Application of Accurate Angle of Healthy Side Upper Limb in Body Posture in Radical Mastectomy

Lian Huizhao; Guo Xiaoxia; Rao Jingmin; Qian Yuxiu; Hou Lihuan; Xiao Xiaolu

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijcems.20200601.13

| Peer-Reviewed |

Application of Accurate Angle of Healthy Side Upper Limb in Body Posture in Radical Mastectomy

Lian Huizhao, Guo Xiaoxia, Rao Jingmin, Qian Yuxiu, Hou Lihuan, Xiao Xiaolu

Received: 20 February 2020 Accepted: 2 March 2020 Published: 10 March 2020

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Objective: We attempt to explore the effect of accurate angle of healthy side upper limb on body posture in radical mastectomy. Methods: We enrolled 150 patients who received radical mastectomy in our hospital and averagely randomized them into three groups: control group A, control group B and observation group. In control group A, the intraoperative abduction angle of healthy side upper limb was 90°, in control group B it was 0°, and observation group 75-80°. We scored the comfort level of the healthy side upper limb of patients in three groups prior to anesthesia induction and 24 hours after operation. At the end of operation, we scored the first assistant surgeon’s, anesthetist’s and circulating nurse’s satisfaction with standing space, the convenience of intravenous administration and convenience of observing transfusion during operation respectively. Results: There was significant difference in the comfort level between observation group and control group A, B (P<0.05). The first assistant surgeon’s satisfaction with standing space was 100% in all three groups with no significant difference (P>0.05). Anesthetist’s satisfaction with the convenience of intravenous administration during operation was 100% in observation group and control group A while it was 36% in control group B. There was a significant difference (P<0.05). Circulating nurse’s satisfaction with the convenience of observing transfusion during operation was 100% in observation group and control group A while it was 30% in control group B. There was a significant difference (P<0.05). Conclusions: When the accurate angle of healthy side upper limb in the body posture in radical mastectomy is 75-80°, it does not affect the standing space of the first assistant surgeon, intraoperative administration by anesthetist and observation of transfusion by circulating nurse, and avoids intraoperative position-related complications of patients.

DOI	10.11648/j.ijcems.20200601.13
Published in	International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medical Sciences (Volume 6, Issue 1, January 2020)
Page(s)	12-16
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Accuracy, Healthy Side Upper Limb, Angle, Radical Mastectomy

