The close formation flight of UAVs has many significant advantages over single vehicle flight. The aerodynamic stability analysis of two heterogeneous UAVs in close formation flight is detailed in the present paper. The issues of altitude changes and the associated shifts or changes in centre of gravity or moments, the equivalent actuator control surface deflections etc. are explained with the help of simulations. The short period frequency variations with these changes are also correlated with the help of pole-zero diagrams.
| Published in | Fluid Mechanics (Volume 3, Issue 3) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.fm.20170303.11 |
| Page(s) | 13-19 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Control, Close Formation Flight, Heterogeneous UAVs, Wing Vortex
| [1] | Innocenti, M., Guilietti, F. and Pollini, L., “Intelligent Management Control for Unmanned Aircraft Navigation and Formation keeping,” RTO AVT Course at Belgium,May,2002. |
| [2] | How, J., King, E. and Kuwata, Y., “Flight Demonstration of cooperative control for UAV Teams,” AIAA 3rd‘Unmanned Unlimited’ Technical Conference, Workshop and Exhibit, Illinois, 2004. |
| [3] | Zou, Y. and Pagilla, P. R., “Distributed Formation Flight Control Using Constrained Forces,” Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, Vol 32, No. 1, 2009. |
| [4] | Paul T. R., Krogstad, and Gravdahl, J. T., “Modeling of UAV Formation Flight Using 3D Potential Field, Simulation Modeling Practice and Theory, Vol. 16, Issue 9, pp. 1453-1462, 2008. |
| [5] | S. Yoon, J. Bae, and Y. Kim,“Cooperative Standoff Tracking of a Moving Target using Decentralized Extended Information Filter,” KSAS(Korean Society for Aeronautical and Space Science) Spring Conference,Gyeongju, Republic of Korea, Apr 2011. |
| [6] | S. Yoon, S. Park, and Y. Kim, Constrained Adaptive Backstepping Controller Design for Aircraft Landing in Wind Disturbance and Actuator Stuck, International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 101-116, 2012. |
| [7] | H. J. Kim, M. Kim, H. Lim, C. Park, S. Yoon, D. Lee, G.Oh, J. Park, andY. Kim, Fully-Autonomous Vision-based Net-Recovery Landing System for a Fixed-Wing UAV, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, accepted for publication, 2013. |
| [8] | Proud, A., Pachter, M., and D’Azzo, J. J., Close Formation Control, Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, AIAA99-4207, pp. 1231 - 1246, Portland, OR, August 1999. |
| [9] | Dogan, A. and Venkataramanan, S., “Nonlinear control for Reconfiguration of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Formation,” J. ofGuidance, Control and Dynamics, Vol 28, No 4(2005). |
| [10] | Vanek and Balint, “Practical approach to real-time trajectory tracking of UAV formations,” Proceedings of the American Control Conference,2005. |
| [11] | Saffarian, M. and Fahimi, F., “Control of helicopters’ formation using non-iterative nonlinear model predictive approach,” Proceedings of IEEE American Control Conference, pp. 3707-3712, Seattle, Washington, June 2008. |
| [12] | Min, H., “Decentralized UAV formation tracking flight control using gyroscopic force,” IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence,2009. |
| [13] | Chichka, D. F., Speyer J. L., Fanti C. and Park C.G., “Peak seeking Control for Drag Reduction in Formation Flight,” AIAA Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, University of California,2002. |
| [14] | Saban, D., Whidborne, J. F. and Cooke A., “Simulation of Wake Vortex Effects for UAV in close formation flight,” Aeronautical Journal, Volume 113,Issue 1149,pp. 727-738, 2009. |
| [15] | Anderson J. D., “Introduction to Flight,” 2nd Edition, McGraw Hill Book Company. |
| [16] | Johnson, Y. and Dasgupta, S., “Robust Hurwitz Stability and Performance Analysis of H-Infinity Controlled Forward-Velocity Dynamics of UAVs in Close Formation Flight Using Bounded Phase Conditions in a Kharitonov Framework”, Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India), Springer Publications, Series C: Volume 95, Issue 3 (2014), Page 223-231. |
| [17] | Roskam J., “Airplane Flight Dynamics and Automatic Flight Control,”Part-I, DAR Corporation, USA, 2003. |
| [18] | Campa G., and Gu Y., “Design and flight testing of non-linear formation control law,” Science Direct, Control Engineering Practice 15, 1 (2007). |
| [19] | Christopher, G., “Modeling,Simulation and Flight Test for Automatic Flight Control of the CONDOR Hybrid- Electric Remote Piloted Aircraft,” MS Thesis Aeronautics and Astronautics Graduate School of Engineering and Management, Air Force Institute of Technology Air University, March, 2012. |
APA Style
Johnson Yohannan, Imthias Ahamed T. P. (2017). Aerodynamic Stability Analysis of Two Heterogeneous UAVs in Close Formation Flight System. Fluid Mechanics, 3(3), 13-19. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.fm.20170303.11
ACS Style
Johnson Yohannan; Imthias Ahamed T. P. Aerodynamic Stability Analysis of Two Heterogeneous UAVs in Close Formation Flight System. Fluid Mech. 2017, 3(3), 13-19. doi: 10.11648/j.fm.20170303.11
AMA Style
Johnson Yohannan, Imthias Ahamed T. P. Aerodynamic Stability Analysis of Two Heterogeneous UAVs in Close Formation Flight System. Fluid Mech. 2017;3(3):13-19. doi: 10.11648/j.fm.20170303.11
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.fm.20170303.11,
author = {Johnson Yohannan and Imthias Ahamed T. P.},
title = {Aerodynamic Stability Analysis of Two Heterogeneous UAVs in Close Formation Flight System},
journal = {Fluid Mechanics},
volume = {3},
number = {3},
pages = {13-19},
doi = {10.11648/j.fm.20170303.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.fm.20170303.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.fm.20170303.11},
abstract = {The close formation flight of UAVs has many significant advantages over single vehicle flight. The aerodynamic stability analysis of two heterogeneous UAVs in close formation flight is detailed in the present paper. The issues of altitude changes and the associated shifts or changes in centre of gravity or moments, the equivalent actuator control surface deflections etc. are explained with the help of simulations. The short period frequency variations with these changes are also correlated with the help of pole-zero diagrams.},
year = {2017}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Aerodynamic Stability Analysis of Two Heterogeneous UAVs in Close Formation Flight System AU - Johnson Yohannan AU - Imthias Ahamed T. P. Y1 - 2017/06/16 PY - 2017 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.fm.20170303.11 DO - 10.11648/j.fm.20170303.11 T2 - Fluid Mechanics JF - Fluid Mechanics JO - Fluid Mechanics SP - 13 EP - 19 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-1816 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.fm.20170303.11 AB - The close formation flight of UAVs has many significant advantages over single vehicle flight. The aerodynamic stability analysis of two heterogeneous UAVs in close formation flight is detailed in the present paper. The issues of altitude changes and the associated shifts or changes in centre of gravity or moments, the equivalent actuator control surface deflections etc. are explained with the help of simulations. The short period frequency variations with these changes are also correlated with the help of pole-zero diagrams. VL - 3 IS - 3 ER -
Information
Email: