International Journal of Sustainability Management and Information Technologies

| Peer-Reviewed |

Factors Affecting the Adoption of ICT by Administrators in the University for Development Studies Tamale: Empirical Evidence from the UTAUT Model

Received: 16 January 2018    Accepted: 16 February 2018    Published: 15 March 2018
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

The study of technology acceptance is a constantly developing field, perhaps, resulting from the ever evolvement of new technologies. Models and theories have been developed to address and determine technology user acceptance behaviour. The study adopted the UTAUT model, which is considered parsimonious and comprehensive because of its eclectic nature. The study thus examined the critical predictors of behavioural intentions and the relationships that exist among the predictor variables in the ICT adoption context in the University for Development Studies, Tamale in Ghana. The study surveyed 100 respondents using self-administered questionnaire. The findings of the study indicate that the adopted model for the study explains 67.3% of the variation in behavioural intention to adopt ICT. It also found that facilitating conditions exert the strongest influence on behavioural intention than the rest of the predictor variables in the research context. Whereas performance expectancy was the least influential, social influence and effort expectancy were second and third respectively. Theoretically, the study fills the dearth of application of technology acceptance models in understanding the critical determinants of behavioural intention in Universities’ staff ICT adoption context. It also provides valuable implications for management of Higher Institutions of Learning.

DOI 10.11648/j.ijsmit.20180401.11
Published in International Journal of Sustainability Management and Information Technologies (Volume 4, Issue 1, March 2018)
Page(s) 1-9
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

