Description and Reliability of Rigo Classification of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Associated with Brace Therapy
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medical Sciences
Volume 5, Issue 4, July 2019, Pages: 53-57
Received: Jul. 9, 2019;
Accepted: Aug. 10, 2019;
Published: Aug. 23, 2019
Views 143 Downloads 19
Junze Chen, Department of Orthopaedics, Guangzhou The People's Hospital of Baiyun District, Guangzhou, China
Bagen Liao, Department of Sports Medicine, Guangzhou Sports University, Guangzhou, China
Objectives To develop the Rigo classification system for scoliosis brace design and treatment and to compare the reliability and reproducibility of the Rigo classification system for scoliosis within and across observers related to orthopedic treatment. Methods The imaging data of 136 cases of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were collected, and a Rigo classification system was established to determine the specific corrective principles and methods needed for the effective design and manufacturing of braces. Three observers, one spine surgeon, one imaging surgeon and one orthopedic brace surgeon, diagnosed and classified 136 AIS patients. The collected data were used to analyze the reliability across different observers and the repeatability within the same observer, and kappa values were calculated to confirm the consistency. Results The kappa value of the classification results of the spine surgeons and radiologists was 0.936, that of the spine surgeons and brace surgeons was 0.901, that of the imaging surgeons and brace surgeons was 0.886, the average repeatability was 90%, and the average Kappa was 0.887. Conclusion The Rigo classification system for scoliosis brace therapy has good practicability and consistency. The reliability of the Rigo classification system is acceptable both within and across observers. The system is suitable for clinical applications.
Description and Reliability of Rigo Classification of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Associated with Brace Therapy, International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medical Sciences.
Vol. 5, No. 4,
2019, pp. 53-57.
Copyright © 2019 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Lonstein J, Bradford D, Winter R, Ogilvie J: Moe’s textbook of scoliosis and other spinal deformities Philadelphia PA: WB Saunders, Third 1995.
Chase AP, Bader DL, Houghton GR. The biomechanical effectiveness of the Boston brace in the management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis [J]. Spine, 1989, 14 (6): 636- 642.
Wong MS, Mak AF, Luk KD, et al. Effectiveness and biomechanics of spinal orthoses in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) [J]. Prosthet Orthot Int, 2000, 24 (2): 148-162.
Manuel D Rigo, Mónica Villagrasa1, Dino Gallo. A specific scoliosis classification correlating with brace treatment: description and reliability. Scoliosis 2010 5: 1-11.
Barton CB, Weinstein SL. Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Natural History [M] / Pathogenesis of Idiopathic Scoliosis. Springer, Tokyo, 2018: 27-50.
Choudhry MN, Ahmad Z, Verma R. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis [J]. Open Orthop J, 2016, 10 (11): 143.
Lenke LG, Edwards CC, Bridwell KH: The Lenke classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: how it organizes curve patterns as a template to perform selective fusions of the spine [J], Spine, 2003, 28: 199-207.
D’Amato CR, Griggs S, McCoy B: Nighttime bracing with the Providence brace in adolescent girls with idiopathic scoliosis [J]. Spine, 2001, 26: 2006-2012.
QIU Gui- xing, YU Bin, Norbert Ventura, et al. Application and analysis of King, Lenke and PUMC classifications of idiopathic scoliosis [J]. Chin J Orthop, March 2006, Vd. 26, No. 3: 145-150.
Richards BS, Sucato DJ, Konigsberg DE, et al. Comparison of reliability between the Lenke and King classification systems for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using radiographs that were not premeasured [J]. Spine, 2003, 28: 1148-1157.
QIU Gui-xing, ZHANG Jian-guo, WANG Yi-peng, et al. The PUMC operative classifyion system for idiopathic scoliosis. Chin J Orthop, January 2003, 23 (1): 1-9.
Mac- Thiong JM, Petit Y, Aubin CE, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of the Boston brace system for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: relationship between strap tension and brace interface forces [J]. Spine, 2004, 29 (1): 26- 32.
Clin J, Aubin CE, Parent S, et al. Comparison of the bio- mechanical 3D efficiency of different brace designs for the treatment of scoliosis using a finite element model [J]. Eur Spine J, 2010, 19 (7): 1169-1178.
Qiu G, Zhang J, Wang Y, et al. A new operative classification of idiopathic scoliosis: a Peking Union Medical College method [J]. Spine, 2005, 30: 1419-1426.
Manuel Rigo, and Mina Jelačić. Brace Technology Thematic Series: The 3D Rigo Chêneau-type Brace [J]. Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders 2017, 12 (10): 1-49.