An Investigation of Nurse Clinicians’ Opinions on Standardized Training Methods for Nurses

Li Qiufeng; Wang Yu; Liu Lina; Zuo Feifei; Hong Weixi

doi:doi:10.11648/j.jfmhc.20200601.13

| Peer-Reviewed

An Investigation of Nurse Clinicians’ Opinions on Standardized Training Methods for Nurses

Li Qiufeng, Wang Yu, Liu Lina, Zuo Feifei, Hong Weixi

Published in Journal of Family Medicine and Health Care (Volume 6, Issue 1)

Received: 5 February 2020 Accepted: 19 February 2020 Published: 28 February 2020

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Objective: We try to explore new standardized training methods for nurses to further improve the standardized training system for nurse clinicians. Methods: Based on study of previous literature, we used self-designed questionnaires to investigate 262 nurse clinicians. Their opinions on through what training methods they most expect to receive the 25 standardized training contents and the common ways through which they acquire professional knowledge were collected. Results: Most nurses expect the 25 training contents for new nurses to be imparted through instruction of supervisors and intensive teaching mode; the nurses prefer diverisified training methods; they acquire professional nursing knowledge mainly through textbooks, lectures and training on special topics, internet, new media (WeChat, QQ or Official Accounts), literature database searching and other channels. There is significant difference in the number of nurses who acquire professional nursing knowledge through new media between new nurses, and middle and senior nurses (χ²=5.828, P=0.016). Conclusions: When giving standardized training for new nurses, we should choose appropriate training methods according to the training contents. Diversified training can meet different needs of different nurses. We encourage new standardized training mode combined with internet and new media to save training cost and improve training effect.

Published in	Journal of Family Medicine and Health Care (Volume 6, Issue 1)
DOI	10.11648/j.jfmhc.20200601.13
Page(s)	15-19
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Standardized Training, Training Method, Diversified Training, Nurse