References

[1]	Kamel, I., & Barnette, R. (2014). Positioning patients for spine surgery: avoiding uncommon position-related complications. World Journal of Orthopaedics, 5 (4), 425-443.
[2]	Uppal, R. S., Casaer, B., Landuyt, K. V., & Blondeel, P. (2009). The efficacy of preoperative mapping of perforators in reducing operative times and complications in perforator flap breast reconstruction. Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 62 (7), 859-864.
[3]	Tuija Leinonen, & Helena Leino-Kilpi. (1999). Research in peri-operative nursing care. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 8 (2), 123-138.
[4]	N Al-Yateem, M Al-Tamimi, Brenner, H Altawil, & S Brownie. (2018). Research priorities for specialized nursing practice in the united arab emirates. International Nursing Review, 65 (3), 381-391.
[5]	Kasagi, Y., Okutani, R., & Oda, Y. (2015). Specialized operating room for cesarean section in the perinatal care unit: a review of the opening process and operating room management. Journal of Anesthesia, 29 (1), 149-151.
[6]	Yue Guo, Yan Li, Kuaile Zhao, Xiao Yue, & Tiyu Zhao. (2017). Effects of curvilinear supine position on tissue interface pressure: a prospective before-and-after study. Journal of Wocn, 44 (5), 450-454.
[7]	Flaherty, Geraldine G., & Fitzpatrick, Joyce J. (1978).. Relaxation technique to increase comfort level of postoperative patients: a preliminary study. Nursing Research, 27 (6), 352-355.
[8]	Lorry Schoenly. (2015). Research priorities in correctional nursing practice: results of a three-round delphi study. Journal of Correctional Health Care, 21 (4), 400-7.
[9]	Mcgarvey, H. E., Chambers, M. G. A., & Boore, J. R. P. (2000). Development and definition of the role of the operating department nurse: a review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32 (5), 1092-1100.
[10]	Ann-Catrin Blomberg, Lindwall, L., & Bisholt, B. (2019). Operating theatre nurses’ self-reported clinical competence in perioperative nursing: a mixed method study. Nursing Open, 6 (4), 1510-1518.
[11]	Woernle, C. M., Sarnthein, J., Foit, N. A., & Krayenbühl, Niklaus. (2013). Enhanced serum creatine kinase after neurosurgery in lateral position and intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, 115 (3), 266-269.
[12]	Neidert, M. C., Losa, M., Regli, L., & Sarnthein, J. (2015). Elevated serum creatine kinase after neurosurgeries in lateral position with intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring is associated with op duration, bmi and age. Clinical Neurophysiology, 126 (10), S138824571500005X.
[13]	Vassileios, Karampelias, Dimitrios, Koukouras, Evaggelos, & Tzorakoleftherakis, et al. (2019). Breast cancer section analysis correlates with sentinel lymph node biopsies: precision and topographic anatomy. Breast disease, 38 (1), 1-5.
[14]	Andrea Michalski, John Atyeo, Jennifer Cox, & Marianne Rinks. (2012). Inter- and intra-fraction motion during radiation therapy to the whole breast in the supine position: a systematic review. Journal of Medical Imaging & Radiation Oncology, 56 (5), 499-509.
[15]	Lillie, H. M., Venetis, M. K., & Chernichky-Karcher, S. M.. (2018). “He would never let me just give up”: communicatively constructing dyadic resilience in the experience of breast cancer. Health Communication, 33 (12): 1516-1524.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Lian Huizhao, Guo Xiaoxia, Rao Jingmin, Qian Yuxiu, Hou Lihuan, et al. (2020). Application of Accurate Angle of Healthy Side Upper Limb in Body Posture in Radical Mastectomy. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medical Sciences, 6(1), 12-16. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcems.20200601.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Lian Huizhao; Guo Xiaoxia; Rao Jingmin; Qian Yuxiu; Hou Lihuan, et al. Application of Accurate Angle of Healthy Side Upper Limb in Body Posture in Radical Mastectomy. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. Sci. 2020, 6(1), 12-16. doi: 10.11648/j.ijcems.20200601.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Lian Huizhao, Guo Xiaoxia, Rao Jingmin, Qian Yuxiu, Hou Lihuan, et al. Application of Accurate Angle of Healthy Side Upper Limb in Body Posture in Radical Mastectomy. Int J Clin Exp Med Sci. 2020;6(1):12-16. doi: 10.11648/j.ijcems.20200601.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijcems.20200601.13,
  author = {Lian Huizhao and Guo Xiaoxia and Rao Jingmin and Qian Yuxiu and Hou Lihuan and Xiao Xiaolu},
  title = {Application of Accurate Angle of Healthy Side Upper Limb in Body Posture in Radical Mastectomy},
  journal = {International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medical Sciences},
  volume = {6},
  number = {1},
  pages = {12-16},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijcems.20200601.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcems.20200601.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijcems.20200601.13},
  abstract = {Objective: We attempt to explore the effect of accurate angle of healthy side upper limb on body posture in radical mastectomy. Methods: We enrolled 150 patients who received radical mastectomy in our hospital and averagely randomized them into three groups: control group A, control group B and observation group. In control group A, the intraoperative abduction angle of healthy side upper limb was 90°, in control group B it was 0°, and observation group 75-80°. We scored the comfort level of the healthy side upper limb of patients in three groups prior to anesthesia induction and 24 hours after operation. At the end of operation, we scored the first assistant surgeon’s, anesthetist’s and circulating nurse’s satisfaction with standing space, the convenience of intravenous administration and convenience of observing transfusion during operation respectively. Results: There was significant difference in the comfort level between observation group and control group A, B (PP>0.05). Anesthetist’s satisfaction with the convenience of intravenous administration during operation was 100% in observation group and control group A while it was 36% in control group B. There was a significant difference (PP<0.05). Conclusions: When the accurate angle of healthy side upper limb in the body posture in radical mastectomy is 75-80°, it does not affect the standing space of the first assistant surgeon, intraoperative administration by anesthetist and observation of transfusion by circulating nurse, and avoids intraoperative position-related complications of patients.},
 year = {2020}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Application of Accurate Angle of Healthy Side Upper Limb in Body Posture in Radical Mastectomy
AU  - Lian Huizhao
AU  - Guo Xiaoxia
AU  - Rao Jingmin
AU  - Qian Yuxiu
AU  - Hou Lihuan
AU  - Xiao Xiaolu
Y1  - 2020/03/10
PY  - 2020
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcems.20200601.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijcems.20200601.13
T2  - International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medical Sciences
JF  - International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medical Sciences
JO  - International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medical Sciences
SP  - 12
EP  - 16
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2469-8032
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcems.20200601.13
AB  - Objective: We attempt to explore the effect of accurate angle of healthy side upper limb on body posture in radical mastectomy. Methods: We enrolled 150 patients who received radical mastectomy in our hospital and averagely randomized them into three groups: control group A, control group B and observation group. In control group A, the intraoperative abduction angle of healthy side upper limb was 90°, in control group B it was 0°, and observation group 75-80°. We scored the comfort level of the healthy side upper limb of patients in three groups prior to anesthesia induction and 24 hours after operation. At the end of operation, we scored the first assistant surgeon’s, anesthetist’s and circulating nurse’s satisfaction with standing space, the convenience of intravenous administration and convenience of observing transfusion during operation respectively. Results: There was significant difference in the comfort level between observation group and control group A, B (PP>0.05). Anesthetist’s satisfaction with the convenience of intravenous administration during operation was 100% in observation group and control group A while it was 36% in control group B. There was a significant difference (PP<0.05). Conclusions: When the accurate angle of healthy side upper limb in the body posture in radical mastectomy is 75-80°, it does not affect the standing space of the first assistant surgeon, intraoperative administration by anesthetist and observation of transfusion by circulating nurse, and avoids intraoperative position-related complications of patients.
VL  - 6
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Lian Huizhao

