International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences

| Peer-Reviewed |

Performance of Castor Bean Selects In Saline Sodic Soil

Received: 31 May 2016    Accepted: 06 June 2016    Published: 20 June 2016
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

To determine the influence of selection on castor bean plants tolerance to saline sodic soil, three planting methods were used; in the bottom of furrow, at the side of furrow, and in rows of plots. The soil was saline sodic (pH > 8.4, SAR < 13, Ec < 4 dS/m), the cultivar of castor bean was Hindi 21. The experiments were conducted in 2010 and 2011 on the farm of Field Crops, Coll. of Agric., Univ. of Baghdad. At maturity, selected plants of those gave higher seed yield were harvested from each treatment. Selection pressure used on plant populations was 10%. In the second year, seeds from each of the three treatments with the control were planted on the same field with 53 and 89 thousand plants/ha. The design used was a factorial with RCBD of three replicates. The results revealed that selected plants from row planting out yielded the other three treatments in seed yield/plant, seed no./plant, seed weight and harvest index. The values were 61 g, 251 seeds, 0.25 g, and 9.9%, respectively. The lower planting density gave higher plant seed yield, seed no./plant and harvest index (55.6 g, 281 seeds, 8.0%). It was concluded that selection on individual plants from planting in rows was effective to create a new variation in castor bean tolerance to saline sodic soil. The higher percent of heritability was in total dry matter (98.9%), crop growth rate (98.4%), and plant seed yield (96.8%). That was indicating that genetic variance has the significant influence in phenotypic variance.

DOI 10.11648/j.ijaas.20160204.14
Published in International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences (Volume 2, Issue 4, July 2016)
Page(s) 64-68
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Planting Methods, Population Densities, Heritability

References
[1] Elsahookie, M. M. 2013. Breeding Crops for Abiotic Stress: A Molecular Approach and Epigenetic. Coll. of Agric., Univ. of Baghdad.pp. 244.
[2] Kamel, L., I. Kande, B. A. El. Ahmer, and S. I. Elmohandes. 1985. Effect of nitrogen level and plant population on sunflower. Anns. of Agric. Sci., Moshtohor 23:(2) 502-511.
[3] Lima, G. S., R. G. Nobre, H. R. Gheyi, L. A. A. Soares and E. M. Silva. 2015. Irrigation water salinity and nitrogen doses affect the cultivation of castor bean (Ricinus communus L.) at different phonological stages. Australian J. of Crop Sci. 9(9): 870-878.
[4] Jeschke, W. D. and O. Wolf. 1988. Effect of NaCl salinity on growth, development, ion distribution and ion translocation in castor bean (Ricinus communis L.). J. of Plant Physiology. 132(1): 45-53.
[5] Khan, A., S. Rao, and T. McNeilly. 2003. Assessment of salinity tolerance based upon seedling root growth response function in maize. Euphytica. 131: 81-89.
[6] Gautam, R.C., and K.C. Sharma. 1987. Dry matter accumulation under different planting schemes and plant densities of rice. Indian J. Agric. Res. 21(2): 101-109.
[7] Janmohammed, M., A. Abbasi and N. Sabaghnia. 2012. Influence of NaCl treatments on growth and biochemical parameters of castor bean (Ricinus communis L.). Acta Agriculturae Slovenica. 99(1): 31-40.
[8] Li, G., H. Zhang, X. Wu, C. Shi, X. Huang and A. Qin. 2011. Canopy reflectance in two castor been varieties (Ricinus communus L.) for growth assessment and yield prediction on coastal saline land of Yancheng district, China. Industrial Crops and Products. 33: 395-402.journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/indcrop.
[9] Rezek, T. Y, and H. A. Ali. 1982. Oil and Sugar Crops. Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research. Iraq. pp. 592.
[10] Singh, R.K., and Chaudhary. 1985. Biometrical Methods in Quantitative Genetic Analysis. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi, Ludhiana. pp. 318.
[11] Dimova, R. and D. Dekov. 1990. Field Crops of Tropic and Semitropic Areas. Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research. Iraq. Translated by K. I. M. Ali.pp.432.
[12] Khan, M. H. and S. K. Panda. 2008. Alterations in root lipid peroxidation and antioxidative responses in two rice cultivars under NaCl-salinity stress. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum. 30: 250-255.
[13] Parida, A. K. and A. B. Das. 2005. Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety.60-324-349.
[14] Aziz, F. O. 2008. Breeding Sunflower, Sorghum, and Maize by Hoeycomb. Ph. D. Dissertation, Dept. of Field Crop Sci., College of Agric., Univ. of Baghdad, pp. 90.
[15] Flowers, T.J. 2004. Improving crop salt tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 55: 307-319.
[16] Ashraf, M. and P. J. C. Harris. 2004. Potential biochemical indicators of salinity tolerance in plants. Plant Sci. 166: 3-16.
[17] Preetha, S. and T. S. Raveendran. 2007. Genetic variability and association analysis in three different morphological groups of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Asian Journal of Plant Sciences. 6(1): 122-128.
[18] Soomro, Z. A., M. B. Kumbhar, A. S. Larik, M. Imran and S. A. Brohi. 2010. Heritability and selection response in segregating generations of upland cotton. Pakistan J. Agric. Res. 23(1-2): 25-30.
[19] Elsahookie, M. M. and M. I. Al-Khafajy. 2014. Mechanism of plant salinity stress tolerance. The Iraqi. J. Agric. Sci. 45(5): 430-438.
[20] Salisbury, F.B. 1996.Units, Symbols, and Terminology for Plant Physiology. New York, Oxford, Oxford University Press. pp. 234.
Author Information
  • Directorate of Horticulture, Ministry of Agriculture, Baghdad, Iraq

