International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medical Sciences

| Peer-Reviewed |

Assessment of the Quality of Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Test, Adama District, East Shewa Zone, Ethiopia

Received: 21 September 2020    Accepted: 06 October 2020    Published: 23 November 2020
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

Background: In Ethiopia, smear microscopy is the gold standard for malaria diagnosis however; it is not available in health post. Smear microscopy is time consuming, requires trained personnel and needs careful preparation and application of reagents to ensure quality results. Objective: This study was aimed at testing the diagnostic performance of SD BIOLINE malaria rapid diagnostic test (RDT) with reference to smear microscopy for the diagnosis of falciparum and vivax malaria in Ethiopia. Methods: Blood samples were collected from 402 patients suspected to have malaria in four health facilities in the late minor malaria transmission season from June18-30, 2014. The samples were examined immediately by smear microscopy and the RDT (SD BIOLINE Malaria HRP2/pLDH POCT Test kit). Statistical analysis was performed using Epi-info version 7 and the two-way contingency table analysis. Results: The overall parasite positivity using smear microscopy was 163 (45.6%): 136 (33.8%) for P. falciparum, 25 (6.2%) for P. vivax and two (0.5%) for mixed infections. Using the SD BIOLINE RDT, the overall parasite positivity was 176 (43.7%): 149 (37%) for P. falciparum, 26 (6.5%) for P. vivax and 1 (0.2%) for mixed infections. The overall sensitivity and specificity of SD BIOLINE RDT was found to be 98.2% (97.5–99.9%, 95% CI) and 95.2% (93.9–97.7%, 95% CI), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of SD BIOLINE RDT was found to be 98.2% (94–99.1%, 95% CI) and 95.4% (93.9–97.1%, 95% CI), respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) and the negative predictive value (NPV) were found to be 93.6% (88.5–96.1%, 95% CI) and 98.7% (95.3–99.8%, 95% CI), respectively. There was an excellent agreement between the smear microscopy and SD BIOLINE RDT with a Kappa value of 0.965 (0.896–0.988, 95% CI). Conclusion: The SD BIOLINE RDT test showed good sensitivity and specificity with an excellent agreement to the reference smear microscopy. The RDT could therefore be used in place of smear microscopy, at health post where the microscope not applicable.

DOI 10.11648/j.ijcems.20200606.11
Published in International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medical Sciences (Volume 6, Issue 6, November 2020)
Page(s) 109-118
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Malaria, Rapid Diagnostic Test, East Shoa Zone, Ethiopia