References

[1]	Mackinnon, K., Marcellus, L., Rivers, J., Gordon, C., & Butcher, D. (2015). Student and educator experiences of maternalchild simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol. JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports, 13 (1), 14-26.
[2]	Considine, J., & Botti, M. (2004). Who, when and where identification of patients at risk of an in-hospital adverse event: implications for nursing practice. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 10 (1), 21-31.
[3]	V. Olišarová, L. Šedová, V. Tóthová, S. Bártlová, I. Chloubová, & H. Michálková, et al. (2016). Areas of health-education of physicians and nurses in care for cardiac patients from the perspective of citizens of the czech republic. Neuro Endocrinology Letters, 37 (suppl 2), 5.
[4]	LI Xiao-wei, WANG Zhi-wen, LI Shu-jia, & SHANG Shao-mei. (2012). Current situation and reflection on training of new graduate nurses in china. Journal of Nursing Administration, 89 (s1), 1-2.
[5]	Chang, S. J., Kwon, E. O., Kwon, Y. O., & Kwon, H. K. (2010). The effects of simulation training for new graduate critical care nurses on knowledge, selfefficacy, and performance ability of emergency situations at intensive care unit. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing, 22 (4), 375-383.
[6]	Altier, M. E., & Krsek, C. A. (2006). Effects of a 1-year residency program on job satisfaction and retention of new graduate nurses. Journal for Nurses in Staff Development (JNSD), 22 (2), 70-77.
[7]	Bratt, M. M., & Felzer, H. M. (2012). Predictors of new graduate nurses' organizational commitment during a nurse residency program. Journal for Nurses in Professional Development, 28 (3), 108-19.
[8]	ZHANG Zhen-lu, SHI Rui-fen, ZHENG Zhi-hui, LIU Yin-yan. (2015). Current situation and thinking on the training of specialized nurses in tertiary hospitals in guangdong province. Journal of Nursing Administration, 15 (12), 840-842.
[9]	Eizenberg, M. M. (2011). Implementation of evidence-based nursing practice: nurses’ personal and professional factors?. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 67 (1), 33-42.
[10]	Bscn, S. V., Bscn, M. S., & Mohammad Ali Cheraghi. (2013). Implementation of evidence-based nursing practice for diabetic patients: an iranian experience. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 19 (S3), 73-80.
[11]	Fleming, S., Mckee, G., & Huntley-Moore, S. (2011). Undergraduate nursing students' learning styles: a longitudinal study. Nurse education today, 31 (5), 444-449.
[12]	Wittmann-Price, R., Celia, L., & Dunn, R. (2013). Successful implementation of evidence-based nursing practice: the indispensable role of staff development. Journal for Nurses in Professional Development, 29 (4), 202-4.
[13]	Chang, W. Y., Sheen, S. T. H., Chang, P. C., & Lee, P. H. (2008). Developing an e-learning education programme for staff nurses: processes and outcomes. Nurse Education Today, 28 (7), 822-828.
[14]	Liu, W. I., Rong, J. R., & Liu, C. Y. (2014). Using evidence-integrated e-learning to enhance case management continuing education for psychiatric nurses: a randomised controlled trial with follow-up. Nurse Education Today, 34 (11), 1361-1367.
[15]	BlažUn, H., Kokol, P., & Vošner, J. (2015). Research literature production on nursing competences from 1981 till 2012: a bibliometric snapshot. Nurse Education Today, 35 (5), 673-679.
[16]	Liu, W. I., Liu, C. H., Liao C. Y., Chao P. R., & Chu, K. C. (2020). Mobile community learning programme's effectiveness in case management for psychiatric nurses: A preliminary randomised controlled trial. Nurse Education Today, 85, 104259.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Li Qiufeng, Wang Yu, Liu Lina, Zuo Feifei, Hong Weixi. (2020). An Investigation of Nurse Clinicians’ Opinions on Standardized Training Methods for Nurses. Journal of Family Medicine and Health Care, 6(1), 15-19. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfmhc.20200601.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Li Qiufeng; Wang Yu; Liu Lina; Zuo Feifei; Hong Weixi. An Investigation of Nurse Clinicians’ Opinions on Standardized Training Methods for Nurses. J. Fam. Med. Health Care 2020, 6(1), 15-19. doi: 10.11648/j.jfmhc.20200601.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Li Qiufeng, Wang Yu, Liu Lina, Zuo Feifei, Hong Weixi. An Investigation of Nurse Clinicians’ Opinions on Standardized Training Methods for Nurses. J Fam Med Health Care. 2020;6(1):15-19. doi: 10.11648/j.jfmhc.20200601.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.jfmhc.20200601.13,
  author = {Li Qiufeng and Wang Yu and Liu Lina and Zuo Feifei and Hong Weixi},
  title = {An Investigation of Nurse Clinicians’ Opinions on Standardized Training Methods for Nurses},
  journal = {Journal of Family Medicine and Health Care},
  volume = {6},
  number = {1},
  pages = {15-19},
  doi = {10.11648/j.jfmhc.20200601.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfmhc.20200601.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jfmhc.20200601.13},
  abstract = {Objective: We try to explore new standardized training methods for nurses to further improve the standardized training system for nurse clinicians. Methods: Based on study of previous literature, we used self-designed questionnaires to investigate 262 nurse clinicians. Their opinions on through what training methods they most expect to receive the 25 standardized training contents and the common ways through which they acquire professional knowledge were collected. Results: Most nurses expect the 25 training contents for new nurses to be imparted through instruction of supervisors and intensive teaching mode; the nurses prefer diverisified training methods; they acquire professional nursing knowledge mainly through textbooks, lectures and training on special topics, internet, new media (WeChat, QQ or Official Accounts), literature database searching and other channels. There is significant difference in the number of nurses who acquire professional nursing knowledge through new media between new nurses, and middle and senior nurses (χ2=5.828, P=0.016). Conclusions: When giving standardized training for new nurses, we should choose appropriate training methods according to the training contents. Diversified training can meet different needs of different nurses. We encourage new standardized training mode combined with internet and new media to save training cost and improve training effect.},
 year = {2020}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - An Investigation of Nurse Clinicians’ Opinions on Standardized Training Methods for Nurses
AU  - Li Qiufeng
AU  - Wang Yu
AU  - Liu Lina
AU  - Zuo Feifei
AU  - Hong Weixi
Y1  - 2020/02/28
PY  - 2020
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfmhc.20200601.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.jfmhc.20200601.13
T2  - Journal of Family Medicine and Health Care
JF  - Journal of Family Medicine and Health Care
JO  - Journal of Family Medicine and Health Care
SP  - 15
EP  - 19
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2469-8342
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfmhc.20200601.13
AB  - Objective: We try to explore new standardized training methods for nurses to further improve the standardized training system for nurse clinicians. Methods: Based on study of previous literature, we used self-designed questionnaires to investigate 262 nurse clinicians. Their opinions on through what training methods they most expect to receive the 25 standardized training contents and the common ways through which they acquire professional knowledge were collected. Results: Most nurses expect the 25 training contents for new nurses to be imparted through instruction of supervisors and intensive teaching mode; the nurses prefer diverisified training methods; they acquire professional nursing knowledge mainly through textbooks, lectures and training on special topics, internet, new media (WeChat, QQ or Official Accounts), literature database searching and other channels. There is significant difference in the number of nurses who acquire professional nursing knowledge through new media between new nurses, and middle and senior nurses (χ2=5.828, P=0.016). Conclusions: When giving standardized training for new nurses, we should choose appropriate training methods according to the training contents. Diversified training can meet different needs of different nurses. We encourage new standardized training mode combined with internet and new media to save training cost and improve training effect.
VL  - 6
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Li Qiufeng

