Investigating the Effect of Wiki-Based Corrective Feedback on Accuracy of L2 Learners’ Written Production
International Journal of Applied Linguistics and Translation
Volume 5, Issue 3, September 2019, Pages: 48-54
Received: Jun. 26, 2018; Accepted: Sep. 3, 2019; Published: Sep. 19, 2019
Views 95      Downloads 18
Authors
Shamsurahman Adel, Department of English Language, Nangarhar University (NU), Nangarhar, Afghanistan
Nik Aloesnita Bt Nik Mohm Alwi, Department for Modern Languages and Human Sciences, University Malaysia Pahang (UMP), Pahang, Malaysia
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
Providing feedback to and correcting errors of learners’ language performance is important in both first (L1) and second language (L2) teaching and learning process. A number of studies have examined the effectiveness of different types of corrective-feedback (CF) on L2 learners’ writing and results showed positive effects [1-3]. However, little has examined the effects of CF on L2 writing via wiki [4-5]. Therefore, the current study aims to provide further insights into the effects of implicit CF on L2 learners’ writing through wiki. Nineteen (n=19) undergraduate L2 learners doing English at University Malaysia Pahang were enrolled in the study. During the pretest session, the learners were required to write an essay on Communication Skills at Workplace for approximately one hour. Next, implicit CF was provided to the essays, and a week later during the posttest session, the learners revised their essays based on the feedback given. Results indicated that wiki-based implicit CF helped L2 learners to improve the accuracy of their written productions as evident in total number of error per T-unit (E/T-unit) and total number of error per clauses (E/C). The findings of the study would have great impact and would help the L2 professors and students teaching and learning the L2.
Keywords
Implicit Corrective Feedback (ICF), Wiki, Accuracy
To cite this article
Shamsurahman Adel, Nik Aloesnita Bt Nik Mohm Alwi, Investigating the Effect of Wiki-Based Corrective Feedback on Accuracy of L2 Learners’ Written Production, International Journal of Applied Linguistics and Translation. Vol. 5, No. 3, 2019, pp. 48-54. doi: 10.11648/j.ijalt.20190503.13
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
[1]
Ahmadi, D., Maftoon, P. & Mehrdad, A. G. (2012). Investigating the Effects of Two Types of Feedback on EFL Students’ Writing. Social and behavioral sciences, 46, 2590–2595.
[2]
Kamberi, L. 2013. The significance of teacher feedback in EFL writing for tertiary level foreign language learners. Social and behavioral science. 70, 1686-1690.
[3]
Lyster, R. & Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom. Studies in second language acquisition, 32, 265-302.
[4]
Zailin, S. Y. (2010). Evaluating the impact of feedback given via wikis on ESL students’ reports. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, International Islamic University Malaysia.
[5]
Zailin, S. Y, Nik, A, & Ainol, H. (2012). Investigating students’ perception of using wikis in Academic writing. 3L: The southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 18 (3), 91-102.
[6]
Sheen, Y. 2007. The effects of corrective feedback, language aptitude, and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles. In: A. Mackey, ed., Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: a collection of empirical studies. (301-322). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[7]
Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (1999). How languages are learned. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
[8]
Biber, D., Nekrasova, T. & Horn, B. (2011). The Effectiveness for L1-English and L2 Writing Development: A Meta Analysis. Educational testing services (ETS), 1-110.
[9]
Ferris, D. (1999). The Case for Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes: A Response to Truscott (1996). Journal of second language writing, 8 (1), 1-11.
[10]
Ferris, D. & Robberts, B. (2001). Error Feedback in L2 Writing Classes. How Explicit Does It Need To Be? Journal of second language writing, 10, 161-184.
[11]
Ferries, D., Liu, H., Sniha, A., and Senna, M. (2013). Written Corrective Feedback for Individual L2 Writers. Journal of second language writing, 22, 307-329.
[12]
Truscott, J. (1996). The Case Against Grammar Correction in Second Language Writing Classes. Language learning, 46 (2), 327-369.
[13]
Truscott, J. (2004). Evidence and conjecture on the effects of correction: A response to Chandler. Journal of second language writing, 13, 337-343.
[14]
Truscott, J. (2007). The effect of error correction on learners’ ability to write accurately. Journal of second language writing, 16, 255-272.
[15]
Truscott, J. (2010). Further thoughts on Anthony Bruton’s critique of the correction debate. System, 38, 626-633.
[16]
Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 students’ writing. Journal of second language writing, 12, 267-296.
[17]
Meihami, H. (2013). Truscott’s claims in giving corrective feedback: Does it matter in EFL writing context? International letters of social and humanistic sciences, 8, 8-23.
[18]
Williams, J. G. (2003). Providing Feedback on ESL Students’ Written Assignment. The internet TESL journal, No. 10, http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Williams-Feedback.html
[19]
Van Beuningen, C. G., De Jong, N. H., and Kuiken, F. (2011). Evedience on the effectiveness of comprehensive error correction in second language writing. Language learning, 62, 1-41.
[20]
Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2010). Rising the Linguistic Accuracy Level of Advanced L2 Writers with Written Corrective Feedback. Journal of second language writing, 19, 207-217.
[21]
Farid, S., & Samad, A. A. (2012). Effects of Different Kind of Direct Feedback on Students’ Writing. Social and behavioral sciences, 66, 232–239.
[22]
Kao, C. W. (2013). Effects of focused feedback on the acquisition of two English articles. Teaching English as a second or foreign language, 17.1, 1-15.
[23]
Mourssi, A. (2012). The impact of reflection and meta-linguistic feedback in SLA: A qualitative research in the context of post graduates. The international journal of language learning and applied linguistics world (IJLLALW), 1 (1), 128-146.
