International Journal of Data Science and Analysis

| Peer-Reviewed |

Structural Vector Autoregressive (SVAR) Analysis of Maize Prices and Extreme Weather Shocks

Received: 18 September 2018    Accepted: 16 October 2018    Published: 16 November 2018
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

Food prices have experienced enormous movements and volatility in the recent past which can be predominantly attributed to climate change. Extreme weather events such as drought, flooding and heat waves have adverse effects on agricultural production in areas where agriculture is weather reliant. Among the extreme weather events experienced in Kenya is a drought in 2008/09 which led to a record increase in food prices. It is against this backdrop that this study sought to investigate the dynamic relationship between maize prices and extreme agro-climatic indicators. The study uses structural vector autoregressive (SVAR) tools; Granger causality, Impulse Response Function (IRF) and Forecast Error Variance Decomposition (FEVD) to examine the dynamic relationship between extreme weather indicators (minimum and maximum temperature and precipitation) and wholesale maize prices. Using different lag length determinant criterion, reduced-form VAR (2) is highlighted as the best model to fit the study data past weather and maize prices information over a data period spanning from January 2000 and December 2016. The study established that there exists granger causality between maize prices and weather variables. Agro-climatic indicators are therefore significant in predicting future maize prices. Principally, this significance can be inferred from the reliance of local agricultural production on phenological patterns. Maize price shocks exhibited inflationary effects on future maize prices, while a shock in weather variables has depreciating effects after three months. With regard to forecast variance, 30-39% of maize price variations resulted from its own shocks. The rest is attributed to precipitation (29-39%); maximum temperature (24-26%); and minimum temperature (7-8%).

DOI 10.11648/j.ijdsa.20180405.12
Published in International Journal of Data Science and Analysis (Volume 4, Issue 5, October 2018)
Page(s) 79-88
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Structural Vector Autoregressive (SVAR), Granger Causality, Forecast Error Variance Decomposition (FEVD), Impulse Response Function (IRF)

References
[1] Akaike. (1976). Canonical Correlation Analysis of Time Series and the Use of an Information Criterion. Systems Identification: Advances and Case Studies. Academic Press, New York.
[2] Baumeister, Christiane, & Kilian, L. (2013). Do Oil Price Increases Cause Higher Food Prices? No. 2013/10. CFS Working Paper.
[3] Ben, & Abdoussallam. (2002). Impact of Climate Change on Agricultural Production in the Sahel Part 1. Methodological Approach and Case Study for Millet in Niger. Climatic Change.
[4] Carter, Colin, Rausser, G., & Smith. A. (2013). The effect of the US Ethanol Mandate on Corn Prices. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Davis.
[5] Chen, Q., Colson, Escalante, & Wetzstein. (2012). Considering Macroeconomic Indicators in the Food before Fuel Nexus. Energy Economics.
[6] Chuku, Effiong, & Sam. (2010). Oil Price Distortions and their Shorthand Long-Run Impacts on the Nigerian Economy. MPRA Paper No. 24434.
[7] Dinku, Ceccato, Grover-Kopec, Lemma, & Conner. (2007). Validation of Satellite Rainfall Products over East Africa’s Complex Topography. International Journal of Remote Sensing.
[8] Ekpoh, I. (2010). Adaption to The Impact of Climatic Variations on Agriculture by Rural Farmers in North-western Nigeria. J Sustain Dev.
[9] Fackler. (1988). Vector Autoregressive Techniques for Structural Analysis. Rev. Anal. Econ.
[10] FAO. (2013). Rural Youth Employment in Developing Countries: A Global View. Rural Employment Overview/Synthesis No. 1.
[11] FAOSTAT. (2013). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
[12] FAOSTAT, D. (2013). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Statistical Database.
[13] Granger. (1969). Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods. Econometrica.
[14] Hannan, & Quinn. (1979). The Determination of the Order of an Auto-regression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 41.
[15] Hosking. (1980). The Multivariate Portmanteau Statistic. Journal of the American Statistical Association.
[16] Hui. (2004). Application of Vector Autoregressive Models to Hong Kong Air Pollution Data. Hong Kong.
[17] Javid, & Munir. (2011). The price puzzle and transmission mechanism of monetary policy in Pakistan: Structural vector autoregressive approach. MPRA Paper No. 30670.
[18] Jayne, Thomas, & Robert. (2006). The Effects of Government Maize Marketing Policies On Maize Market Prices. In Kenya. In Contributed Paper Prepared for Presentation at the International Association of Agricultural Economists’ Conference. Gold Coast, Australia.
[19] Kilavi, M. (2012). Kenya’s Climate. Kenya.
[20] Kimani. (2015). Climate Change on Agricultural: Challenges on Maize Production in Uasin Gishu and Trans Nzoia Counties. Department of Meteorology. University of Nairobi.
[21] Lutkepohl. (2005a). New Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis. Springer, Berlin.
[22] Lutz, K. (2009). Not All Oil Price Shocks Are Alike: Disentangling Demand and Supply Shocks in the Crude Oil Market. The American Economic Review No. 99.
[23] Maccini, & Yang. (2009). Under The Weather: Health, Schooling, and Economic Consequences of Early-Life Rainfall. American Economic Review.99 (3).
[24] McPhail, Lu, L., Du, X., & Muhammad. A. (2012). Disentangling Corn Price Volatility: The Role of Global Demand, Speculation, and Energy. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
[25] Melolinna, & Marko. (2012). Macroeconomic Shocks in an Oil Market VAR. European Central Bank.
[26] Mirza, M. (2003). Climate Change and Extreme Weather Events: Can Developing Countries Adapt? Climate Policy.
[27] Murungaru. (2003). Opening Statement by the Minister of State, Office of the President Republic of Kenya during the Second Conference on Early Warning Systems. Opening-Statement.
[28] Ong’amo, Raij, L., Dupas, Moyal, Calatayud, & Silvain. (2006). Distribution, Pest Status and Agro-Climatic Preferences of Lepidopteran Stem Borers of Maize in Kenya. In Annales de la Socie Entomologique de France.
[29] Oseni, & Masarirambi. (2011). Effect of Climate Change on Maize (Zea Mays) Production and Food Security in Swaziland. Change, 2, 3.
[30] Oyinbo, Adegboye, & Sulaiman. (2010). Retrospective Study of Causal Relationship between Climate Variability and Crop Production in Nigeria. Journal of Occupational Safety and Environmental Health.
[31] Rocha, & Soares. (2015). Water Scarcity and Birth Outcomes in the Brazilian Semiarid. Journal of Development Economics.
[32] Rojas, Vrieling, & Rembold. (2011). Assessing Drought Probability for Agricultural Areas in Africa with Coarse Resolution Remote Sensing Imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment,
[33] Schwarz. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics.
[34] Shibata. (1980). Asymptotically Efficient Selection of the Order of the Model for Estimating Parameters of a Linear Process. Annals of Statistics,
[35] Sims. (1980). Macroeconomics and Reality. Econometrica.
[36] Sims, & Zha. (2006). Were There Regime Switches in Us Monetary Policy. American Economic Review 96, 54 81.
[37] Tewari, Mehlhorn, Parrott, & Hill. (2015). Climatic Variability and Crop Price Trends in West Tennessee: A Bivariate Granger Causality Analysis. European Scientific Journal.
[38] Tsay, R. S. (2013). Multivariate Time Series Analysis: With R and Financial Applications. John Wiley & Sons.
[39] Zhang, Vedenov, & Wetzstein. (2007). Can the US Ethanol Industry Compete in the Alternative Fuels Market? Agricultural Economics. Fuels market? Agricultural Economics.
Author Information
  • Department of Statistics and Actuarial Sciences, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya

  • Department of Statistics and Actuarial Sciences, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya

  • Department of Statistics and Actuarial Sciences, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya

Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Samuel Waiguru Muriuki, Joseph Kyalo Mung’atu, Antony Gichuhi Waititu. (2018). Structural Vector Autoregressive (SVAR) Analysis of Maize Prices and Extreme Weather Shocks. International Journal of Data Science and Analysis, 4(5), 79-88. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijdsa.20180405.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Samuel Waiguru Muriuki; Joseph Kyalo Mung’atu; Antony Gichuhi Waititu. Structural Vector Autoregressive (SVAR) Analysis of Maize Prices and Extreme Weather Shocks. Int. J. Data Sci. Anal. 2018, 4(5), 79-88. doi: 10.11648/j.ijdsa.20180405.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Samuel Waiguru Muriuki, Joseph Kyalo Mung’atu, Antony Gichuhi Waititu. Structural Vector Autoregressive (SVAR) Analysis of Maize Prices and Extreme Weather Shocks. Int J Data Sci Anal. 2018;4(5):79-88. doi: 10.11648/j.ijdsa.20180405.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijdsa.20180405.12,
      author = {Samuel Waiguru Muriuki and Joseph Kyalo Mung’atu and Antony Gichuhi Waititu},
      title = {Structural Vector Autoregressive (SVAR) Analysis of Maize Prices and Extreme Weather Shocks},
      journal = {International Journal of Data Science and Analysis},
      volume = {4},
      number = {5},
      pages = {79-88},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijdsa.20180405.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijdsa.20180405.12},
      eprint = {https://download.sciencepg.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijdsa.20180405.12},
      abstract = {Food prices have experienced enormous movements and volatility in the recent past which can be predominantly attributed to climate change. Extreme weather events such as drought, flooding and heat waves have adverse effects on agricultural production in areas where agriculture is weather reliant. Among the extreme weather events experienced in Kenya is a drought in 2008/09 which led to a record increase in food prices. It is against this backdrop that this study sought to investigate the dynamic relationship between maize prices and extreme agro-climatic indicators. The study uses structural vector autoregressive (SVAR) tools; Granger causality, Impulse Response Function (IRF) and Forecast Error Variance Decomposition (FEVD) to examine the dynamic relationship between extreme weather indicators (minimum and maximum temperature and precipitation) and wholesale maize prices. Using different lag length determinant criterion, reduced-form VAR (2) is highlighted as the best model to fit the study data past weather and maize prices information over a data period spanning from January 2000 and December 2016. The study established that there exists granger causality between maize prices and weather variables. Agro-climatic indicators are therefore significant in predicting future maize prices. Principally, this significance can be inferred from the reliance of local agricultural production on phenological patterns. Maize price shocks exhibited inflationary effects on future maize prices, while a shock in weather variables has depreciating effects after three months. With regard to forecast variance, 30-39% of maize price variations resulted from its own shocks. The rest is attributed to precipitation (29-39%); maximum temperature (24-26%); and minimum temperature (7-8%).},
     year = {2018}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Structural Vector Autoregressive (SVAR) Analysis of Maize Prices and Extreme Weather Shocks
    AU  - Samuel Waiguru Muriuki
    AU  - Joseph Kyalo Mung’atu
    AU  - Antony Gichuhi Waititu
    Y1  - 2018/11/16
    PY  - 2018
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijdsa.20180405.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijdsa.20180405.12
    T2  - International Journal of Data Science and Analysis
    JF  - International Journal of Data Science and Analysis
    JO  - International Journal of Data Science and Analysis
    SP  - 79
    EP  - 88
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2575-1891
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijdsa.20180405.12
    AB  - Food prices have experienced enormous movements and volatility in the recent past which can be predominantly attributed to climate change. Extreme weather events such as drought, flooding and heat waves have adverse effects on agricultural production in areas where agriculture is weather reliant. Among the extreme weather events experienced in Kenya is a drought in 2008/09 which led to a record increase in food prices. It is against this backdrop that this study sought to investigate the dynamic relationship between maize prices and extreme agro-climatic indicators. The study uses structural vector autoregressive (SVAR) tools; Granger causality, Impulse Response Function (IRF) and Forecast Error Variance Decomposition (FEVD) to examine the dynamic relationship between extreme weather indicators (minimum and maximum temperature and precipitation) and wholesale maize prices. Using different lag length determinant criterion, reduced-form VAR (2) is highlighted as the best model to fit the study data past weather and maize prices information over a data period spanning from January 2000 and December 2016. The study established that there exists granger causality between maize prices and weather variables. Agro-climatic indicators are therefore significant in predicting future maize prices. Principally, this significance can be inferred from the reliance of local agricultural production on phenological patterns. Maize price shocks exhibited inflationary effects on future maize prices, while a shock in weather variables has depreciating effects after three months. With regard to forecast variance, 30-39% of maize price variations resulted from its own shocks. The rest is attributed to precipitation (29-39%); maximum temperature (24-26%); and minimum temperature (7-8%).
    VL  - 4
    IS  - 5
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

  • Sections