ICT Adoption, UTAUT, UDS, Administrators, Tamale

References
[1] Bayindir, N., & Inan, H. Z. (2009). The educational quality of the technology used in teacher training. World Applied Science Journal, 6 (6), 855-860.
[2] Algahtani, M. (2017). Factors influencing the adoption of learning management systems in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabian universities by female academic staff. (Doctoral dissertation), University of RMIT, Melbourne, Australia.
[3] Ray, S. & Davis, R. (1991). Teaching and learning in the global era. In R. King et al. The University in the global age. (pp. 164-180). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
[4] Norris, C., Sullivan, T., Poirot, J., & Slowav, E. (2003). No access, no use, no impact: Ohio University diffusion of ICT in education snapshot surveys of educational technology in K-12. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. 36 (1), pp. 15-28.
[5] Felton, F. S. (2006). The use of computers by elementary school principals. Virginia: Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
[6] Afshari, M., Bakar, K., Luan, W., Samah, B., & Foo, F. (2010). Computer use by secondary school principals. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9 (3), pp. 8-25.
[7] Afshari, M., Bakar, K., Luan, W & Siraj, S. (2012). Factors affecting the transformational leadership role of principals in implementing ICT in schools. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11 (4), pp. 164-176.
[8] Kamel, S. (2010). E-strategies for technological diffusion and adoption: National ICT approaches for socioeconomic development. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
[9] Hennessey, S. (2010). Teacher factors influencing classroom use of ICT in Sub-Saharan Africa. Itupale Online Journal of African Studies, 2 (1), pp. 39- 54.
[10] Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. Mis Quarterly, 319.
[11] Al-Qeisi, K., (2009). Analyzing the Use of UTAUT Model in Explaining and Online Behavior: Internet Banking Adoption, Ph.D. thesis, Brunel University, UK.
[12] Eben, A.-K., & Tanye, H. A. (2009). Tertiary Students' View on Information and Communications Technology Usage in Ghana. Journal of Information Technology Impact, Volume 9, 81-90.
[13] Kwame, O. Y., Fosu, C., & Roderick, K.-D. (2013). Exploring the Trend of ICT Adoption in Tertiary Institutions in Ghana: A Case Study at Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST). Information and Knowledge Management, 44-51.
[14] Kwame, O. Y., Fosu, C., & Roderick, K.-D. (2013). Exploring the Trend of ICT Adoption in Tertiary Institutions in Ghana: A Case Study at Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST). Information and Knowledge Management, 44-51.
[15] Oye, N., Iahad, N. A., & Zairah, A. R. (2011, October). A Model of ICT Acceptance and Use for Teachers in Higher Education. International Journal of Computer Science & Communication Networks, Volume 1 (1), 22-40. Retrieved from http://www.ijcscn.com.
[16] Oye, N. D., A. Iahad, N., & Ab., R. N. (2012, June 3). Using Mixed Method Approach to Understand Acceptance and Usage of ICT in Nigerian Public Universities. International Journal of Computer & Technology, Volume 2, 47-63.
[17] Bassey, S., D. Okodoko and U. Akpanumoh, (2009). Information communication technologies in the management of education for sustainable development in Africa. African Research Review, 3 (3): 414-428.
[18] Ertugrul, T., Ergin, S. V., & Toker, B. (2010). A study on the Acceptance of Information Technologies from the Perspective of the Academicians in turkey. Ege Academic Review, 791-812.
[19] Kukafka, R., Johnson, B., Linfante, A., & Allegrante, J. P. (2003). Grounding a new information technology implementation framework in behavioral science: a systematic analysis of the literature on IT use. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 36 (3), 218-227.
[20] Traci, J. H., Anna L, M., & Basoglu, K. A. (2014). Reliabilty Generalization of Percieved Ease of Use, Percieved Usefulness, and Behavioural Intentions. Mis Quaterly, 1/28.
[21] Yu, C. -S. (2012). Factors Affecting Individuals to Adopt Mobile Banking: Empirical Evidence from the UTAUT Model. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, Volume 13 (2), 104-120.
[22] Mohammed, A., Steve, D., & Rayed, A. (2012). Analysis of Citzens Acceptance of Technology in the Kindom of Saudi Arabia. Journal Article, 56-65.
[23] Beaudry, A., & Pinsonneault, A. (2010). The Other Side of Acceptance: Studying the Direct and Indirect Effects of Emotions on Information Technology Use. Mis Quarterly, 589-710.
[24] Williams, M. D., Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Lal, B. (2010). Is UTAUT Really Used or Just Cited for the Sake of It? A Systematic Review of Citations of UTAUT's Originating Article. Journal Artcle, 103-110.
[25] Mumtaz, A. H., & Steve, C. (2014). User Acceptance Determinants of Information Technology Innovation in Organizations. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 1-17.
[26] Krishnaveni, D. R., & J. Meenakumari. (2010). Usage of ICT for Information Administration in Higher Education Institutions - A Study. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, Vol. 1, 282-286.
[27] Oye, N., Iahad, N. A., & Zairah, A. R. (2011, October). A Model of ICT Acceptance and Use for Teachers in Higher Education. International Journal of Computer Science & Communication Networks, Volume 1 (1), 22-40. Retrieved from http://www.ijcscn.com Hair et al., 2006 as cited in Al – Qeisi, 2009).
[28] Katz, I. R. and Macklin, A. S. (2007). Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Literacy: Integration and Assessment in Higher Education. Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 5 (4), pp.50-55.
[29] Schiler, J. (2003). Working with ICT: Perceptions of Australian principals. Journal of Educational Administration, 41 (3), pp. 171-185.
[30] Quadri, N. N., Muhammed, A., Sanober, S., Qureshi, M. R. N., & Shah, A. (2017). Barriers Effecting Successful Implementation of E-Learning in Saudi Arabian Universities. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 12 (06), 94-107.
[31] Mbatia, M. (2014). Factors influencing school principals’ integration of ICT in administration of public secondary schools in Githunguri sub-county, Kiambu county, Kenya. Nairobi, Unpublished Masters project, University of Nairobi.
[32] Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., & Davis, F. (2003). User Acceptance of information technology: toward a unified veiw. MIS Quarterly, 27 (3) 425 - 478.
[33] Caroline Salerno (2009), “Administrator’s Role in Technology Integration”, Education World 2009 (Obeng, 2004).
[34] Krishnaveni, D. R., & J. Meenakumari. (2010). Usage of ICT for Information Administration in Higher Education Institutions - A Study. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, Vol. 1, 282-286.
[35] Krishnaveni, D. R., & J. Meenakumari. (2010). Usage of ICT for Information Administration in Higher Education Institutions - A Study. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, Vol. 1, 282-286.
[36] E. Abu Shanab, J. M. Pearson, (2007) "Internet banking in Jordan: The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) perspective", Journal of Systems and Information Technology, Vol. 9 Issue: 1, pp. 78-97.
[37] Ikechukwu, O. (2012). Behavoral Intention to Adopt Internet Banking. Master's Thesis, 9 92.
[38] Oye, N., Iahad, N. A., & Zairah, A. R. (2011, October). A Model of ICT Acceptance and Use for Teachers in Higher Education. International Journal of Computer Science & Communication Networks, Volume 1 (1), 22-40. Retrieved from http://www.ijcscn.com Hair et al., 2006 as cited in Al – Qeisi, 2009).
[39] Muriithi, P., Horner, D., & Pemberton, L. (2014). Understanding factors influencing the effect of scientific collaboration on productivity in a developing country: Kenya. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Montreal, Canada, 50, 1–10.
[40] http://www.fidis.net/resources/fidis-deliverables/mobility-and-identity/int-d11100010/doc/23/
[41] http://mhhe.com/socscience/psychology/runyon/spss/spss.html
[42] http://sphweb.bumc.bu.edu/otlt/MPH-Modules/SB/SB721-Models/SB721-Models3.html
[43] http://study.com/academy/lesson/albert-bandura-social-cognitive-theory-and-vicarious- learning.html
[44] http://www.uds.edu.gh/about-us/history-facts
Author Information
  • Department of Academic Planning and Quality Assurance, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana

