Effect of Temporomandibular Joint Bony Ankylosis on Maxillary Sinus Wall Thickness

Dehis M.; Tantawi W.; Rasheed A.

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijcoms.20160202.11

| Peer-Reviewed

Effect of Temporomandibular Joint Bony Ankylosis on Maxillary Sinus Wall Thickness

Dehis M., Tantawi W., Rasheed A.

Published in International Journal of Clinical Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Volume 2, Issue 2)

Received: 15 May 2016 Accepted: 3 June 2016 Published: 20 June 2016

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Objectives: This study was designed to clarify the changes that might be induced in the maxillary sinus walls thickness in response to TMJ bony ankylosis Subjects and methods: Forty five (45) subjects were included in the study. They were divided into two groups Group I, (patients group) comprised fifteen 15 patients were suffering from temporomandibular joint bony ankylosis (26 maxillary sinuses involved) and Group II, (control group) contained thirty (30) healthy volunteer. Maxillary sinus walls thickness has been measured by computerized tomography scan for both groups and was compared. Results: There was significant increase in mean thickness of all walls of maxillary sinus in patients group. The thickness of lateral wall of recurrent cases of TMJ ankylosis showed significant decrease when compared with the non-recurrent cases. Conclusion: Observable Increase in the thickness of maxillary sinus walls. This may be attributed to bone apposition from outer side without resorption from inner side. This explanation is ascribed to lack of pneumatization associated with hindrance of upper air way that usually existing with cases of TMJ bony ankylosis

Published in	International Journal of Clinical Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Volume 2, Issue 2)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijcoms.20160202.11
Page(s)	5-11
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Ankylosis, Computerized Tomography, Maxillary Sinus Wall Thickness

