| Peer-Reviewed

Physical and Physiological Comparison Between Indian Female College Basketball Players and Sedentary Students

Received: 6 December 2015    Accepted: 15 December 2015    Published: 18 January 2016
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The study aimed to assess and compare the physical and physiological performances of Indian female college basketball players (BB) with sedentary females (SS) of same age group. Randomly selected 20 female college students, 10 each in 2 groups, BB (19.0 ± 0.8) and SS (19.7 ± 1.3) respectively, volunteered for this study. Standing height, body weight, resting blood pressure, resting and maximum heart rate (RHR and MHR respectively), resting oxygen consumption (VO2rest), maximal aerobic capacity (VO2max), anaerobic power, hand grip strength (HGS) and back leg strength (BLS) were recorded. Body surface area (BSA), body mass index (BMI), maximum oxygen pulse (O2Pmax), fatigue percentage and relative peak power output (RPP) were calculated. Significant difference was observed between BB and SS in body weight (P<0.001), BSA (P<0.01), BMI (P<0.001), HGS (left; P<0.05 and right; P<0.01) and BLS (P<0.01). No significant difference was observed in height and blood pressure among the players and sedentary females, while, significantly lower RHR (P<0.01), higher MHR (P<0.01), VO2max (P<0.001), O2Pmax (P<0.01) were noted in sportswomen compared to sedentary females. Peak anaerobic power, average anaerobic power (both P<0.01) and RPP (P<0.001) of sportswomen was also significantly higher than the sedentary group. The study revealed that female college basketball players were physiologically potent than sedentary students of similar age group. It is once again substantiated the fact that involvement in sports or games like basketball, renders a person with better physiological health and physical fitness as compared to sedentary individuals.

Published in Advances in Applied Physiology (Volume 1, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.aap.20160102.11
Page(s) 18-23
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Basketball, Aerobic Capacity, Anaerobic Power, Muscle Strength, Physical Fitness