Department of Operating Room, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
Guo Xiaoxia

The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
Rao Jingmin

The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
Qian Yuxiu

Department of Operating Room, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
Hou Lihuan

Department of Operating Room, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
Xiao Xiaolu

Department of Operating Room, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Lian Huizhao, Guo Xiaoxia, Rao Jingmin, Qian Yuxiu, Hou Lihuan, et al. (2020). Application of Accurate Angle of Healthy Side Upper Limb in Body Posture in Radical Mastectomy. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medical Sciences, 6(1), 12-16. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcems.20200601.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Lian Huizhao; Guo Xiaoxia; Rao Jingmin; Qian Yuxiu; Hou Lihuan, et al. Application of Accurate Angle of Healthy Side Upper Limb in Body Posture in Radical Mastectomy. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. Sci. 2020, 6(1), 12-16. doi: 10.11648/j.ijcems.20200601.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Lian Huizhao, Guo Xiaoxia, Rao Jingmin, Qian Yuxiu, Hou Lihuan, et al. Application of Accurate Angle of Healthy Side Upper Limb in Body Posture in Radical Mastectomy. Int J Clin Exp Med Sci. 2020;6(1):12-16. doi: 10.11648/j.ijcems.20200601.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijcems.20200601.13,
  author = {Lian Huizhao and Guo Xiaoxia and Rao Jingmin and Qian Yuxiu and Hou Lihuan and Xiao Xiaolu},
  title = {Application of Accurate Angle of Healthy Side Upper Limb in Body Posture in Radical Mastectomy},
  journal = {International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medical Sciences},
  volume = {6},
  number = {1},
  pages = {12-16},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijcems.20200601.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcems.20200601.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijcems.20200601.13},
  abstract = {Objective: We attempt to explore the effect of accurate angle of healthy side upper limb on body posture in radical mastectomy. Methods: We enrolled 150 patients who received radical mastectomy in our hospital and averagely randomized them into three groups: control group A, control group B and observation group. In control group A, the intraoperative abduction angle of healthy side upper limb was 90°, in control group B it was 0°, and observation group 75-80°. We scored the comfort level of the healthy side upper limb of patients in three groups prior to anesthesia induction and 24 hours after operation. At the end of operation, we scored the first assistant surgeon’s, anesthetist’s and circulating nurse’s satisfaction with standing space, the convenience of intravenous administration and convenience of observing transfusion during operation respectively. Results: There was significant difference in the comfort level between observation group and control group A, B (PP>0.05). Anesthetist’s satisfaction with the convenience of intravenous administration during operation was 100% in observation group and control group A while it was 36% in control group B. There was a significant difference (PP<0.05). Conclusions: When the accurate angle of healthy side upper limb in the body posture in radical mastectomy is 75-80°, it does not affect the standing space of the first assistant surgeon, intraoperative administration by anesthetist and observation of transfusion by circulating nurse, and avoids intraoperative position-related complications of patients.},
 year = {2020}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Application of Accurate Angle of Healthy Side Upper Limb in Body Posture in Radical Mastectomy
AU  - Lian Huizhao
AU  - Guo Xiaoxia
AU  - Rao Jingmin
AU  - Qian Yuxiu
AU  - Hou Lihuan
AU  - Xiao Xiaolu
Y1  - 2020/03/10
PY  - 2020
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcems.20200601.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijcems.20200601.13
T2  - International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medical Sciences
JF  - International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medical Sciences
JO  - International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medical Sciences
SP  - 12
EP  - 16
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2469-8032
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcems.20200601.13
AB  - Objective: We attempt to explore the effect of accurate angle of healthy side upper limb on body posture in radical mastectomy. Methods: We enrolled 150 patients who received radical mastectomy in our hospital and averagely randomized them into three groups: control group A, control group B and observation group. In control group A, the intraoperative abduction angle of healthy side upper limb was 90°, in control group B it was 0°, and observation group 75-80°. We scored the comfort level of the healthy side upper limb of patients in three groups prior to anesthesia induction and 24 hours after operation. At the end of operation, we scored the first assistant surgeon’s, anesthetist’s and circulating nurse’s satisfaction with standing space, the convenience of intravenous administration and convenience of observing transfusion during operation respectively. Results: There was significant difference in the comfort level between observation group and control group A, B (PP>0.05). Anesthetist’s satisfaction with the convenience of intravenous administration during operation was 100% in observation group and control group A while it was 36% in control group B. There was a significant difference (PP<0.05). Conclusions: When the accurate angle of healthy side upper limb in the body posture in radical mastectomy is 75-80°, it does not affect the standing space of the first assistant surgeon, intraoperative administration by anesthetist and observation of transfusion by circulating nurse, and avoids intraoperative position-related complications of patients.
VL  - 6
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download