References

[1]	Jagannathan M: Temporomandibular joint ankylosis. Indian J Plast Surg. 2009; 42:187-8.
[2]	Vasconcelos BC, Bessa-Nogueira RV, & Cypriano RV: Treatment of temporomandibular joint ankylosis by gap arthroplasty. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2006; 11: 66-9.
[3]	Hamilton, WJ & Harrison, RJ: The nose, nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. In: Scott-Brown W.G., editor. Diseases of the ear nose and throat. London: Butterworth; 1952; pp. 16–20.
[4]	Lund VJ: Anatomy of the nose and paranasal sinuses. In: Kerr A.G., editor. Scott Brown’s Otolaryngology. 6. London: Butterworth Heinemann; 1997; pp. 1/5/1–1/5/29.
[5]	Anagnostopoulou S, Venieratos D& Spyropoulos N: Classification of human maxillary sinuses according to their geometric features. Anat Anz. 1991; 173: 121-30.
[6]	Karmody CS, Carter B, &Vincent ME: Developmental anomalies of the maxillary sinus. Trans Sect Otolaryngol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1977; 84: 723-8.
[7]	Mc Growan DA, Baxter PW & James J: The Maxillary Sinus and its Dental Implications. 1st ed. London: Wright Co; 1993; pp. 1–25.
[8]	Hamdy RM, & Abdel-Wahed N: Cone-beam computed tomographic volumetric analysis of the maxillary antra for sinus augmentation. Egypt Dent J. 2012; 58: 3157–3165.
[9]	Sahlstrand-Johnson P, Jannert M, Strömbeck A, &Abul-Kasim K: Computed tomography measurements of different dimensions of maxillary and frontal sinuses. BMC Med Imaging. 2011; 11: 8.
[10]	Ariji Y, Kuroki T, Moriguchi S, Ariji E, &Kanda S: Age changes in the volume of the human maxillary sinus: a study using computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1994; 23: 163-8.
[11]	Ariji Y, Ariji E, Yoshiura K, & Kanda S. Computed tomographic indices for maxillary sinus size in comparison with the sinus volume. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1996; 25: 19-24.
[12]	Hamdy RM, & Abdel-Wahed N: Three-dimensional linear and volumetric analysis of maxillary sinus pneumatization. J Adv Res. 2014; 5: 387-95.
[13]	Tiwana, PS, Kushner GM, & Haug RH: Maxillary sinus augmentation. Dent Clin North Am. 2006; 50:409-24.
[14]	Shahbazian M, Xue D, Hu Y, van Cleynenbreugel J, & Jacobs R: Spiral computed tomography based maxillary sinus imaging in relation to tooth loss, implant placement and potential grafting procedure. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2010; 1: 7.
[15]	Wolf G, Anderhuber W, & Kuhn F: Development of the paranasal sinuses in children: implications for paranasal sinus surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol.1993; 102: 705-11.
[16]	Uchida Y, Goto M, Katsuki T, & Akiyoshi T: A cadaveric study of maxillary sinus size as an aid in bone grafting of the maxillary sinus floor. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998; 56: 1158-63.
[17]	Japanese Society of Pediatric Dentistry: A study on the cephalometric standards of Japanese children. Jpn J Ped Dent.1995; 33: 659-96.
[18]	Barghouth G, Prior JO, Lepori D, Duvoisin B, Schnyder P, & Gudinchet F: Paranasal sinuses in children: size evaluation of maxillary, sphenoid, and frontal sinuses by magnetic resonance imaging and proposal of volume index percentile curves. Eur Radiol. 2002; 12: 1451-8.
[19]	Emirzeoglu M, Sahin B, Bilgic S, Celebi M, & Uzun A:Volumetric evaluation of the paranasal sinuses in normal subjects using computer tomography images: a stereological study. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2007; 34: 191-5.
[20]	Jun BC, Song SW, Park CS, Lee DH, Cho KJ, &Cho JH: The analysis of maxillary sinus aeration according to aging process; volume assessment by 3-dimensional reconstruction by high-resolutional CT scanning. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005; 132: 429-34.
[21]	Basdra EK, Stellzig A, & Komposch G: The importance of the maxillary sinuses in facial development: a case report. Eur J Orthod. 1998; 20: 1-4.
[22]	Koppe T, Weigel C, Bärenklau M, Kaduk W, Bayerlein T, & Gedrange T: Maxillary sinus pneumatization of an adult skull with an untreated bilateral cleft palate. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2006; 34: 91-5.
[23]	Suzuki H, Yamaguchi T, & Furukawa M: Rhinologic computed tomographic evaluation in patients with cleft lip and palate. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999; 125: 1000-4.
[24]	Pirner S, Tingelhoff K, Wagner I, Westphal R, Rilk M, Wahl FM, Bootz F, & Eichhorn KW: CT-based manual segmentation and evaluation of paranasal sinuses. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009; 266: 507-18.
[25]	Yang HM, Bae HE, Won SY, Hu KS, Song WC, Paik DJ, & Kim HJ: The buccofacial wall of maxillary sinus: an anatomical consideration for sinus augmentation. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009; 11: 2-6.
[26]	Neiva RF, Gapski R, & Wang HL: Morphometric analysis of implant-related anatomy in Caucasian skulls. J Periodontol. 2004; 75: 1061-7.
[27]	Yang SM, Park SI, Kye SB, & Shin SY: Computed tomographic assessment of maxillary sinus wall thickness in edentulous patients. J Oral Rehabil. 2012; 39: 421-8.
[28]	Kim HY, Kim MB, Dhong HJ, Jung YG, Min JY, Chung SK, Lee HJ, Chung SC, & Ryu NG: Changes of maxillary sinus volume and bony thickness of the paranasal sinuses in longstanding pediatric chronic rhinosinusitis. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol.2008; 72: 103-8.
[29]	Cho SH, Kim TH, Kim KR, Lee JM, Lee DK, Kim JH, Im JJ, Park CJ, & Hwang KG: Factors for maxillary sinus volume and craniofacial anatomical features in adults with chronic rhinosinusitis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010; 136: 610-5.
[30]	Deeb R, Malani PN, Gill B, Jafari-Khouzani K, Soltanian-Zadeh H, Patel S, & Zacharek MA: Three-dimensional volumetric measurements and analysis of the maxillary sinus. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2011; 25: 152-6.
[31]	Khajehahmadi S, Rahpeyma A, & Hoseini Zarch SH: Association between the lateral wall thickness of the maxillary sinus and the dental status: cone beam computed tomography evaluation. Iran J Radiol. 2014; 11: 6675.
[32]	Li J, Zhou ZX, Yuan H, Shen M, Sun C, & Chen N: A study of maxillary sinus lateral wall thickness of Han population in Jiangsu region using cone-beam CT. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2013; 22: 537-41.
[33]	Monje A, Catena A, Monje F, Gonzalez-García R, Galindo-Moreno P, Suarez F, & Wang HL: Maxillary sinus lateral wall thickness and morphologic patterns in the atrophic posterior maxilla. J Periodontol. 2014; 85:76-82.
[34]	Kang SJ, Shin SI, Herr Y, Kwon YH, Kim GT, & Chung JH: Anatomical structures in the maxillary sinus related to lateral sinus elevation: a cone beam computed tomographic analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013; 24: 75-81.
[35]	Brough AL, Bennett J, Morgan B, Black S, & Rutty GN: Anthropological measurement of the juvenile clavicle using multi-detector computed tomography—affirming reliability. J Forensic Sci. 2013; 58: 946-51.
[36]	Hildebolt CF, Vannier MW, & Knapp RH: Validation study of skull three-dimensional computerized tomography measurements. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1990; 82: 283-94.
[37]	Lopes PM, Moreira CR, Perrella A, Antunes JL, & Cavalcanti MG: 3-D volume rendering maxillofacial analysis of angular measurements by multislice CT. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008; 105: 224-30.
[38]	Stull KE, Tise ML, Ali Z, & Fowler DR: Accuracy and reliability of measurements obtained from computed tomography 3D volume rendered images. Forensic Sci Int. 2014; 238: 133-40.
[39]	Williams FL, & Richtsmeier JT: Comparison of mandibular landmarks from computed tomography and 3D digitizer data. Clin Anat. 2003; 16:494-500.
[40]	Lou L, Lagravere MO, Compton S, Major PW, & Flores-Mir C: Accuracy of measurements and reliability of landmark identification with computed tomography techniques in the maxillofacial area: a systematic review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007; 104: 402-11.
[41]	Jóźwiak M, Rychlik M, Musielak B, Chen BP, Idzior M, & Grzegorzewski A: An accurate method of radiological assessment of acetabular volume and orientation in computed tomography spatial reconstruction. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015; 16: 42.
[42]	Joshua BZ, Sachs O, Shelef I, Vardy-Sion N, Novack L, Vaiman M, & Puterman M: Comparison of clinical data, CT, and bone histopathology in unilateral chronic maxillary sinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013; 148: 145-50.
[43]	Kamal A: Effect of gap-arthroplasty on the tongue position in patients of temporomandibular joint ankylosis. (Master Dissertation) Cairo University. Egypt; 1999: Page 93.
[44]	Khedr H: Effect of gap-arthroplasty on the position of hyoid bone in patients suffering from temporomandibular joint ankylosis. (Master Dissertation) Cairo University. Egypt; 2001: Page 99.
[45]	Alaa MA: Effect of gap-arthroplasty on the upper airway in patients of temporomandibular joint ankylosis. (Master Dissertation) Cairo University. Egypt; 2000: Page 82.
[46]	Dehis M, Tantawi W, Kamal A, & Atta M: Assessment of maxillary sinus volume in patients of temporomandibular joint bony ankylosis. International Clinical Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2015; 1: 24-30.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Dehis M., Tantawi W., Rasheed A. (2016). Effect of Temporomandibular Joint Bony Ankylosis on Maxillary Sinus Wall Thickness. International Journal of Clinical Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2(2), 5-11. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcoms.20160202.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Dehis M.; Tantawi W.; Rasheed A. Effect of Temporomandibular Joint Bony Ankylosis on Maxillary Sinus Wall Thickness. Int. J. Clin. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2016, 2(2), 5-11. doi: 10.11648/j.ijcoms.20160202.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Dehis M., Tantawi W., Rasheed A. Effect of Temporomandibular Joint Bony Ankylosis on Maxillary Sinus Wall Thickness. Int J Clin Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;2(2):5-11. doi: 10.11648/j.ijcoms.20160202.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijcoms.20160202.11,
  author = {Dehis M. and Tantawi W. and Rasheed A.},
  title = {Effect of Temporomandibular Joint Bony Ankylosis on Maxillary Sinus Wall Thickness},
  journal = {International Journal of Clinical Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery},
  volume = {2},
  number = {2},
  pages = {5-11},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijcoms.20160202.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcoms.20160202.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijcoms.20160202.11},
  abstract = {Objectives: This study was designed to clarify the changes that might be induced in the maxillary sinus walls thickness in response to TMJ bony ankylosis Subjects and methods: Forty five (45) subjects were included in the study. They were divided into two groups Group I, (patients group) comprised fifteen 15 patients were suffering from temporomandibular joint bony ankylosis (26 maxillary sinuses involved) and Group II, (control group) contained thirty (30) healthy volunteer. Maxillary sinus walls thickness has been measured by computerized tomography scan for both groups and was compared. Results: There was significant increase in mean thickness of all walls of maxillary sinus in patients group. The thickness of lateral wall of recurrent cases of TMJ ankylosis showed significant decrease when compared with the non-recurrent cases. Conclusion: Observable Increase in the thickness of maxillary sinus walls. This may be attributed to bone apposition from outer side without resorption from inner side. This explanation is ascribed to lack of pneumatization associated with hindrance of upper air way that usually existing with cases of TMJ bony ankylosis},
 year = {2016}
}