References
[1] Smith HK, Thomas SG. Physiological characteristics of elite female basketball players. Can J Sport Sci, 1991; 16(4): 289-295.
[2] Kohmura Y, Aoki K, Yoshigi H, Sakuraba K, Yanagiya T. Development of a baseball-specific battery of tests and a testing protocol for college baseball players. J Strength Cond Res, 2008 Jul; 22(4): 1051-8.
[3] MacLaren D. Court games: volleyball and basketball. In: Reilly T, Secher N, Snell P, Williams C, editors. Physiology of Sports, Spoon Press, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon; 2002, pp 427–464.
[4] Hoffman JR. Physiology of basketball. In: McKeag DB, editor. Handbook of Sports Medicine and Science, Blackwell Science Inc, Malden; 2003, pp 12-24.
[5] Ostojic SM, Mazic S, Dikic N. Profiling in basketball: physical and physiological characteristics of elite players. J Strength Cond Res, 2006; Nov; 20(4): 740-744.
[6] Narazaki K, Berg K, Stergiou N, Chen B. Physiological demands of competitive basketball. Scand J Med Sci Sports, 2009; Jun; 19(3): 425-432.
[7] Abdelkrim NB, Fazaa SE, Ati JE. Time–motion analysis and physiological data of elite under- 19-year-old basketball players during competition. Br J Sports Med, 2007; 41: 69–75.
[8] Tsunawake N, Tahara Y, Moji K, Muraki S, Yukawa Minowa K, Koichi Y. Body Composition and Physical Fitness of Female Volleyball and Basketball Players of the Japan Inter-high School Championship Teams. J Physiol Anthropol Appl Human Sci, 2003; 22 (4): 195–201.
[9] Official basketball rule for men and women. Federation Internationale De Basketball (FIBA), Central board of FIBA, Munich, Germany, 2000.
[10] Sodhi HS. Kinanthropometry and performance of top ranking Indian basketball players. Brit J Sports Med, 1980; 14 (9): 139-144.
[11] De AK, Bhattacharya AK, Panda BK, Das Gupta PK. Respiratory performance and grip strength tests on the basketball players of inter-university competition. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 1980; 24(4): 305-9.
[12] Muthiah CM, Sodhi HS. The effect of training on some morphological parameters of top-ranking Indian basketball players. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1980; 20(4): 405-12.
[13] Sodhi HS. A study of morphology and body composition of Indian basketball players. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1980; 20(4): 413-22.
[14] Ghosh AK, Paliwal R, Sam MJ, Ahuja A. Effect of 4 weeks detraining on aerobic & anaerobic capacity of basketball players & their restoration. Ind J Med Res, 1987; 86: 522-527.
[15] Rid A, Schmidt H. The 2008 Declaration of Helsinki — First among Equals in Research Ethics? The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2010; 38 (1): 143–148.
[16] DuBois D, DuBois EF. A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. Arch Intern Medicine. 1916; 17: 863-871.
[17] Bar-Or O. The Wingate anaerobic test. An update on methodology, reliability and validity. Sports Med, 1987; 4: 381-391.
[18] Tsunawake N, Tahara Y, Moji K, Muraki S, Yukawa Minowa K, Koichi Y. Body Composition and Physical Fitness of Female Volleyball and Basketball Players of the Japan Inter-high School Championship Teams. J Physiol Anthropol Appl Human Sci, 2003; 22 (4): 195–201.
[19] Ostojic SM, Mazic S, Dikic N. Profiling in basketball: physical and physiological characteristics of elite players. J Strength Cond Res, 2006; 20(4): 740-744.
[20] Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO Consultation. WHO Technical Report Series 894. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2000.
[21] Narazaki K, Berg K, Stergiou N, Chen B. Physiological demands of competitive basketball. Scand J Med Sci Sports, 2009; 19(3): 425-432.
[22] Rodríguez-Alonso M, Fernández-García B, Pérez-Landaluce J, Terrados N. Blood lactate and heart rate during national and international women's basketball. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2003; 43(4): 432-6.
[23] Smith ML, Hudson DL, Graitzer HM, Raven PB. Exercise training bradycardia: the role of autonomic balance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1989; 21: 40-44.
[24] Borresen J, Lambert MI. Autonomic control of heart rate during and after exercise: measurements and implications for monitoring training status. Sports Med. 2008; 38: 633-646.
[25] Riezebos ML, Paterson DH, Hall CR, Yuhasz MS. Relationship of selected variables to performance in women's basketball. Can J Appl Sport Sci, 1983; 8(1): 34-40.
[26] Cunningham DA, Hill JS. Effect of training on cardiovascular response to exercise in women. J Appl Physiol. 1975; 39(6): 891-895.
[27] Wasserman K, Hansen J, Sue DY, Casaburi R, Whipp B J. Measurements during integrative cardiopulmonary exercise testing. In: Wasserman K, Hansen J, Sue DY, Casaburi R, Whipp B J.; editors. Principles of exercise testing and interpretation (3 rd ed). Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 1999, pp - 91-92.
[28] Borresen J, Lambert MI. Autonomic control of heart rate during and after exercise: measurements and implications for monitoring training status. Sports Med, 2008; 38(8): 633-46.
[29] Sigmon C. Fifty-two week basketball training. In: Sigmon C, editor. Program Components, Human Kinetics, 2003; pp 3-16.
[30] McInnes SE, Carlson JS, Jones CJ, McKenna MJ. The physiological load imposed on basketball players during competition. Sports Sci. 1995; 13(5): 387-397.
[31] Hoffman JR, Marsh CM. Physiology of Basketball. In: Garrett WE Jr, Kirkendall DT, editors. Exercise and sport science. Lippencott, Williams & Wilkins; 2000; pp 733-744.
[32] Hoffman JR, Tennenbaum G, Marsh CM, Kraemer WJ. Relationship between athletic performance tests and playing time in elite college basketball players. J Strength Cond Res, 1996; 10: 67–71.
[33] Delextrat A, Cohen D. Physiological testing of basketball players: toward a standard evaluation of anaerobic fitness. J Strength Cond Res, 2008; 22(4): 1066-1072.
[34] Visnapuu M, Jürimäe T. Handgrip strength and hand dimensions in young handball and basketball players. J Strength Cond Res, 2007; 21(3): 923-929.
[35] Tsuji S, Tsunoda N, Yata H, Katsukawa F, Onishi S, Yamazaki H. Relation between grip strength and radial bone mineral density in young athletes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1995; 76(3): 234-238.
[36] Bhargava AS, Eapen C, Kumar SP. Grip strength measurements at two different wrist extension positions in chronic lateral epicondylitis-comparison of involved vs. uninvolved side in athletes and non athletes: a case-control study. Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy, Rehabilitation, Therapy & Technology, 2010; 2: 22.
