Students’ Social Movements: Expanding Communication Through Social Networking Sites
Advances in Sciences and Humanities
Volume 2, Issue 6, December 2016, Pages: 76-85
Received: Oct. 24, 2016; Accepted: Dec. 8, 2016; Published: Oct. 18, 2017
Views 2003      Downloads 94
Authors
Fernando Rezende da Cunha Junior, Department of Research and Theory in Education, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Monica Ferreira Lemos, Institute of Behavioural Sciences, Centre for Research on Activity, Development and Learning, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
This article describes an exploratory study on how secondary education students, from nine different states in Brazil, used SNS as a form of communication, more specifically Facebook and Facebook fan pages, in order to organize and to publish news, videos and pictures about their Students’ Social Movements. This study is framed under Cultural-Historical Activity Theory, in order to understand how students achieve their objectives acting collaboratively. Data was obtained from 9 pages on Facebook, which coordinates more than 400 pages created by students all over the country. Our findings suggest that collaborative agency plays a central role for the development and expansion of the social movements. By using Facebook as a communicative mediational tool, students were able to report, plan and coordinate online and physical activities.
Keywords
Online Communication, Facebook Groups, Students Social Movement, Collaborative Agency
To cite this article
Fernando Rezende da Cunha Junior, Monica Ferreira Lemos, Students’ Social Movements: Expanding Communication Through Social Networking Sites, Advances in Sciences and Humanities. Vol. 2, No. 6, 2016, pp. 76-85. doi: 10.11648/j.ash.20160206.14
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
[1]
S. Brunsting and T. Postmes, “Social movement participation in the digital age - Predicting offline and online collective action,” Small Gr. Res., vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 525–554, 2002.
[2]
S. González-Bailón, J. Borge-Holthoefer, and Y. Moreno, “Broadcasters and Hidden Influentials in Online Protest Diffusion,” Am. Behav. Sci., vol. 57, no. 7, p. 943, 2013.
[3]
X. Tian, “Network domains in social networking sites: expectations, meanings, and social capital,” Information, Commun. Soc., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 188–202, 2016.
[4]
J. Donovan, “‘Can you hear me now?’ Phreaking the party line from operators to occupy,” Information, Commun. Soc., vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 601–617, 2016.
[5]
F. Bailo, “Mapping online political talks through network analysis: a case study of the website of Italy’s Five Star Movement,” Policy Stud., vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 550–572, 2015.
[6]
C. Guzman-Concha, “The Students’ Rebellion in Chile: Occupy Protest or Classic Social Movement?,” Soc. Mov. Stud., pp. 1–8, 2012.
[7]
K. Varnali and V. Gorgulu, “A social influence perspective on expressive political participation in Twitter: the case of #OccupyGezi,” Information, Commun. Soc., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2014.
[8]
F. R. da Cunha Jr. and M. F. Lemos, “Do not close my school: Facebook, occupations and demonstrations for promoting social change.” Submitted manuscript.
[9]
S. Taipale, “Synchronicity matters: defining the characteristics of digital generations,” Information, Commun. Soc., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 80–94, 2016.
[10]
M. Micheli, “Social networking sites and low-income teenagers: between opportunity and inequality,” Inf. Commun. Soc., vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 565–581, 2016.
[11]
S. Triliva, C. Varvantakis, and M. Dafermos, “YouTube, young people, and the socioeconomic crises in Greece,” Information, Commun. Soc., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 407–423, 2014.
[12]
Y. Engeström, Learning by expanding: an activity-theoretical approach to developmental research, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
[13]
A. N. Leontiev, Activity, consciousness and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1978.
[14]
L. S. Vygotsky, Thinking and speech, vol. 1. New york: Plenum Press, 1988.
[15]
R. Miettinen, “Creative encounters and the emergence of object-oriented collaborative agency,” European Group of Organizational Studies. EGOS, Lisbon, 2010.
[16]
R. Miettinen, “Creative encounters and collaborative agency in science, technology and innovation,” in Handbook of research on creativity, K. Thomas and J. Chan, Eds. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2013, pp. 435–449.
[17]
P. Freire, Educação como prática da liberdade [Education as liberty practice]. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Paz e Terra Ltda, 1967.
[18]
P. Freire, Pedagogia da Autonomia [Pedagogy of autonomy], 49a. Rio de Janeiro: Paz & Terra, 2014.
[19]
B. van Oers, “Is it play? Towards a reconceptualization of role play from an activity theory perspective,” Eur. Early Child. Educ. Res. J., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 185–198, 2013.
[20]
M. F. Lemos and F. Cunha Jr, “Networking sites in social movements: Communicating and transforming educational realities.” Submitted manuscript.
[21]
J. Pickerill and J. Krinsky, “Why Does Occupy Matter?,” Soc. Mov. Stud., pp. 1–9, 2012.
[22]
G. Kress, Literacy in the New Media Age. London: Routledge, 2003.
[23]
J. van Dijk, The network society, 2nd ed. London: SAGE Publications, 2006.
[24]
F. R. da Cunha Jr., C. van Kruistum, and B. van Oers, “Teachers and Facebook: Using Online Groups to Improve Students’ Communication and Engagement in Education,” Commun. Teach., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 228–241, 2016.
[25]
Y. Engeström, Learning, working and imagining: twelve studies in activity theory. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy, 1990.
[26]
IBGE, “Vamos conhecer o Brasil [Let’s know about Brazil].” IBGE, Brasil, 2016.
[27]
P. Freire, Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder, 1970.
[28]
P. Freire, Pedagogia da Tolerância [Pedagogy of Tolerance], 3rd ed. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 2014.
[29]
B. Van Oers and M. Hännikäinen, “Some Thoughts About Togetherness: An introduction. Reflexions sur e Togetherness f Algunos Pensamientos Sobre el Sentimiento de Unión,” Int. J. Early Years Educ., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 101–108, 2001.
[30]
M. F. Lemos, “Collaborative agency in educational management: constructing a joint object for school and community transformation,” 9th International Conference on Researching Work & Learning. Government of Singapore, Singapore, 2015.
[31]
J. Rantavuori, Y. Engeström, and L. T. Lipponen, “Learning actions, objects and types of interaction: An analysis of expansive learning among pre-service teachers in Finland.,” Front. Learn. Res., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 1–27, 2016.
[32]
L. S. Vygotsky, Problems of General Psychology, vol. 1. New York and London: Plenum Press, 1999.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-983-5186