Department of Intravenous Catheter Nursing Clinic, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
Wang Yu

The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
Liu Lina

Foshan Science and Technology College, Foshan, China
Zuo Feifei

The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
Hong Weixi

The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Li Qiufeng, Wang Yu, Liu Lina, Zuo Feifei, Hong Weixi. (2020). An Investigation of Nurse Clinicians’ Opinions on Standardized Training Methods for Nurses. Journal of Family Medicine and Health Care, 6(1), 15-19. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfmhc.20200601.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Li Qiufeng; Wang Yu; Liu Lina; Zuo Feifei; Hong Weixi. An Investigation of Nurse Clinicians’ Opinions on Standardized Training Methods for Nurses. J. Fam. Med. Health Care 2020, 6(1), 15-19. doi: 10.11648/j.jfmhc.20200601.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Li Qiufeng, Wang Yu, Liu Lina, Zuo Feifei, Hong Weixi. An Investigation of Nurse Clinicians’ Opinions on Standardized Training Methods for Nurses. J Fam Med Health Care. 2020;6(1):15-19. doi: 10.11648/j.jfmhc.20200601.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.jfmhc.20200601.13,
  author = {Li Qiufeng and Wang Yu and Liu Lina and Zuo Feifei and Hong Weixi},
  title = {An Investigation of Nurse Clinicians’ Opinions on Standardized Training Methods for Nurses},
  journal = {Journal of Family Medicine and Health Care},
  volume = {6},
  number = {1},
  pages = {15-19},
  doi = {10.11648/j.jfmhc.20200601.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfmhc.20200601.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jfmhc.20200601.13},
  abstract = {Objective: We try to explore new standardized training methods for nurses to further improve the standardized training system for nurse clinicians. Methods: Based on study of previous literature, we used self-designed questionnaires to investigate 262 nurse clinicians. Their opinions on through what training methods they most expect to receive the 25 standardized training contents and the common ways through which they acquire professional knowledge were collected. Results: Most nurses expect the 25 training contents for new nurses to be imparted through instruction of supervisors and intensive teaching mode; the nurses prefer diverisified training methods; they acquire professional nursing knowledge mainly through textbooks, lectures and training on special topics, internet, new media (WeChat, QQ or Official Accounts), literature database searching and other channels. There is significant difference in the number of nurses who acquire professional nursing knowledge through new media between new nurses, and middle and senior nurses (χ2=5.828, P=0.016). Conclusions: When giving standardized training for new nurses, we should choose appropriate training methods according to the training contents. Diversified training can meet different needs of different nurses. We encourage new standardized training mode combined with internet and new media to save training cost and improve training effect.},
 year = {2020}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - An Investigation of Nurse Clinicians’ Opinions on Standardized Training Methods for Nurses
AU  - Li Qiufeng
AU  - Wang Yu
AU  - Liu Lina
AU  - Zuo Feifei
AU  - Hong Weixi
Y1  - 2020/02/28
PY  - 2020
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfmhc.20200601.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.jfmhc.20200601.13
T2  - Journal of Family Medicine and Health Care
JF  - Journal of Family Medicine and Health Care
JO  - Journal of Family Medicine and Health Care
SP  - 15
EP  - 19
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2469-8342
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jfmhc.20200601.13
AB  - Objective: We try to explore new standardized training methods for nurses to further improve the standardized training system for nurse clinicians. Methods: Based on study of previous literature, we used self-designed questionnaires to investigate 262 nurse clinicians. Their opinions on through what training methods they most expect to receive the 25 standardized training contents and the common ways through which they acquire professional knowledge were collected. Results: Most nurses expect the 25 training contents for new nurses to be imparted through instruction of supervisors and intensive teaching mode; the nurses prefer diverisified training methods; they acquire professional nursing knowledge mainly through textbooks, lectures and training on special topics, internet, new media (WeChat, QQ or Official Accounts), literature database searching and other channels. There is significant difference in the number of nurses who acquire professional nursing knowledge through new media between new nurses, and middle and senior nurses (χ2=5.828, P=0.016). Conclusions: When giving standardized training for new nurses, we should choose appropriate training methods according to the training contents. Diversified training can meet different needs of different nurses. We encourage new standardized training mode combined with internet and new media to save training cost and improve training effect.
VL  - 6
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download