Copy | Download

TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of Temporomandibular Joint Bony Ankylosis on Maxillary Sinus Wall Thickness
AU - Dehis M.
AU - Tantawi W.
AU - Rasheed A.
Y1 - 2016/06/20
PY - 2016
N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcoms.20160202.11
DO - 10.11648/j.ijcoms.20160202.11
T2 - International Journal of Clinical Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
JF - International Journal of Clinical Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
JO - International Journal of Clinical Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
SP - 5
EP - 11
PB - Science Publishing Group
SN - 2472-1344
UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcoms.20160202.11
AB - Objectives: This study was designed to clarify the changes that might be induced in the maxillary sinus walls thickness in response to TMJ bony ankylosis Subjects and methods: Forty five (45) subjects were included in the study. They were divided into two groups Group I, (patients group) comprised fifteen 15 patients were suffering from temporomandibular joint bony ankylosis (26 maxillary sinuses involved) and Group II, (control group) contained thirty (30) healthy volunteer. Maxillary sinus walls thickness has been measured by computerized tomography scan for both groups and was compared. Results: There was significant increase in mean thickness of all walls of maxillary sinus in patients group. The thickness of lateral wall of recurrent cases of TMJ ankylosis showed significant decrease when compared with the non-recurrent cases. Conclusion: Observable Increase in the thickness of maxillary sinus walls. This may be attributed to bone apposition from outer side without resorption from inner side. This explanation is ascribed to lack of pneumatization associated with hindrance of upper air way that usually existing with cases of TMJ bony ankylosis
VL - 2
IS - 2
ER -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Dehis M.

Faculty of Oral & Dental medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
Tantawi W.

Faculty of Medicine, Ein Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
Rasheed A.

Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Dehis M., Tantawi W., Rasheed A. (2016). Effect of Temporomandibular Joint Bony Ankylosis on Maxillary Sinus Wall Thickness. International Journal of Clinical Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2(2), 5-11. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcoms.20160202.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Dehis M.; Tantawi W.; Rasheed A. Effect of Temporomandibular Joint Bony Ankylosis on Maxillary Sinus Wall Thickness. Int. J. Clin. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2016, 2(2), 5-11. doi: 10.11648/j.ijcoms.20160202.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Dehis M., Tantawi W., Rasheed A. Effect of Temporomandibular Joint Bony Ankylosis on Maxillary Sinus Wall Thickness. Int J Clin Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;2(2):5-11. doi: 10.11648/j.ijcoms.20160202.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijcoms.20160202.11,
  author = {Dehis M. and Tantawi W. and Rasheed A.},
  title = {Effect of Temporomandibular Joint Bony Ankylosis on Maxillary Sinus Wall Thickness},
  journal = {International Journal of Clinical Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery},
  volume = {2},
  number = {2},
  pages = {5-11},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijcoms.20160202.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcoms.20160202.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijcoms.20160202.11},
  abstract = {Objectives: This study was designed to clarify the changes that might be induced in the maxillary sinus walls thickness in response to TMJ bony ankylosis Subjects and methods: Forty five (45) subjects were included in the study. They were divided into two groups Group I, (patients group) comprised fifteen 15 patients were suffering from temporomandibular joint bony ankylosis (26 maxillary sinuses involved) and Group II, (control group) contained thirty (30) healthy volunteer. Maxillary sinus walls thickness has been measured by computerized tomography scan for both groups and was compared. Results: There was significant increase in mean thickness of all walls of maxillary sinus in patients group. The thickness of lateral wall of recurrent cases of TMJ ankylosis showed significant decrease when compared with the non-recurrent cases. Conclusion: Observable Increase in the thickness of maxillary sinus walls. This may be attributed to bone apposition from outer side without resorption from inner side. This explanation is ascribed to lack of pneumatization associated with hindrance of upper air way that usually existing with cases of TMJ bony ankylosis},
 year = {2016}
}

Copy | Download