Teaching Lean Manufacturing in Educational Field Through LBD: A Case Study in an Engineering School
International Journal of Vocational Education and Training Research
Volume 4, Issue 1, June 2018, Pages: 41-44
Received: Apr. 30, 2018;
Accepted: May 28, 2018;
Published: Jun. 28, 2018
Views 1198 Downloads 124
Meddaoui Anwar, Department of Industrial Engineering, Ecole Nationale Superieur d’Arts et Metiers, University Hassan II, Casablanca, Morocco
Hachmoud Sami, Department of Information Technology, Faculty of Science and Technology, University Hassan I, Settat, Morocco
Allali Hakim, Department of Information Technology, Faculty of Science and Technology, University Hassan I, Settat, Morocco
Classical learning in an engineering educational environment presents problems for most of students to understand in practice some engineering methodologies, especially lean manufacturing. Lean is a philosophy initiated by Toyota to eliminate waste, organize workplace and procedures to enhance productivity. The current paper compares efficiency between classical teaching method and learning by doing pedagogic process. The purpose is to propose a new manufacturing educational model based on previous works and return of experiments. A case study is established to support proposed model by measuring training efficiency and students’ creativity compared to classical educational tools. Future researches could use the proposed model in other educational fields.
Teaching Lean Manufacturing in Educational Field Through LBD: A Case Study in an Engineering School, International Journal of Vocational Education and Training Research.
Vol. 4, No. 1,
2018, pp. 41-44.
Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2007). Advances in technology-based training. In S. Werner (Ed.), Managing Human Resources in North America (pp. 27-42). New York: Routledge.
Dukovska -Popovska, I., Hove-Madsen, & V., Nielsen, K. B., (2008), “Teaching lean thinking through game: some challenges”, Flemming Fink, Aalborg University.
Faria, A. J. (1998). Business simulation games: Current usage levels – an update. Simulation & Gaming, 29, 295-308.
Faria, A. J., & Nulsen, R. (1996). Business simulation games: Current usage levels a ten year update. Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Exercises, 23, 22-28.
Summers, G. J. (2004), Today’s business simulation industry. Simulation & Gaming, 35, 208-241.
Salas, E., Kosarzycki, M. P., Burke, S., Fiore, S. M., & Stone, D. L. (2002). Emerging themes in distance learning research and practice: Some food for thought. International Journal of Management Reviews, 4, 135-153.
Draijer, C., Schenk, D. J. (2004). Best practices of business simulation with SAP R/3. Journal of Information Systems Education, 15, 261-265.
Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T., & Roos, D. (1990), “The Machine that Changed the World”, Harper Perennial, New York.
Emiliani, B., Lean Teaching: A Guide to Becoming a Better Teacher, Center for Lean Business Management, LLC, 2015 – pp. 5-148.
Waterbury, T. (2011), Educational Lean for Higher Education: Theory and Practice, published by lulu.com.
Svensson, C., Antony, J., Ba-Essa, M., Bakhsh, M., and Albliwi, S. (2015), “A Lean Six Sigma Program in Higher Education,” International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 32, Issue 9, pp. 951-969.
Sunder M, V., (2016), “Lean Six Sigma in Higher Education Institutions,” forthcoming in International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, Vol. 8 Issue 2.
Wood, R., Herscher, M., and Emiliani, B. (2015), Shingijutsu-Kaizen: The Art of Discovery and Learning, The CLBM, LLC, Wethersfield, CT.
Wang, Y., Huzzard, T., (2011), “the impact of lean thinking on organizational learning”, Lund University, Sweden.