References
[1] Laura Penny, Paul Neuwald, and Mickey Urdea. Biomarkers for infectious Disease Diagnostics in the Developing World: Rapid Home based Diagnosis of Malaria in Symptomatic Individuals and Screening of Asymptomatic Pregnant Women, July 2006.
[2] Baboo K. S, N dayambaje I. et. a. Effectiveness of Rapid diagnostic test for malaria diagnosis in children 15 years of age of Nchelenge District in the Luapula province. medical journal of Zambia, Volume 35, Number 4 (2008) page 160.
[3] Qualitative Study on Malaria Prevention and Control in Oromia and Amhara Regional States in Ethiopia, Report Submitted to Academy for Educational Development (AED) by Addis Continental Institute of Public Health (ACIPH) 17 July, 2009.
[4] Manual of standard operating procedures for Assessment of Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Tests within the Product Testing Programme of the World Health Organization At US Centre’s for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta Version Three 2010 For internal use.
[5] The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygienewww.ajtmh.org 1. Am J Trop Med Hyg December 2007 vol. 77 no. 6 Suppl 119-127.
[6] Clinical Microbiology Rev. 2008 January; 21 (1): 97–110. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00035-07 http://dx.crossref.org/10.1128%2FCMR.00035-07 PMCID: PMC2223842.
[7] Clinical Microbiology Rev. 2005 January; 20 (1): 87–120. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00024-03 http://dx.crossref.org/10.1128%1FCMR.00024-03.
[8] Malaria in Ethiopia www.EthioDemographyAndHealth.Org.AynalemAdugna, accessed on 25/12/2011.
[9] Clinical Microbiology Reviewscmr.asm.org doi: 10.1128/CMR.15.1.66-78.2002 Clin. Microbiol. Rev. January 2002 vol. 15 no. 1 66-78.
[10] Rapid diagnostic test for diagnosis of uncomplicated P.falciparum malaria, validation and ease of use of three new pan pLDH tests, final report Jan 2006.
[11] Bendezu et al., Field evaluation of a rapid diagnostic test (Parascreen™) for malaria diagnosis in the Peruvian Amazon Malaria Journal 2010, 9: 154.
[12] Beyene M, Bemnet A, et al. Comparison of CareStart™ HRP2/pLDH COMBO Rapid Malaria Test with Light Microscopy in North-west Ethiopia, Malaria Journal, 2012.
[13] Adugna W, Wakgari D, et al., Evaluation of CareStart™ malaria Pf/Pv combo test for Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax malaria diagnosis in Butajira area, south-central Ethiopia, Malaria Journal, 2013.
[14] Alemu A, Abebe G, Tsegaye W, Golassa L: Climatic variables and malaria transmission dynamics in Jimma Town, South West Ethiopia. Parasit ectors 2011, 4:30. PubMed Abstract | BioMed Central Full Text |PubMed Central Full Text.
[15] Gemeda A, Wakgari D, Ahmed A, Lindtjørn B: Shifting to Plasmodium vivax dominance at highlands of Ethiopia following the countrywide intensive use of artemether-lumefantrine throughout endemic areas since 2005: Can we neglect the role of climate and relapse cases?. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: 13th World Congress on Public Health; April 23-27; 2012.
[16] Bell D, Wongsrichanalai C, Barnwell J: Ensuring quality and access for malaria diagnosis: how can it be achieved? Nature 2006, 4: S7-S20.
[17] Endeshaw T, Gebre T, Ngondi J, Graves PM, Shargie EB, Ejigsemahu Y, Ayele B, Yohannes G, Teferi G, Messele A, Zerihun M, Genet A, Mosher AW, Emerson PM, Richards FO: Evaluation of light microscopy and rapid diagnostic test for the detection of malaria under operational field conditions: a household survey in Ethiopia. Malar J 2008, 7:118. PubMed Abstract | BioMed Central Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text.
[18] Lemma H, Byass P, Desta A, Bosman A, Costanzo G, Toma L, Fottrell E, Marrast AC, Ambachew Y, Getachew A, Mulure N, Morrone A, Bianchi A, Barnabas GA: Deploying artemether-lumefantrine with rapid testing in Ethiopian communities: impact on malaria morbidity, mortality and healthcare resources. Trop Med Int Health 2009, 15: 241-250. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text.
[19] WHO: The use of malaria diagnostic tests. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2006.
[20] WHO: Malaria rapid diagnostic test performance: results of WHO product testing of malaria RDTs: Rounds 1 and 2 (2008-2009). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
[21] Negash K, Kebede A, Medhin A, Argaw D, Babaniyi O, Guintran JO, Delacollette C: Malaria epidemics in the highlands of Ethiopia. East African Med J 2005, 82: 186-192. PubMed Abstract.
[22] Ashton R, Kefyalew T, Tesfaye G, Counihan H, Yadeta D, Cundill B, Reithinger R, Kolaczinski JH: Performance of three multi-species rapid diagnostic tests for diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax malaria in Oromia Regional State. Ethiopia. Malar J 2010, 9: 297. BioMed Central Full Text.
[23] Chanie M, Erko B, Animut A, Legesse M: Performance of CareStartTM Malaria Pf/Pv Combo tests for the diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivaxinfections in Afar Region in North East Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Dev 2011, 25: 206-211.
[24] Okell L, Ghani AC, Lyons E, Drakeley CJ: Submicroscopic infection in Plasmodium falciparum-endemic populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Infect Dis 2009, 200: 1509-1517. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text.
Author Information
  • Department of Medical Laboratory Science, College of Health Science, Arsi University, Asella, Ethiopia

  • Oromia Public Health Research Capacity Building and Quality Assurance Laboratory, Adama, Ethiopia

  • Oromia Public Health Research Capacity Building and Quality Assurance Laboratory, Adama, Ethiopia

  • Department of Medical Laboratory Science, College of Health Science, Arsi University, Asella, Ethiopia

Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Merga Gonfa, Daba Mulleta, Wakgari Deresa, Bizuayehu Gurmesa. (2020). Assessment of the Quality of Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Test, Adama District, East Shewa Zone, Ethiopia. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medical Sciences, 6(6), 109-118. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcems.20200606.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Merga Gonfa; Daba Mulleta; Wakgari Deresa; Bizuayehu Gurmesa. Assessment of the Quality of Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Test, Adama District, East Shewa Zone, Ethiopia. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. Sci. 2020, 6(6), 109-118. doi: 10.11648/j.ijcems.20200606.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Merga Gonfa, Daba Mulleta, Wakgari Deresa, Bizuayehu Gurmesa. Assessment of the Quality of Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Test, Adama District, East Shewa Zone, Ethiopia. Int J Clin Exp Med Sci. 2020;6(6):109-118. doi: 10.11648/j.ijcems.20200606.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijcems.20200606.11,
      author = {Merga Gonfa and Daba Mulleta and Wakgari Deresa and Bizuayehu Gurmesa},
      title = {Assessment of the Quality of Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Test, Adama District, East Shewa Zone, Ethiopia},
      journal = {International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medical Sciences},
      volume = {6},
      number = {6},
      pages = {109-118},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijcems.20200606.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcems.20200606.11},
      eprint = {https://download.sciencepg.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijcems.20200606.11},
      abstract = {Background: In Ethiopia, smear microscopy is the gold standard for malaria diagnosis however; it is not available in health post. Smear microscopy is time consuming, requires trained personnel and needs careful preparation and application of reagents to ensure quality results. Objective: This study was aimed at testing the diagnostic performance of SD BIOLINE malaria rapid diagnostic test (RDT) with reference to smear microscopy for the diagnosis of falciparum and vivax malaria in Ethiopia. Methods: Blood samples were collected from 402 patients suspected to have malaria in four health facilities in the late minor malaria transmission season from June18-30, 2014. The samples were examined immediately by smear microscopy and the RDT (SD BIOLINE Malaria HRP2/pLDH POCT Test kit). Statistical analysis was performed using Epi-info version 7 and the two-way contingency table analysis. Results: The overall parasite positivity using smear microscopy was 163 (45.6%): 136 (33.8%) for P. falciparum, 25 (6.2%) for P. vivax and two (0.5%) for mixed infections. Using the SD BIOLINE RDT, the overall parasite positivity was 176 (43.7%): 149 (37%) for P. falciparum, 26 (6.5%) for P. vivax and 1 (0.2%) for mixed infections. The overall sensitivity and specificity of SD BIOLINE RDT was found to be 98.2% (97.5–99.9%, 95% CI) and 95.2% (93.9–97.7%, 95% CI), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of SD BIOLINE RDT was found to be 98.2% (94–99.1%, 95% CI) and 95.4% (93.9–97.1%, 95% CI), respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) and the negative predictive value (NPV) were found to be 93.6% (88.5–96.1%, 95% CI) and 98.7% (95.3–99.8%, 95% CI), respectively. There was an excellent agreement between the smear microscopy and SD BIOLINE RDT with a Kappa value of 0.965 (0.896–0.988, 95% CI). Conclusion: The SD BIOLINE RDT test showed good sensitivity and specificity with an excellent agreement to the reference smear microscopy. The RDT could therefore be used in place of smear microscopy, at health post where the microscope not applicable.},
     year = {2020}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Assessment of the Quality of Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Test, Adama District, East Shewa Zone, Ethiopia
    AU  - Merga Gonfa
    AU  - Daba Mulleta
    AU  - Wakgari Deresa
    AU  - Bizuayehu Gurmesa
    Y1  - 2020/11/23
    PY  - 2020
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcems.20200606.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijcems.20200606.11
    T2  - International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medical Sciences
    JF  - International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medical Sciences
    JO  - International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medical Sciences
    SP  - 109
    EP  - 118
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2469-8032
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcems.20200606.11
    AB  - Background: In Ethiopia, smear microscopy is the gold standard for malaria diagnosis however; it is not available in health post. Smear microscopy is time consuming, requires trained personnel and needs careful preparation and application of reagents to ensure quality results. Objective: This study was aimed at testing the diagnostic performance of SD BIOLINE malaria rapid diagnostic test (RDT) with reference to smear microscopy for the diagnosis of falciparum and vivax malaria in Ethiopia. Methods: Blood samples were collected from 402 patients suspected to have malaria in four health facilities in the late minor malaria transmission season from June18-30, 2014. The samples were examined immediately by smear microscopy and the RDT (SD BIOLINE Malaria HRP2/pLDH POCT Test kit). Statistical analysis was performed using Epi-info version 7 and the two-way contingency table analysis. Results: The overall parasite positivity using smear microscopy was 163 (45.6%): 136 (33.8%) for P. falciparum, 25 (6.2%) for P. vivax and two (0.5%) for mixed infections. Using the SD BIOLINE RDT, the overall parasite positivity was 176 (43.7%): 149 (37%) for P. falciparum, 26 (6.5%) for P. vivax and 1 (0.2%) for mixed infections. The overall sensitivity and specificity of SD BIOLINE RDT was found to be 98.2% (97.5–99.9%, 95% CI) and 95.2% (93.9–97.7%, 95% CI), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of SD BIOLINE RDT was found to be 98.2% (94–99.1%, 95% CI) and 95.4% (93.9–97.1%, 95% CI), respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) and the negative predictive value (NPV) were found to be 93.6% (88.5–96.1%, 95% CI) and 98.7% (95.3–99.8%, 95% CI), respectively. There was an excellent agreement between the smear microscopy and SD BIOLINE RDT with a Kappa value of 0.965 (0.896–0.988, 95% CI). Conclusion: The SD BIOLINE RDT test showed good sensitivity and specificity with an excellent agreement to the reference smear microscopy. The RDT could therefore be used in place of smear microscopy, at health post where the microscope not applicable.
    VL  - 6
    IS  - 6
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

  • Sections