Asymmetrical Relationship Construction in Medical Interactions - A Case Study of Advice-giving in Mandarin Chinese
Communication and Linguistics Studies
Volume 6, Issue 1, March 2020, Pages: 10-15
Received: Feb. 20, 2020; Accepted: Mar. 4, 2020; Published: Mar. 17, 2020
Views 387      Downloads 114
Author
Li Chuntao, School of Foreign Languages, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, China
Article Tools
Follow on us
Abstract
Social interactions are fundamental components of social life, and we as social members witness and participate in a myriad of social actions and activities. It is in and through these interactions that cultures are established, identities are constructed and relationships are created, maintained or changed. Conversation analysis (CA), as an emergent discipline and research method, is committed to pin down the refined details in social interaction, in the hope to develop systematic knowledge and analysis of what participants in social interactions do and what they achieve. Doctor-patient interaction has long been a much explored topic in CA, but there is still much to be probed into, as talks in the medical context can be a complicated process dependent on many contingencies arising right from that context. This paper adopts conversation analysis as its research method and takes advice-giving in doctor-patient talks as its focus. It is argued that despite the apparently fixed layman-professional relationship in clinical contexts, the professional and lay people relationship is continually created, maintained and adjusted. In medical contexts, a professional’s advice is given with displays of higher epistemic authority, but it may meet with resistances as a result of contingencies in the diagnosis or treatment process. To manage those resistances, a doctor can resort to different practices, including embedding the advice into stories or fusing the advice-giving action into information delivery, and so on. This study aims to contribute to the understanding of dynamic relationship construction and advice-giving practices in medical encounters.
Keywords
Advice-giving, Asymmetry, Medical Interaction, Conversation Analysis
To cite this article
Li Chuntao, Asymmetrical Relationship Construction in Medical Interactions - A Case Study of Advice-giving in Mandarin Chinese, Communication and Linguistics Studies. Vol. 6, No. 1, 2020, pp. 10-15. doi: 10.11648/j.cls.20200601.13
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
[1]
C. W. Butler, J. Potter, S. Danby, M. Emmison, and A. Hepburn, (2010). Advice-implicative interrogatives. Social Psychology Quarterly 73 (3), 265-287.
[2]
T. Parsons, The Social System. New York: The Free Press, 1951.
[3]
T. Parsons, (1975). The sick role and the role of the physician reconsidered. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 53: 257-78.
[4]
J. Heritage, and S. Sefi, “Dilemmas of advice: Aspects of the delivery and reception of advice in interactions between health visitors and first time mothers”, In Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, P. Drew and J. Heritage, Eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992, pp. 359-419.
[5]
A. Pilnick, (1999). “Patient counseling” by pharmacists: Advice, information, or instruction? Sociological Quarterly 40 (4): 613-622.
[6]
A. Kinnell, and D. Maynard, (1996). The delivery and receipt of safer sex advice in pre-test counseling sessions for HIV and AIDS. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 35: 405-437.
[7]
D. Silverman, Discourses of Counselling: HIV Counselling as Social Interaction. London, England: Sage, 1997.
[8]
A. Pilnick, and T. Coleman, (2003). “I’ll give up smoking when you get me better”: patients’ resistance to attempts to problematise smoking in general practice (GP) consultations. Social Science and Medicine 57 (1): 135-145.
[9]
C. W. Butler, S. Danby, M. Emmison, and K. Thorpe, (2009). Managing medical advice seeking in calls to Child Health Line. Sociology of Health and Illness 31 (6): 817-834.
[10]
A. Hepburn, and J. Potter, (2011). Designing the recipient: Managing advice resistance in institutional settings. Social Psychology Quarterly 74 (2), 216-241.
[11]
I. Hutchby, (1995). Aspects of recipient design in expert advice-giving on call-in radio. Discourse Processes 19 (2): 219-238.
[12]
J. Heritage, “Epistemics in conversation”, in The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, J. Sidnell and T. Stivers, Eds. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013, pp. 370-394.
[13]
J. Heritage, and G. Raymond, (2005). The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly 68: 15-38.
[14]
G. Jefferson, “A glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction”, in Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, G. Lerner, Ed., Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2004, pp. 13-31.
[15]
L. Mondada, “The conversation analytic approach to data collection”, in The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, J. Sidnell and T. Stivers, Eds. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013, pp. 32-56.
[16]
P. Drew, “Turn design”, in The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, J. Sidnell and T. Stivers, Eds. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013, pp. 131-149.
[17]
H. Sacks, E. A. Schegloff, and G. Jefferson, (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language 50: 696-735.
[18]
H. Sacks, Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell, 1992.
[19]
E. A. Schegloff, (2007). Tutorial on membership categorization. Journal of Pragmatics 39: 462-482.
[20]
J. Heritage, and S. Clayman, Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities and Institutions. Oxford: Wiley - Blackwell, 2010.
[21]
E. Gülich, and T. Kotschi, “Les actes de reformulation dans la consultation La dame de Caluire, in L'analyse des interactions verbales. La dame de Caluire: une consultation, P. Bange, Ed. P Lang, Berne, 1987, pp. 15-81.
[22]
B. Pennec, Discourse Readjustment (s) in Contemporary English. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2018, pp. 75-87.
[23]
C. Kitzinger, (2013). “Repair”, in The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, J. Sidnell and T. Stivers, Eds. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013, pp. 229-256.
[24]
A. Pomrantz, (1986). Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies 9: 219-226.
[25]
J. Heritage, “A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement”, in Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage, Eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984, pp. 299-345.
[26]
M. Toerien, and C. Jackson, “Seeing silenced agendas in medical interaction: A conversation analytic case study”, in Qualitative Studies of Silence: The Unsaid as Social Action, A. Murray and K. Durrheim, Eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019, pp. 38-58.
[27]
C. Shaw, J. Potter, and A. Hepburn, (2015). Advice-implicative actions: Using interrogatives and assessments to deliver advice in mundane conversation. Discourse Studies 17: 317-342.
[28]
L. Wu, (2017). Symptom assessment and patient resistance in primary care interactions in Chinese hospitals. East Asian Pragmatics, 2 (2): 259-288.
[29]
S. Kushida and Y. Yamakawa, (2015). Fitting proposals to their sequential environment: A comparison of turn designs for proposing treatment in ongoing outpatient psychiatric consultations in Japan. Sociology of Health & Illness 37 (4), 522–544.
[30]
J. Heritage and A. McArthur, (2019). The diagnostic moment: A study in US primary care, Social Science & Medicine, 228: 262-271.
ADDRESS
Science Publishing Group
1 Rockefeller Plaza,
10th and 11th Floors,
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.
Tel: (001)347-983-5186