Comparative Analysis of the Industrial Patent Competition Situation—Take Xiamen as an Example
European Business & Management
Volume 3, Issue 6, November 2017, Pages: 134-142
Received: Nov. 22, 2017;
Accepted: Dec. 27, 2017;
Published: Jan. 11, 2018
Views 1247 Downloads 86
Dan Li, Intellectual Property Research Center of Jiangsu Province, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China
Hen Tang, Intellectual Property Research Center of Jiangsu Province, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China
Long Cheng, Jiangsu Hui-zhi Intellectual Property Services Limited, Zhenjiang, China
The global development of regional industry becomes more transparent because of the economic globalization. The development and reform of industrial technology caused by big data analysis makes industries more predictable. Based on the core issue of "patent thicket", this paper constructs an analysis framework of the competitive situation of industrial patents and carries out empirical research, taking Xiamen city as an example, basing on Jiangsu province, Guangdong province and Shenzhen city and with the aid of WIPO "industry - technology" matching table. It shows that compared with the advanced provinces and cities, Xiamen’s competitiveness of industrial patent is relatively weak. Most of them are in the state of technological precursor monopoly and exploration of weak competitive technology. Based on the results of case analysis, the paper puts forward setting up the periodic monitoring mechanism of the competitive situation of industrial patents, rationally arranging incentive policies and paying attention to industry development, so as to ensure measures such as the monitoring quality of competitive situation of industrial patents to promote industrial innovation and development.
Comparative Analysis of the Industrial Patent Competition Situation—Take Xiamen as an Example, European Business & Management.
Vol. 3, No. 6,
2017, pp. 134-142.
Copyright © 2017 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Koivisto R, Wessberg N, Eerola A, et al. Integrating future-oriented technology analysis and risk assessment methodologies [J]. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2009, 76 (9): 1163-1176.
Xu Qiaoling. Empirical research on the relationship between patent development and industrial development of high-tech industries [J/OL]. Scientific and technological progress and countermeasures, 2013, 30 (04): 60-63.
Zhang Huiying, Wei Yanhui. Research on the multi-effect relationship between the patent system and the high technology industry [J]. Economic restructuring, 2015, (04): 116-122.
Solow R M. Growth theory. An exposition. [J]. Oup Catalogue, 2000, 22 (4): 1016.
Zheng Yu. Knowledge flow and patent efficiency of high technology industry in China [J]. Exploration of economic problems, 2014, (07): 63-70.
Chen Xin, Liu Lina. Economics analysis of monopoly of patent union [J]. Exploration of economic problems, 2005, (12): 42-44.
To Promote Innovation: The Proper Balance of Competition and Patent Law and Policy [J]. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2004 (1): 309.
Mou Lili. Research on the relationship between patent application motivation, behavior and performance of high-tech enterprises [D]. Dalian university of technology, 2011.
Zhang Hanguo. The problem of patent administrative confirmation system and its solution [J]. Intellectual property, 2016, (03): 111-116.
Mansfield E. Patents and innovation: An empirical study [J]. Management Science, 1986, 32 (2): 173-181.
Levin R C, Klevorick A K, Nelson R R, et al. Appropriating the returns from industrial R&D [J]. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1987: 121-136.
Rycroft R W, Kash D E. The Complexity Challenge: Technological Innovation for the 21st Century [J]. Research-Technology Management, 1999, 43 (2): 60-61.
Shapiro C. Navigating the patent thicket: cross licenses, patent pools, and standard-setting [J]. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 2001, 1 (1): 119-150.
Shapiro C. Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard Setting [J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2000, 1 (Volume 1): 119-150.
Galasso A, Schankerman M. Patents and Cumulative Innovation: Causal Evidence from the Courts [J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2014, 130 (1).
Von Graevenitz G, Greenhalgh C, Helmers C, et al. Trade Mark Cluttering: An Exploratory Report [M]. 2012.
Bessen J. Patent Thickets: Strategic Patenting of Complex Technologies [J]. Ssrn Electronic Journal, 2002.