  • College of Agriculture, University of Baghdad, Dept. of Crop Sciences, Baghdad, Iraq

  • College of Agriculture, University of Baghdad, Dept. of Crop Sciences, Baghdad, Iraq

Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Ali Mohammed Oleiwi, Medhat Mejeed Elsahookie, Layla Ismail Mohammed. (2016). Performance of Castor Bean Selects In Saline Sodic Soil. International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences, 2(4), 64-68. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20160204.14

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Ali Mohammed Oleiwi; Medhat Mejeed Elsahookie; Layla Ismail Mohammed. Performance of Castor Bean Selects In Saline Sodic Soil. Int. J. Appl. Agric. Sci. 2016, 2(4), 64-68. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaas.20160204.14

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Ali Mohammed Oleiwi, Medhat Mejeed Elsahookie, Layla Ismail Mohammed. Performance of Castor Bean Selects In Saline Sodic Soil. Int J Appl Agric Sci. 2016;2(4):64-68. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaas.20160204.14

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijaas.20160204.14,
      author = {Ali Mohammed Oleiwi and Medhat Mejeed Elsahookie and Layla Ismail Mohammed},
      title = {Performance of Castor Bean Selects In Saline Sodic Soil},
      journal = {International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences},
      volume = {2},
      number = {4},
      pages = {64-68},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijaas.20160204.14},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20160204.14},
      eprint = {https://download.sciencepg.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijaas.20160204.14},
      abstract = {To determine the influence of selection on castor bean plants tolerance to saline sodic soil, three planting methods were used; in the bottom of furrow, at the side of furrow, and in rows of plots. The soil was saline sodic (pH > 8.4, SAR < 13, Ec < 4 dS/m), the cultivar of castor bean was Hindi 21. The experiments were conducted in 2010 and 2011 on the farm of Field Crops, Coll. of Agric., Univ. of Baghdad. At maturity, selected plants of those gave higher seed yield were harvested from each treatment. Selection pressure used on plant populations was 10%. In the second year, seeds from each of the three treatments with the control were planted on the same field with 53 and 89 thousand plants/ha. The design used was a factorial with RCBD of three replicates. The results revealed that selected plants from row planting out yielded the other three treatments in seed yield/plant, seed no./plant, seed weight and harvest index. The values were 61 g, 251 seeds, 0.25 g, and 9.9%, respectively. The lower planting density gave higher plant seed yield, seed no./plant and harvest index (55.6 g, 281 seeds, 8.0%). It was concluded that selection on individual plants from planting in rows was effective to create a new variation in castor bean tolerance to saline sodic soil. The higher percent of heritability was in total dry matter (98.9%), crop growth rate (98.4%), and plant seed yield (96.8%). That was indicating that genetic variance has the significant influence in phenotypic variance.},
     year = {2016}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Performance of Castor Bean Selects In Saline Sodic Soil
    AU  - Ali Mohammed Oleiwi
    AU  - Medhat Mejeed Elsahookie
    AU  - Layla Ismail Mohammed
    Y1  - 2016/06/20
    PY  - 2016
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20160204.14
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijaas.20160204.14
    T2  - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences
    JF  - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences
    JO  - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences
    SP  - 64
    EP  - 68
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2469-7885
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20160204.14
    AB  - To determine the influence of selection on castor bean plants tolerance to saline sodic soil, three planting methods were used; in the bottom of furrow, at the side of furrow, and in rows of plots. The soil was saline sodic (pH > 8.4, SAR < 13, Ec < 4 dS/m), the cultivar of castor bean was Hindi 21. The experiments were conducted in 2010 and 2011 on the farm of Field Crops, Coll. of Agric., Univ. of Baghdad. At maturity, selected plants of those gave higher seed yield were harvested from each treatment. Selection pressure used on plant populations was 10%. In the second year, seeds from each of the three treatments with the control were planted on the same field with 53 and 89 thousand plants/ha. The design used was a factorial with RCBD of three replicates. The results revealed that selected plants from row planting out yielded the other three treatments in seed yield/plant, seed no./plant, seed weight and harvest index. The values were 61 g, 251 seeds, 0.25 g, and 9.9%, respectively. The lower planting density gave higher plant seed yield, seed no./plant and harvest index (55.6 g, 281 seeds, 8.0%). It was concluded that selection on individual plants from planting in rows was effective to create a new variation in castor bean tolerance to saline sodic soil. The higher percent of heritability was in total dry matter (98.9%), crop growth rate (98.4%), and plant seed yield (96.8%). That was indicating that genetic variance has the significant influence in phenotypic variance.
    VL  - 2
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

  • Sections