Traitors Among Victims: The Case of Market-Community Wildlife Collaborative Management in Malawi’s Majete Wildlife Reserve
Advances in Sciences and Humanities
Volume 2, Issue 5, October 2016, Pages: 40-47
Received: Sep. 26, 2016; Accepted: Oct. 28, 2016; Published: Dec. 5, 2016
Views 2136      Downloads 65
Authors
Sane Pashane Zuka, Department of Land Economy, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi
Brenda-Kanyika Zuka, Department of History, Catholic University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
In line with political moves towards democratic governance, state-based management of wildlife is being replaced by community-market collaborative management approaches. In Malawi, community-market collaboration in wildlife management is particularly presented as a panacea to lack of community support for wildlife conservation due to their exclusion from enjoying the benefits ofits conservation. Community-market collaborative management, however, changes the rules and procedures in accessingthe benefits of wildlife conservation. Using MajeteWildlife Reserve, this study explores theextent to which the new approach addresses past unequal benefits from wildlife conservation, especially for the local communities. The study employed both qualitative (in-depth interviews, focus group discussions) and quantitative (desk study) methods. The findings from Majete Wildlife Reserve reveal that collaborative wildlifemanagement is predominantly a market oriented activity that reproduces newmodes of accessing benefits and new actors that sustains its inherent principles. Consequently, while a few victims of former state-based wildlife management approach are currently benefiting from and have become faithful advocates of the new regime, a number of vulnerable groups of people continue to suffer. At present, community-market collaborative management hastaken the form of patronage rather than partnership. Hence, the solution to inclusive and transparent wildlife management cannot be a matter of just fussing two management approaches.
Keywords
Malawi, Community-Market Wildlife Management, Political Ecology, Market System, Collaborative Management
To cite this article
Sane Pashane Zuka, Brenda-Kanyika Zuka, Traitors Among Victims: The Case of Market-Community Wildlife Collaborative Management in Malawi’s Majete Wildlife Reserve, Advances in Sciences and Humanities. Vol. 2, No. 5, 2016, pp. 40-47. doi: 10.11648/j.ash.20160205.11
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
[1]
Abdellatif, M. A., (2003). Good Governance and its relationship to Democracy and economic Development in Governance, Democracy and Economic Development. A Report from the Global Forum III on Fighting Corruption and Safeguarding Integrity, 20-31 May 2003, Seoul.
[2]
Adams, J. S. and McShane, T. S., (1992). The Myth of Wild Africa. New York: Norton.
[3]
Adams W., and D., Hulme (2001). Community Conservation: Changing Narratives, Policies and Practices in African Conservation, in David Hulme and Marshall Murphree (eds.) African Wildlife and Livelihoods: The Promise and Performance of CommunityConservation. Oxford: James Currey.
[4]
African Parks Network (2010). Annual Report, Johannesburg.
[5]
Blaikie, P. (2006). Is Small Really Beautiful? Community-based Natural Resources Management in Malawi and Botswana inWorld Development, 34(11) 1942-1957.
[6]
Borrini-Feyerabend (1996). Collaborative Management of Protected Areas: Tailoring theApproach to the Context, Issues in Social Policy, IUCN, Gland Switzerland.
[7]
Brockington, D., (2002). Fortress Conservation: The Preservation of Mkomazi Game Reserve in Tanzania (Blooming: Indiana University Press, 2002).
[8]
Brockington, D., (1999). Conservation, Displacement and Livelihoods: the consequences of the evictionfor pastoralists moved from Mkomazi Game Reserve in Tanzania, in Nomadic Peoples NS Volume Number 3, Issue 2 1999.
[9]
Elahi, K., and Danapoulos, C. P., (2004). Democracy, Capitalism and Development in Journal of Security Sector Management, Vol. 2 No.
[10]
Escobar A., (1998). Whose Knowledge, Whose Nature? Biodiversity Conservation and PoliticalEcology of Social Movements, in Journal of Political Ecology Vol.
[11]
Escobar A., (2006). “Difference and Struggle over Natural Resources A Political ecology framework”, inDevelopment (2006) 49(3), 6–13.
[12]
Fairhead, J., and Leach, M. (1995). False Forest History, Complicit Social Analysis: Rethinking Some West African Environmental Narratives in World Development Vol. 23, No. 6 pp 1023-1035.
[13]
Grindle, M. S., (2004), 'Good Enough Governance: Poverty Reduction and Reform inDeveloping Countries', Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 525-48.
[14]
Government of Malawi (GoM, 2005). Wildlife Policy, Department of National Parks and Wildlife, Lilongwe: Ministry of Tourism and National Parks.
[15]
Hayes, G. D. (1977). Guide to Malawi’s National Parks and Game Reserves (Nyasaland FaunaPreservation Society.
[16]
Hayes, G. D., (1972) Wildlife Conservation in Malawi in Society of Malawi. Journal. 25(2), pp.22-31.
[17]
Hayes, G. D., (1957). Mijeti, in Oryx, Vol. 2, No. 5 pp 294-298.
[18]
Hulme D., and Murphree M., (1999). Policy Arena: Communities, Wildlife and the New Conservation in Africa, Journal of International Development, 11, (1999) pp. 277-285.
[19]
Hunter, N. D., “G. D Hayes and the N.F.P.S”, in C., Dudley (1978). Nyala Vol. 5, No. 2, December 1978, Nyasaland Fauna Preservation Society pp. 67-75.
[20]
Kjekshus, H., (1977). Ecology Control and Economic Development in East African History; The Case of Tanganyika 1850-1950 (London: Heinemann pp126-160.
[21]
Kideghesho, J. R., (2006). Wildlife Conservation and Local Land Use Conflicts in Western Serengeti, Tanzania, (Norway: NTNU.
[22]
Kideghesho J. R., (2008). Who Pays for Wildlife Conservation in Tanzania and Who Benefits? Tanzania: Sokoine University of Agriculture.
[23]
Merry, S. E. (1988). Legal Pluralism in Law and Society Review, 22(5).
[24]
Ostrom, E. (2000). Private and Common Property Rights. Indiana University, Center forthe study of Institutions, Population and Environmental Change, Indiana.
[25]
Quazi, S. A, Bushley B. R., and Miles W. B., (2002). Connecting Communities and Conservation: Collaborative Management of Protected Areas in Bangladesh.
[26]
Sharma, S., (2007) Democracy, Good Governance, and Economic Development in Taiwan Journal of Democracy, Volume 3, No. 1: 29-62.
[27]
Sherry, B. Y., (1995). The Demise of Elephants of the Middle Shire Valley, Southern Malawi Project No. 94/30/9 of the Fauna and Flora Preservation Society of the United Kingdom. Study carried out in collaboration with the Wildlife Society of Malawi, and the Department of National Parks and Wildlife, Lilongwe.
[28]
Sullivan, S., (2012). Conservation is sexy! What makes this so, and what does this make? AnEngagement with Celebrity and the Environment, in Conservation and Society.
[29]
Vaccaro, I., Beltran. O, and Paquet P. A., (2013). Political Ecology and Conservation Policies: some theoretical genealogies”, in Journal of Political Ecology, (2013 Vol. 20), pp. 256-277.
[30]
Waheduzzaman, (2010). People’s Participation for Good Governance: A Study of Rural Development Programs in Bangladesh, PhD Thesis. Victoria University, School of Management and Information Systems, Faculty of Business and Law.
[31]
Zuka, S., (2013). Myths and realities in community management of common pool resources in Malawi:social stratification as a negative side-effect of social capital. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-983-5186