| Peer-Reviewed

COVID-19 Cannot Sustainably Improve Air Quality: Evidence from Reopening an Economy

Received: 10 March 2021    Accepted: 26 March 2021    Published: 7 April 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

One “silver lining” of the COVID-19 pandemic has been the reduction in air pollution that followed lockdowns. Unfortunately, this unintended air pollution decline will likely be short-lived. As regions begin to recover their economies, travel and industrial activity will increase the ambient pollutants quickly offsetting the improvement in air quality. Therefore, it is urgent to clarify the causal impact of reopening an economy on air quality during COVID-19. Based on city-level daily air quality data in China, this paper is the first to empirically analyze the causal effect of reopening the economy in the provincial capital Lanzhou on concentrations of four air pollutants using the synthetic control method. The results show that the reopening caused a significant increase in the concentration of NO2 by as much as 30 μg/m3 (an increase of 75% from the lockdown level) and a significant increase in O3 concentrations by 60μg/m3 (a 60% increase) which peaked on the 6th day after the restart. The reopening also led to significant fluctuations in SO2 and CO concentrations. This study contains useful conclusions by providing timely and reliable causal evidence on the lasting impact of COVID-19 on air quality.

Published in Journal of Health and Environmental Research (Volume 7, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.jher.20210702.12
Page(s) 88-98
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

COVID-19, Air Quality, Reopening Economies, Synthetic Control Method

References
[1] Chen, S., Yang, J., Yang, W., Wang, C., & Bärnighausen, T. (2020). COVID-19 control in China during mass population movements at New Year. The Lancet, 395 (10226), 764-766.
[2] Qiu, Y., Chen, X., & Shi, W. (2020). Impacts of social and economic factors on the transmission of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China. Journal of Population Economics, 1.
[3] Chan, J. F. W., Yuan, S., Kok, K. H., To, K. K. W., Chu, H., Yang, J.,... & Tsoi, H. W. (2020). A familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating person-to-person transmission: a study of a family cluster. The Lancet, 395 (10223), 514-523.
[4] Bajardi, P., Poletto, C., Ramasco, J. J., Tizzoni, M., Colizza, V., & Vespignani, A. (2011). Human mobility networks, travel restrictions, and the global spread of 2009 H1N1 pandemic. PloS one, 6 (1), e16591.
[5] Wang, Q., & Taylor, J. E. (2016). Patterns and limitations of urban human mobility resilience under the influence of multiple types of natural disaster. PLoS one, 11 (1), e0147299.
[6] Charu, V., Zeger, S., Gog, J., Bjørnstad, O. N., Kissler, S., Simonsen, L.,... & Viboud, C. (2017). Human mobility and the spatial transmission of influenza in the United States. PLoS computational biology, 13 (2), e1005382.
[7] Fang, H., Wang, L., & Yang, Y. (2020). Human mobility restrictions and the spread of the novel coronavirus (2019-ncov) in china. Journal of Public Economics, 191, 104272.
[8] New York Times (2020) Watch the footprint of coronavirus spread across countries, March 17th. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/climate/coronavirus-pollution.html. Accessed 27 Aug 2020.
[9] Guardian (2020) Coronavirus pandemic leading to huge drop in air pollution, March 23rd. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/mar/23/coronavirus-pandemic-leading-to-huge-drop-in-air-pollution. Accessed 27 Aug 2020.
[10] Independent (2020) Coronavirus: air pollution drops in UK cities as life comes to a halt with nationwide lockdown, March 24th. https://www.independent.co.uk/environment/coronavirus-air-pollution-uk-lockdown-china-italy-covid-19-a9421291.html. Accessed 27 Aug 2020.
[11] Space (2020) Italy’s coronavirus response dramatically reduces air pollution emissions, satellites show, March 13th. https://www.space.com/italy-coronavirus-outbreak-response-reduces-emissions-satellite-images.html. Accessed 27 Aug 2020.
[12] Cole, M. A., Elliott, R. J., & Liu, B. (2020). The impact of the Wuhan Covid-19 lockdown on air pollution and health: a machine learning and augmented synthetic control approach. Environmental and Resource Economics, 1-28.
[13] He, G., Pan, Y., & Tanaka, T. (2020). The short-term impacts of COVID-19 lockdown on urban air pollution in China. Nature Sustainability, 1-7.
[14] Almond, D., Du, X., & Zhang, S. (2020). Did COVID-19 Improve Air Quality Near Hubei? (No. w27086). National Bureau of Economic Research.
[15] Cicala, S., Holland, S. P., Mansur, E. T., Muller, N. Z., & Yates, A. J. (2020). Expected Health Effects of Reduced Air Pollution from COVID-19 Social Distancing (No. w27135). National Bureau of Economic Research.
[16] Brodeur, A., Cook, N., & Wright, T. (2020). On the Effects of COVID-19 Safer-At-Home Policies on Social Distancing, Car Crashes and Pollution.
[17] Dang, H. A., & Trinh, T. A. (2020). Does the COVID-19 pandemic improve global air quality? New cross- national evidence on its unintended consequences.
[18] Tian, H., Liu, Y., Li, Y., Wu, C. H., Chen, B., Kraemer, M. U.,... & Wang, B. (2020). An investigation of transmission control measures during the first 50 days of the COVID-19 epidemic in China. Science, 368 (6491), 638-642.
[19] Abadie, A., & Gardeazabal, J. (2003). The economic costs of conflict: A case study of the Basque Country. American economic review, 93 (1), 113-132.
[20] Abadie, A., Diamond, A., & Hainmueller, J. (2010). Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: Estimating the effect of California’s tobacco control program. Journal of the American statistical Association, 105 (490), 493-505.
[21] Abadie, A. (2019). Using synthetic controls: Feasibility, data requirements, and methodological aspects. Journal of Economic Literature.
[22] Athey, S., & Imbens, G. W. (2017). The state of applied econometrics: Causality and policy evaluation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31 (2), 3-32.
[23] Bertrand, M., Duflo, E., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates?. The Quarterly journal of economics, 119 (1), 249-275.
[24] Abadie, A., Diamond, A., & Hainmueller, J. (2015). Comparative politics and the synthetic control method. American Journal of Political Science, 59 (2), 495-510.
[25] Fuentes, R., Galeotti, M., Lanza, A., & Manzano, B. (2020). COVID-19 and Climate Change: A Tale of Two Global Problems. Available at SSRN 3604140.
[26] Anh, V., Duc, H., & Azzi, M. (1997). Modeling anthropogenic trends in air quality data. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 47 (1), 66-71.
[27] Grange, S. K., Carslaw, D. C., Lewis, A., Boleti, E., & Heuglin, C. (2018). Random forest meteorological normalisation models for Swiss PM10 trend analysis. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions.
[28] Grange, S. K., & Carslaw, D. C. (2019). Using meteorological normalisation to detect interventions in air quality time series. Science of The Total Environment, 653, 578-588.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Xiaoxuan Yang. (2021). COVID-19 Cannot Sustainably Improve Air Quality: Evidence from Reopening an Economy. Journal of Health and Environmental Research, 7(2), 88-98. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jher.20210702.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Xiaoxuan Yang. COVID-19 Cannot Sustainably Improve Air Quality: Evidence from Reopening an Economy. J. Health Environ. Res. 2021, 7(2), 88-98. doi: 10.11648/j.jher.20210702.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Xiaoxuan Yang. COVID-19 Cannot Sustainably Improve Air Quality: Evidence from Reopening an Economy. J Health Environ Res. 2021;7(2):88-98. doi: 10.11648/j.jher.20210702.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.jher.20210702.12,
      author = {Xiaoxuan Yang},
      title = {COVID-19 Cannot Sustainably Improve Air Quality: Evidence from Reopening an Economy},
      journal = {Journal of Health and Environmental Research},
      volume = {7},
      number = {2},
      pages = {88-98},
      doi = {10.11648/j.jher.20210702.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jher.20210702.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jher.20210702.12},
      abstract = {One “silver lining” of the COVID-19 pandemic has been the reduction in air pollution that followed lockdowns. Unfortunately, this unintended air pollution decline will likely be short-lived. As regions begin to recover their economies, travel and industrial activity will increase the ambient pollutants quickly offsetting the improvement in air quality. Therefore, it is urgent to clarify the causal impact of reopening an economy on air quality during COVID-19. Based on city-level daily air quality data in China, this paper is the first to empirically analyze the causal effect of reopening the economy in the provincial capital Lanzhou on concentrations of four air pollutants using the synthetic control method. The results show that the reopening caused a significant increase in the concentration of NO2 by as much as 30 μg/m3 (an increase of 75% from the lockdown level) and a significant increase in O3 concentrations by 60μg/m3 (a 60% increase) which peaked on the 6th day after the restart. The reopening also led to significant fluctuations in SO2 and CO concentrations. This study contains useful conclusions by providing timely and reliable causal evidence on the lasting impact of COVID-19 on air quality.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - COVID-19 Cannot Sustainably Improve Air Quality: Evidence from Reopening an Economy
    AU  - Xiaoxuan Yang
    Y1  - 2021/04/07
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jher.20210702.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.jher.20210702.12
    T2  - Journal of Health and Environmental Research
    JF  - Journal of Health and Environmental Research
    JO  - Journal of Health and Environmental Research
    SP  - 88
    EP  - 98
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2472-3592
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jher.20210702.12
    AB  - One “silver lining” of the COVID-19 pandemic has been the reduction in air pollution that followed lockdowns. Unfortunately, this unintended air pollution decline will likely be short-lived. As regions begin to recover their economies, travel and industrial activity will increase the ambient pollutants quickly offsetting the improvement in air quality. Therefore, it is urgent to clarify the causal impact of reopening an economy on air quality during COVID-19. Based on city-level daily air quality data in China, this paper is the first to empirically analyze the causal effect of reopening the economy in the provincial capital Lanzhou on concentrations of four air pollutants using the synthetic control method. The results show that the reopening caused a significant increase in the concentration of NO2 by as much as 30 μg/m3 (an increase of 75% from the lockdown level) and a significant increase in O3 concentrations by 60μg/m3 (a 60% increase) which peaked on the 6th day after the restart. The reopening also led to significant fluctuations in SO2 and CO concentrations. This study contains useful conclusions by providing timely and reliable causal evidence on the lasting impact of COVID-19 on air quality.
    VL  - 7
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Harris School of Public Policy, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States of America

  • Sections