[37] Miller FY, Coffey W. Preparation for success – getting in shape In: Miller FY, Coffey W.; editors. Wining basketball for girls. Chelsea House, New York. 4th edition, 2009; pp 21.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Kaushik Halder, Anjana Pathak, O. S. Tomer, Abhirup Chatterjee, Mantu Saha. (2016). Physical and Physiological Comparison Between Indian Female College Basketball Players and Sedentary Students. Advances in Applied Physiology, 1(2), 18-23. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aap.20160102.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Kaushik Halder; Anjana Pathak; O. S. Tomer; Abhirup Chatterjee; Mantu Saha. Physical and Physiological Comparison Between Indian Female College Basketball Players and Sedentary Students. Adv. Appl. Physiol. 2016, 1(2), 18-23. doi: 10.11648/j.aap.20160102.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Kaushik Halder, Anjana Pathak, O. S. Tomer, Abhirup Chatterjee, Mantu Saha. Physical and Physiological Comparison Between Indian Female College Basketball Players and Sedentary Students. Adv Appl Physiol. 2016;1(2):18-23. doi: 10.11648/j.aap.20160102.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.aap.20160102.11,
      author = {Kaushik Halder and Anjana Pathak and O. S. Tomer and Abhirup Chatterjee and Mantu Saha},
      title = {Physical and Physiological Comparison Between Indian Female College Basketball Players and Sedentary Students},
      journal = {Advances in Applied Physiology},
      volume = {1},
      number = {2},
      pages = {18-23},
      doi = {10.11648/j.aap.20160102.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aap.20160102.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.aap.20160102.11},
      abstract = {The study aimed to assess and compare the physical and physiological performances of Indian female college basketball players (BB) with sedentary females (SS) of same age group. Randomly selected 20 female college students, 10 each in 2 groups, BB (19.0 ± 0.8) and SS (19.7 ± 1.3) respectively, volunteered for this study. Standing height, body weight, resting blood pressure, resting and maximum heart rate (RHR and MHR respectively), resting oxygen consumption (VO2rest), maximal aerobic capacity (VO2max), anaerobic power, hand grip strength (HGS) and back leg strength (BLS) were recorded. Body surface area (BSA), body mass index (BMI), maximum oxygen pulse (O2Pmax), fatigue percentage and relative peak power output (RPP) were calculated. Significant difference was observed between BB and SS in body weight (P2max (P2Pmax (P<0.01) were noted in sportswomen compared to sedentary females. Peak anaerobic power, average anaerobic power (both P<0.01) and RPP (P<0.001) of sportswomen was also significantly higher than the sedentary group. The study revealed that female college basketball players were physiologically potent than sedentary students of similar age group. It is once again substantiated the fact that involvement in sports or games like basketball, renders a person with better physiological health and physical fitness as compared to sedentary individuals.},
     year = {2016}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Physical and Physiological Comparison Between Indian Female College Basketball Players and Sedentary Students
    AU  - Kaushik Halder
    AU  - Anjana Pathak
    AU  - O. S. Tomer
    AU  - Abhirup Chatterjee
    AU  - Mantu Saha
    Y1  - 2016/01/18
    PY  - 2016
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aap.20160102.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.aap.20160102.11
    T2  - Advances in Applied Physiology
    JF  - Advances in Applied Physiology
    JO  - Advances in Applied Physiology
    SP  - 18
    EP  - 23
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2471-9714
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aap.20160102.11
    AB  - The study aimed to assess and compare the physical and physiological performances of Indian female college basketball players (BB) with sedentary females (SS) of same age group. Randomly selected 20 female college students, 10 each in 2 groups, BB (19.0 ± 0.8) and SS (19.7 ± 1.3) respectively, volunteered for this study. Standing height, body weight, resting blood pressure, resting and maximum heart rate (RHR and MHR respectively), resting oxygen consumption (VO2rest), maximal aerobic capacity (VO2max), anaerobic power, hand grip strength (HGS) and back leg strength (BLS) were recorded. Body surface area (BSA), body mass index (BMI), maximum oxygen pulse (O2Pmax), fatigue percentage and relative peak power output (RPP) were calculated. Significant difference was observed between BB and SS in body weight (P2max (P2Pmax (P<0.01) were noted in sportswomen compared to sedentary females. Peak anaerobic power, average anaerobic power (both P<0.01) and RPP (P<0.001) of sportswomen was also significantly higher than the sedentary group. The study revealed that female college basketball players were physiologically potent than sedentary students of similar age group. It is once again substantiated the fact that involvement in sports or games like basketball, renders a person with better physiological health and physical fitness as compared to sedentary individuals.
    VL  - 1
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Exercise Physiology and Yoga Division, Defence Institute of Physiology and Allied Sciences (DIPAS), Defence Research and Development Organization (DRDO), Min. Of Defence, Lucknow Road, Timarpur, Delhi, India

  • Exercise Physiology and Yoga Division, Defence Institute of Physiology and Allied Sciences (DIPAS), Defence Research and Development Organization (DRDO), Min. Of Defence, Lucknow Road, Timarpur, Delhi, India

  • Exercise Physiology and Yoga Division, Defence Institute of Physiology and Allied Sciences (DIPAS), Defence Research and Development Organization (DRDO), Min. Of Defence, Lucknow Road, Timarpur, Delhi, India

  • Centre for Advanced Research and Training in Yoga (CARTY), Defence Institute of Physiology and Allied Sciences (DIPAS), Defence Research and Development Organization (DRDO), Min. of Defence, Lucknow Road, Timarpur, Delhi, India

  • Exercise Physiology and Yoga Division, Defence Institute of Physiology and Allied Sciences (DIPAS), Defence Research and Development Organization (DRDO), Min. Of Defence, Lucknow Road, Timarpur, Delhi, India

  • Sections