[24]
Evans, N. W., Hartshorn, K. J., and Strong-Krause, D. (2011). The Efficacy of Dynamic Written Corrective Feedback for University-matriculated ESL Learners. System, 39, 229-239.
[25]
Ding, T. (2012). The comparative effectiveness of recasts and prompts in second language classrooms. Journal of Cambridge Studies, 7 (2), 83-97.
[26]
Jeong, L. (2012). Corrective feedback preferences and learner repair among advanced ESL students. System, 1-14.
[27]
Sheen, Y. & Ellis, R. 2011. Corrective feedback in language teaching. In: E. Hinkel, ed., Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning. Vol. 2. New York: Routledge, 593–610.
[28]
Sato, M., & Lyster, R. (2012). Peer Interaction and Corrective Feedback for Accuracy and Fluency Development. Studies in second language acquisition, 34 (04), 591–626.
[29]
Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M. & Takashima, H. 2008. The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in English as a foreign language context. System. 36, 353-371.
[30]
Bitchener, J. (2008) Evidence of Support of Written Corrective Feedback. Journal of second language writing, 17, 102-118.
[31]
Lam, R. (2013). Two Portfolio Systems: EFL Students’ Perceptions of Writing Ability, Text Improvement, and Feedback. Assessing writing, 18, 132-153.
[32]
Nazari, N. (2013). The Effect of Implicit and Explicit Grammar Instruction on Learners’ Achievements in Receptive and Productive Modes. Social and behavioral sciences, 70, 156–162.
[33]
Falhasiri, M., Tavakoli, M., Hasiri, F., & Mohammadzadeh, A. R. (2011). The effectiveness of explicit and implicit corrective feedback on inter-lingual and intra-lingual errors: A case of error analysis of students’ compositions. Canadian Center of Science and Education, English language teaching, 4 (3), 251-264.
[34]
Clerckx, B., Kim, G., Choi, J., & Hong, Y.-J. (2010). Explicit vs. Implicit Feedback for SU and MU-MIMO. 2010 IEEE global telecommunications conference, GLOBECOM, 1–5.
[35]
Campillo, P. S. (2003). An analysis of implicit and explicit feedback on grammatical accuracy. Journal of English and American studies, 27, 209-228.
[36]
Marzban, A. & Arabahmadi, S. (2013). The effects of written corrective-feedback on Iranian EFL students’ writing. 2nd world conference on educational technology research. Social and behavioral sciences. 83, 1000-1005.
[37]
Miceli, T. (2006). Foreign language students’ perception of a reflective approach to text correction. Flinders University Languages Group Online Review, 3 (1), 25-36, Retrieved from http://ehlt.flinders.edu.au/deptlang/fulgor/
[38]
Zhao, H. (2010). Investigating learners’ use and understanding of peer and teacher feedback on writing: A comparative study in a Chinese English writing classroom. Assessing writing, 15 (1), 3–17.
[39]
Yilmaz, Y. (2013). The relative effectiveness of mixed, explicit, and implicit feedback in the acquisition of English articles. System, 41, 691-705.
[40]
O'Neill, M. (2005). Automated use of a wiki for collaborative lecture notes. ACM SIGSCE Bulletin, 37, 267-271.
[41]
Wagner, C. 2004. Wiki: A technology for conversational knowledge management and group collaboration. Communications of the Association for Information. System. 13, 265-289.
[42]
Ebersbach, A., Glaser, M. & Heigl, R. (2006). Wiki: Web collaboration. Berlin Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag.
[43]
Ruth, A. & Houghton, L. (2009). The wiki way of learning. Australian journal of education technology, 25, 135-152.
[44]
Ben-zvi, D. (2007). Using Wiki to Promote Collaborative Learning in Statistics Education. Technology innovations in statistics education (TISE), Center for the Teaching of Statistics, UCLA. UC Los Angeles.
[45]
Kovacic, A., Bubas, G., & Zlatovic, M. (2007). Evaluation of Activities with a Wiki System in Teaching English as a second language. 2–5.
[46]
Parker, R. P., & Chao, J. T. (2007). Wiki as a teaching tool. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects. Retrieved September 2, 2010.
[47]
Ren, Y., & Gong, C. (2011). An Empirical Study on Application of Wiki-based Collaborative Lesson-Preparing. International conference of information technology computer engineering and management sciences, IEEE.
[48]
Wang, H., Lu, C., Yang, J., Hu, H., Chiou, G., & Hsu, W. (2005). An Empirical Exploration of Using Wiki in an English as a Second Language Course. Fifth IEEE international conference on advanced learning technologies (ICALT’05).
[49]
Biasutti, M. and EL-Deghaidy, H. (2012). Using wiki in teacher education: Impact on knowledge management process and students’ satisfaction. Computers and education, 59, 861-872.
[50]
Barry, S. (2012). A video recording and viewing protocol for student group presentations: Assisting self-assessment through a Wiki environment. Computers and education, 59 (3), 855-860.
[51]
Umar, I., N., & Rathakrishnan, M. (2012). The Effects of Online Teachers’ Social Role and Learning Style on Students’ Essay Writing Performance and Critical Thinking in a Wiki Environment. Social and behavioral sciences, 46, 5730-5735.
[52]
Ng, E. (2014). Using a mix research method to evaluate the effectiveness of formative assessment in supporting student teachers’ wiki authoring. Computers and education, 73, 141-148.
[53]
Macky, A. & Gass, M. S. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. Mahwah, New Jersey, USA, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
[54]
Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., & Kim, H. Y. (1998). Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy and complexity. University of Hawaii Press.
[55]
Mackey, A. & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.), 407–452.
[56]
Farrokhi, F & Mahmoudi, A. 2012. Rethinking Convenience Sampling: Defining quality criteria. Theory and practice in language studies. 2, 784-792.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-983-5186