Television Directors’ Visual Focus on Sport Games: An Eye-Tracking Study
Advances in Sciences and Humanities
Volume 2, Issue 6, December 2016, Pages: 86-91
Received: Aug. 10, 2016; Accepted: Aug. 19, 2016; Published: Oct. 20, 2016
Views 2186      Downloads 91
Author
Anthony S. C. Huang, Department of Sport Information and Communication, National Taiwan University of Sport, Taichung, Taiwan
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
With the advent of digital media, live television sports broadcast became an important training for future sports communication professionals. Sports TV directors will usually direct all broadcast sports visual contents, in the training of student (future) sports TV directors, they must first have solid background knowledge of the sports itself, be familiar with sports TV directing and their sports onscreen visual focus should be the most important aspect of all. The current study is an exploratory and pioneering eye-tracking study in sports communication that combined sports TV directing with eye-tracking methodology, examining the visual focus of sport TV directors on volleyball games, with a Cognitive Load theoretical framework. It attempts to fill the gap in the sports communication and education literature, comparing and analyzing the differences between senior and junior students with sports TV directing experiences, examining their visual focus of the Business Enterprise Volleyball Games. Results found that (1) Visual focus differences were found among senior and junior student sport TV directors. The eyes of senior students, with more than two years of sports and games training, scanned at a faster speed than junior students; (2) Visual focus of senior students were more detailed as they focused on sports athletes’ movement and close-up shots; (3) Panoramic shots of sports games allows TV directors to have an overall visual pace and a better interpretation of the game. Application of the cognitive load theory can further explain the differences in visual focus among the senior and junior students. The more sports expertise, familiarity with the players they have in their long term memory, the more onsite performance and observation they would have in handling the complexity of the game. Results of the current study served as a benchmark for future research and contributed to the education and training of sport communicators.
Keywords
Sports TV Director, Eye Tracking, Visual Focus, Cognitive Load, Sportscast
To cite this article
Anthony S. C. Huang, Television Directors’ Visual Focus on Sport Games: An Eye-Tracking Study, Advances in Sciences and Humanities. Vol. 2, No. 6, 2016, pp. 86-91. doi: 10.11648/j.ash.20160206.15
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
[1]
Amadieu, F., Marine, C., & Laimay, C. (2011). The attention-guiding effect and cognitive load in the comprehension of animation. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 36-40.
[2]
Amadieu, F., Salmeron, L., Cegarra, J., Paubel, P. V., Lemarie J., & Chevalier A. (2015). Learning from concept mapping and hypertext: An eye tracking study. Educational Technology & Society, 18 (4), 100-112.
[3]
Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2005). The split-attention principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 135-146). New York: Cambridge University Press.
[4]
Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1996). Cognitive load while learning to use a computer program. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 151-170.
[5]
De Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Paas, F. (2011). Attention cueing in an instructional animation: The role of presentation speed. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 41-45.
[6]
Jones, S. J., Fong, C. J., Torres, L. G., Yoo, J. H., Decker, M. L., & Robinson, D. H. (2010). Productivity in educational psychology journals from 2003-2008. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 11-16.
[7]
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning, Educational Psychologist, 38 (1), 43-52.
[8]
Ozcinar, Z. (2009). The topic of instructional design in research journals: A citation analysis for the years 1980-2008. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25, 559-580.
[9]
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257-285.
[10]
Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251-296.
[11]
Sweller, J., & Chandler. P. (1994). Why some material is difficult to learn? Cognition and Instruction, 12 (3), 185-233.
[12]
Tversky, B., Morrison, J. B., & Betrancourt, M. (2002). Animation: Can it facilitate? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57, 247-262.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-983-5186