  • Office of the University Principal, University of Education - Winneba, Kumasi, Ghana

  • Department of Academic Planning and Quality Assurance, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana

Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Alhassan Ibrahim, Mavis Adu-Gyamfi, Bawa Abdallah Kassim. (2018). Factors Affecting the Adoption of ICT by Administrators in the University for Development Studies Tamale: Empirical Evidence from the UTAUT Model. International Journal of Sustainability Management and Information Technologies, 4(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsmit.20180401.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Alhassan Ibrahim; Mavis Adu-Gyamfi; Bawa Abdallah Kassim. Factors Affecting the Adoption of ICT by Administrators in the University for Development Studies Tamale: Empirical Evidence from the UTAUT Model. Int. J. Sustain. Manag. Inf. Technol. 2018, 4(1), 1-9. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsmit.20180401.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Alhassan Ibrahim, Mavis Adu-Gyamfi, Bawa Abdallah Kassim. Factors Affecting the Adoption of ICT by Administrators in the University for Development Studies Tamale: Empirical Evidence from the UTAUT Model. Int J Sustain Manag Inf Technol. 2018;4(1):1-9. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsmit.20180401.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijsmit.20180401.11,
      author = {Alhassan Ibrahim and Mavis Adu-Gyamfi and Bawa Abdallah Kassim},
      title = {Factors Affecting the Adoption of ICT by Administrators in the University for Development Studies Tamale: Empirical Evidence from the UTAUT Model},
      journal = {International Journal of Sustainability Management and Information Technologies},
      volume = {4},
      number = {1},
      pages = {1-9},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijsmit.20180401.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsmit.20180401.11},
      eprint = {https://download.sciencepg.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijsmit.20180401.11},
      abstract = {The study of technology acceptance is a constantly developing field, perhaps, resulting from the ever evolvement of new technologies. Models and theories have been developed to address and determine technology user acceptance behaviour. The study adopted the UTAUT model, which is considered parsimonious and comprehensive because of its eclectic nature. The study thus examined the critical predictors of behavioural intentions and the relationships that exist among the predictor variables in the ICT adoption context in the University for Development Studies, Tamale in Ghana. The study surveyed 100 respondents using self-administered questionnaire. The findings of the study indicate that the adopted model for the study explains 67.3% of the variation in behavioural intention to adopt ICT. It also found that facilitating conditions exert the strongest influence on behavioural intention than the rest of the predictor variables in the research context. Whereas performance expectancy was the least influential, social influence and effort expectancy were second and third respectively. Theoretically, the study fills the dearth of application of technology acceptance models in understanding the critical determinants of behavioural intention in Universities’ staff ICT adoption context. It also provides valuable implications for management of Higher Institutions of Learning.},
     year = {2018}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Factors Affecting the Adoption of ICT by Administrators in the University for Development Studies Tamale: Empirical Evidence from the UTAUT Model
    AU  - Alhassan Ibrahim
    AU  - Mavis Adu-Gyamfi
    AU  - Bawa Abdallah Kassim
    Y1  - 2018/03/15
    PY  - 2018
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsmit.20180401.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijsmit.20180401.11
    T2  - International Journal of Sustainability Management and Information Technologies
    JF  - International Journal of Sustainability Management and Information Technologies
    JO  - International Journal of Sustainability Management and Information Technologies
    SP  - 1
    EP  - 9
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2575-5110
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsmit.20180401.11
    AB  - The study of technology acceptance is a constantly developing field, perhaps, resulting from the ever evolvement of new technologies. Models and theories have been developed to address and determine technology user acceptance behaviour. The study adopted the UTAUT model, which is considered parsimonious and comprehensive because of its eclectic nature. The study thus examined the critical predictors of behavioural intentions and the relationships that exist among the predictor variables in the ICT adoption context in the University for Development Studies, Tamale in Ghana. The study surveyed 100 respondents using self-administered questionnaire. The findings of the study indicate that the adopted model for the study explains 67.3% of the variation in behavioural intention to adopt ICT. It also found that facilitating conditions exert the strongest influence on behavioural intention than the rest of the predictor variables in the research context. Whereas performance expectancy was the least influential, social influence and effort expectancy were second and third respectively. Theoretically, the study fills the dearth of application of technology acceptance models in understanding the critical determinants of behavioural intention in Universities’ staff ICT adoption context. It also provides valuable implications for management of Higher Institutions of Learning.
    VL  - 4
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

  • Sections