteristics Of Turkish Honeybee (Apis Mellifera L.) Genotypes,” J. Anim. Vet. Adv., vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 864–870, 2005.
R. A. Morse, Rearing Queen Honey Bees: Second Edition 2nd ed. Edition. Retrieved from https://www.amazon.com/Rearing Queen Honey Bees- Roger A Morse/dp/ 1878075055. 1993.
E. Crane, Bees and beekeeping: science, practice and world resources. 1990.
H. H. Laidlaw and R. E. Page, Queen rearing and bee breeding. https://www.amazon.com/Queen-Rearing-Breeding-Harry-Laidlaw/dp/187807508X. 1997.
D. M. R. Serrano, “Queen rearing, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands.,” O Apic., vol. 5, no. 16, pp. 39–41, 1997.
R. Büchler et al., “Standard methods for rearing and selection of Apis mellifera queens,” J. Apic. Res., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 1–30, 2013.
N. Adgaba et al., “The responses of Apis mellifera jemenitica to different artificial queen rearing techniques,” Saudi J. Biol. Sci., pp. 4–9, 2018.
S. B. Ahmad and S. A. Dar, “Mass rearing of queen bees, apis mellifera l. (hym : apidae ) for bee colony development raised under the temperate conditions of kashmir,” vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 945–948, 2013.
K. Crailsheim et al., “Standard methods for artificial rearing of Apis mellifera larvae Standard methods for artificial rearing of Apis mellifera larvae,” vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2013.
S. W. Cobey, “Comparison studies of instrumentally inseminated and naturally mated honey bee queens and factors affecting their performance,” vol. 38, pp. 14524–14531, 2013.
E. BUESCU (LIPAN), M. R. GURĂU, and A. I. BÎRȚOIU, “Artificial Insemination on Apis Mellifera – Aspects of Artificial Inseminated Queen Performances and Factors That May Affect Their Performance,” pp. 21–24, 2015.
A. Nuru and W. Dereje, “Response of Ethiopian honeybees to different queen rearing techniques,” in Proceedings of 7th Annual Conference of Ethiopian Society of Animal Production, 26–27 May 1999, pp. 125– 133., 1999, pp. 125–133.
A. Zewudu, L. Gemechis, and A. Tadele, “The response of central highland honeybee, Apis mellifera bandasii to grafting and natural cell cup of queen rearing techniques,” in Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Ethiopian Society of Animal Production (ESAP) held in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, October 03 to 05, 2013.
B. Amssalu, A. Nuru, S. E. Radloff, and H. R. Hepburn, “Multivariate morphometric analysis of honeybees (Apis mellifera) in the Ethiopian region,” Apidologie, vol. 35, pp. 71–81, 2004.
N. K. Dhaliwal, J. Singh, and P. K. Chhuneja, “Comparative evaluation of Doolittle, Cupkit and Karl Jenter techniques for rearing Apis mellifera Linnaeus queen bees during breeding season,” J. Appl. Nat. Sci., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1658–1661, 2017.
A. Nuru and W. Dereje, “Response of Ethiopian honeybees to different queen rearing techniques, Holeta Bee Research Center, P. O. Box 22, Holeta,” 1999.
A. Dodologlu, B. Emsen, and F. Gene, “Comparison of some characteristics of queen honey bees (Apis mellifera l.) reared by using doolittle method and natural queen cells,” J. Appl. Anim. Res., vol. 26, pp. 113–115, 2004.
M. Cengiz, B. Emsen, and A. Dodologlu, “Some characteristics of queenbees (Apis mellifera L.) rearing in queenright and queenless colonies,” J. Anim. Vet. Adv., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 1083–1085, 2009.
K. ÖNK, M. M. CENGİZ, K. YAZICI, and T. KIRMIZIBAYRAK, “Effects of Rearing Periods on Some Reproductive Characteristics of Caucasian (Apis mellifera caucasica) Queen Bees,” Atatürk Üniversitesi Vet. Bilim. Derg., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 259–259, 2016.
F. Gene, B. Emsen, and A. Dodologlu, “Effects of rearing period and grafting method on the queen bee rearing,” J. Appl. Anim. Res., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 45–48, 2005.